Back to Journals » International Journal of Nanomedicine » Volume 20
Engineering Biomimetic Nanoplatforms for Acute Lung Injury: From Mechanistic Insights to Translational Opportunities
Authors Liu Y, Wang K, Gao F, Xu Z, Zhao X, Bai X, Li Z, Wan G, Yang J, Wang Y
Received 12 September 2025
Accepted for publication 14 November 2025
Published 27 November 2025 Volume 2025:20 Pages 14201—14218
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S567188
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Kamakhya Prakash Misra
Yukun Liu,1,* Kang Wang,1,* Fangli Gao,2 Zhikai Xu,3– 6 Xuan Zhao,3– 6 Xiangjun Bai,3– 6 Zhanfei Li,3– 6 Guoyun Wan,7 Jian Yang,8 Yuchang Wang3– 6
1Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, People’s Republic of China; 2College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, 4453007, People’s Republic of China; 3Division of Trauma Surgery, Emergency Surgery & Surgical Critical Care, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, People’s Republic of China; 4Sino-German Research Institute of Disaster Medicine, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, People’s Republic of China; 5Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, People’s Republic of China; 6Trauma Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, People’s Republic of China; 7School of Life Science and Technology, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, 4453007, People’s Republic of China; 8Emergency Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, 832008, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Jian Yang, Email [email protected] Yuchang Wang, Email [email protected]
Abstract: Acute lung injury (ALI) remains a critical clinical challenge characterized by uncontrolled inflammation, oxidative stress, and immune dysregulation, with limited therapeutic options and high mortality. In recent years, biomimetic nanoplatforms—including those derived from cell membranes, extracellular vesicles (EVs), and hybrid biological interfaces—have emerged as transformative tools for ALI management. Unlike conventional nanocarriers, these systems reproduce natural intercellular communication and immune evasion mechanisms, thereby achieving precise lung targeting, sustained therapeutic delivery, and coordinated regulation of inflammation and tissue repair.This review provides a comprehensive and mechanistic overview of biomimetic nanoplatforms in ALI therapy, with an emphasis on membrane-derived, EV-based, and hybrid nanosystems. We further introduce less-explored biomimetic strategies, including protein-, bacterial-, and virus-inspired nanoparticles, to expand the conceptual framework of biological mimicry in pulmonary nanomedicine. Beyond summarizing progress, we critically discuss key translational barriers—immunogenicity, model fidelity, and large-scale manufacturing—and propose integrative solutions leveraging artificial intelligence, organ-on-chip technologies, and precision medicine approaches.By offering a unified perspective on the design, function, and translational roadmap of biomimetic nanotherapeutics, this review highlights how the integration of biology-inspired engineering and pulmonary pathophysiology could pave the way toward personalized and clinically viable nanomedicine for ALI.
Keywords: acute lung injury, biomimetic nanoplatforms, acute respiratory distress syndrome, biomimetic membranes, EVs
Introduction
ALI and its more severe manifestation, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), are life-threatening clinical syndromes characterized by diffuse alveolar damage, excessive release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (“cytokine storm”), and severe disruption of the alveolar epithelial and vascular endothelial barriers.1–3 Despite continuous advancements in both clinical management and basic research, the mortality rate of ALI/ARDS remains alarmingly high, typically ranging from 30% to 50%, and no effective disease-specific therapies are currently available in clinical practice.4–6 The pathogenesis of ALI is highly complex, involving massive infiltration of neutrophils and monocytes, aberrant release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β, reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced oxidative stress, and multiple forms of regulated cell death including apoptosis, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis, all of which contribute to impaired pulmonary tissue repair.2,7,8 ALI can be triggered by a wide range of direct (eg, bacterial or viral pneumonia, inhalation injury) or indirect (eg, sepsis, severe trauma, pancreatitis) insults, further complicating therapeutic strategy development.7,9
Currently, the clinical management of ALI/ARDS primarily relies on supportive care, including mechanical ventilation and fluid management.10–12 Although pharmacological interventions such as corticosteroids, antioxidants, and immunomodulators have demonstrated partial benefits in certain patient populations, their limited targeting capability, poor bioavailability, and systemic side effects significantly restrict their overall efficacy.10,13 Moreover, conventional therapies generally fail to simultaneously address the multifaceted pathological events of ALI—including immune dysregulation, oxidative stress, and barrier dysfunction—which greatly hampers their clinical utility.5,14,15 Consequently, there is an urgent need to develop innovative therapeutic strategies with enhanced targeting capability, multimodal mechanisms of action, and favorable biocompatibility.16,17
In recent years, increasing preclinical evidence has highlighted the therapeutic potential of various biomimetic membranes—such as red blood cell membranes, macrophage membranes, platelet membranes, and their hybrid composites—due to their diverse targeting capacities and immune-modulatory properties.18–20 Although existing reviews have summarized therapeutic strategies for ALI/ARDS based on membrane-coated nanotechnology and extracellular vesicle-inspired systems,21 the field has witnessed rapid and substantial progress over the past two years, bringing forth novel concepts and design frameworks. In this review, we systematically summarize the latest advances in the application of biomimetic nanoplatforms for ALI therapy, with an emphasis on their design rationale, structural features, and multifaceted therapeutic mechanisms. Furthermore, we delve into the major translational challenges currently faced, including immunogenicity, safety, large-scale manufacturing, and regulatory hurdles, and offer perspectives on the future development of biomimetic nanoplatforms for precision pulmonary therapy. By establishing a comprehensive knowledge framework spanning from fundamental design to clinical translation, this review aims to provide valuable insights for researchers and facilitate the clinical advancement of this promising therapeutic paradigm.
Pathophysiological Mechanisms of ALI
ALI is fundamentally an acute inflammatory condition marked by the disruption of the alveolar epithelial and capillary endothelial barriers, involving a complex interplay of cellular components and signaling pathways.22,23 The pathological cascade is typically initiated by direct or indirect insults such as infection, trauma, inhalation injury, or sepsis, leading to excessive immune cell activation, uncontrolled inflammatory cytokine release, and elevated oxidative stress. These events culminate in increased alveolar-capillary permeability and respiratory dysfunction.24,25 Therefore, elucidating the core pathophysiological mechanisms of ALI is pivotal for developing highly targeted, low-toxicity therapeutic approaches and provides a robust theoretical foundation for the functional design of biomimetic nanotherapeutics.
In the early stages of ALI, the alveolar epithelial cells and pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells are among the first to be damaged.5,26 Continuous stimulation by pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1β, along with elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), leads to downregulation of intercellular junction proteins—including VE-cadherin, occludin, and ZO-1—accompanied by cytoskeletal rearrangement and the initiation of apoptotic pathways. These changes result in increased vascular permeability, alveolar edema, and reduced pulmonary compliance.27–29 The loss of barrier integrity is not only a hallmark of early ALI but also lays the foundation for the amplification and propagation of inflammatory cascades.30,31 (Figure 1) The cytokine storm represents a major driving force behind the progression of ALI.32,33 Under persistent infectious or injury-related stimuli, alveolar macrophages and neutrophils become massively activated, releasing large quantities of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β, as well as a range of chemokines that rapidly recruit and activate additional immune cells. This initiates a localized and systemic inflammatory amplification loop.34 The resultant “waterfall-like” cytokine storm exacerbates alveolar damage and may eventually lead to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS).35
|
Figure 1 The pathophysiology of ARDS involves complex interactions among inflammation, alveolar–capillary barrier disruption, oxidative stress, and impaired fluid clearance. In pulmonary ARDS, direct epithelial injury caused by pneumonia or aspiration activates alveolar epithelial cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells, leading to cytokine and chemokine release that recruits immune cells into the airspaces. Infiltrating neutrophils amplify inflammation through reactive oxygen species (ROS) and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), further damaging the epithelial–endothelial interface. Endothelial activation promotes coagulation and microthrombus formation, resulting in protein-rich edema and hypoxemia. In extrapulmonary ARDS, circulating inflammatory mediators primarily injure pulmonary endothelium, which secondarily induces epithelial dysfunction and alveolar flooding.29 Abbreviations: AFC, alveolar fluid clearance; AM, alveolar macrophage; AT I, alveolar type I cell; AT II, alveolar type II cell; DC, dendritic cell; IL-1β, interleukin-1β; IL-6, interleukin-6; IL-8, interleukin-8; NETs, neutrophil extracellular traps; PLT, platelet; RBC, red blood cell; ROS, reactive oxygen species; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α. |
Dysregulation of immune cell function also plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of ALI.36 Neutrophils are rapidly recruited to the alveolar space during the early inflammatory response, where they transmigrate across the endothelium and release proteolytic enzymes and ROS, contributing to tissue damage. Simultaneously, they induce alveolar macrophages to secrete anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10, demonstrating a dual role in inflammation promotion and immune regulation.37,38 However, under pathological conditions, immune responses frequently become imbalanced: macrophage polarization skews toward the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype, with a marked reduction in the anti-inflammatory and tissue-reparative M2 phenotype;39–41 neutrophils release excessive neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), aggravating alveolar structural injury;42 and on the adaptive immune front, regulatory T cell (Treg) function is impaired, failing to initiate effective tissue repair mechanisms.43 Amid this dysregulated immune environment, oxidative stress intensifies as ROS levels rise significantly within lung tissues. Major ROS sources include the NADPH oxidase system of activated neutrophils and dysfunctional mitochondria.44,45 High concentrations of ROS induce lipid peroxidation, mitochondrial membrane potential collapse, and DNA damage, which in turn trigger various forms of programmed cell death—including apoptosis,46 pyroptosis,47 ferroptosis,48 necroptosis, and PANoptosis—all of which collectively undermine pulmonary structural integrity and functional stability, necroptosis, and PANoptosis—all of which collectively undermine pulmonary structural integrity and functional stability.49,50
In summary, the pathological progression of ALI involves a complex and interwoven network of events—including barrier dysfunction, cytokine storm, immune dysregulation, and oxidative stress—each of which contributes to disease exacerbation. Given this multifactorial nature, nanotherapeutic systems integrating targeted recognition, multimodal intervention, and biomimetic functionality offer a promising avenue for precision ALI/ARDS therapy. Such platforms hold the potential to overcome the limitations of traditional treatments by simultaneously regulating multiple pathological pathways and promoting functional recovery of pulmonary tissues.
Classification of Biomimetic Nanoplatforms
In recent years, biomimetic nanoplatforms have emerged as promising therapeutic strategies for ALI, owing to their excellent biocompatibility, targeting capacity, and functional versatility. Based on their structural design and source of biofunctionality, these platforms can be broadly categorized into three major types: (i) cell membrane-coated nanoparticles, (ii) extracellular vesicle (EV)-mimetic nanocarriers, and (iii) artificial EV-inspired nanoplatforms.51 Besides membrane- and EV-based platforms, emerging protein-, bacterial-, and virus-inspired biomimetic nanoparticles expand the diversity of nanoplatforms and are expected to provide new opportunities for ALI therapy.52–54
Cell Membrane-Coated Nanoparticles
By cloaking synthetic nanocarriers with natural cell membranes, these nanoparticles inherit glycosylation patterns and membrane protein compositions from source cells, thereby acquiring immune evasion and active targeting capabilities. For instance, red blood cell (RBC) membranes are rich in the self-marker CD47, which significantly reduces mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) clearance and prolongs circulation time.51 RBC membrane camouflage has been shown to extend nanoparticle half-life from 15.8 to 39.6 hours in vivo, offering advantages for sustained pulmonary circulation and trans-barrier drug delivery.55 Macrophage membranes, enriched with inflammatory chemokine receptors such as TLR4, CCR2, and CXCR4, endow nanoparticles with innate inflammation-targeting properties, allowing for preferential accumulation at inflamed sites.56,57 Similarly, platelet membranes carry a repertoire of vascular injury- and thrombosis-associated proteins, facilitating adhesion to damaged endothelium and thrombi. Coating nanoparticles with such membranes enables the construction of inflammation-targeted drug delivery systems or cytokine-neutralizing platforms, thereby enhancing disease-site specificity.58,59 Furthermore, hybrid membrane strategies—formed by fusing two or more types of cell membranes via techniques such as serial extrusion—can integrate complementary functions. For example, combining RBC and macrophage membranes, or mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) and T cell membranes, can simultaneously confer prolonged circulation, immune evasion, and inflammation tropism.19,60,61 Compared with single-source membranes, hybrid membranes exhibit a richer protein composition (eg, co-presence of CD47 and other self-recognition molecules), offering superior performance in immune escape, prolonged retention, and homotypic targeting.19,62
Extracellular Vesicle-Mimetic or Artificial EV-Based Nanocarriers
Capitalizing on the natural delivery and signaling functions of extracellular EVs, researchers have developed EV-based nanoplatforms with excellent biocompatibility and therapeutic potential in immune-compromised environments.63,64 Two main strategies are employed: isolation of native EVs and construction of artificial EV mimetics.65
Native EVs are structurally stable, exhibit strong tissue tropism, and are well-suited for navigating the complex immunological landscape of lung tissue. Among them, mesenchymal stem cell-derived EVs (MSC-EVs) are particularly promising, as they are rich in anti-inflammatory and tissue-regenerative factors.66 Their low immunogenicity and high pulmonary permeability also make them ideal candidates for intravenous administration.67 Additionally, immune cell-derived EVs (eg, from macrophages or T cells) possess potent immunomodulatory functions and can deliver anti-inflammatory microRNAs or activate specific signaling pathways within inflamed tissues.68–70 To address the limitations of native EVs—such as low yield and compositional heterogeneity—artificial biomimetic EV systems have been developed. These include EV-like vesicles generated by co-extrusion of liposomes with cellular contents or the use of polymeric nanocapsules that mimic EV structures while allowing precise control over size, charge, and surface functionalities.71 Such artificial systems not only improve batch-to-batch consistency and production scalability but also enhance pharmacokinetic profiles while retaining EV-like biofunctions.71
Preclinical Studies of Biomimetic Nanoplatforms in ALI Models
Biomimetic nanoplatforms have demonstrated considerable therapeutic potential in preclinical models of ALI. By harnessing the natural functionalities of cell membranes, these platforms offer a multifaceted therapeutic approach, including inflammation targeting, immune modulation, antioxidation, and anticoagulation.72,73 In the following sections, we systematically summarize recent preclinical advances in ALI animal models, categorized by the cellular source of membrane materials (Figure 2).
|
Figure 2 Therapeutic Potential of Engineering Biomimetic Nanoplatforms in the Treatment of Acute Lung Injury (ALI). |
RBC Membrane-Coated NPs
Due to their exceptional biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, and prolonged circulation half-life, red blood cell (RBC) membranes have been widely utilized in drug delivery systems.74,75 When applied to ALI therapy, RBC membrane coatings enhance nanoparticle stability in circulation and promote pulmonary retention. Liu et al developed a RBC membrane-coated PLGA nanoparticle (γ3-RBCNPs), functionalized with a γ3 peptide targeting intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), which is highly upregulated at sites of infection. The core was loaded with ciprofloxacin to eliminate Klebsiella pneumoniae. The RBC membrane not only endowed the particles with immune evasion and extended blood circulation time but also enhanced targeting to inflamed endothelium—such as TNF-α-activated HUVECs—and inflamed lung tissues in septic mice, demonstrating potent anti-infective efficacy and improved pulmonary accumulation.76
Macrophage Membrane-Coated Platforms
Macrophage membranes inherently recognize and bind pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and can neutralize pro-inflammatory mediators, thereby halting downstream inflammatory cascades.56,57 Leveraging these properties, macrophage membrane-coated nanoparticles have been extensively explored as “inflammation sponges” for ALI treatment.
Zhao et al engineered mesoporous polydopamine nanoparticles coated with macrophage membranes (MM@mPDA-PM NPs), loaded with the anti-inflammatory alkaloid peimine. This platform demonstrated precise targeting of inflamed lung regions, potent antioxidant properties, and robust anti-inflammatory effects both in vitro and in vivo. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that the system downregulated key inflammatory mediators—including myeloperoxidase (MPO), neutrophil elastase (NE), and peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PAD4)—thus inhibiting neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation. Additionally, the nanoparticles suppressed NF-κB and JAK/STAT signaling and promoted M2 macrophage polarization, effectively restoring immune homeostasis and mitigating ALI-associated inflammation77 (Figure 3).
|
Figure 3 Schematic illustration for the preparation of MM@mPDA-PM NPs and the therapeutic mechanism against. (A) The preparation of MM@mPDA-PM NPs. (B) The therapeutic mechanism of MM@mPDA-PM NPs.77 |
To address the persistently elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cytokines in ALI, Liang et al developed a polymeric biomimetic system (mem HMP) with both ROS-scavenging and cytokine-neutralizing capabilities. The platform was constructed via copolymerization of alkene-modified hyaluronic acid with a ROS-responsive hyperbranched poly(amino ketal) (HBPAK), and coated with membranes derived from M1-polarized macrophages via electrostatic adsorption. The resulting nanocarriers exhibited strong anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity in vitro and in vivo. Upon pulmonary administration, mem HMP significantly reduced neutrophil infiltration, oxidative stress, and lung tissue damage in LPS-induced ALI models.78
In another study, Zhao Yue et al developed a PLGA-based nanoparticle cloaked with neutrophil membranes (Neutrophil-NP-TLR4) to deliver siRNA targeting Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). This system effectively silenced TLR4 in macrophages and inflammatory cells within the inflamed lung microenvironment, downregulated key inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1β, and inhibited critical signaling molecules including TRAF6, XIAP, and NF-κB. Moreover, the platform restored expression of aquaporins AQP1 and AQP5, alleviating LPS-induced pulmonary injury.79 Collectively, macrophage membrane-based platforms leverage their innate inflammation-recognition capabilities, coupled with intelligent nanocarrier design, to achieve multi-target regulation and precise intervention in ALI.
Neutrophil-Mimicking Nanocarriers
Neutrophil membranes possess intrinsic inflammation-homing properties, enabling autonomous migration toward inflamed tissues. This makes them ideal candidates for early intervention in ALI [77,78]. Various neutrophil membrane-cloaked nanocarriers have been developed, showing great potential in inflammation-targeted drug delivery, immune regulation, and tissue protection.80–82
Small interfering RNA (siRNA) holds therapeutic promise in ALI by silencing pro-inflammatory genes. However, its clinical application is hindered by poor in vivo stability and a lack of targeted delivery. To overcome this, researchers engineered neutrophil membrane-coated PLGA nanoparticles (Neutrophil-NP-TLR4) for pulmonary delivery of TLR4-targeted siRNA. This platform exhibited excellent lung-targeting capacity, significantly suppressed TNF-α and IL-1β expression, inhibited key TLR4 pathway mediators (TRAF6, XIAP, and NF-κB), and restored AQP1/5 expression. As a result, it markedly alleviated LPS-induced lung damage. Notably, the system demonstrated favorable biocompatibility and pulmonary specificity, without inducing notable toxicity, highlighting its potential for clinical translation of siRNA therapeutics in ALI.83
Beyond nucleic acid delivery, neutrophil-mimicking platforms also show promise in protein drug delivery. Given the excessive activation and infiltration of neutrophils during ALI pathogenesis, Huang et al developed a neutrophil membrane-coated liposomal system (aFGF@NMLs) to deliver acidic fibroblast growth factor (aFGF) for sepsis-induced ALI. Neutrophil membranes provided injury-homing capability, enhancing pulmonary accumulation. In vitro, aFGF@NMLs demonstrated superior pro-inflammatory cytokine binding, enhanced cellular uptake, antioxidative, and anti-inflammatory effects. In vivo, the system reduced cytokine levels, mitigated alveolar epithelial apoptosis, and improved lung function and histopathology, validating its therapeutic efficacy84 (Figure 4).
|
Figure 4 Targeted therapy of neutrophil membrane-coated liposome loaded acidic fibroblast growth factor (aFGF@NMLs) for treating sepsis-induced ALI.84 |
To address the challenges of glucocorticoid delivery in respiratory diseases, Yang et al designed a neutrophil membrane-functionalized metal-organic framework (MOF) system (UiO66-Dex@NMP) for inhalation-based delivery of dexamethasone (Dex). The UiO66 MOF afforded high drug-loading capacity, while neutrophil membrane functionalization enhanced mucus penetration and inflammation-targeting. The platform exhibited sustained drug release in vitro, traversed mucus barriers effectively, and achieved lung-specific accumulation in vivo. It significantly alleviated LPS-induced inflammation and tissue damage, overcoming limitations of traditional Dex inhalation therapies such as low deposition and short duration of action.85 Owing to their superior inflammation-recognition and homing capabilities, neutrophil-mimicking nanocarriers offer a versatile and effective strategy for delivering diverse bioactive agents in ALI.
Biomimetic Platelet Membrane-Coated Nanoparticles
Platelet membranes possess intrinsic inflammation-homing capabilities, enabling specific recognition of endothelial injury and binding to inflammatory and coagulation factors.58,59 Among various biomimetic platforms, platelet membranes have garnered significant attention in the field of targeted drug delivery for ALI due to their unique biological functions.
To enhance the stability and targeting efficiency of tea polyphenols (TP), a natural anti-inflammatory compound, in ALI treatment, Hua Jin et al developed platelet membrane-coated TP nanoparticles (PM@TP-NPs). These were fabricated using an emulsion-solvent evaporation method to encapsulate TP, followed by coating with platelet membranes to confer excellent biocompatibility and inflammation-targeting ability. In an LPS-induced ALI mouse model, PM@TP-NPs significantly reduced macrophage and neutrophil infiltration, suppressed NLRP3 inflammasome activation, and inhibited the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This effectively alleviated pulmonary vascular hyperpermeability and tissue damage. Targeting assays demonstrated that the nanoparticles selectively accumulated in inflamed lung tissue, particularly within vascular endothelial cells, with minimal retention in healthy lungs, indicating a strong inflammation-responsive targeting capacity and promising potential for pulmonary anti-inflammatory therapy.86
Building on this platform, Hua Jin’s team further designed a dual-drug delivery system (PM@Cur-RV NPs) encapsulating both curcumin and resveratrol for synergistic treatment of ALI. Administered via pulmonary inhalation, the system exhibited excellent lung accumulation and biocompatibility. Animal studies revealed that PM@Cur-RV NPs significantly reduced vascular leakage and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels, alleviating histopathological damage. Mechanistically, the platform promoted macrophage polarization toward the M2 phenotype and inhibited key epigenetic processes such as histone lactylation, thereby exerting anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects at both cellular and molecular levels.87
Considering that corticosteroids, while potent anti-inflammatory agents, can lead to serious adverse effects with repeated or high-dose use, Peihong Lin et al developed a platelet membrane-coated liposomal system (PM-LPs@Dex) for targeted delivery of dexamethasone in ALI therapy. Combining the high drug-loading capacity of liposomes with the inflammation-homing ability of platelet membranes, this system offered improved stability and sustained release properties. It demonstrated enhanced uptake by inflammation-associated cells and significantly prolonged circulation time. In ALI animal models, PM-LPs@Dex effectively mitigated pulmonary tissue damage, reduced pulmonary edema and inflammatory cell infiltration, and suppressed pro-inflammatory cytokine expression, showcasing excellent therapeutic potential.88
Additionally, Yue Zhao et al engineered a platelet membrane-coated biomimetic nanoparticle system (PM@ASIV-NPs) for targeted delivery of astragaloside IV (ASIV) to inflamed lung tissue. Through the integration of network pharmacology and molecular docking, the system demonstrated favorable lung-targeting and biocompatibility. In ALI models, PM@ASIV-NPs effectively reduced inflammatory cytokine expression, scavenged reactive oxygen species (ROS), and promoted the release of anti-inflammatory mediators, ultimately improving pulmonary inflammation and survival outcomes.89
In summary, platelet membrane-based biomimetic platforms play a pivotal role in targeted pulmonary delivery of anti-inflammatory agents. Their superior inflammation-homing capacity, endothelial affinity, and ability to modulate the immune-coagulation axis render them particularly valuable in treating ALI and ARDS, warranting further development.
Hybrid Membrane-Coated Nanocarriers
Hybrid membrane-coated nanocarriers combine the functional advantages of two or more different cell membrane sources to achieve “functional complementation.” This strategy not only enhances targeted delivery efficiency but also broadens adaptability to complex pathological environments, such as concurrent multi-source inflammation, bacterial infection, and pulmonary barrier dysfunction commonly seen in ALI.60,61
Zhengyu Lin et al developed a hybrid membrane-coated nanoparticle platform composed of neutrophil and alveolar epithelial cell membranes for targeted delivery of rifampicin to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-induced ALI and bacteremia. The resulting dual-membrane nanoparticles, with an average diameter of ~191 nm and a surface potential of –2.7 mV, integrated the bio-recognition features of both source cells, enabling enhanced bacterial binding and epithelial cell uptake. Compared to single-membrane nanoparticles, the hybrid system demonstrated nearly a twofold increase in pulmonary targeting efficiency and effectively eradicated planktonic, biofilm, and intracellular MRSA. It significantly reduced bacterial burden, inflammatory cytokine levels, and histopathological damage, highlighting its therapeutic potential for complex infectious ALI.90
Mesenchymal Stem Cell Membrane-Based Platforms
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and their derived membranes are rich in anti-inflammatory mediators, antioxidant enzymes, and regenerative signaling molecules. They can modulate multiple pathological processes in ALI, including inflammatory cascades, apoptosis, oxidative stress, and tissue repair.91,92 MSC membrane-derived biomimetic platforms preserve the immunomodulatory functions of MSCs while circumventing the immunogenicity and safety risks associated with live-cell therapies.93,94
Hua Jin et.al developed a stem cell membrane-coated nanoplatform (CM@Nar-NPs) for the delivery of naringin in ALI treatment. This system exhibited excellent dispersibility and biocompatibility, with the ability to actively target inflammation-activated macrophages, efficiently scavenge ROS in lung tissues, and significantly reduce inflammatory cytokine expression, thereby improving histopathological outcomes and survival in ALI mouse models. Mechanistically, CM@Nar-NPs promoted macrophage polarization toward the M2 phenotype, exerting sustained anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory effects. These findings underscore the promise of MSC-mimetic nanocarriers in managing ALI and sepsis-associated pulmonary injury95 (Figure 5).
|
Figure 5 Schematic illustration of the preparation and therapeutic mechanism of CM@Nar-NPs for ALI treatment.(A) Mesenchymal stem cell membranes (CM) were extracted from healthy mouse bone marrow.(B) Nar-loaded PLGA nanoparticles (Nar-NPs) were prepared via an emulsification–evaporation method and coated with CM by membrane extrusion to form CM@Nar-NPs.(C) After intratracheal administration, CM@Nar-NPs target inflamed lungs, suppress ROS production and cytokine release, and promote macrophage polarization toward the M2 phenotype, thereby alleviating inflammation. (↑ and ↓ indicate increase and decrease, respectively).95 |
Extracellular Vesicle–Based Biomimetic Nanoplatforms
EVs are nano-sized lipid bilayer vesicles naturally secreted by cells and play essential roles in intercellular communication and regulation.96 Owing to their native membrane structures, excellent biocompatibility, and functional protein expression, engineered EVs have emerged as an innovative therapeutic strategy for inflammatory diseases, including ALI.97 Inspired by the natural homing ability of platelets, Qingle Ma et al developed platelet-derived EVs (PEVs) for targeted delivery of the anti-inflammatory small molecule TPCA-1 in pneumonia-associated ALI. Leveraging platelets’ inherent affinity for inflamed endothelium, the PEVs precisely accumulated in inflamed pulmonary tissues, significantly suppressed neutrophil infiltration and cytokine storm, mitigated lung injury, and ultimately improved survival outcomes in vivo.98
In parallel, engineered EVs have also been explored for the delivery of therapeutic nucleic acids and gene-editing tools. Although CRISPR/Cas9 systems based on EVs have shown effective DNA editing, strategies for acute inflammation targeting via RNA editing remain limited. To address this, Tianwen Li et al developed a functional EV platform to deliver CasRx (Cas13d) along with optimized guide RNAs (gRNAs) for short-lived, RNA-level knockdown of pro-inflammatory mediators. By tandem expression of CasRx and multiplexed gRNAs, the system effectively inhibited macrophage activation and suppressed key cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6. In LPS-induced ALI and sepsis models, this platform markedly attenuated tissue inflammation, improved multi-organ function, and enhanced survival, highlighting the transformative potential of RNA-editing EVs in acute inflammatory therapy99 (Figure 6).
|
Figure 6 Schematic illustration of engineered EVs delivering a CRISPR/CasRx RNA-editing system. Engineered EVs encapsulate the CasRx/gRNA complex to specifically degrade TNF, IL-1β, and IL-6 mRNAs, thereby suppressing LPS-induced cytokine storms and alleviating acute inflammatory responses in mice.99 |
Other Biomimetic Membranes
Beyond commonly used sources such as red blood cell and macrophage membranes, researchers have increasingly explored alternative membrane types—such as apoptotic cell membranes, alveolar epithelial cell membranes, and pulmonary endothelial cell membranes—to construct biomimetic nanocarriers with enhanced targeting and therapeutic capacity for inflammatory lung diseases like ALI.
Apoptotic cell membranes present “eat-me” signals, such as exposed phosphatidylserine, which are specifically recognized by phagocytes and can promote immune cell uptake [97]. This innate recognition pathway offers a promising mechanism for inflammation-site targeting. Based on this, researchers designed a zirconium-based metal-organic framework (UiO-66) coated with apoptotic cell membranes (ACM@U) for the delivery of fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21), aimed at rebalancing macrophage-mediated immunity in ALI. By mimicking apoptotic exocytosis signals, ACM@U facilitated targeted interaction and uptake by lung-resident macrophages, leading to local enrichment of FGF21. In vivo studies showed significant suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (eg, TNF-α, IL-6) and promotion of M2-type macrophage polarization, thereby alleviating pulmonary inflammation and injury. This strategy not only enhanced the bioavailability of FGF21 but also established a paradigm for membrane-assisted immune reprogramming100 (Figure 7).
|
Figure 7 Schematic illustration of ACM@U-FGF21 for treating LPS-induced ALI.(A) Apoptotic lung cell membranes carrying “eat me” signals were coated onto FGF21-loaded UiO-66 nanoparticles.(B) ACM@U-FGF21 accumulates in inflamed lung tissue via homologous targeting and monocyte recruitment.(C) The nanoplatform alleviates inflammation by suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion and modulating macrophage polarization.100 |
MicroRNA-155 (miR-155) is a well-recognized pro-inflammatory regulator in ALI, primarily by inhibiting suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1) and exacerbating cytokine expression.101 To efficiently suppress miR-155, Chuanyu Zhuang et al developed biomimetic cell membrane-derived nanovesicles (CMNVs) from murine alveolar epithelial cells to deliver cholesterol-conjugated antisense oligonucleotides (AMO155c). These nanocarriers preserved cell-type specificity and demonstrated superior stability (~120 nm) and targeting capacity compared to conventional carriers like PEI25k or natural exosomes. In animal models, AMO155c/CMNV significantly downregulated miR-155, restored SOCS1 expression, and reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine release, indicating excellent anti-inflammatory activity and pulmonary targeting, and highlighting the potential of biomimetic nanocarriers for oligonucleotide delivery.102
Poor water solubility has limited the clinical application of berberine.103 To overcome this, Chengkang Jin constructed diselenide-crosslinked berberine nanomicelles coated with alveolar epithelial cell membranes (MM-NPs). Exploiting the tissue affinity of lung-derived membranes, the platform actively targeted damaged pulmonary tissues. In ROS-rich microenvironments, diselenide bonds are cleaved to trigger berberine release, enabling inflammation-specific therapy. In vitro and in vivo experiments confirmed the system’s biocompatibility and ROS-responsiveness, effectively suppressing cytokine expression and reducing tissue injury without observable toxicity, offering a novel strategy to enhance the therapeutic potential of natural compounds for ALI.104 Fang Wang et al further developed polyester-based nanoparticles coated with pulmonary endothelial cell membranes (endothelial membrane-coated particles, EM-Ps), which retained critical adhesion molecules (eg, ICAM-1, VCAM-1). These molecules allowed EM-Ps to bind to circulating neutrophils and monocytes. Under inflammatory conditions, EM-Ps leveraged leukocyte migration to achieve “hitchhiking transport” to inflamed lung tissues. In ALI models, this strategy facilitated precise accumulation in injured regions and significantly reduced local inflammation. This work expands the scope of membrane-biomimetic nanomedicine and offers a new concept for leukocyte-assisted drug delivery.105 In summary, diverse cell membrane-derived biomimetic strategies have demonstrated substantial versatility and mechanistic specificity in ALI therapy. Whether through apoptotic mimicry to facilitate phagocytic uptake, organotropic targeting based on tissue origin, or indirect delivery via immune cell migration, these platforms offer powerful tools for precision pulmonary therapy and hold significant promise for translational advancement.
In summary, diverse cell membrane-derived biomimetic strategies have demonstrated substantial versatility and mechanistic specificity in ALI therapy. However, although many platforms have shown targeted regulation of inflammation, oxidative stress, and immune signaling (Section 4), most studies remain focused on in vitro/in vivo phenotypic outcomes, with limited systematic molecular mechanism validation. Future work should integrate disease models with mechanistic readouts to strengthen the direct correspondence between material design and ALI pathogenesis.
Challenges and Future Perspectives
Biomimetic nanoplatforms offer distinct advantages for ALI therapy, including high biocompatibility, immune evasion, lesion-specific targeting, and the ability to integrate multiple therapeutic modalities such as anti-inflammatory, antioxidative, and regenerative functions. Compared with conventional nanocarriers, their natural surface composition enables improved pharmacokinetics and reduced off-target toxicity, which are particularly advantageous in the delicate pulmonary microenvironment.106,107 Despite the remarkable therapeutic potential and multifunctionality of biomimetic nanoplatforms in the treatment of ALI, their clinical translation faces considerable hurdles. A comprehensive strategy is urgently needed to address challenges related to immunological safety, model fidelity, scalable manufacturing, and technological integration.
First, immunogenicity and long-term biosafety remain central concerns limiting their broader application. Although membrane-camouflaged nanoparticles and exosome-based carriers exhibit inherent biocompatibility, issues such as membrane source heterogeneity, residual immunostimulatory components, and the physicochemical properties of the nanomaterials themselves may still provoke immune activation or tolerance responses in vivo.19,108 Most current studies are limited to short-term safety evaluations, lacking systematic investigations into chronic toxicity, metabolic accumulation, and long-term biodistribution. Therefore, comprehensive toxicological assessments and pharmacokinetic studies are imperative prerequisites for clinical advancement.
Second, significant discrepancies in immune context, pathological progression, and response mechanisms between animal models and human ALI hinder translational efficacy. Rodent models, which dominate preclinical studies, fail to fully replicate the complex microenvironment of human pulmonary injury, often resulting in poor reproducibility in clinical settings. It is thus critical to develop more human-relevant platforms, such as lung organ-on-chip systems and immune-reconstituted large animal models, to enhance the predictive accuracy and translational value of early-stage studies.
From a manufacturing perspective, the extraction and assembly of natural biomaterials—such as cell membranes and exosomes—remain technically demanding and poorly standardized. These processes are highly sensitive to the state of source cells and environmental variables, posing major challenges to large-scale production and batch-to-batch consistency. Accordingly, the development of efficient, controllable purification and assembly techniques, along with the establishment of GMP-compliant quality control systems, will be pivotal in driving the industrial translation of biomimetic nanoplatforms.
Moreover, interdisciplinary integration offers promising opportunities for the intelligent design of next-generation nanotherapeutics. Artificial intelligence-assisted structural optimization and high-throughput screening can rapidly identify optimal design parameters from large datasets. Lung-on-chip platforms can mimic the local pulmonary microenvironment, enabling in vitro drug efficacy and toxicity profiling, thereby improving preclinical throughput and reliability.
As precision medicine continues to evolve, personalized nanotherapeutics are expected to play an increasingly vital role in managing ALI and related inflammatory lung disorders. By incorporating patient-specific genomic, transcriptomic, and immunoprofiling data, personalized biomimetic nanosystems can be designed with targeted responsiveness and therapeutic synergy, allowing for precise modulation of inflammation and enhanced tissue repair. Such approaches hold great promise in improving therapeutic outcomes while minimizing adverse effects, paving the way for safer and more effective clinical interventions.
Collectively, while biomimetic nanoplatforms possess unparalleled potential in achieving precise and multifactorial intervention for ALI, their complexity in source materials, fabrication, and quality control still poses obstacles to large-scale application. Future work should therefore strive to balance their biological advantages with practical considerations of safety, reproducibility, and manufacturability to accelerate clinical translation.
Conclusion
Biomimetic nanoplatforms represent a promising frontier in the treatment of ALI, offering exceptional biocompatibility, multifunctional integration, and targeted delivery capabilities. By emulating natural cell membranes, these platforms enable multi-target modulation of inflammation, immune responses, and oxidative stress, thereby enhancing the specificity and safety of drug delivery.
Their programmable architecture and integration of diverse mechanisms provide flexible therapeutic strategies. With the continued advancement of materials science and biomedical engineering, biomimetic nanoplatforms are poised to become powerful tools for the management of ALI and other complex pulmonary diseases. However, most studies remain at the proof-of-concept stage, and critical barriers—including immunological safety, production scalability, and model relevance—must be overcome to achieve clinical translation.
Looking ahead, interdisciplinary collaboration, technological innovation, and patient-tailored design will be essential in accelerating the clinical application of biomimetic nanomedicine, ultimately delivering more effective and safer therapeutic options for patients suffering from ALI.
Data Sharing Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Consent Statement
No individual personal data is included in the study.
Funding
This study was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China(No. 82002101, 82002096), Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (No. 2023AFB825) and Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (No. 2023A15).
Disclosure
The authors declare that the research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1. Long ME, Mallampalli RK, Horowitz JC. Pathogenesis of pneumonia and acute lung injury. Clin Sci. 2022;136(10):747–769. doi:10.1042/CS20210879
2. Bos LDJ, Ware LB. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: causes, pathophysiology, and phenotypes. Lancet. 2022;400(10358):1145–1156. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01485-4
3. Pathogenesis KS. Imaging, and evolution of acute lung injury. Radiol Clin North Am. 2022;60(6):925–939. doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2022.06.005
4. Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, et al. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA. 2016;315(8):788–800. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0291
5. Mokra D. Acute lung injury - from pathophysiology to treatment. Physiol Res. 2020;69(Suppl 3):S353–S66. doi:10.33549/physiolres.934602
6. Zhang J, Guo Y, Mak M, Tao Z. Translational medicine for acute lung injury. J Transl Med. 2024;22(1):25. doi:10.1186/s12967-023-04828-7
7. Verma N, Hochhegger B, Mukhopadhyay S, ESTPP T, Mohammed TL. Acute lung injury. J Thorac Imaging. 2025;40(3). doi:10.1097/RTI.0000000000000820
8. Wick KD, Ware LB, Matthay MA. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. BMJ. 2024;
9. Murray DD, Itenov TS, Sivapalan P, et al. Biomarkers of acute lung injury the individualized approach: for phenotyping, risk stratification and treatment surveillance. J Clin Med. 2019;8(8):1163. doi:10.3390/jcm8081163
10. Grotberg JC, Reynolds D, Kraft BD. Management of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: a primer. Crit Care. 2023;27(1):289. doi:10.1186/s13054-023-04572-w
11. Williams GW, Berg NK, Reskallah A, Yuan X, Eltzschig HK. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology. 2021;134(2):270–282. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000003571
12. Guo L, Wang W, Zhao N, et al. Mechanical ventilation strategies for intensive care unit patients without acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):226. doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1396-0
13. Jain R, DalNogare A. Pharmacological therapy for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81(2):205–212. doi:10.4065/81.2.205
14. Butt Y, Kurdowska A, Allen TC. Acute lung injury: a clinical and molecular review. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016;140(4):345–350. doi:10.5858/arpa.2015-0519-RA
15. Sadikot RT, Kolanjiyil AV, Kleinstreuer C, Rubinstein I. Nanomedicine for treatment of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Biomed Hub. 2017;2(2):1–12. doi:10.1159/000477086
16. Beitler JR, Thompson BT, Baron RM, et al. Advancing precision medicine for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med. 2022;10(1):107–120. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00157-0
17. Bian S, Cai H, Cui Y, Liu W, Xiao C. Nanomedicine-based therapeutics to combat acute lung injury. Int J Nanomed. 2021;16:2247–2269. doi:10.2147/IJN.S300594
18. Kong H, Yi K, Zheng C, et al. Membrane-fusogenic biomimetic particles: a new bioengineering tool learned from nature. J Mater Chem B. 2022;10(36):6841–6858. doi:10.1039/D2TB00632D
19. Liao Y, Zhang Y, Blum NT, Lin J, Huang P. Biomimetic hybrid membrane-based nanoplatforms: synthesis, properties and biomedical applications. Nanoscale Horiz. 2020;5(9):1293–1302. doi:10.1039/D0NH00267D
20. Mohammad-Rafiei F, Khojini JY, Ghazvinian F, et al. Cell membrane biomimetic nanoparticles in drug delivery. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2023;70(6):1843–1859. doi:10.1002/bab.2487
21. Gao R, Lin P, Fang Z, et al. Cell-derived biomimetic nanoparticles for the targeted therapy of ALI/ARDS. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2024;14(6):1432–1457. doi:10.1007/s13346-023-01494-6
22. Meyer NJ, Gattinoni L, Calfee CS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet. 2021;398(10300):622–637. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00439-6
23. Huppert LA, Matthay MA, Ware LB. Pathogenesis of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;40(1):31–39. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1683996
24. Qiao X, Yin J, Zheng Z, Li L, Feng X. Endothelial cell dynamics in sepsis-induced acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: pathogenesis and therapeutic implications. Cell Commun Signal. 2024;22(1):241. doi:10.1186/s12964-024-01620-y
25. Patel VJ, Biswas Roy S, Mehta HJ, Joo M, Sadikot RT. Alternative and natural therapies for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:2476824. doi:10.1155/2018/2476824
26. Borek I, Birnhuber A, Voelkel NF, Marsh LM, Kwapiszewska G. The vascular perspective on acute and chronic lung disease. J Clin Invest. 2023;133(16). doi:10.1172/JCI170502
27. Fanelli V, Ranieri VM. Mechanisms and clinical consequences of acute lung injury. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12(Suppl 1):S3–8. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201407-340MG
28. Matthay MA, Folkesson HG, Campagna A, Kheradmand F. Alveolar epithelial barrier and acute lung injury. New Horiz. 1993;1(4):613–622.
29. Huang Q, Le Y, Li S, Bian Y. Signaling pathways and potential therapeutic targets in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Respir Res. 2024;25(1):30. doi:10.1186/s12931-024-02678-5
30. Yanagi S, Tsubouchi H, Miura A, Matsumoto N, Nakazato M. Breakdown of epithelial barrier integrity and overdrive activation of alveolar epithelial cells in the pathogenesis of acute respiratory distress syndrome and lung fibrosis. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:573210. doi:10.1155/2015/573210
31. Bhattacharya J, Matthay MA. Regulation and repair of the alveolar-capillary barrier in acute lung injury. Annu Rev Physiol. 2013;75:593–615. doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183756
32. Lin S, Wu H, Wang C, Xiao Z, Xu F. Regulatory T cells and acute lung injury: cytokines, uncontrolled inflammation, and therapeutic implications. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1545. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.01545
33. Deng JC, Standiford TJ. Growth factors and cytokines in acute lung injury. Compr Physiol. 2011;1(1):81–104. doi:10.1002/j.2040-4603.2011.tb00315.x
34. Ware LB. Pathophysiology of acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;27(4):337–349. doi:10.1055/s-2006-948288
35. Zhu W, Zhang Y, Wang Y. Immunotherapy strategies and prospects for acute lung injury: focus on immune cells and cytokines. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:1103309. doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.1103309
36. Guo K, Ma S. The immune system in transfusion-related acute lung injury prevention and therapy: update and perspective. Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8:639976. doi:10.3389/fmolb.2021.639976
37. Zhou X, Dai Q, Huang X. Neutrophils in acute lung injury. Front Biosci. 2012;17(6):2278–2283.
38. Ning L, Shishi Z, Bo W, Huiqing L. Targeting immunometabolism against acute lung injury. Clin Immunol. 2023;249:109289.
39. Wang Z, Wang Z. The role of macrophages polarization in sepsis-induced acute lung injury. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1209438. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1209438
40. Cheng P, Li S, Chen H. Macrophages in lung injury, repair, and fibrosis. Cells. 2021;10(2).
41. Chen X, Tang J, Shuai W, Meng J, Feng J, Han Z. Macrophage polarization and its role in the pathogenesis of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Inflamm Res. 2020;69(9):883–895. doi:10.1007/s00011-020-01378-2
42. Scozzi D, Liao F, Krupnick AS, Kreisel D, Gelman AE. The role of neutrophil extracellular traps in acute lung injury. Front Immunol. 2022;13:953195.
43. Guan T, Zhou X, Zhou W, Lin H. Regulatory T cell and macrophage crosstalk in acute lung injury: future perspectives. Cell Death Discov. 2023;9(1):9.
44. Sarma JV, Ward PA. Oxidants and redox signaling in acute lung injury. Compr Physiol. 2011;1(3):1365–1381. doi:10.1002/j.2040-4603.2011.tb00369.x
45. Zheng D, Liu J, Piao H, Zhu Z, Wei R, Liu K. ROS-triggered endothelial cell death mechanisms: focus on pyroptosis, parthanatos, and ferroptosis. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1039241.
46. Chopra M, Reuben JS, Sharma AC. Acute lung injury:apoptosis and signaling mechanisms. Exp Biol Med. 2009;234(4):361–371. doi:10.3181/0811-MR-318
47. Liu B, He R, Zhang L, et al. Inflammatory caspases drive pyroptosis in acute lung injury. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:631256.
48. Feng Y, Li M, Yangzhong X, et al. Pyroptosis in inflammation-related respiratory disease. J Physiol Biochem. 2022;78(4):721–737. doi:10.1007/s13105-022-00909-1
49. Qi X, Luo Y, Xiao M, et al. Mechanisms of alveolar type 2 epithelial cell death during acute lung injury. Stem Cells. 2023;41(12):1113–1132. doi:10.1093/stmcls/sxad074
50. Xiao J, Wang L, Zhang B, Hou A. Cell death in acute lung injury: caspase-regulated apoptosis, pyroptosis, necroptosis, and PANoptosis. Front Pharmacol. 2025;16:1559659. doi:10.3389/fphar.2025.1559659
51. Luk BT, Zhang L. Cell membrane-camouflaged nanoparticles for drug delivery. J Control Release. 2015;220(Pt B):600–607. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.07.019
52. Hong S, Choi DW, Kim HN, Park CG, Lee W, Park HH. Protein-based nanoparticles as drug delivery systems. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(7):604. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12070604
53. Jiang Y, Zhou Z, Liu C, Wang L, Li C. Bacterial outer membrane vesicles as drug delivery carrier for photodynamic anticancer therapy. Front Chem. 2023;11:1284292. doi:10.3389/fchem.2023.1284292
54. Mejia-Mendez JL, Vazquez-Duhalt R, Hernandez LR, Sanchez-Arreola E, Bach H. Virus-like particles: fundamentals and biomedical applications. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(15):8579. doi:10.3390/ijms23158579
55. Hu CM, Zhang L, Aryal S, Cheung C, Fang RH, Zhang L. Erythrocyte membrane-camouflaged polymeric nanoparticles as a biomimetic delivery platform. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(27):10980–10985. doi:10.1073/pnas.1106634108
56. Wang C, Li C, Zhang R, Huang L. Macrophage membrane-coated nanoparticles for the treatment of infectious diseases. Biomed Mater. 2024;19(4):042003. doi:10.1088/1748-605X/ad4aaa
57. Lopes J, Lopes D, Pereira-Silva M, et al. Macrophage cell membrane-cloaked nanoplatforms for biomedical applications. Small Methods. 2022;6(8):e2200289. doi:10.1002/smtd.202200289
58. Han H, Bartolo R, Li J, Shahbazi MA, Santos HA. Biomimetic platelet membrane-coated nanoparticles for targeted therapy. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2022;172:1–15. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2022.01.004
59. Kunde SS, Wairkar S. Platelet membrane camouflaged nanoparticles: biomimetic architecture for targeted therapy. Int J Pharm. 2021;598:120395. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120395
60. Chen HY, Deng J, Wang Y, Wu CQ, Li X, Dai HW. Hybrid cell membrane-coated nanoparticles: a multifunctional biomimetic platform for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Acta Biomater. 2020;112:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.05.028
61. Zhao Y, Li A, Jiang L, Gu Y, Liu J. Hybrid membrane-coated biomimetic nanoparticles (HM@BNPs): a multifunctional nanomaterial for biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules. 2021;22(8):3149–3167. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.1c00440
62. Liu H, Su YY, Jiang XC, Gao JQ. Cell membrane-coated nanoparticles: a novel multifunctional biomimetic drug delivery system. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2023;13(3):716–737. doi:10.1007/s13346-022-01252-0
63. Sharma S, Masud MK, Kaneti YV, et al. Extracellular vesicle nanoarchitectonics for novel drug delivery applications. Small. 2021;17(42):e2102220. doi:10.1002/smll.202102220
64. Kim H, Kim D, Nam H, Moon S, Kwon YJ, Lee JB. Engineered extracellular vesicles and their mimetics for clinical translation. Methods. 2020;177:80–94. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.10.005
65. Chen Y, Douanne N, Wu T, et al. Leveraging nature’s nanocarriers: translating insights from extracellular vesicles to biomimetic synthetic vesicles for biomedical applications. Sci Adv. 2025;11(9):eads5249. doi:10.1126/sciadv.ads5249
66. Hade MD, Suire CN, Suo Z. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes: applications in regenerative medicine. Cells. 2021;10(8).
67. Keshtkar S, Azarpira N, Ghahremani MH. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles: novel frontiers in regenerative medicine. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9(1):63. doi:10.1186/s13287-018-0791-7
68. Ye J, Liu X. Macrophage-derived small extracellular vesicles in multiple diseases: biogenesis, function, and therapeutic applications. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:913110. doi:10.3389/fcell.2022.913110
69. Wang Y, Zhao M, Liu S, et al. Macrophage-derived extracellular vesicles: diverse mediators of pathology and therapeutics in multiple diseases. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(10):924. doi:10.1038/s41419-020-03127-z
70. Garcia MJC, Hnit SST, Shklovskaya E, Wang Y. T cell-derived small extracellular vesicles in cancer-immune interactions. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2025;74(8):252. doi:10.1007/s00262-025-04109-w
71. Rosso G, Cauda V. Biomimicking extracellular vesicles with fully artificial ones: a rational design of EV-BIOMIMETICS toward effective theranostic tools in nanomedicine. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2023;9(11):5924–5932. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c01025
72. Zou S, Wang B, Wang C, Wang Q, Zhang L. Cell membrane-coated nanoparticles: research advances. Nanomedicine. 2020;15(6):625–641. doi:10.2217/nnm-2019-0388
73. Narain A, Asawa S, Chhabria V, Patil-Sen Y. Cell membrane coated nanoparticles: next-generation therapeutics. Nanomedicine. 2017;12(21):2677–2692.
74. Xia Q, Zhang Y, Li Z, Hou X, Feng N. Red blood cell membrane-camouflaged nanoparticles: a novel drug delivery system for antitumor application. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2019;9(4):675–689. doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2019.01.011
75. Jan N, Madni A, Khan S, et al. Biomimetic cell membrane-coated poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Bioeng Transl Med. 2023;8(2):e10441. doi:10.1002/btm2.10441
76. Sun M, Wei J, Su Y, et al. Red blood cell-hitchhiking delivery of simvastatin to relieve acute respiratory distress syndrome. Int J Nanomed. 2024;19:5317–5333.
77. Zhao Y, Zhu X, Hu L, et al. Macrophage membrane-coated polydopamine nanomedicine for treating acute lung injury through modulation of neutrophil extracellular traps and M2 macrophage polarization. Mater Today Bio. 2025;32:101708. doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101708
78. Song L, Zhai Z, Ouyang W, et al. Inhalation of macrophage membrane-coated hydrogel microparticles for inflammation alleviation of acute lung injury in vivo. Acta Biomater. 2025;192:409–418.
79. Zhao Y, Shen X, Fan Y, et al. Intranasal delivery of macrophage cell membrane cloaked biomimetic drug-nanoparticle system attenuates acute lung injury. J Tissue Eng. 2024;15:20417314241287487.
80. Jin K, Luo Z, Zhang B, Pang Z. Biomimetic nanoparticles for inflammation targeting. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2018;8(1):23–33. doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2017.12.002
81. Zinger A, Sushnitha M, Naoi T, et al. Enhancing inflammation targeting using tunable leukocyte-based biomimetic nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2021;15(4):6326–6339. doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c05792
82. Parodi A, Kostyushev D, Brezgin S, et al. Biomimetic approaches for targeting tumor-promoting inflammation. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022;86(Pt 2):555–567. doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.04.007
83. Cao L, Du M, Cai M, et al. Neutrophil membrane-coated nanoparticles for targeted delivery of toll-like receptor 4 siRNA ameliorate LPS-induced acute lung injury. Int J Pharm. 2025;668:124960. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124960
84. Huang Z, Wang H, Long J, Lu Z, Chun C, Li X. Neutrophil membrane-coated therapeutic liposomes for targeted treatment in acute lung injury. Int J Pharm. 2022;624:121971. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121971
85. Yang Y, Yan L, Zhang H, Xiao C, Wang K. atomized neutrophil membrane-coated MOF nanoparticles for direct delivery of dexamethasone for severe pneumonia. Front Biosci. 2025;30(1):26721. doi:10.31083/FBL26721
86. Jin H, Zhao Y, Yao Y, et al. Therapeutic effects of tea polyphenol-loaded nanoparticles coated with platelet membranes on LPS-induced lung injury. Biomater Sci. 2023;11(18):6223–6235. doi:10.1039/D3BM00802A
87. Jin H, Luo R, Li J, et al. Inhaled platelet vesicle-decoyed biomimetic nanoparticles attenuate inflammatory lung injury. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:1050224. doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.1050224
88. Lin P, Gao R, Yang W, et al. Platelet membrane-cloaked biomimetic nanoparticles for targeted acute lung injury therapy. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2025;250:114542. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2025.114542
89. Zhao Y, Yao Y, Fan S, et al. Intranasal delivery of platelet cell membrane-cloaked Astragaloside IV loaded biomimetic nanoparticles for enhanced therapeutics in acute lung injury mice. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2025;214:114777. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2025.114777
90. Lin CY, Chang YT, Chung YK, Alalaiwe A, Yu HP, Fang JY. Dual-membrane bioinspired nanocarriers for targeted therapy of MRSA-induced acute lung injury and bacteremia. J Mater Chem B. 2025;13(19):5686–5704. doi:10.1039/D4TB02742F
91. Uccelli A, Moretta L, Pistoia V. Mesenchymal stem cells in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(9):726–736. doi:10.1038/nri2395
92. Fu X, Liu G, Halim A, Ju Y, Luo Q, Song AG. Mesenchymal stem cell migration and tissue repair. Cells. 2019;8(8):784. doi:10.3390/cells8080784
93. Wu HH, Zhou Y, Tabata Y, Gao JQ. Mesenchymal stem cell-based drug delivery strategy: from cells to biomimetic. J Control Release. 2019;294:102–113. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.12.019
94. Xiao Y, Xu RH, Dai Y. Nanoghosts: harnessing mesenchymal stem cell membrane for construction of drug delivery platforms via optimized biomimetics. Small. 2024;20(1):e2304824. doi:10.1002/smll.202304824
95. Jin H, Zhao Y, Yao Y, et al. Intratracheal administration of stem cell membrane-cloaked naringin-loaded biomimetic nanoparticles promotes resolution of acute lung injury. Antioxidants. 2024;13(3):282. doi:10.3390/antiox13030282
96. Zhang X, Zhang H, Gu J, et al. Engineered extracellular vesicles for cancer therapy. Adv Mater. 2021;33(14):e2005709. doi:10.1002/adma.202005709
97. Hu Z, Wang W, Lin Y, et al. Extracellular vesicle-inspired therapeutic strategies for the COVID-19. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024;13(29):e2402103. doi:10.1002/adhm.202402103
98. Ma Q, Fan Q, Xu J, et al. Calming cytokine storm in pneumonia by targeted delivery of TPCA-1 using platelet-derived extracellular vesicles. Matter. 2020;3(1):287–301. doi:10.1016/j.matt.2020.05.017
99. Li T, Zhang L, Lu T, et al. Engineered extracellular vesicle-delivered CRISPR/CasRx as a novel rna editing tool. Adv Sci. 2023;10(10):e2206517. doi:10.1002/advs.202206517
100. Huang Z, Li X, Yu D, Wang H, Chun C, Zhao Y. Efferocytosis-inspired biomimetic nanoplatform for targeted acute lung injury therapy. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024;13(13):e2304304. doi:10.1002/adhm.202304304
101. Tuerdi B, Zuo L, Ma Y, Wang K. Downregulation of miR-155 attenuates sepsis-induced acute lung injury by targeting SIRT1. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2018;11(9):4483–4492.
102. Zhuang C, Kang M, Oh J, Lee M. Pulmonary delivery of cell membrane-derived nanovesicles carrying anti-miRNA155 oligonucleotides ameliorates LPS-induced acute lung injury. Regen Biomater. 2024;11:rbae092. doi:10.1093/rb/rbae092
103. Xiao Z, Cao J, Zhao C, et al. Thermoresponsive biodegradable hydrogel combined with photothermal and chemodynamic therapies to eliminate biofilms and accelerate infected wound healing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2025;17(28):40052–40070. doi:10.1021/acsami.5c06210
104. Jin C, Zhang Y, Chen L, et al. Lung epithelial cell membrane-camouflaged ROS-activatable berberine nanoparticles for targeted treatment in acute lung injury. Int J Nanomed. 2025;20:6163–6183. doi:10.2147/IJN.S514611
105. Wang F, Hou W, Xiao C, et al. Endothelial cell membrane-based biosurface for targeted delivery to acute injury: analysis of leukocyte-mediated nanoparticle transportation. Nanoscale. 2021;13(35):14636–14643. doi:10.1039/D1NR04181A
106. Zhang Y, Zhang X, Li H, Liu J, Wei W, Gao J. Membrane-coated biomimetic nanoparticles: a state-of-the-art multifunctional weapon for tumor immunotherapy. Membranes. 2022;12(8):738. doi:10.3390/membranes12080738
107. Kang W, Xu Z, Lu H, et al. Advances in biomimetic nanomaterial delivery systems: harnessing nature’s inspiration for targeted drug delivery. J Mater Chem B. 2024;12(29):7001–7019. doi:10.1039/D4TB00565A
108. Guo M, Xia C, Wu Y, Zhou N, Chen Z, Li W. Research progress on cell membrane-coated biomimetic delivery systems. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:772522. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.772522
© 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
