Back to Journals » Research and Reports in Urology » Volume 3

Mathieu repair of distal and midshaft hypospadias: risks and benefits of foreskin reconstruction versus circumcision

Authors Moslemi MK, Sadighi Gilani MA, Shahrokh H

Published 17 June 2011 Volume 2011:3 Pages 105—108

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S21577

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 3

Mohammad Kazem Moslemi1, Mohammad Ali Sadighi Gilani2, Hossein Shahrokh3
1Department of Urology, Kamkar Hospital, School of Medicine, Qom, University of Medical Science, Qom, Iran; 2Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; 3Department of Urology, Hasheminejad Kidney Research Center, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the risks and benefits of Mathieu repair of hypospadias with or without circumcision in consecutive operated cases.
Methods: Eighty-six children with midshaft or distal hypospadias were randomly divided into two groups and underwent circumcision (Group A) or preputial reconstruction (Group B) during hypospadias repair. Postoperative complications, outcomes, and parental satisfaction were assessed for circumcised and uncircumcised patients. All patients with midshaft or distal hypospadias with or without minimal chordee were included.
Results: No statistically significant differences in urethral complications were found between the two groups. Meatal stenosis occurred in one case in Group A and one case in Group B. Fistulae occurred in five cases in Group A and six cases in Group B. Urethral dehiscence occurred in no case in either group. No case of phimosis was seen in Group B. After a mean follow-up of 6 months, all parents of Group A cases stated that they were satisfied with the circumcision for religious and/or social reasons, but no parents of Group B cases were satisfied with preputioplasty (P ≤ 0.05). No case of hypospadias repair failure was seen in our operated cases. Finally, no cases in Group B required redo hypospadias surgery.
Conclusion: Mathieu repair with synchronous circumcision is feasible in all patients with distal or midshaft hypospadias with or without minimal chordee, and should be considered in accordance with surgeon preference. In the case of prepuce preservation, parents should be informed that there is a benefit of tissue banking for probable redo hypospadias repair but with an increased risk of complications and a need for another procedure, ie, circumcision.

Keywords: hypospadias, circumcision, preputioplasty, distal, midshaft, Mathieu repair

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF] 

 

Other articles by this author:

Does intraperitoneal injection of propofol prior to detorsion improve testes weight and histopathological findings in a rat model?

Amirhassani S, Mehrabi S, Hosseinipanah SM, Iloon Kashkouli A, Torabian S, Moslemi MK

Research and Reports in Urology 2017, 9:101-105

Published Date: 16 June 2017

Genitourinary system trauma after 2003 Bam earthquake in Kerman, Iran

Mohammad Hasan Dehghani Firoozabadi, Mehdi Abedinzadeh, Mohammad Kazem Moslemi

Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management 2011, 7:49-52

Published Date: 9 February 2011

Urologist-operated ultrasound and its use in urological outpatient clinics

Mohammad Kazem Moslemi, Behnam Mahfoozi

Patient Preference and Adherence 2011, 5:85-88

Published Date: 24 January 2011

Selenium–vitamin E supplementation in infertile men: effects on semen parameters and pregnancy rate

Mohammad K Moslemi, Samaneh Tavanbakhsh

International Journal of General Medicine 2011, 4:99-104

Published Date: 23 January 2011

Comparative evaluation of prophylactic single-dose intravenous antibiotic with postoperative antibiotics in elective urologic surgery

Mohammad K Moslemi, Seyed M Moosavi Movahed, Akram Heidari, et al

Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management 2010, 6:551-556

Published Date: 9 November 2010

An improved delivery system for bladder irrigation

Mohammad K Moslemi, Mojtaba Rajaei

Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management 2010, 6:459-462

Published Date: 30 September 2010

Readers of this article also read:

Emerging and future therapies for hemophilia

Carr ME, Tortella BJ

Journal of Blood Medicine 2015, 6:245-255

Published Date: 3 September 2015

Acquired hemophilia A: emerging treatment options

Janbain M, Leissinger CA, Kruse-Jarres R

Journal of Blood Medicine 2015, 6:143-150

Published Date: 8 May 2015

Green synthesis of water-soluble nontoxic polymeric nanocomposites containing silver nanoparticles

Prozorova GF, Pozdnyakov AS, Kuznetsova NP, Korzhova SA, Emel’yanov AI, Ermakova TG, Fadeeva TV, Sosedova LM

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2014, 9:1883-1889

Published Date: 16 April 2014

Methacrylic-based nanogels for the pH-sensitive delivery of 5-Fluorouracil in the colon

Ashwanikumar N, Kumar NA, Nair SA, Kumar GS

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5769-5779

Published Date: 15 November 2012

A novel preparation method for silicone oil nanoemulsions and its application for coating hair with silicone

Hu Z, Liao M, Chen Y, Cai Y, Meng L, Liu Y, Lv N, Liu Z, Yuan W

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5719-5724

Published Date: 12 November 2012

Cross-linked acrylic hydrogel for the controlled delivery of hydrophobic drugs in cancer therapy

Deepa G, Thulasidasan AK, Anto RJ, Pillai JJ, Kumar GS

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:4077-4088

Published Date: 27 July 2012

Crystallization after intravitreal ganciclovir injection

Pitipol Choopong, Nattaporn Tesavibul, Nattawut Rodanant

Clinical Ophthalmology 2010, 4:709-711

Published Date: 14 July 2010