Back to Journals » Infection and Drug Resistance » Volume 13

Management of Acute Bacterial Meningitis in Children

Authors Alamarat Z, Hasbun R

Received 4 August 2020

Accepted for publication 19 October 2020

Published 11 November 2020 Volume 2020:13 Pages 4077—4089

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S240162

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Professor Suresh Antony

Download Article [PDF] 

Zain Alamarat,1 Rodrigo Hasbun2

1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, UT Health, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA; 2Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Health, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA

Correspondence: Rodrigo Hasbun
Department of Internal Medicine, UT Health, McGovern Medical School, 6431 Fannin St. MSE 226, Houston, TX 77030, USA
Tel +1 (713) 500-7140
Fax +1 (713) 500-5495
Email [email protected]

Abstract: Acute community-acquired bacterial meningitis (ABM) in children continues to have high rates of neurological morbidity and mortality despite the overall declining rates of infection attributed to the use of vaccines and intrapartum Group B Streptococcus prophylaxis. Prompt diagnosis and early antibiotic therapy are crucial and should not be delayed to obtain cranial imaging. Differentiating bacterial from viral meningitis continues to be a clinical dilemma especially in patients with previous antibiotic exposure. Clinical models and inflammatory biomarkers can aid clinicians in their diagnostic approach. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction and metagenomic next-generation sequencing are promising tools that can help in early and accurate diagnosis. This review will present the epidemiology of ABM in children, indications of cranial imaging, role of different models and serum biomarkers in diagnosing ABM, and management including the use of adjunctive therapies and methods of prevention.

Keywords: management, CNS infection, meningitis, bacterial meningitis, children

Introduction

Acute bacterial meningitis (ABM) is a life-threatening bacterial infection of the meninges. The overall rates have been declining1,2 since the introduction of vaccines against the three most common meningeal pathogens (Haemophilus influenzae type b, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Neisseria meningitides) and by the introduction of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus (GBS). Worldwide, bacterial meningitis continues to be a neurological emergency associated with high mortality and morbidity requiring immediate evaluation and management.

Etiology by Age Group

Earlier studies in pediatric community-acquired bacterial meningitis have shown that five pathogens (H. influenzae, S. pneumoniae, N. meningitidis, GBS and Listeria monocytogenes) are the most common causes of bacterial meningitis.3–5 More recent studies have shown that despite the changes in the incidence of each pathogen, these five pathogens remain the most common in the pediatric population.1,6,7 The specific etiology depends on factors such as age, immune function, immunization status, genetics8,9 and geographical location.

Despite the fact that these results represent data from the United States of America (USA), it holds true for developing countries; who carries the highest burden of the disease. In a recent systematic review and meta-analysis conducted to evaluate available data on the etiology of bacterial meningitis published globally in the last five years, the frequency of seven bacterial types known to cause meningitis: Escherichia coli, Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, group B Streptococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes was analyzed, with results being stratified by six geographical regions as determined by the World Health Organization, and by seven age groups.10

In this global review of the burden of meningitis, S. pneumoniae and N. meningitidis were the predominant pathogens in all age groups and regions, accounting for 25.1–41.2% and 9.1–36.2% of bacterial meningitis cases, respectively. S. pneumoniae infection was the most common cause of bacterial meningitis in the “all children” group, ranging from 22.5% (Europe) to 41.1% (Africa), and in all adults ranging from 9.6% (Western Pacific) to 75.2% (Africa). E. coli and S. pneumoniae were the most common pathogens that caused bacterial meningitis in neonates in Africa (17.7% and 20.4%, respectively). N. meningitidis was the most common in children aged ±1–5 years in Europe (47.0%) while S. pneumoniae was the most prevalent pathogen in children aged ±6–18 years.10

Neonates and Infants

Premature infants, neonates and infants less than 2 months of age represent the highest risk groups for bacterial meningitis in children. The predisposition to develop bacterial meningitis is similar to the risk of developing sepsis and can be due to the lack of maternal immunoglobulins that cross the placenta after 32-week gestation11 and secondary to the immature immune system with impaired phagocytic ability of neutrophils and monocytes.6

The organisms that are commonly observed in neonatal meningitis are the same as those that cause neonatal sepsis with differences depending on postnatal age; early and late-onset neonatal meningitis occurs at ≤72 and >72 hours of life, respectively. Risk factors for developing neonatal meningitis include prematurity, maternal rectovaginal colonization with GBS, premature rupture of membranes, prolonged rupture of membranes >18 hours, invasive fetal monitoring, very low birth weight (<1500g), prolonged hospitalization, and presence of external devices (eg, reservoirs, shunts, catheters).11

Despite the institution of intrapartum prophylaxis, GBS remains the leading cause accounting for approximately 40% of early-onset neonatal meningitis cases.11,12 Escherichia coli (E. coli) is the second most common cause accounting for 30% of cases in the USA and 17.7% in Africa10,11,13 and is the leading cause of early-onset meningitis and sepsis in neonates with very low birth weight (<1500 g birth weight).14 Studies in the USA showed significant increase in the rate of E. coli early-onset neonatal infections between 1991–1993 and 1998–2000; 3.2 to 6.8 per 1000 live births, while there was no significant increase in 2002–2003; 7.0 per 1000 live births.15,16 In late-onset neonatal meningitis, GBS and E. coli are the two most common pathogens.11 Of note, there has been a significant reduction in the incidence of L. monocytogenes meningitis in this age group due to the efforts in decreasing the incidence of listeriosis during pregnancy by reducing food-borne contamination.7

Children After the Neonatal Period

Despite the significant reduction in the incidence of meningitis in this age group after the introduction of vaccines to the three most common meningeal pathogens, S. pneumoniae and N. meningitides remain the most common organisms causing community-acquired bacterial meningitis7,17–19 followed by GBS and gram-negative bacilli organisms.

Development of Resistant Strains

Due to the global use of antibiotics, multi-drug resistant bacterial strains have emerged posing serious challenges to treating physicians. In a report published from Europe and the Mediterranean region, N. meningitidis isolates with reduced susceptibility to penicillin have been detected but not yet to the extended-spectrum cephalosporins (eg, cefotaxime or ceftriaxone).20 Chloramphenicol, Rifampin and low level (MIC 0.12–0.25 mg/L) resistance to fluoroquinolones have also been reported. Penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae isolates have been recently increasing with varying rates ranging from 30% in France and Spain to less than 3% in the more northern countries. The resistance to penicillin is often associated with a decreased susceptibility to other beta-lactams but ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and the carbapenems are less affected. Resistance to macrolides is also widespread, being particularly high in the Mediterranean region: >30% in Italy; 40% in France; 30% in Greece and around 45–50% in Spain but low levels of fluoroquinolone resistance have been detected H. influenzae isolates had shown increasing rates of ampicillin resistance with special attention to non-lactamase-producing ampicillin-resistant strains while rates of fluoroquinolones resistance have remained very low.

Cranial Imaging in Suspected Meningitis

The clinical features of bacterial meningitis can be subtle, variable, and non-specific or absent in the pediatric population especially in neonates and infants.11 Neuroimaging is not essential for the diagnosis or management in the majority of patients with acute bacterial meningitis. The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines recommend that infants and children with the following should have a cranial computed tomography (CT) scan done:21 history of central nervous system disease (CSF shunts, hydrocephalus, head trauma, post neurosurgery, space-occupying lesions), immunocompromised, papilledema, or focal neurological deficits (except palsy of abducens or facial nerve).18,22,23 In the absence of these clinical features an abnormal CT is rare and furthermore a normal CT does not mean a lumbar puncture (LP) is safe as patients can still herniate. In a nationwide prospective cohort study, 1533 adults with community-acquired bacterial meningitis were evaluated. In this cohort 47 patients (3.1%) had possible deterioration after an LP, a cranial CT was performed for 43/47 patients (91%) of which 17/43 (40%) was reported normal and the most common finding was generalized cerebral edema in 13/43 (30%),24 similar data in children do not exist. In neonates and infants (as long as the anterior fontanelle is open), cranial ultrasound can be a useful diagnostic method when bacterial meningitis is suspected. Ultrasound abnormalities are observed in approximately 65% of patients with uncomplicated bacterial meningitis and up to 100% in patients with severe neurological symptoms.25 The spectrum of characteristic signs visualized in patients with bacterial meningitis using ultrasound and doppler imaging may aid in a quick preliminary diagnosis and initiation of treatment, which can have a significant impact on the patient’s prognosis.26

CT or MRI of brain can be useful in showing meningeal enhancement, areas of ischemia due to secondary vasculitis, define pathology of the base of skull that may be causative and require rapid therapeutic intervention and surgical consultation and to identify potential sources of infection such as fractures of the paranasal sinus or petrous bone as well as inner ear infection and mastoiditis. Despite this, LP remains the only tool in diagnosing or excluding bacterial meningitis. It is a relatively safe procedure, but minor and major complications can still happen.27

Diagnosis

When ABM is suspected, early diagnosis and prompt empirical antibiotics are paramount. An LP for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis and culture remains key for diagnosis.21,28 Characteristic CSF findings for bacterial meningitis consist of polymorphonuclear pleocytosis (WBC >1000 Cells/µL, 80–90% polymorphonuclear cells), hypoglycorrachia (CSF glucose <40 mg/dL, a ratio of CSF to serum glucose of ≤0.4 in children and ≤0.6 in term neonates) and elevated CSF protein levels >150 mg/dL.21,29,30 In the pediatric population, CSF indexes vary with age, with poorly defined normal values especially in infants.11 Gram stain and culture remains the most important tool for diagnosis of ABM. They are cheap and well-validated tools but the sensitivity varies by different age groups, types of meningeal pathogens and by the use of previous antibiotic therapy.26–31 The sensitivity of the Gram stain in neonates is ~60%31 while in children it ranges from 50% to 63%.32,33 The sensitivity also ranges by pathogen: 90% in S. pneumoniae meningitis,34,35 80% in N. meningitides, 50% in Gram-negative bacillary meningitis, and 30% in L. monocytogenes.35 The effects of antibiotic pretreatment on the microbiological yield of ABM were studied in 231 children.31 Antibiotic pretreatment was significantly associated with a lower sensitivity of the CSF and blood cultures but had no impact on the sensitivity of the CSF Gram stain.31

Differentiation of Bacterial from Viral or Aseptic Meningitis

Use of Antibiotic Therapy in Aseptic (Viral) Meningitis

Aseptic meningitis is an acute community-acquired syndrome presenting with CSF pleocytosis, negative CSF gram stain and culture, with no parameningeal focus or a systemic illness. In children, this syndrome is common, mostly caused by viruses (eg, enteroviruses) and has a good clinical outcome. Despite this, the majority of patients with aseptic meningitis continue to be admitted to the hospital and receive unnecessary empirical antibiotics, which increases the length and cost of hospital stay.36–41 In a recent large epidemiological study for children presenting with meningitis or encephalitis in the U.S, 6665 patients’ ≤ 17 years of age were identified. Despite that approximately two-thirds had a viral etiology, the majority were admitted to the hospital and up to 92.2% received empirical antibiotics.36

In a retrospective observational cohort study, 509 patients with aseptic meningitis were identified of which 105 (21%) were children. Children were more likely to have at least one viral study (CSF PCR or arbovirus serology) sent compared to adults (75.2% vs 61.3%, P=0.008) and also were less likely to have an unknown infectious etiology (60.9% vs 85.6%, P<0.001). Empiric antibiotic therapy was given to the majority of patients (77.4%) with children receiving them more frequently than adults (92.3% vs 73.5%, p <0.001).37

CSF Profile and Clinical Models

Definitive differentiation between viral and bacterial meningitis depends on the results of the CSF culture, which may take up to 3 days, and other CSF parameters can greatly overlap between both entities (see Table 1). Several clinical models were developed to aid physicians in differentiating viral from bacterial meningitis. One study evaluated 422 patients ≥1 month of age with acute bacterial or aseptic meningitis. This study suggested a model where it was found that a CSF glucose level less than 34.2 mg/dl, a CSF-blood glucose ratio less than 0.23, a CSF protein level greater than 220 mg/dL, CSF pleocytosis greater than 2000 leukocytes/mm3, or more than 1180 neutrophils/mm3 in the CSF were individual predictors of bacterial infection with 99% certainty or better.42

Table 1 Cerebrospinal Fluid Characteristics in Children with and without Meningitis (Viral, Bacterial) According to Age18,89,90

Another model that was derived and validated only in children is the Bacterial Meningitis Score. This risk score can identify patients at low risk (BMS =0) or high risk (BMS≥2) of having ABM depending on the following predictors: positive CSF Gram stain for bacteria, CSF protein > or =80 mg/dL, peripheral absolute neutrophil count > or =10,000 cells/mm3, seizure before or at time of presentation, and CSF absolute neutrophil count > or =1000 cells/mm3, attributing 2 points for a positive Gram stain and 1 point for each of the other variables.43 A meta-analysis performed to evaluate the performance of the Bacterial Meningitis Score in children with CSF pleocytosis showed a combined sensitivity of 99.3%, specificity 62.1% and negative predictive value 99.7%.44 As the majority of patients with meningitis present with a negative Gram stain and a positive CSF Gram stain is diagnostic of a bacterial etiology, a more clinically useful risk score that excludes a positive Gram stain should be done in children as it has been done in adults.45

Inflammatory Markers and Biomarker

In children, serum inflammatory markers can also be of help in differentiating viral and bacterial meningitis. Multiple studies have been conducted to identify biomarkers that can help clinicians in their assessment of patients. Normal C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin values have good diagnostic accuracy in excluding all bacterial infections including those causing meningitis but they are not widely used in clinical practice.46–48 Serum concentration of CRP greater than 80 mg/dl41 and elevated serum procalcitonin level (0.5-ng/mL) can be helpful in identifying patients with ABM. One study showed that a procalcitonin level >0.5 ng/mL was 99% sensitive and 83% specific for ABM,47 while another study showing a value of >2 ng/mL was 100% sensitive and 63% specific.48 This latter study also showed that the procalcitonin level could also be used to follow the response to antibiotic therapy.

CSF lactate was found to be a useful tool to differentiate bacterial from viral meningitis when elevated.49–51 In one study a cut-off of 54mg/dL had a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, and negative predictive value of 96.3%, with an accuracy of 97.2%.49 Two meta-analyses conducted to evaluate the role of CSF lactate in differentiating viral from bacterial meningitis, one including 25 studies with 1692 patients (adults and children)52 and the other including 31 studies with 1885 patients,53 concluded that the diagnostic accuracy of CSF lactate is better than that of the CSF white blood cell count, glucose concentration, and protein level in patients who did not receive prior antimicrobial therapy.52,53

CSF Diagnostic Studies

The gold standard to make a diagnosis of bacterial meningitis still relies on identifying the pathogen by CSF culture but this is hampered by the administration of previous antibiotic therapy.12,15,17 Sterilization of the CSF occurs rapidly after the initiation of parenteral antibiotics; with complete sterilization of N. meningitidis within 2 hours and the beginning of sterilization of S. pneumoniae by 4 hours and GBS by 8 hours into therapy.54 Non-culture-based diagnostic methods include testing the CSF for the Streptococcus pneumoniae antigen, multiplex PCRs and metagenomic sequencing.

The Streptococcus pneumoniae BinaxNOW® antigen is an inexpensive and rapid (~15 minutes) immunochromatographic test that has 99–100% sensitivity and specificity in ruling in or out pneumococcal meningitis.55 In patients with prior antibiotic therapy, the antigen testing detected 25% of culture-negative cases.56 These studies have been done in children in countries from Asia and Africa but have not been validated in adults or in high-income countries. Another rapid, non-culture based method is multiplex PCR. The Film Array meningitis/encephalitis (ME) panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, UT) received FDA clearance in 2015 and utilizes a sample of 200 μL of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to identify in 1 hour the presence of 14 pathogens (Escherichia coli K1, Haemophilus influenzae, Listeria monocytogenes, Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus agalactiae, S. pneumoniae, cytomegalovirus (CMV), enterovirus (EV), herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1), herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2), human herpesvirus 6 (HHSV-6), human parechovirus (HPeV), varicella zoster (VZV), Cryptococcus neoformans/C. gattii). Diagnostic correlation studies with CSF sample banks positive for the targets identified by the test have an agreement of greater than 90%.57 A retrospective analysis of 291 residual CSF samples (tested positive by routine methods) using the Film Array ME panel demonstrated an overall percent positive agreement (PPA) of 97.5% (78/80) for bacterial pathogens, 90.1% (145/161) for viruses, and 52% (26/50) for Cryptococcus neoformans/C. gattii.58 In patients with suspected fungal meningitis, a CSF cryptococcal antigen should also be done.

Another promising approach for the diagnosis of meningitis or encephalitis is metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS). A recent, 1-year, prospective, multicenter study involving hospitalized patients presenting with idiopathic meningitis, encephalitis, or myelitis (the Precision Diagnosis of Acute Infectious Diseases [PDAID] study) was conducted to evaluate the utility of the mNGS assay for identification of pathogens in patients with neurologic infection confirmed by routine diagnostic testing, including culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay in CSF.59 In this study, 204 pediatric and adult patients were enrolled, a total of 58 infections were diagnosed in 57 patients. Among these 58 infections, mNGS identified 13 that were not identified by clinical testing and 19 concurrent diagnoses with the available clinical testing. Although the highest diagnostic yield resulted from a combination of mNGS of CSF and conventional testing which can provide reassurance that the diagnosis is correct and help rule out active infections in patients with suspected autoimmune encephalitis, mNGS proved to have potential usefulness in diagnosing pathogens that were either not considered by treating clinicians or had tested negative by conventional testing.

Miller et al developed and analytically validated a clinical CSF mNGS assay. In their study, the test accuracy was evaluated by blinded mNGS testing of 95 patient samples, revealing 73% sensitivity and 99% specificity compared to original clinical test results, and 81% positive percent agreement and 99% negative percent agreement after discrepancy analysis. Subsequent mNGS challenge testing of 20 positive CSF samples prospectively collected from a cohort of pediatric patients hospitalized with meningitis, encephalitis, and/or myelitis showed 92% sensitivity and 96% specificity relative to conventional microbiological testing of CSF in identifying the causative pathogen.60 Despite the potential benefit of mNGS assay for pan-pathogen detection, results need to be interpreted with caution especially in patients with very high CSF WBC counts.

Management

Empirical Antibiotics Therapy

It is important to assure that empirical antibiotics are administered in timely manner, cover the most common etiological agents, can achieve good concentrations in the CSF and are bactericidal against the targeted bacterial pathogens. Several retrospective and prospective studies especially in adults showed that delay in antibiotic treatment >6 hours is associated with adverse outcomes.41,61–64 In a retrospective chart review of 171 cases of bacterial meningitis in children and adults, mortality rate increased from 7.9% for patients who received antibiotics in the emergency center (meantime of administration 1.8 hours) to 29% for patients who received inpatient antibiotics (meantime 6–9 hours).62 While another prospective, multicenter, observational study of 156 adults hospitalized for pneumococcal meningitis study showed that delay in antibiotic treatment >3 hours and isolation of penicillin-nonsusceptible S. pneumoniae strains were independent predictors of mortality.64

In neonates, although the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Committee on Infectious Diseases, the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) recommends use of ampicillin plus cefotaxime or gentamicin,18,21,65 use of cefotaxime is reasonable given the increasing resistance of E. coli and other Gram-negative enteric organisms to ampicillin and due to the suboptimal CSF penetration by gentamicin (see Table 2).66 The prevalence of S. pneumoniae strains that are relatively resistant to penicillin (MIC 0·1–1·0 μg/mL) or highly resistant to penicillin (MIC greater than 1·0 μg/mL) is increasing, and many of the penicillin-resistant pneumococci have reduced susceptibility to third-generation cephalosporins which lead to increasing rates of treatment failure.21,67,68 As a result to that, vancomycin plus either cefotaxime or ceftriaxone should be used as empirical antibiotics in children presenting with signs and symptoms of ABM in the United States or Europe where the incidence of ceftriaxone-resistant pneumococcus is >1%.18,21,30,65 When the causative organism and its antibiotic susceptibilities are determined, specific targeted therapy can be provided.

Table 2 The Most Common Organism Causing Acute Bacterial Meningitis per Age Group with the Recommended Standard Therapy Based on in vitro Susceptibility Testing18,21,30,69,70,91–95

Length of Therapy

In neonates, 14 days of antibiotics is sufficient in uncomplicated meningitis caused by GBS, L. monocytogenes, or S. pneumoniae; while 21 days is recommended Gram-negative bacilli meningitis. In children; uncomplicated meningitis caused by N. meningitidis 5 to 7 days, H. influenzae 7 to 10 days, S. pneumoniae 10 to 14 days, L. monocytogenes 14 to 21 days and a minimum of 21 days for Gram-negative bacilli. Longer antimicrobial treatment courses are necessary for complicated meningitis, such as subdural empyema, ventriculitis, brain abscess, and suppurative venous sinus thrombosis.18

Repeat LP

While some experts recommend that all cases of neonatal meningitis should get a repeat LP after 24 to 48 hours of therapy to confirm CSF sterilization,66 the AAP and IDSA recommend that only neonate with meningitis due to gram-negative bacilli should undergo repeat LP.18,21,69 End of therapy LP may be warranted in cases where CSF culture remained positive after 48–72 hours of therapy, or in neonates with persistent abnormal neurological findings, especially focal deficits. CSF values of neutrophils >30%, glucose <20 mg/dL, or CSF-to-blood glucose ratio <20% are non-reassuring and in these circumstances, CSF examination as well as neuroimaging can assist in determining an optimal duration of antibiotic therapy to prevent relapse.18,66

In children; a repeat LP is not routinely recommended in patients who respond appropriately to antimicrobial therapy. Except in the case of meningitis due to S. pneumoniae; If the organism is cephalosporin-nonsusceptible, the AAP recommends considering a repeat LP at 48 to 72 hours to verify CSF clearance of the bacteria,18 while the IDSA and the AAP guidelines based on expert opinion suggest considering a repeat LP after 48–72 hours of therapy if: 1) the organism is penicillin or cephalosporin –non-susceptible, 2) the patient’s condition has not improved or is worsening, or 3) the patient has received dexamethasone which can obscure clinical features such as fever, headache, and nuchal rigidity.11,18,21,70

Adjunctive Therapy

In neonatal meningitis, the role of adjunctive therapies such as dexamethasone, glycerol, immunoglobulins, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) has not been well studied and is not recommended or used in clinical practice.11,71–73

In children, randomized trials showed that adjunctive dexamethasone 0.6 mg/kg of body weight daily, with the first dose being given before or with the first dose of antibiotics, for 4 days decreases overall hearing loss and severe neurological sequelae in children with bacterial meningitis in high-income countries while in low-income countries, no benefit was established.71 The most likely cause of this disparity is that patients in low-income countries present late to care with advanced disease, making early steroid administration extremely difficult if not impossible, highlighting the importance of the early administration of the steroids. The efficacy of adjunctive steroids in children with bacterial meningitis vary by pathogen: in H. influenzae, dexamethasone causes reduction in severe hearing loss and reduces inflammatory markers in the CSF,71,74 in S. pneumoniae, there is no effect of dexamethasone on mortality but some effect on severe hearing loss if given early34,75 and in N. meningitidis it might decrease mortality but there is no effect on hearing or other neurological sequelae.71 Despite the variability on the data published, the AAP and IDSA recommend dexamethasone 0.15 mg/kg per dose intravenously every 6 hours for 2 days for patients with H. influenzae meningitis and indicates that empiric use might be considered for suspected S. pneumoniae meningitis in infants and children 6 weeks of age and older.11,18,21

The use of other adjunctive therapy such as osmotic therapy (glycerol) has been reviewed in a Cochrane review,76 which included 5 trials with 1451 participants, 4/5 studies are in children; glycerol had no effect on death but may reduce neurological deficiency and deafness although the evidence is incomplete and unequivocal results could not be derived.

Supportive Care

Serious life-threatening complications of ABM (septic shock, inadequate ventilation, cerebral herniation, cerebral infarction and seizures) often occurs in the first 2–3 days therefore patient should be cared for in the intensive care setting to assure close monitoring of their cardiopulmonary status.15,26 Recently, delayed cerebral infarctions (DCI) have been reported in up to 4% of adults with bacterial meningitis that have been associated with the use of adjunctive dexamethasone.77 The cause of DCI in bacterial meningitis is currently unknown. Fluid and electrolyte resuscitation must be administered to attain appropriate blood pressure and cerebral perfusion.78 In the most recent Cochrane meta-analysis, there was no significant difference detected between the maintenance-fluid and restricted-fluid groups in number of deaths or acute severe neurological sequelae, except for those patients with spasticity and seizure in favor of maintenance fluid.79 Early tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation should be considered in patients with signs of ongoing shock, respiratory failure, impaired mental status (reduced or fluctuating level of consciousness), raised intracranial pressure or intractable seizures.78

Approximately one-third of infants and children with bacterial meningitis will have markedly reduced cerebral blood flow primarily due to cerebral edema and increased intracranial pressure.80 Early signs of increased ICP can be managed by elevating the head of the bed. However, late signs of increased ICP (apnea, bradycardia, hypertension and sluggish or dilated pupils) require more aggressive therapy with mannitol, intubation and hyperventilation.

Seizures usually occur early in the illness, are generalized, can be controlled easily with standard anticonvulsant and have limited prognostic significance. However focal seizures, difficult-to-control seizures, or seizures occurring more than 48 hours after admission should raise concerns for underlying complications; such as vascular disturbance, brain abscesses or subdural empyema.

Outcome

Despite the decline in the incidence of bacterial meningitis in children, it continues to be associated high morbidity and mortality rates that depend on the age group, pathogen, country and the time period of the study.

In neonates, mortality rates ranges from 10% in developed countries to 58% in developing countries.46,48 In a recent prospective study for infants <90 days from the United Kingdom and Ireland, mortality rate was 9%, with 23% rate of serious central nervous system complications in the form (seizures, motor disorder, hydrocephalus with or without a ventriculoperitoneal shunt, hearing loss or extradural collection requiring neurosurgical intervention) in the survivors.41 In this study, mortality was associated with prematurity, coma on admission and S. pneumoniae as a causative agent, while the risk of serious CNS complications was associated with temperature instability, seizures, elevated CSF protein and S. pneumoniae as the causative agent.

In children, mortality rates range from less than 5% to 15%. Seizures, hearing loss and developmental delay are the most common CNS complication associated with bacterial meningitis.18,33,34,81 S. pneumoniae is associated with the worst outcome when compared to other pathogens with 10% mortality and 20–30% morbidity.19,34 Other predictors of death and long-term neurological sequelae are decreased level of consciousness (Glasgow coma scale score (GCS) < 8), cranial nerve palsy, seizures, low CSF white blood cell count, positive gram stain/culture and abnormal findings of ultrasonography and CT imaging.17,18,34,81

Prevention

In neonates, the introduction of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) in 1996 had significantly decreased the incidence of early-onset GBS disease but had no effect on late-onset disease. The current screening method implemented since 2002 likely misses a significant portion of colonization during pregnancy due to false-negative screens, precipitous deliveries and extreme preterm delivery.11,72 Efforts are ongoing for the development of GBS vaccine to cover the most common GBS serotypes causing neonatal disease which will induce maternal immunity that can be transferred passively to the infant to protect against early and late-onset disease.82–84

In children, the best way to prevent the most common etiological agents for bacterial meningitis (H. influenzae, S. pneumoniae, N. meningitidis) continues to be compliance with timely childhood vaccination against these organisms, which will also aid in providing herd immunity in neonates and infants who are either not or under vaccinated.

A special population at increased risk for S. pneumoniae meningitis are patients with cochlear implants who were found to have 30 times more the incidence of pneumococcal meningitis than that of an age‐matched cohort in the general population in the U.S.85 Studies have shown that pneumococcal vaccination was effective in preventing meningitis induced via the hematogenous route but not through direct extension from the middle ear.86–88 So the current recommendation is that all current and future recipients of cochlear implants should be immunized against S. pneumoniae. In addition to vaccination, providing chemoprophylaxis to close contacts of patients with H. influenzae and N. meningitidis should be provided to prevent and eradicate carrier state and secondary cases.

Future Perspectives

Globally, bacterial meningitis remains a significant cause of neurological morbidity and mortality in children. Future efforts should focus on prevention by improving access and adherence to vaccination in children to the most common meningeal pathogens (S. pneumoniae, N. meningitidis, H. influenzae type b) and to group B streptococcus screening and therapy in pregnancy. Furthermore, future pentavalent vaccines for N. meningitidis could further decrease meningococcal meningitis due serogroup B or even eliminate sub Saharan Africa outbreaks due to non-Meningococcal group A serotypes. Improving health infrastructure in developing countries could improve access to care that could help reduce the morbidity and mortality in infants and children presenting with bacterial meningitis. Lastly, availability of rapid multiplex PCR panels could help in differentiating viral vs bacterial meningitis to aid in improving the time to diagnosis and therapy for bacterial meningitis.

Conclusion

Despite the decreased incidence in children due to vaccination and other preventive measures, community-acquired bacterial meningitis continues to be associated with high neurological morbidity and mortality. Prompt antibiotic therapy and adjunctive steroids in some etiologies is paramount in improving clinical outcomes. CT scan is indicated but should not delay antibiotic therapy in case of history of central nervous system disease, immunocompromised state, papilledema, or focal neurological deficits. Clinical models such as the Bacterial Meningitis Score and biomarkers such as serum CRP, procalcitonin and CSF lactate can be useful tools to differentiate bacterial from viral meningitis. Repeat LP is not routinely recommended in patients who respond appropriately to antimicrobial therapy. Future studies should continue to explore the utility of multiplex PCR and metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in the evaluation patients with suspected ABM.

Funding

Grant A Star Foundation.

Disclosure

RH has received research support, grants, and personal fees from Biofire®, outside the submitted work, and reports no other potential conflicts of interest for this work. ZA has no conflicts of interest for this work.

References

1. Brouwer MCTA, Van de Beek D. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and antimicrobial treatment of acute bacterial meningitis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23(3):467–492.

2. Mwenda JMSE, Weldegebriel G, Katsande R, et al. Pediatric bacterial meningitis surveillance in the world health organization african region using the invasive bacterial vaccine-preventable disease surveillance network, 2011–2016. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69(Supplement_2):S49–S57. doi:10.1093/cid/ciz472

3. Schlech WF, Band JD, Hightower A, Fraser DW, Broome CV. Bacterial meningitis in the United States, 1978 through 1981. The national bacterial meningitis surveillance study. JAMA. 1985;253(12):1749–1754. doi:10.1001/jama.1985.03350360075022

4. Wenger JDHA, Facklam RR, Gaventa S, Broome CV, Broome CV. The bacterial meningitis study group. bacterial meningitis in the United States, 1986: report of a multistate surveillance study. J Infect Dis. 1990;162(6):1316–1323. doi:10.1093/infdis/162.6.1316

5. Schuchat ARK, Wenger JD, Harrison LH, et al. For the active surveillance team. bacterial meningitis in the United States in 1995. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(14):970–976. doi:10.1056/NEJM199710023371404

6. Le D. Acute bacterial meningitis. Continuum. 2018;24(5):1264–1283.

7. Thigpen WC, Messonnier NE, Zell ER, et al. For the emerging infections programs network. bacterial meningitis in the United States, 1998–2007. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(21):2016–2025. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1005384

8. Brouwer MCD, Heckenberg SG, Zwinderman AH, van der Poll T, van de Beek D, van de Beek D. Host genetic susceptibility to pneumococcal and meningococcal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9(1):31–44. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70261-5

9. Heckenberg SGBM, van de Beek D. Bacterial Meningitis. Vol. 121. 2014.

10. Anouk M, Oordt-Speets RB, Bhavsar A, Moe H. Kyaw global etiology of bacterial meningitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(6).

11. Lawrence CKBK, Cohen-Wolkowiez M, Cohen-Wolkowiez M. Bacterial meningitis in the infant. Clin Perinatol. 2015;42(1):29–45. doi:10.1016/j.clp.2014.10.004

12. Phares CRLR, Farley MM, Mohle-Boetani J, et al. Active bacterial core surveillance/emerging infections program network. Epidemiology of invasive group B streptococcal disease in the United States, 1999–2005. JAMA. 2008;299(17):2056–2065. doi:10.1001/jama.299.17.2056

13. Stoll BJHN, Sánchez PJ, Faix RG, et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver national institute of child health and human development neonatal research network. Early onset neonatal sepsis: the burden of group B Streptococcal and E. coli disease continues. Pediatrics. 2011;127(5):817–826. doi:10.1542/peds.2010-2217

14. Camacho-Gonzalez ASP, Stoll BJ, Stoll BJ. Neonatal infectious diseases: evaluation of neonatal sepsis. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2013;60(2):367–389. doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2012.12.003

15. Stoll BJHN, Fanaroff AA, Wright LL, et al. Changes in pathogens causing early-onset sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(4):240–247. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa012657

16. Stoll BJHN, Higgins RD, Fanaroff AA, et al. Very low birth weight preterm infants with early onset neonatal sepsis: the predominance of gram-negative infections continues in the national institute of child health and human development neonatal research network, 2002–2003. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005;24(7):635–639.

17. Kim KS. Acute bacterial meningitis in infants and children. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10(1):32–42.

18. Swanson D. Meningitis. Pediatr Rev. 2015;36(12):514–526. doi:10.1542/pir.36-12-514

19. Hénaff FLC, Cohen R, Picard C, Varon E. French group of pediatric infectious diseases (GPIP). Risk factors in children older than 5 years with pneumococcal meningitis: data from a national network. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017;36(5):457–461. doi:10.1097/INF.0000000000001470

20. Tzanakaki GMP. Aetiology of bacterial meningitis and resistance to antibiotics of causative pathogens in Europe and in the Mediterranean region. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007;29(6):621–629.

21. Tunkel ARHB, Kaplan SL, Kaufman BA, Roos KL, Scheld WM, Whitley RJ. Practice guidelines for the management of bacterial meningitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(9):1267–1284. doi:10.1086/425368

22. Hughes DCRA, Mordekar SR, Griffiths PD, Connolly DJA, Connolly DJA. Role of imaging in the diagnosis of acute bacterial meningitis and its complications. Postgrad Med J. 2010;86(1018):478–485. doi:10.1136/pgmj.2010.097022

23. de Campo JVE, Villanueva EV. Diagnostic imaging clinical effectiveness fact sheet: suspected meningitis - role of lumbar puncture and computed tomography. Australas Radiol. 2005;49(3):252–253. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1673.2005.01450.x

24. Costerus JMBM, Sprengers MES, Roosendaal SD, Van der Ende A, Van de Beek D, van de Beek D. Cranial computed tomography, lumbar puncture, and clinical deterioration in bacterial meningitis: a nationwide cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67(6):920–926. doi:10.1093/cid/ciy200

25. Yikilmaz ATG, Taylor GA. Sonographic findings in bacterial meningitis in neonates and young infants. Pediatr Radiol. 2008;38(2):129–137. doi:10.1007/s00247-007-0538-6

26. Littwin BPA, Stępień-Roman M, Spârchez Z, Kosiak W. Bacterial meningitis in neonates and infants – the sonographic picture. J Ultrason. 2018;18(72):63–70.

27. Kastrup OWI, Maschke M, Maschke M. Neuroimaging of infections of the central nervous system. Semin Neurol. 2008;28(4):511–522. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1083688

28. Hoen BVE, de Debroucker T, Fantin B, Grimprel E, Wolff M, Duval X. Management of acute community-acquired bacterial meningitis (excluding newborns). Long version with arguments. Med Mal Infect. 2019;49(6):405–441. doi:10.1016/j.medmal.2019.03.009

29. Johansson Kostenniemi UND, Borgström M, Silfverdal SA. The clinical presentation of acute bacterial meningitis varies with age, sex and duration of illness. Acta Paediatr. 2015;104(11):1117–1124.

30. Panuganti SKNS. Acute bacterial meningitis beyond the neonatal period. In: Long SSPC, Fischer M, editors. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. 5th ed. Elsevier; 2017:278–287.

31. Pong ABJ, Bradley JS. Bacterial meningitis and the newborn infanT. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1999;13(3):711–733. doi:10.1016/S0891-5520(05)70102-1

32. Nigrovic LEKN, Malley R. Bacterial meningitis study group of the pediatric emergency medicine collaborative research committee of the American academy of pediatrics. Children with bacterial meningitis presenting to the emergency department during the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine era. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(6):522–528.

33. Franco-Paredes CLL, Hernández I, Santos-Preciado JI, Santos-Preciado JI. Epidemiology and outcomes of bacterial meningitis in mexican children: 10-year experience (1993–2003). Int J Infect Dis. 2008;12(4):380–386. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2007.09.012

34. Arditi MME, Bradley JS, Tan TQ, et al. Three-year multicenter surveillance of pneumococcal meningitis in children: clinical characteristics, and outcome related to penicillin susceptibility and dexamethasone use. Pediatrics. 1998;102(5):1087–1097. doi:10.1542/peds.102.5.1087

35. Tunkel AR. Meningitis. Antimicrobe. Available from: www.antimicrobe.org/e7.asp. Accessed April 13, 2020.

36. Hasbun RWS, Rosenthal N, Balada-Llasat JM, et al. Epidemiology of meningitis and encephalitis in infants and children in the United States, 2011–2014. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2019;38(1):37–41. doi:10.1097/INF.0000000000002081

37. Shukla BAE, Salazar L, Wootton SH, Kaewpoowat Q, Hasbun R, Hasbun R. Aseptic meningitis in adults and children: diagnostic and management challenges. J Clin Virol. 2017;49:110–114. doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2017.07.016

38. Le N. Aseptic meningitis. In: Dulac OLM, Sarnat H, editors. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Vol. 112. 2013:1153–1156.

39. Hasbun R. The acute aseptic meningitis syndrome. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2000;2(4):345–351. doi:10.1007/s11908-000-0014-z

40. Mount HRBS. Aseptic and bacterial meningitis: evaluation, treatment and prevention. Am Fam Physician. 2017;96(5):314–322.

41. Balada-Llasat JMRN, Hasbun R, Zimmer L, et al. Cost of managing meningitis and encephalitis among infants and children in the United States. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;93(4):349–354. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.10.012

42. Spanos AHF, Durack DT. Differential diagnosis of acute meningitis. An analysis of the predictive value of initial observations. JAMA. 1989;262(19):2700–2707. doi:10.1001/jama.1989.03430190084036

43. Nigrovic LEKN, Malley R, Malley R. Development and validation of a multivariable predictive model to distinguish bacterial from aseptic meningitis in children in the post-haemophilus influenzae era. Pediatrics. 2002;110(4):712–719. doi:10.1542/peds.110.4.712

44. Nigrovic LEMR, Malley R, Kuppermann N. Meta-analysis of bacterial meningitis score validation studies. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97(9):799–805. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2012-301798

45. Hasbun RBM, Brouwer MC, Khoury N, et al. Risk score for identifying adults with CSF pleocytosis and negative CSF gram stain at low risk for an urgent treatable cause. J Infect. 2013;67(2):102–110. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2013.04.002

46. Gowin EWJAD, Januszkiewicz-Lewandowska D, Michalak M, Januszkiewicz-Lewandowska D, Michalak M. Usefulness of inflammatory biomarkers in discriminating between bacterial and aseptic meningitis in hospitalized children from a population with low vaccination coverage. Arch Med Res. 2016;12:408–414. doi:10.5114/aoms.2016.59269

47. Dubos F, Korczowski B, Aygun DA. Serum procalcitonin level and other biological markers to distinguish between bacterial and aseptic meningitis in children: a European multicenter case cohort study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(12):1157–1163. doi:10.1001/archpedi.162.12.1157

48. El Shorbagy HH, Barseem NF, Abdelghani WE. The value of serum procalcitonin in acute meningitis in children. J Clin Neurosci. 2018;56:28–33. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2018.08.012

49. Nazir MWW, Malik MA, Mir MR, Ashraf Y, Kawoosa K, Ali SW. Cerebrospinal fluid lactate: a differential biomarker for bacterial and viral meningitis in children. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2018;94(1):88–92. doi:10.1016/j.jped.2017.03.007

50. Dashti ASAS, Karimi A, Khalifeh M, Shoja SA, Shoja SA. Diagnostic value of lactate, procalcitonin, ferritin, serum-c-reactive protein, and other biomarkers in bacterial and viral meningitis: a cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(35):e7637. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000007637

51. Domingues RBFG, Fernandes GBP, Leite FBVDM, Senne C. Performance of lactate in discriminating bacterial meningitis from enteroviral meningitis. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2019;61:e24. doi:10.1590/s1678-9946201961024

52. Huy NTTN, Diep DTN, Kikuchi M, Zamora J, Hirayama K, Hirayama K. Cerebrospinal fluid lactate concentration to distinguish bacterial from aseptic meningitis: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2010;14(6):R240. doi:10.1186/cc9395

53. Sakushima KHY, Kawaguchi T, Jackson JL, Fukuhara S, Fukuhara S. Diagnostic accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid lactate for differentiating bacterial meningitis from aseptic meningitis: a meta-analysis. J Infect. 2011;62(4):255–262. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2011.02.010

54. Kanegaye JTSP, Bradley JS. Lumbar puncture in pediatric bacterial meningitis: defining the time interval for recovery of cerebrospinal fluid pathogens after parenteral antibiotic pretreatment. Pediatrics. 2001;108(5):1169–1174.

55. Saha SKDG, Yamanaka N, Billal DS, Nasreen T, Islam M, Hamer DH. Rapid diagnosis of pneumococcal meningitis: implications for treatment and measuring disease burden. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005;24(12):1093–1098. doi:10.1097/01.inf.0000190030.75892.78

56. Moïsi JCSS, Falade AG, Njanpop-Lafourcade BM, et al. Enhanced diagnosis of pneumococcal meningitis using the Binax NOW® S. pneumoniae immuno-chromatographic test: a multi-site study. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;28(Supplemenet_2):S49–S56. doi:10.1086/596481

57. Leber ALEK, Balada-Llasat JM, Cullison J, et al. Multicenter evaluation of biofire filmarray meningitis/encephalitis panel for detection of bacteria, viruses, and yeast in cerebrospinal fluid specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54(9):2251–2261. doi:10.1128/JCM.00730-16

58. Liesman RMSA, Heitman AK, Theel AS, Patel R, Binnickera MJ. Evaluation of a commercial multiplex molecular panel for diagnosis of infectious meningitis and encephalitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56(4):e01927–01917. doi:10.1128/JCM.01927-17

59. Wilson MRSH, Zorn KC, Arevalo S, et al. Clinical metagenomic sequencing for diagnosis of meningitis and encephalitis. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(24):2327–2340. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1803396

60. Miller SNS, Samayoa E, Messacar K, et al. Laboratory validation of a clinical metagenomic sequencing assay for pathogen detection in cerebrospinal fluid. Genome Res. 2019;29(5):831–842. doi:10.1101/gr.238170.118

61. Aronin SIPP, Quagliarello VJ. Community-acquired bacterial meningitis: risk stratification for adverse clinical outcome and effect of antibiotic timing. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129(11):862–869. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-129-11_Part_1-199812010-00004

62. Miner JRHW, Mapes A, Biros M, Biros M. Presentation, time to antibiotics, and mortality of patients with bacterial meningitis at an urban county medical center. J Emerg Med. 2001;21(4):387–392. doi:10.1016/S0736-4679(01)00407-3

63. Proulx NFD, Toye B, Chan J, Kravcik S, Kravcik S. Delays in the administration of antibiotics are associated with mortality from adult acute bacterial meningitis. QJM. 2005;98(4):291–298. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hci047

64. Auburtin MWM, Charpentier J, Varon E, et al. Detrimental role of delayed antibiotic administration and penicillin-nonsusceptible strains in adult intensive care unit patients with pneumococcal meningitis: the PNEUMOREA prospective multicenter study. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(11):2758–2765. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000239434.26669.65

65. van de Beek DCC, Dzupova O, Esposito S, et al. For the ESCMID study group for infections of the brain (ESGIB). ESCMID guideline: diagnosis and treatment of acute bacterial meningitis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(SUPPLEMENT 3):S37–62. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2016.01.007

66. Heath PT. Neonatal meningitis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003;88(3):F173–178. doi:10.1136/fn.88.3.F173

67. Chaudhuri A-M-MP, Kennedy PGE, Andrew Seaton R, et al. EFNS guideline on the management of community‐acquired bacterial meningitis: report of an EFNS task force on acute bacterial meningitis in older children and adults. Eur J Neurol. 2008;15(7):649–659. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02193.x

68. Klugman KPFI, Bradley JS, Bradley JS. Bactericidal activity against cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in cerebrospinal fluid of children with acute bacterial meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39(9):1988–1992. doi:10.1128/AAC.39.9.1988

69. American Academy of Pediatrics CoID. Serious bacterial infections caused by enterobacteriaceae (with emphasis on septicemia and meningitis in neonates). In: Kimberlin DWBM, Jackson MA, Long SS, editors. Red Book: 2018 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 31st edn. Itasca, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2018.

70. American Academy of Pediatrics CoID. Pneumococcal infections. In: Kimberlin DWBM, Jackson MA, Long SS, editors. Red Book: 2018 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 31st edn. Itasca, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2018.

71. Brouwer MC, McIntyre P, de Gans J, Prasad K, van de Beek D. Corticosteroids for acute bacterial meningitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007.

72. Heath PTOI, Oeser C. Neonatal meningitis: can we do better? Adv Exp Med Biol. 2011;719:11–24.

73. Okike IO, Ladhani SN, Johnson AP. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for poor outcome in infants less than 90 days of age with bacterial meningitis in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018;37(9):837–843. doi:10.1097/INF.0000000000001917

74. McIntyre PBBC, King SM, Schaad UB, Kilpi T, Kanra GY. Dexamethasone as adjunctive therapy in bacterial meningitis. a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials since 1988. JAMA. 1997;278(11):925–931. doi:10.1001/jama.278.11.925

75. Molyneux EMWA, Forsyth H, Tembo M, et al. Dexamethasone treatment in childhood bacterial meningitis in malawi: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;360(9328):211–218.

76. EC AK W, Bergman H, Heyderman RS, Garner P. Osmotic therapies added to antibiotics for acute bacterial meningitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;2(2):CD008806.

77. Gallegos CTF, Nigo M, Hasbun R, Hasbun R. Delayed cerebral injury in adults with bacterial meningitis: a novel complication of adjunctive steroids? Crit Care Med. 2018;46(8):e811–e814. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000003220

78. (UK) NCCfWsaCsH. Bacterial Meningitis and Meningococcal Septicaemia: Management of Bacterial Meningitis and Meningococcal Septicaemia in Children and Young People Younger Than 16 Years in Primary and Secondary Care. London: RCOG Press; 2010.

79. Maconochie IKBS. Fluid therapy for acute bacterial meningitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11(11).

80. Ashwal STL, Schneider S, Perkin R, Thompson J, Thompson J. Bacterial meningitis in children: pathophysiology and treatment. Neurology. 1992;42(4):739–748. doi:10.1212/WNL.42.4.739

81. Singhi PBA, Geeta P, Singhi S, Singhi S. Predictors of long term neurological outcome in bacterial meningitis. Indian J Pediatr. 2007;74(4):369–374. doi:10.1007/s12098-007-0062-6

82. Law MRPG, Alfirevic Z, Gilbert R, et al. The prevention of neonatal group b streptococcal disease: a report by a working group of the medical screening society. J Med Screen. 2005;12(2):60–68. doi:10.1258/0969141053908366

83. Baker CJRM, McInnes P. Immunization of pregnant women with group b streptococcal type III capsular polysaccharide-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine. Vaccine. 2003;21(24):3468–3472. doi:10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00353-0

84. Oster GEJ, Hennegan K, Lewin C, et al. Prevention of group B streptococcal disease in the first 3 months of life: would routine maternal immunization during pregnancy be cost-effective? Vaccine. 2014;32(37):4778–4785. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.06.003

85. Reefhuis JHM, Whitney CG, Chamany S, et al. Risk of bacterial meningitis in children with cochlear implants. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(5):435–445. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa031101

86. Wei PC, Shepherd RK, Clark GM, O’Leary SJ, O’Leary SJ. Can we prevent cochlear implant recipients from developing pneumococcal meningitis? Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(1):e1–7. doi:10.1086/524083

87. Wei PC, Shepherd RK, Azzopardi K, Clark GM, O’Leary SJ, O’Leary SJ. Assessment of the protective effect of pneumococcal vaccination in preventing meningitis after cochlear implantation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133(10):987–994. doi:10.1001/archotol.133.10.987

88. Wei BPS SR, Robins-Browne RM, Clark GM, O’Leary SJ, O’Leary SJ. Pneumococcal meningitis post-cochlear implantation: preventative measures. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;143(5 Suppl 3):s9–14. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2010.08.011

89. Thomson JSH, Cruz AT, Nigrovic LE, et al. Pediatric emergency medicine collaborative research committee (PEM CRC) HSV study group. Cerebrospinal fluid reference values for young infants undergoing lumbar puncture. Pediatrics. 2018;141(3):e20173405. doi:10.1542/peds.2017-3405

90. Ahmed AHS, Ehrett S, Trujillo M, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid values in the term neonate. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996;15(4):298–303. doi:10.1097/00006454-199604000-00004

91. Pick AMSD, Begley KJA. Review of pediatric bacterial meningitis. USPharmacist. 2016;41(5):41–45.

92. American Academy of Pediatrics CoID. Group B streptococcal infections. In: Kimberlin DWBM, Jackson MA, Long SS, editors. Red Book: 2018 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 31st edn. Itasca, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2018.

93. American Academy of Pediatrics CoID. Haemophilus influenzae infections. In: Kimberlin DWBM, Jackson MA, Long SS, editors. Red Book: 2018 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 31st edn. Itasc, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2018.

94. American Academy of Pediatrics CoID. Listeria monocytogenes infections (listeriosis). In: Kimberlin DWBM, Jackson MA, Long SS, editors. Red Book: 2018 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 31st edn. Itasca, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2018.

95. American Academy of Pediatrics CoID. Meningococcal infections. In: Kimberlin DWBM, Jackson MA, Long SS, editors. Red Book: 2018 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 31st edn. Itasca, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2018.

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]