Back to Journals » OncoTargets and Therapy » Volume 10

Letter to the editor regarding the article “Prognostic role of long noncoding RNA NEAT1 in various carcinomas: a meta-analysis”

Authors Yu H, Wang P, Zhang X

Received 30 March 2017

Accepted for publication 19 April 2017

Published 6 June 2017 Volume 2017:10 Pages 2823—2824

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S138413

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Editor who approved publication: Dr Yao Dai



He Yu,1,* Peng Wang,2,* Xiong Zhang3

1Department of Pathology, Kunming Medical University, 2Medical Faculty, Kunming University of Science and Technology, 3Department of Vascular Surgery, Kunming Medical University, Chenggong, Kunming, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this letter

With great interest, we read Chen et al’s paper entitled “Prognostic role of long noncoding RNA NEAT1 in various carcinomas: a meta-analysis”.1 The authors stated that high expression of NEAT1 might potentially serve as a reliable biomarker for poor clinical outcome in various cancers.

View the original paper by Chen and colleagues.

Dear editor

With great interest, we read Chen et al’s paper entitled “Prognostic role of long noncoding RNA NEAT1 in various carcinomas: a meta-analysis”.1 The authors stated that high expression of NEAT1 might potentially serve as a reliable biomarker for poor clinical outcome in various cancers.

After reviewing the article, we found an error that should be double checked and be corrected. The data (hazard ratio [HR] =2.17, 95% confidence intervals: 0.65–7.23 P=0.208) Chen et al extracted from Sun et al’s paper based on the survival curve indicated that the expression of long noncoding RNA NEAT1 was not related to prognosis, which conflicts with the conclusion of Sun et al. However, Sun et al indicated that the patients with tumors with high NEAT1 expression had a shorter overall survival than patients whose tumors had low NEAT1 expression (P=0.061).2 As we know that the HR and P-values obtained by the curve are offset from the values obtained from the original data calculations, therefore, we suggest the authors contact Sun et al to verify the article data and to obtain the true values. Nevertheless, we still appreciate the authors efforts in studying the correlation between IncRNA NEAT1 and various carcinomas.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this communication.


References

1.

Chen T, Wang H, Yang P, He ZY. Prognostic role of long noncoding RNA NEAT1 in various carcinomas: a meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther. 2017;10:993–1000.

2.

Sun C, Li S, Zhang F, et al. Long non-coding RNA NEAT1 promotes non-small cell lung cancer progression through regulation of miR-377–3p-E2F3 pathway. Oncotarget. 2016;7(32):51784–51814.

Dove Medical Press encourages responsible, free and frank academic debate. The content of the OncoTargets and Therapy ‘letters to the editor’ section does not necessarily represent the views of Dove Medical Press, its officers, agents, employees, related entities or the OncoTargets and Therapy editors. While all reasonable steps have been taken to confirm the content of each letter, Dove Medical Press accepts no liability in respect of the content of any letter, nor is it responsible for the content and accuracy of any letter to the editor.

Creative Commons License © 2017 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.