Interpersonal psychotherapy for eating disorders: current perspectives
Received 29 March 2018
Accepted for publication 11 June 2018
Published 5 September 2018 Volume 2018:11 Pages 353—369
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Igor Elman
Mario Miniati,1 Antonio Callari,1 Alessandra Maglio,1 Simona Calugi2
1Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; 2Department of Eating and Weight Disorders, Villa Garda Hospital, Verona, Italy
Background: Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) is a time-limited and affect-, life-event-, and present-focused psychotherapy originally conceptualized for unipolar depression, and then adapted to the treatment of other disorders, including eating disorders (EDs). The purpose of this paper is to conduct a systematic review of studies on IPT for EDs.
Methods: The authors performed literature searches, study selection, method, and quality evaluation independently. Data were summarized using a narrative approach.
Results: Of the 534 papers retrieved, 37 studies met the inclusion criteria, and 15 were considered for the systematic review (randomized controlled trials and long-term follow-up studies derived from the randomized controlled trials). Their analysis revealed six main findings: 1) no significant differences between IPT and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) were found when administered as monotherapy to patients with anorexia nervosa; 2) when administered as monotherapy to patients with bulimia nervosa (BN), IPT had lower outcomes than CBT and its enhanced version; 3) patients with BN who remitted with IPT showed a prolonged time spent in clinical remission, when followed up on the long term; 4) IPT and CBT, with different timings and methods, have both shown efficacy in the mid-term/long-term period in patients with BN; 5) CBT and its enhanced version produced rapid changes in the acute phase. IPT led to improvements occurring later, with slower changes that tended to maintain efficacy in the long term; 6) abstinence from binge eating with group IPT for binge eating disorder is stable and maintained (or further improved) in the long term.
Conclusion: IPT is a reasonable, cost-effective alternative to CBT for the overall ED spectrum.
Keywords: interpersonal psychotherapy, eating spectrum, bulimia nervosa, anorexia nervosa, binge-eating disorder, treatment efficacy
The overvaluation of shape, weight, and eating control are core psychopathological features of eating disorders (EDs) and have negative effects on intimate relationships.1 Extreme concern about eating control and its expressions negatively affect mood and cognition, damaging education and vocational performances, with up to 20% of subjects no longer able to function independently 10–20 years after the illness onset.2,3 Features of EDs can be directly maintained by interpersonal difficulties: both binge eating and dietary restraint tend to occur in the context of (or are exacerbated by) adverse interpersonal events. Several psychotherapeutic approaches for EDs encompass interpersonal difficulties, stating that lifetime interpersonal dysfunctions could be precursors, prodromals, or sequelae of a full-blown ED.4 Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) is a time-limited, affect-, life-event-, and present-focused psychotherapy that emphasizes the interpersonal context of symptoms. Mainly based on Sullivan’s interpersonal theory and Bowlby’s attachment model and originally conceptualized for unipolar depression, IPT has been adapted for the treatment of other disorders, including EDs.5–9 In contrast to cognitive-behavior therapy for bulimia nervosa (CBT-BN), whose theoretical model was originally formulated in the 1980s, the adaptation of IPT to EDs derives from an empirically supported model.10,11 The rationale for applying IPT to EDs is clinical rather than theoretical: interpersonal difficulties are common in patients with EDs; they may predate the onset of EDs or be consequential, but always maintain the disorder through a number of mechanisms, especially during late adolescence and early adulthood. Patients become more isolated from the normalizing influence of their peers, and, as a result, their symptoms persist unchallenged.
As in the classical IPT for depression, the patient and the therapist define a central “interpersonal problem” or “treatment focus”, falling into one (or more) of the following categories: 1) lack of intimacy and interpersonal deficits; 2) interpersonal role disputes (a conflict, overt or covert, in an important relationship); 3) role transitions (an unsettling major life change); 4) complicated grief (a complicated bereavement reaction following the death of a loved one, with difficulty reestablishing satisfying interpersonal ties in the absence of the deceased); and 5) life goals (specific focus of IPT for EDs), namely, problems with future life plans interfering with interpersonal functioning.12
Despite the rationale supporting the adaptation of IPT to EDs, IPT has been modified for anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN) to some degree to its disadvantage when compared with CBT, presuming an equivalence in target and techniques between AN and BN.13
The main aim of this paper is to systematically review finding from clinical studies that tested IPT in EDs. We set out to systematically review the published literature on the topic in accordance with the PICOS process as follows: P—population: female and male patients of any age who met the diagnosis criteria for AN, BN, binge eating disorder (BED), and loss of control eating (LOC); I—intervention: individual or group therapy with IPT for EDs; C—comparison: patients with EDs before and after treatment with IPT, and matched groups treated with other forms of psychotherapy (such as CBT) or control groups (when available); O—outcome: changes in body mass index (BMI) or number of binge-purge episodes, or number of episodes of LOC, however expressed (absolute value, z- or t-scores standard deviations, increases in percentage from baseline to follow-up); S—study design: we initially included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, case–control studies, follow-up studies, pilot studies, quasi-experimental studies, case series, or case reports. However, we decided to perform the systematic review only on RCTs and on long-term follow-up studies derived from the RCTs.
Materials and methods
We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in completion of this systematic review.14
Protocol and registration
This systematic review is not included in a research protocol.
We proceeded in two steps: First step: all studies published between 1990 and January 2018 using PubMed were included, provided that they met the following criteria: 1) written in English; 2) original articles on studies with a longitudinal design; and 3) prospective or retrospective, observational (analytical or descriptive), experimental or quasi-experimental, controlled or noncontrolled studies. Reviews and non-original articles (ie, case reports, editorials, Letters to the Editor, and book chapters) were not included. Second step: after this first selection, we decided to include in the systematic review only the RCTs and the long-term follow-up studies derived from the abovementioned RCTs.
Information source and search strategy
The literature search was designed and performed independently in duplicate by two authors. The PubMed database was systematically screened using the following terms: [Interpersonal Psychotherapy] AND [Anorexia Nervosa] (n=112); [Interpersonal Psychotherapy] and [Bulimia] (n=160); [Interpersonal Psychotherapy] AND [Loss of Control Eating] (n=29); [Interpersonal Psychotherapy] AND [Binge-Eating Disorder] (n=93); [IPT] AND [loss of control eating] (n=13); [IPT AND [binge eating] (n=49); [IPT] AND [LOC] (n=6); [IPT] AND BED] (n=26); [IPT] AND [Bulimia] (n=35); [IPT] AND [Anorexia Nervosa] (n=11), leading to a total of 534 papers. Records after duplicates removed were 282; four (n=4) additional records were selected after a manual search was carried out to retrieve other articles that had not been identified via the initial search strategy, leading to a total of 286 papers (for a detailed description, see PRISMA flow diagram).
Two authors independently screened the resulting articles for their methodology and appropriateness for inclusion. Noncontrolled studies as well as studies that did not consider treatment response as primary outcome were excluded from the systematic review and summarized in Table 1. Quality appraisal of controlled studies was conducted according to the RCT of Psychotherapy Quality Rating Scale (RCT-PQRS) by Kocsis et al,15 a 25-item measure designed and tested in the context of an assessment of the empirical psychodynamic literature, but applicable to all RCTs of psychotherapy. Consensus discussion was used to resolve disagreements between reviewers.15
Data collection process and data items
First, the title and abstract of each paper were assessed by two independent authors for language suitability and subject matter relevance, and the studies thereby selected were assessed for their appropriateness for inclusion and quality of method. The first author, year of publication, design, sample age, duration of follow-up, intervention, and main findings are reported in Table 1. Quality score of each RCT that passed the two rounds of screening is summarized in Tables 2 and 3.
Table 2 Research clinical trials on IPT for EDs: RCT of Psychotherapy Quality Rating Scale scoring
Abbreviations: ED, eating disorder; IPT, interpersonal psychotherapy; RCT, randomized controlled trial.
Table 3 Long-term follow-up derived from sample randomized in RCTs on IPT for EDs: RCT of Psychotherapy Quality Rating Scale scoring
Abbreviations: ED, eating disorder; IPT, interpersonal psychotherapy; RCT, randomized controlled trial.
Risk of bias in individual studies
Due to the lack of homogeneity among the resulting studies, a meta-analysis could not be performed. In particular, studies varied in terms of how improvements were measured. Hence, this systematic review is presented as a narrative synthesis.
We found a total of 534 records (Figure 1). Records after duplicates removed were 282; four additional records were selected after a manual search carried out to retrieve other articles that had not been identified via the initial search strategy, leading to a total of 286 papers screened. Two hundred forty records were excluded: 156 papers because not focused on IPT, 46 reviews or editorials, 22 not written in English, and 16 not pertinent to the selected topics. Full-text articles assessed for eligibility were 46. Nine full-text articles were subsequently excluded for the following reasons: 1) Internet assessment of interpersonal areas but not IPT study; 2) theoretical paper; 3) study on self-image; 4) short commentary; 5) psychodynamic interpersonal model; 6) no IPT applied; 7) interpersonal problems in a sample not treated with IPT; 8) commentary and short review; and 9) study of interpersonal problems with no IPT applied. Finally, 37 studies (37/286; 12.9%) were included in the review, as summarized in Table 1. Three studies were on AN (8.1%), 14 on BN (37.8%), 7 on BED (18.9%), and 9 on adolescents with LOC (24.4%); 4 studies addressed the issue of the sequential (individual or group) treatment with IPT (10.8%). All studies were conducted on outpatient samples. Ten studies adopted an RCT methodology (10/37; 27.0%),11,16,20,21,28,29,31,39,40,46 five were follow-up studies (5/37; 13.5%),17–19,30,47 eleven were based on secondary analyses carried out on the same samples of RCTs (11/37; 29.7%),50–54,58,59,61,62,64,67 three were case series or case reports (3/37; 8.1%),55,66,69 four were pilot studies (10.8%),45,55,68,70 and four were studies with experimental designs other than RCTs (retrospective,57 quasi-experimental,60 community based,63 laboratory meal65 (4/37; 10.8%).
Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram of selection studies.14
Abbreviation: PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.
Qualitative synthesis was conducted only on RCTs and on the derived long-term follow-up studies, when available, namely on 15 studies.
The RCTs were all of good quality (mean score/SD of the RCT-PQRS omnibus rating: 6.1±0.9 points; see Table 2).
Summary of evidence
Randomized controlled trial with IPT for anorexia nervosa
We found one RCT with two follow-up points. In a 20-week RCT, 56 patients were randomized to IPT, CBT, or a control treatment called “nonspecific supportive clinical management”, based on educative-nutritional advice and supportive psychotherapy principles.16 Patients were females diagnosed with AN according to the criterion of a BMI <17.5. Amenorrhea was not an inclusion criterion. A chronic, refractory course of AN was an exclusion criterion. Two patients taking antidepressants were included. Therapy, in each modality, consisted of 20-hour-long, manual-based sessions conducted over a minimum of 20 weeks. Each participant completed assessments after the 10th therapy session and after the final session. Thirty-five patients (35/56; 62.5%) attended at least 15 of the 20 therapy sessions. At the end of the study, IPT was the least effective of the three treatments. The explanations included the relative lack of symptom focus, the long time taken to decide the problem area, and a substantial lack of symptom reactivity to specific interpersonal events. However, no additional explanation on the difficulties for the problematic area choices was provided. The authors speculated that the presence of high rates of obsessive personality traits among AN patients might be related to the scarce response to CBT. Surprisingly, they did not consider that a sample of patients with obsessive traits might be too inwardly focused to pay attention to their external environment, including the interpersonal issues of IPT. A study limitation was represented by the heterogeneity of the sample with an age range between 17 and 40 years. Moreover, the same therapists delivered the three therapies, raising questions on allegiance.
Completers from this RCT were subsequently included in a 5-year follow-up.17 Patients were classified according to whether they received any treatment for eating difficulties over the follow-up period (yes/no). At the end of the follow-up, patients initially randomized to IPT (who had the poorest global outcome rating immediately posttreatment) showed the “best global outcome rating”, with a “lag” effect for IPT over time. Study limitations included the small sample size and the enrollment of patients with mild or subthreshold AN.
Randomized controlled trial with IPT for bulimia nervosa
Fairburn et al published two RCTs of IPT for patients with BN.11,18 The first study was on 75 patients randomized to cognitive-behavioral therapy for BN (CBT-BN; n=25), behavioral therapy for BN (BT; n=25) or IPT (n=25).11 The treatments consisted of at least 18 manual-based sessions conducted over 19 weeks. The sessions were held twice weekly for the first month, weekly for the following 2 months and every 2 weeks during the final 6 weeks. Six experienced therapists administered all three treatments. No psychopharmacological treatment was allowed. CBT-BN was significantly more effective than IPT in reducing some key features of BN, such as “dysmorphophobic symptoms” and “resorting to overly drastic diets”.
The same sample entered a second study, a “closed” 12-month follow-up, with no concurrent psychopharmacological treatments, except for patients who showed severe clinical needs. Patients were evaluated at 4, 8, and 12 months posttreatment. The initial differences between CBT-BN and IPT disappeared over 8 months, because of further improvement in the IPT group. The behavioral version of CBT-BN was least effective overall, with substantial posttreatment relapse. IPT was slower acting acutely than CBT-BN but similarly effective in the long term.18
Patients enrolled in the two previous studies were then followed up in a 6-year prospective study.19 Eighty-nine patients underwent a diagnostic reassessment by interview. Patients who received CBT-BN or IPT were markedly better than those who had received BT. IPT and CBT-BN produced equivalent and lasting decreases in general psychiatric features and in improved self-esteem/social functioning.
A multicenter RCT in a sample of 220 patients compared individual IPT vs CBT-BN.20 IPT was defined in a similar way in this trial as in the previous ones: treatment attention was paid to eating habits or attitudes toward weight and shape, and no specific behavioral or cognitive procedures characterizing CBT were allowed. Treatments consisted of 19 individual sessions conducted over a 20-week period (twice weekly for the first 2 weeks, weekly for the next 12 weeks, and biweekly for the last 6 weeks). After the 20-week treatment period, patients were followed up for 1 year. CBT-BN was superior to IPT at the end of treatment in both intent-to-treat and completers analyses. By the 8–12-month open follow-up, the two treatments were equivalent. No differential predictors of response to IPT and CBT-BN were identified.
Fairburn et al compared the enhanced version of CBT (CBT-E) with IPT in patients with BN and other not-underweight EDs.21 After the initial treatment, patients entered a 60-week follow-up and were reassessed with the EDE, blind to treatment condition.22,23 Both groups showed a significant response post treatment. Changes were greater with CBT-E than with IPT. Patients treated with CBT-E reported no binge eating, vomiting, or laxative misuse in the 44.8% of cases (26/58) compared with the 21.7% (13/60) of patients treated with IPT. Seventy-five percent of CBT-E completers achieved remission vs 37% of IPT completers. At 60-week follow-up, posttreatment differences between CBT-E and IPT were no longer statistically significant. However, these results cannot be generalized to younger patients or to patients with lower BMI than those enrolled in the study.
Randomized controlled trial with IPT for BED
Group treatment for BED
Group CBT is the first-line treatment for BED since the late 1990s.24 Group IPT for BED is more recent and empirically related to the pathological management of negative emotions as dysfunctional responses to interpersonal stressors (emotional eating).25–27
A study compared the efficacy of group CBT, group IPT, and a waiting list (WL) condition on a sample of 56 women with nonpurging BN.28 At posttreatment, both CBT and IPT showed significant improvements in reducing binge eating, whereas the WL condition did not. Binge eating remained significantly below baseline levels for both active treatment conditions at 6 months and 1 year.
Wilfley et al compared group IPT and CBT on a sample of BED patients (n=162).29 Both treatments provided 20 weekly group sessions of 90 minutes and three individual sessions addressing patients’ goals and progresses at three triage points: pretreatment, midtreatment, and posttreatment. Outcome measures included BMI and EDE at baseline, at the end of treatment, and every 4 months during a 1-year posttreatment follow-up.22 The two groups showed similar outcomes in recovery rates at posttreatment (79% for CBT vs 73% for IPT) and at 1-year follow-up (59% for CBT vs 62% for IPT). The frequency of binge eating remained lower than at baseline. The two therapies differed in timing of improvement of dietary restriction that occurred more rapidly with CBT than with IPT.
Hilbert et al reassessed 90 patients with BED 4 years after treatment cessation from the original study sample recruited by Wilfley et al.29,30 All participants were randomized again to either CBT or IPT (n=45 each). Both treatments consisted of 20 weekly group sessions of 90 minutes and three additional individual sessions. Fifty-eight patients (64.4%) completed the long-term follow-up assessment. Outcome analyses included pretreatment, posttreatment, and 1–4-year follow-up. A substantial and long-lasting efficacy of both CBT and IPT was found, with full recovery from binge eating in >64% of patients. CBT and IPT yielded comparable long-term rates of remission to a subclinical level of BED: 80% of patients showed clinically significant improvement and 58% experienced an improvement in comorbid psychopathology. Abstinence from binge eating was stable over the follow-up period in the IPT group, whereas CBT patients had a significant tendency to relapse. Reduction of ED psychopathology in the IPT group was better maintained or further improved over the follow-up period, whereas for the CBT group, psychopathology worsened from 1-year to 4-year long-term follow-up, suggesting that the focus on improving interpersonal relationships prepares individuals more comprehensively for the social challenges of daily life.
Individual treatment for BED
Wilson et al compared the short- and longer term outcomes of three individual treatments in a sample of BED patients randomized to IPT (n=75), behavioral weight loss treatment (BWL; n=64), or the guided self-help based on CBT (CBTgsh; n=66).31 Patients with BED were classified into two subtypes characterized by low and high negative affect. The three treatments were conducted over 24 weeks. Participants were followed up (6-month intervals) for 2 years post treatment completion. All sessions were 50–60 minutes long except for the first (2 hours long). The first three sessions were scheduled during the first 2 weeks, followed by 12 weekly sessions; the final four sessions occurred at 2-week intervals, for a total of 19 sessions over 24 weeks. The BWL treatment involved the same total therapy time and included moderate caloric restriction and exercise. The treatment initially focused on dietary change toward a weight loss goal of 7% of baseline weight; participants were asked to reduce first fat intake to 25% of total calories. If satisfactory weight loss progress was not achieved, a caloric goal was set based on initial weight. The exercise goal was 2.5 hours of moderate exercise each week. The core curriculum consisted of 16 weekly individual 50-minute sessions followed by four sessions at 2-week intervals, aimed at continuing weight loss and enhancing maintenance of such losses after the initial 16 sessions. The CBTgsh was based on Fairburn’s book Overcoming Binge Eating and performed under a therapist’s guidance, with ten treatment sessions, each lasting approximately 25 minutes, except for the first session (60 minutes long).32 The first four sessions were weekly, the next two occurred at 2-week intervals, and the last four occurred at 4-week intervals. Questionnaires administered included the BDI, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and the Social Adjustment Self-Report Scale.33–35 Intention-to-treat analyses revealed no differences among the three treatments in remission from binge eating, reduction in days of binge eating, or no longer meeting DSM-IV criteria for BED. Similarly, no differences emerged on the EDE subscales or for BDI or the self-esteem scale. BWL was significantly more effective in reducing BMI than IPT and CBTgsh, and more effective than CBTgsh in increasing dietary restraint. BWL produced a greater number of patients with a 5% reduction in body weight (41%) compared with IPT (15%) or CBTgsh (15%). At 1 year, no significant differences among treatments in any measure of binge eating were found. The BWL group showed significantly more BMI gain than the CBTgsh group. No significant moderator effect of negative affect subtype on remission from binge eating was found. The BWL program was no longer significantly different from the other treatments in terms of weight loss.
Studies addressing sequenced treatment CBT-IPT
CBT and IPT seem “immiscible” because of their procedural differences.36,37 IPT is a less directive, affect-focused approach that differs considerably from CBT in both style and content. However, whether IPT may succeed in cases in which CBT has failed is an open question. For example, Reveler and Fairburn conducted a study on patients with BN and diabetes who responded negatively to a first CBT trial, but who significantly improved after a switch to IPT and a second reassignment to CBT.37 It has been argued that either IPT or CBT could be the initial treatment choice for EDs. Literature recommends CBT as initial treatment, because of a more rapid short-term efficacy and a wide dissemination. IPT is considered a second-line treatment when CBT fails.38 Findings from clinical studies on this topic are very limited and focused on BN. We found two RCTs.
Individual study on sequenced CBT-IPT for BN
A study by Mitchell et al, derived from the one published by Agras et al, tested a second step treatment with IPT or antidepressants for patients with BN who failed the initial treatment with CBT.20,39 A cohort of patients initially treated with CBT-BN was randomized to either IPT or medication management with fluoxetine, followed by desipramine for patients who did not achieve abstinence from purging with fluoxetine. All subjects were initially assessed for 2 weeks, and then they began a 20-session, 16-week course of CBT-BN. Between weeks 16 and 17, patients were not administered with CBT-BN and assessed. Patients who continued to purge were randomly assigned to the second-line treatments. A total of 62 subjects completing the prerandomization phase were eligible for randomization, based on self-reported purging during the past 2 weeks of CBT-BN treatment. The same psychotherapist who had previously delivered CBT-BN delivered IPT in 20 sessions over 16 weeks. At week 33, the IPT treatment ended. Patients randomized to medication therapy were treated with fluoxetine (60 mg/day). Subjects who did not tolerate this dose had their dosage reduced. Patients whose purging did not respond to this dosage within 8 weeks had fluoxetine discontinued and began desipramine at 50 mg/day with subsequent increases to a maximum of 300 mg/day. Patients were then reassessed between weeks 33 and 34 and followed up at week 60. Patients on IPT did not receive additional therapy. Patients on medication management were maintained on the same dosage until week 60 with monthly medication visits. At week 60, pharmacotherapy was discontinued. Despite this sophisticated study design, results were limited. Dropouts were frequent: of the 62 subjects randomized to the second treatments, 37 completed, while 25 dropped out. Of the 25 subjects who dropped out, 10 were on IPT. Moreover, considering that the same therapist delivered the two psychotherapies, the problem of what was the therapists’ relative competence in and allegiance to the two treatments was the main study limitation.
Group study on sequenced CBT-IPT for BN
Nevonen and Broberg tested whether a sequenced group treatment (GRP) had similar effectiveness to sequenced individual treatment (IND) in recovery and remission, clinical ratings, self-reports of symptoms, interpersonal problems, and concomitant psychopathology in a sample of patients with BN.40 One hundred thirty-eight patients (aged 18–24 years) entered the RCT. Patients taking psychotropic medication, already in psychotherapy, or reporting suicidal behaviors were excluded. The GRP consisted of 23 sessions over a period of 20 weeks. Group sessions were 2 hours long and occurred twice weekly for the first 3 weeks, and weekly thereafter for 17 weeks. The individual sessions were 50–60 minutes weekly for 23 weeks. Attrition and long-term (2.5 years) follow-up results were analyzed, using “intention-to-treat” and “completer” samples. The sequenced GRP consisted of twenty-three 2-hour sessions over 20 weeks, scheduled twice weekly for the first 3 weeks and weekly thereafter for 17 weeks. The individual sessions lasted 50–60 minutes weekly for 23 weeks. Four senior psychotherapists conducted both the IND and the GRP, following a revolving schedule, to control for the “therapist factor”. Sixty-three (IND, n=31; GRP, n=32) of 86 participants (73%) completed the study. The immediate posttreatment recovery rate was 26% (n=8) in IND and 28% (n=9) in GRP. At 1-year follow-up, 52% of patients in IND (n=16) and 37.5% (n=12) of those in GRP recovered. At the 2.5-year follow-up, the recovery percentages were 47% in IND (n=14) and 37% in GRP (n=10). Although both IND and GRP showed efficacy at post treatment, the 1-year follow-up revealed increased recovery for IND as opposed to a decreased recovery for GRP in the intention-to-treat analyses. The 2.5-year follow-up intention-to-treat analysis showed a stabilized recovery rate for GRP and an increased recovery from the 1-year to the 2.5-year follow-up for IND. Remission rates increased for IND, whereas GRP slightly decreased from the 1-year to the 2.5-year follow-up. In the completers’ sample, IND was superior to GRP in terms of reducing bulimia symptoms. However, in terms of recovery and remission, both IND and GRP were effective at post treatment. Neither the intention-to-treat nor the completers’ analyses revealed significant differences between groups. The interpersonal problems measured revealed medium effect changes from pretreatment to 1-year follow-up for both the intention-to-treat and the completers’ samples. The authors speculated that this finding might reflect a process of accepting and expressing interpersonal experiences, with an attempt of trying out other ways of functioning after the end of treatment.
Loss of control eating in adolescents: IPT and IPT weight gain
LOC among overweight adolescents ranges from 6% to 40%.41–44 To date, evidence of efficacy of IPT in this population is limited. Of the six available studies, four were on the same sample of overweight adolescent girls aged 12–17 years enrolled in a first pilot study on the acceptability/feasibility of IPT-weight gain (IPT-WG), and then followed up for 1–3 years.45–47
IPT-WG was an adaptation of IPT, with group sessions 75–90 minutes long focused on psychoeducation and interpersonal skill building. The IPT-WG group was compared with a health group program (HE) based on the “Hey-Durham” health program for high school students, and adapted to match the number of sessions for IPT-WG.48 In summary, these studies found a benefit of IPT-WG in reducing LOC eating when compared with HE, especially in girls of ethnic minorities. When binge eating was considered as a categorical variable, girls of the HE group were seven times more likely to endorse binge eating at the 12-month evaluation than IPT-WG patients. However, IPT-WG was not superior to HE for preventing excess weight gain at 1–3-year follow-up.
Summary of evidence
Of the 534 papers retrieved, 37 studies met the inclusion criteria, and 15 were considered for the systematic review (RCTs and long-term follow-up studies derived from the RCTs).
The analysis of the 15 selected papers revealed six main findings: 1) When administered as monotherapy to patients with AN, no significant differences were found between IPT and CBT; 2) when administered as monotherapy to patients with BN, IPT had lower outcomes than CBT and CBT-E; 3) patients who remitted with IPT showed a prolonged time spent in clinical remission, when followed up on the long term; 4) IPT and CBT, with different timings and methods, have both shown efficacy in the mid-term/long-term period, in patients with BN; 5) CBT and CBT-E produced rapid changes in the acute phase. IPT led to improvements occurring later, with slower changes that tended to increase with time and to maintain efficacy in the long term; 6) abstinence from binge eating with group IPT for BED is stable and maintained (or further improved) in the long term.
The RCTs were all of good level, according to the RCT-PQRS scores.
Summary of limitations
There are several limitations to consider when interpreting this review. The first is that only 10 out of 37 selected studies had a controlled design.11,16,20,21,28,29,31,39,40,46 Moreover, only five studies, all derived from previously randomized samples, addressed the question of a longer term standardized follow-up, which varied considerably between studies.17–19,30,47
Furthermore, the number of instruments utilized for the assessment of psychological and psychopathological characteristics of patients with EDs is too wide and inhomogeneous. In this review, 30 different scales were found, raising questions on how to compare findings from such a number of scales, exploring in different ways different areas.
Finally, treatment allegiance is an important topic. A recent meta-analysis of the crossed therapist design in comparative trials demonstrated the bias due to a differential psychotherapist allegiance: those researchers who strongly allied to a treatment ignore therapist allegiance potentially skewing outcomes.49
Conclusions and areas for future research
The severity of ED presentation and clinical course poses challenges to find available, easy-to-administer, and evidence-based treatments. The interpersonal dimension of EDs encourages the progressive enlargement of the spectrum of IPT applications to this area. Controlled clinical trials suggest that IPT is a reasonable, cost-effective alternative to CBT for patients with BN and BED, especially in the long term.
The number of studies with IPT for AN is very limited, but the available finding is interesting. IPT and CBT-BN, with different timings and methods, both show efficacy in the mid-term/long-term period in patients with BN. CBT-BN produces rapid changes in the acute phase. The CBT-E is more effective than IPT in not-underweight patients with transdiagnostic characteristics. Taken as a whole, the body of evidence supporting the IPT use in BN is more modest than for CBT-BN and CBT-E.
The IPT approach to EDs focuses on interpersonal dimensions, leading to improvements in eating behaviors secondary to relational improvements. Findings suggest that IPT may lead to slower changes in the overall clinical picture, but also that changes tend to increase over time, thus sustaining efficacy in the long term. An alternative reading of this evidence is that the effects of CBT, when compared with IPT on the long term, may fade over time.
Researches demonstrate the efficacy of a therapeutic strategy focused on eating behaviors in addition to interpersonal background for BED. IPT, by decreasing emotional eating of BED, shows efficacy for both control and maintenance of body weight. Further research is required to establish how IPT specifically works for these patients. Available studies on IPT-induced mediators of change (focused on the identification of potential specific mechanisms of IPT) are limited or provide negative finding. The current knowledge on IPT, as an alternative to CBT in EDs, leads us to suggest that future research should investigate in greater detail whether the sequential or the combined approach with CBT and/or pharmacotherapy is preferable.
All authors gave their substantial contributions to conception and design, data acquisition, data analysis, and interpretation. All authors gave contributions in drafting the article or critically revising it for important intellectual content, and gave their final approval of the version to be published. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Fairburn CG, Cooper Z, Waller D. “Complex cases” and comorbidity. In: Fairburn CG, editor. Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Eating Disorders. New York: Guilford Press; 2008:245–258.
Treasure J, Claudino AM, Zucker N, Disorders E. Eating disorders. Lancet. 2010;375(9714):583–593.
Hjern A, Lindberg L, Lindblad F. Outcome and prognostic factors for adolescent female in-patients with anorexia nervosa: 9- to 14-year follow-up. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;189:428–432.
Wilfley D, Stein R, Welch R. Interpersonal psychotherapy. In: Treasure J, Schmidt U, van Furth E, editors. Handbook of Eating Disorders. 2nd ed. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2003:253–270.
Sullivan HS. The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry. New York: Norton; 1953.
Bowlby J. Attachment. New York: Basic Books; 1969.
Markowitz JC, Weissman MM. Interpersonal psychotherapy: past, present and future. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2012;19(2):99–105.
Miniati M, Callari A, Calugi S, et al. Interpersonal psychotherapy for postpartum depression: a systematic review. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2014;17(4):257–268.
Apple RF. Interpersonal therapy for bulimia nervosa. J Clin Psychol. 1999;55(6):715–725.
Fairburn CG. The management of bulimia nervosa. J Psychiatr Res. 1985;19(2–3):465–472.
Fairburn CG, Jones R, Peveler RC, et al. Three psychological treatments for bulimia nervosa. A comparative trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1991;48(5):463–469.
Lipsitz JD, Markowitz JC. Mechanisms of change in interpersonal therapy (IPT). Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33(8):1134–1147.
Rieger E, van Buren DJ, Bishop M, Tanofsky-Kraff M, Welch R, Wilfley DE. An eating disorder-specific model of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT-ED): causal pathways and treatment implications. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010;30(4):400–410.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1006–1012.
Kocsis JH, Gerber AJ, Milrod B, et al. A new scale for assessing the quality of randomized clinical trials of psychotherapy. Compr Psychiatry. 2010;51(3):319–324.
McIntosh VV, Jordan J, Carter FA, et al. Three psychotherapies for anorexia nervosa: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162(4):741–747.
Carter FA, Jordan J, Mcintosh VV, et al. The long-term efficacy of three psychotherapies for anorexia nervosa: a randomized, controlled trial. Int J Eat Disord. 2011;44(7):647–654.
Fairburn CG, Jones R, Peveler RC, Hope RA, O’Connor M. Psychotherapy and bulimia nervosa. Longer-term effects of interpersonal psychotherapy, behavior therapy, and cognitive behavior therapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50(6):419–428.
Fairburn CG, Norman PA, Welch SL, O’Connor ME, Doll HA, Peveler RC. A prospective study of outcome in bulimia nervosa and the long-term effects of three psychological treatments. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995;52(4):304–312.
Agras WS, Walsh T, Fairburn CG, Wilson GT, Kraemer HC. A multicenter comparison of cognitive-behavioral therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(5):459–466.
Fairburn CG, Bailey-Straebler S, Basden S, et al. A transdiagnostic comparison of enhanced cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT-E) and interpersonal psychotherapy in the treatment of eating disorders. Behav Res Ther. 2015;70:64–71.
Cooper Z, Cooper PJ, Fairburn CG. The validity of the eating disorder examination and its subscales. Br J Psychiatry. 1989;154:807–812.
Fairburn CG, Cooper Z, O’Connor M. Eating disorder examination (Edition 16.0D). In: Fairburn C, editor. Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Eating Disorders. New York: Guilford Press; 2008:265–308.
Wilfley DE, Cohen LR. Psychological treatment of bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1997;33(3):437–454.
Yanovski SZ, Nelson JE, Dubbert BK, Spitzer RL. Association of binge eating disorder and psychiatric comorbidity in obese subjects. Am J Psychiatry. 1993;150(10):1472–1479.
Mussell MP, Mitchell JE, de Zwaan M, Crosby RD, Seim HC, Crow SJ. Clinical characteristics associated with binge eating in obese females: a descriptive study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1996;20(4):324–331.
Wilfley DE, Friedman MA, Dounchis JZ, Stein RI, Welch RR, Ball SA. Comorbid psychopathology in binge eating disorder: relation to eating disorder severity at baseline and following treatment. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68(4):641–649.
Wilfley DE, Agras WS, Telch CF, et al. Group cognitive-behavioral therapy and group interpersonal psychotherapy for the nonpurging bulimic individual: a controlled comparison. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993;61(2):296–305.
Wilfley DE, Welch RR, Stein RI, et al. A randomized comparison of group cognitive-behavioral therapy and group interpersonal psychotherapy for the treatment of overweight individuals with binge-eating disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59(8):713–721.
Hilbert A, Bishop ME, Stein RI, et al. Long-term efficacy of psychological treatments for binge eating disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;200(3):232–237.
Wilson GT, Wilfley DE, Agras WS, Bryson SW. Psychological treatments of binge eating disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67(1):94–101.
Fairburn CG. Overcoming Binge Eating: New York: Guilford Press; 1995.
Beck AT, Steer RA, Carbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev. 1988;8(1):77–100.
Rosenberg M. Conceiving of the Self. New York: Basic Books; 1979.
Weissman MM, Bothwell S. Assessment of social adjustment by patient self-report. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1976;33(9):1111–1115.
Fairburn CG. Interpersonal psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa. In: Garner DM, Garfinkel PE, editors. Handbook of treatment for eating disorders. New York: Guilford Press; 1997:278–294.
Reveler RC, Fairburn CG. The treatment of bulimia nervosa in patients with diabetes mellitus. Int J Eat Disord. 1992;11(1):45–53.
Garner DM, Needleman LD. Sequencing and integration of treatments. In: Garner DM, Garfinkle PE, editors. Handbook of Treatment for Eating Disorders. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 1997:50–63.
Mitchell JE, Halmi K, Wilson GT, Agras WS, Kraemer H, Crow S. A randomized secondary treatment study of women with bulimia nervosa who fail to respond to CBT. Int J Eat Disord. 2002;32(3):271–281.
Nevonen L, Broberg AG. A comparison of sequenced individual and group psychotherapy for patients with bulimia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord. 2006;39(2):117–127.
Tanofsky-Kraff M. Binge eating among children and adolescents. In: Jelalian E, Steele R, editors. Handbook of Child and Adolescent Obesity. New York: Springer; 2008:41–57.
Croll J, Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M, Ireland M. Prevalence and risk and protective factors related to disordered eating behaviors among adolescents: relationship to gender and ethnicity. J Adolesc Health. 2002;31(2):166–175.
Johnson WG, Rohan KJ, Kirk AA. Prevalence and correlates of binge eating in white and African American adolescents. Eat Behav. 2002;3(2):179–189.
Tanofsky-Kraff M, Mcduffie JR, Yanovski SZ, et al. Laboratory assessment of the food intake of children and adolescents with loss of control eating. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(3):738–745.
Tanofsky-Kraff M, Wilfley DE, Young JF, et al. A pilot study of interpersonal psychotherapy for preventing excess weight gain in adolescent girls at-risk for obesity. Int J Eat Disord. 2010;43(8):701–706.
Tanofsky-Kraff M, Shomaker LB, Wilfley DE, et al. Targeted prevention of excess weight gain and eating disorders in high-risk adolescent girls: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100(4):1010–1018.
Tanofsky-Kraff M, Shomaker LB, Wilfley DE, et al. Excess weight gain prevention in adolescents: three-year outcome following a randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017;85(3):218–227.
Bravender T. Health, Education, and Youth in Durham: HEY Durham Curricular Guide. 2nd ed. Durham, NC: Duke University; 2005.
Falkenström F, Markowitz JC, Jonker H, Philips B, Holmqvist R. Can psychotherapists function as their own controls? Meta-analysis of the crossed therapist design in comparative psychotherapy trials. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74(5):482–491.
Mcintosh VV, Jordan J, Carter JD, et al. Assessing the distinctiveness of psychotherapies and examining change over treatment for anorexia nervosa with cognitive-behavior therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, and specialist supportive clinical management. Int J Eat Disord. 2016;49(10):958–962.
Jones R, Peveler RC, Hope RA, Fairburn CG. Changes during treatment for bulimia nervosa: a comparison of three psychological treatments. Behav Res Ther. 1993;31(5):479–485.
Wolk SL, Devlin MJ. Stage of change as a predictor of response to psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord. 2001;30(1):96–100.
Constantino MJ, Arnow BA, Blasey C, Agras WS. The association between patient characteristics and the therapeutic alliance in cognitive-behavioral and interpersonal therapy for bulimia nervosa. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73(2):203–211.
Constantino M, Smith-Hansen L. Patient interpersonal factors and the therapeutic alliance in two treatments for bulimia nervosa. Psychother Res. 2008;18(6):683–698.
Arcelus J, Whight D, Langham C, et al. A case series evaluation of a modified version of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) for the treatment of bulimic eating disorders: a pilot study. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2009;17(4):260–268.
Arcelus J, Whight D, Brewin N, Mcgrain L. A brief form of interpersonal psychotherapy for adult patients with bulimic disorders: a pilot study. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2012;20(4):326–330.
Serpell L, Stobie B, Fairburn CG, van Schaick R. Empirically-supported and non-empirically supported therapies for bulimia nervosa: retrospective patient ratings. J Eat Disord. 2013;1:41.
Cooper Z, Allen E, Bailey-Straebler S, et al. Predictors and moderators of response to enhanced cognitive behaviour therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy for the treatment of eating disorders. Behav Res Ther. 2016; 84:9–13.
Gomez Penedo JM, Constantino MJ, Coyne AE, Bernecker SL, Smith-Hansen L. Patient baseline interpersonal problems as moderators of outcome in two psychotherapies for bulimia nervosa. Psychother Res. 2018;19:1–13.
Agras WS, Telch CF, Arnow B, et al. Does interpersonal therapy help patients with binge eating disorder who fail to respond to cognitive-behavioral therapy? J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995;63(3):356–360.
Sysko R, Hildebrandt T, Wilson GT, Wilfley DE, Agras WS. Heterogeneity moderates treatment response among patients with binge eating disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010;78(5):681–690.
Hilbert A, Hildebrandt T, Agras WS, Wilfley DE, Wilson GT. Rapid response in psychological treatments for binge eating disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015;83(3):649–654.
Cassidy O, Sbrocco T, Vannucci A, et al. Adapting interpersonal psychotherapy for the prevention of excessive weight gain in rural African American girls. J Pediatr Psychol. 2013;38(9):965–977.
Berger SS, Elliott C, Ranzenhofer LM, et al. Interpersonal problem areas and alexithymia in adolescent girls with loss of control eating. Compr Psychiatry. 2014;55(1):170–178.
Tanofsky-Kraff M, Crosby RD, Vannucci A, et al. Effect of adapted interpersonal psychotherapy versus health education on mood and eating in the laboratory among adolescent girls with loss of control eating. Int J Eat Disord. 2016;49(5):490–498.
Tanofsky-Kraff M, Shomaker LB, Young JF, Wilfley DE. Interpersonal psychotherapy for the prevention of excess weight gain and eating disorders: a brief case study. Psychotherapy. 2016;53(2):188–194.
Burke NL, Shomaker LB, Brady S, et al. Impact of age and race on outcomes of a program to prevent excess weight gain and disordered eating in adolescent girls. Nutrients. 2017;9(9):947.
Shomaker LB, Tanofsky-Kraff M, Matherne CE, et al. A randomized, comparative pilot trial of family-based interpersonal psychotherapy for reducing psychosocial symptoms, disordered-eating, and excess weight gain in at-risk preadolescents with loss-of-control-eating. Int J Eat Disord. 2017;50(9):1084–1094.
Hendricks PS, Thompson JK. An integration of cognitive-behavioral therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa: a case study using the case formulation method. Int J Eat Disord. 2005;37(2):171–174.
Nevonen L, Broberg AG, Lindström M, Levin B. A sequenced group psychotherapy model for bulimia nervosa patients: a pilot study. Eur Eat Dis Rev. 1999;7(1):17–27.
© 2018 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.