Pain Management – A Decade’s Perspective of a New Subspecialty
Authors Hochberg U, Sharon H, Bahir I, Brill S
Received 3 February 2021
Accepted for publication 15 March 2021
Published 9 April 2021 Volume 2021:14 Pages 923—930
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Robert Twillman
Uri Hochberg,1,2 Haggai Sharon,1– 3 Iris Bahir,1,2 Silviu Brill1,2
1Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Institute of Pain Medicine, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; 2Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; 3Sagol Brain Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
Correspondence: Uri Hochberg
Institute of Pain Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, 6 Weizmann Street, Tel Aviv, Israel
Tel +972 3-6974477
Email [email protected]
Objective: Pain management is increasingly recognized as a formal medical subspecialty worldwide. Israel was among the first to offer a board-certified subspecialty, formalized by the Israeli Medical Association in 2010 which is open to all clinicians with a state-recognized specialization. This paper aims at evaluating the current program across several quality control measures.
Design: A survey among pain medicine specialists who graduated from the Israeli Pain Management subspecialty.
Methods: All 43 graduates of the program were sent a web-based questionnaire, each related to a different time in the participants’ residency period – prior to, during and after training.
Results: Forty-one physicians responded to the survey (95% response rate). The most common primary specialty was Anesthesiology (44%), followed by Family Medicine (22%). One-third of the respondents applied to the program over five years after completing their initial residency. Two-thirds reported that they acquired all or most of the professional tools required by a pain specialist. Insufficient training was mentioned regarding addiction management (71%), special population needs (54%) and interventional treatment (37%). A high proportion (82%) responded that the examination contributed to their training and almost all perceived their period of subspecialty as having a positive value in their personal development. Two-thirds of respondents had not yet actively engaged beyond the clinical aspect with other entities responsible for formulating guidelines and other strategic decision-making.
Conclusion: We hope the findings of this first-of-a-kind survey will encourage other medical authorities to construct formal training in pain medicine and enable this discipline to further evolve.
Keywords: chronic pain, medical education, curriculum, pain management, pain training programs
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]