Gender- and age-related treatment compliance in patients with osteoporosis in Germany
Authors Hadji P, Jacob L, Kostev K
Received 28 July 2016
Accepted for publication 4 October 2016
Published 23 November 2016 Volume 2016:10 Pages 2379—2385
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Akshita Wason
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Johnny Chen
Peyman Hadji,1 Louis Jacob,2 Karel Kostev3
1Department of Bone Oncology, Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Nordwest Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany; 2Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris, Paris, France; 3Epidemiology, IMS Health GmbH & Co. Ohg, Darmstädter Landstraße, Frankfurt, Germany
Aim: The purpose of this study was to analyze treatment compliance in osteoporotic patients treated with osteoporosis medications in Germany.
Methods: Patients included in the analysis had been diagnosed with osteoporosis with or without fractures and started anti-osteoporotic therapy (bisphosphonates, denosumab, or strontium ranelate) between 2011 and 2014 in a general (GP) or orthopedic practice (OP) setting in Germany. Data pertaining to 6,221 individuals followed in GP and 4,044 individuals followed in OP were analyzed retrospectively. The last follow-up was in December 2015. The main outcome measure was the compliance within the one-year period after the index prescription date. Compliance was measured indirectly and was based on the mean possession ratio (MPR). A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the association between MPR (dependent variable) and age, gender, type of practice, type of osteoporosis treatment, therapy frequency, and history of fracture (covariates).
Results: The mean age of the study group was 73.3 years, and 13.2% of subjects were men. Regarding type of practice, 60.6% of individuals were followed in GP and 39.4% in OP. Noncompliance was observed in 55.2% of the patients. Patients in the age group ≤60 years were at a higher risk of being noncompliant when compared to those in the age group of 61–70 years. Men and patients who received oral drugs were also more likely to be noncompliant than women and patients who received injectable or intravenous drugs. Finally, therapies that were given every three or six months were associated with a decrease in the risk of noncompliance when compared to weekly therapy, whereas daily and monthly treatments were associated with an increased risk.
Conclusion: Compliance is insufficient in osteoporotic patients treated with osteoporosis medications.
Keywords: osteoporosis treatment, compliance, fracture, real-world data, Germany
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]
Other articles by this author:
Changes in HbA1c, body weight, and systolic blood pressure in type 2 diabetes patients initiating dapagliflozin therapy: a primary care database study
Scheerer MF, Rist R, Proske O, Meng A, Kostev K
Published Date: 31 October 2016
Adherence to GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy administered by once-daily or once-weekly injection in patients with type 2 diabetes in Germany
Qiao Q, Ouwens MJNM, Grandy S, Johnsson K, Kostev K
Published Date: 28 June 2016
Fracture risk in patients with type 2 diabetes under different antidiabetic treatment regimens: a retrospective database analysis in primary care
Pscherer S, Kostev K, Dippel FW, Rathmann W
Published Date: 19 February 2016
Glycemic control after initiating basal insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a primary care database analysis
Kostev K, Dippel FW, Rathmann W
Published Date: 14 January 2015