In vitro mitomycin C absorption and delivery with different sponge materials used in filtering surgery
Authors Urbaneja D, Morilla-Grasa A, Jimenez E, Montemayor J, Marcobal N, Aragall C, Gurdiel C, Armillas M, Ortiz P, Anton A
Received 26 November 2015
Accepted for publication 11 February 2016
Published 15 April 2016 Volume 2016:10 Pages 665—669
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser
Diana Urbaneja,1 Antonio Morilla-Grasa,1 Elisa Jimenez,1 Judith Montemayor,1 Nuria Marcobal,2 Carme Aragay,2 Celia Gurdiel,2 Marta Armillas,2 Pere Ortiz,2 Alfonso Antón1–3
1Department of Ophthalmology, Institut Català de Retina, Barcelona, Spain; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Ntra Sra De La Esperanza - Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain; 3Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare mitomycin C (MMC) absorption and delivery in different materials used in filtering surgery.
Methods: This is an in vitro study comparing polyvinyl alcohol triangular sponges (TS6, TS8), polyvinyl alcohol fluid wicks (EFW), and absorbable gelatin sponges (AGS3, AGS5), from which five different types of transport units were obtained. Seven pieces of sponge of each transport unit type were obtained as follows: two transverse strips were obtained at 6 and 8 mm from the apex of TS and divided into three equal pieces; 4×4 mm pieces of EFW; 3×3 and 5×5 mm pieces of absorbable gelatin sponges were cut. Filter paper was placed on a precision scale (0.01 mg). The seven sponge pieces of each type were weighed three times consecutively in dry and wet states, the latter after immersion for 15 seconds in 0.2 mg/mL MMC. The difference between the weights of the dry and wet filter paper at the end of each measurement sequence was also calculated and considered as an estimate of the amount of mitomycin delivered.
Results: The amounts of MMC absorbed by each transport unit were as follows: (mean ± standard deviation) 27.43±5.13 for TS6, 31.91±6.63 for TS8, 15.96±2.23 for EFW, 17.96±2.05 for AGS3, and 33.81±2.05 for AGS5. The amounts of MMC delivered to the filter paper were as follows: 21.70±2.84 for TS6, 23.83±4.03 for TS8, 12.93±1.75 for EFW, 14.69±1.79 for AGS3, and 27.30±1.58 for AGS5.
Conclusion: Percentage MMC delivered was similar for all materials, but there was a tendency for greater delivery using larger sponges and greater homogeneity in delivery with AGS5. No statistical differences were found in percentage delivered by the different transport materials.
Keywords: glaucoma, absorbable gelatin sponges, mitomycin, polyvinyl alcohol
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]