Back to Journals » Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology » Volume 17

L-Lysine as an Alternative Treatment for Pityriasis Rosea (PR) [Response to Letter]

Authors Potestio L , Martora F , Cacciapuoti S, Megna M, Villani A, Ruggiero A 

Received 15 February 2024

Accepted for publication 18 February 2024

Published 24 February 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 463—464

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S464230



Luca Potestio, Fabrizio Martora, Sara Cacciapuoti, Matteo Megna, Alessia Villani, Angelo Ruggiero

Section of Dermatology - Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy

Correspondence: Angelo Ruggiero, Section of Dermatology - Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, Napoli, 80131, Italy, Tel +39 - 081 – 7462457, Fax +39 - 081 - 7462442, Email [email protected]


View the original paper by Dr Potestio and colleagues

This is in response to the Letter to the Editor


Dear editor

We have read with great interest the letter by dos Santos et al entitled “L-lysine as an Alternative Treatment for Pityriasis Rosea (PR)”,1 commenting our previously published manuscript reviewing current literature on the PR and PR-like eruption following COVID-19 vaccination.2 It is well known that there is an association between PR and human herpesvirus (HHV) 6–7, which, like all HHV, is characterized by the ability to establish lifelong latency.3 Among the several cutaneous reactions and viral reactivations reported following COVID-19 vaccination, PR was one of the commonest.4,5 Among the proposed pathogenetic mechanisms, despite the exact correlation is not still understood, it has been hypothesized that the exposure to the viral antigen boosts the cell-mediated immune response, and this immune response can sometimes become dysregulated, leading to inflammation and reactivation of latent viral infections, including human herpesviruses HHV6 and HHV7, linked to PR.6 Moreover, therapeutic approaches to PR have not been discussed in our review, since this disease is usually self-limited.2

In this context, dos Santos et al showed that one case of PR following the second dose of AZD1222 was treated with the L-lysine + L-arginine protocol, based on the capacity of lysine to inhibit the availability of arginine through competitive antagonism, leading to viral replication impairment.7

According to authors, this therapeutic approach should be suggested in severe cases of PR, regardless the COVID-19 vaccination.

Despite the watchful waiting strategy, coupled with the treatment of eventually associated symptoms such as pruritus with oral antihistamines, it is the mainstay of treatment of PR; patients with severe disease or requiring faster resolution may benefit from other therapies such as antivirals (acyclovir) and phototherapy.8–10 In this context, L-lysine + L-arginine protocol may be an interesting option, also as monotherapy. Certainly, further studies are required to establish the best treatment algorithm for PR.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this communication.

References

1. Dos Santos VAB, Pedrazini MC. L-lysine as an alternative treatment for pityriasis rosea (PR) [Letter]. Clin Cosmet Invest Dermatol. 2024;17:433–434. doi:10.2147/CCID.S461722

2. Potestio L, Martora F, Cacciapuoti S, Megna M, Villani A, Ruggiero A. Pityriasis rosea and pityriasis rosea-like eruption following COVID-19 vaccination: a narrative review. Clin Cosmet Invest Dermatol. 2024;17:51–57. doi:10.2147/CCID.S447834

3. Pantry S, Medveczky P. Latency, integration, and reactivation of human herpesvirus-6. Viruses. 2017;9(7):194. doi:10.3390/v9070194

4. Ruggiero A, Megna M, Fabbrocini G, Martora F. Video and telephone teledermatology consultations during COVID-19 in comparison: patient satisfaction, doubts and concerns. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2022;47(10):1863–1864. doi:10.1111/ced.15286

5. Martora F, Villani A, Battista T, Fabbrocini G, Potestio L. COVID-19 vaccination and inflammatory skin diseases. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023;22(1):32–33. doi:10.1111/jocd.15414

6. Khan I, Elsanousi AA, Shareef AM, Tebha SS, Arif A, Gul S. Manifestation of pityriasis rosea and pityriasis rosea-like eruptions after Covid-19 vaccine: a systematic review. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2023;11(4):e804. doi:10.1002/iid3.804

7. Pedrazini MC, Silva MH. Pityriasis rosea‐like cutaneous eruption as a possible dermatological manifestation after Oxford‐ASTRAZENECA vaccine: case report and brief literature review. Dermatologic Therapy. 2021;34(6). doi:10.1111/dth.15129

8. Rodriguez-Zuniga M, Torres N, Garcia-Perdomo H. Effectiveness of Acyclovir in the treatment of pityriasis rosea. A systematic review and meta-analysis. An Bras Dermatol. 2018;93(5):686–695. doi:10.1590/abd1806-4841.20187252

9. Villalon-Gomez JM. Pityriasis rosea: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2018;97(1):38–44.

10. Marasca C, Ruggiero A, Napolitano M, Fabbrocini G, Megna M. May COVID-19 outbreaks lead to a worsening of skin chronic inflammatory conditions? Med Hypotheses. 2020;143:109853. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109853

Creative Commons License © 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.