Mesenteric panniculitis: comparison of computed tomography findings in patients with and without malignancy
Received 10 August 2018
Accepted for publication 30 November 2018
Published 27 December 2018 Volume 2019:12 Pages 1—8
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Anastasios Koulaouzidis
Mamoon H Al-Omari,1 Khaleel Qararha,1 Mohammed Garaleh,1 Mahmoud M Smadi,2 Mohammed Bani Hani,3 Mwaffaq Elheis1
1Department of Radiology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, King Abdullah University Hospital, Irbid, Jordan; 2Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan; 3Department of Surgery, Jordan University of Science and Technology, King Abdullah University Hospital, Irbid, Jordan
Purpose: The aim was to compare computed tomography (CT) findings between patients with mesenteric panniculitis (MP) with and without known malignancy.
Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 116 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with MP on the basis of CT findings and categorized them according to the absence (Group 1: 73 patients) or presence (Group 2: 43 patients) of malignancy. Patient age and sex, diameter, size, mass effect, location, and fat density of the MP mass, presence of a pseudocapsule and/or halo sign, and lymph node status were compared between the two groups.
Results: MP tends to be more common in males, and this trend shows statistical significance when combining the findings for both groups (P=0.041). Patients in Group 1 were significantly younger than those in Group 2 (54.29 vs 64.77 years, P=0.001). A well-defined fatty mass at the small bowel root was observed in all patients. The halo sign was present in most cases in both groups. A pseudocapsule was observed in 36 patients (49%) in Group 1 and 29 (67%) in Group 2 (P=0.045). The average craniocaudal diameter of the MP masses on the sagittal view was 11.14 and 12.5 cm in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.005). The MP fat density was less negative in patients with malignancy (–66 vs –76 HU, P=0.001). Lymph node status was similar in both groups.
Conclusion: Detailed CT features should be evaluated in patients with MP, as some of these features may indicate an associated malignancy, necessitating further investigation and close follow-up.
Keywords: imaging, mesenteric inflammation, paraneoplastic
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]