Back to Journals » Clinical Ophthalmology » Volume 11

Ectasia following small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): a review of the literature

Authors Moshirfar M, Albarracin JC, Desautels JD, Birdsong OC, Linn SH, Hoopes Sr PC

Received 22 July 2017

Accepted for publication 28 August 2017

Published 15 September 2017 Volume 2017:11 Pages 1683—1688

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S147011

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser

Majid Moshirfar,1,2 Julio C Albarracin,3 Jordan D Desautels,1,4 Orry C Birdsong,1 Steven H Linn,1 Phillip C Hoopes Sr1

1HDR Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, 2John A Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, 3Department of Ophthalmology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 4Department of Ophthalmology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

Purpose: Four cases of corneal ectasia after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) have been reported. In this review, we provide an overview of the published literature on corneal ectasia after SMILE and risk factors associated with this complication.
Methods: Case reports were identified by a search of seven electronic databases for pertinent heading terms between 2011 and July 2017. We identified patient characteristics and surgical details including preoperative topography, central corneal thickness, and anterior keratometry (Km). Residual stromal bed (RSB) values not reported were computed using VisuMax ReLEx SMILE software Version 2.10.10. Preoperative ectasia risk was measured using the Randleman Ectasia Risk Score System (ERSS). Percent tissue alteration was calculated for each patient as described by Santhiago et al.
Results: Seven eyes of four patients developed corneal ectasia post SMILE. Two patients had abnormal topography in both eyes. One patient had abnormal topography in one eye. Only one patient was noted to have normal topography in both eyes and later developed ectasia in one eye in the absence of any known risk factors. The mean Randleman ectasia risk score was 4±3 (range: 1–8). The mean calculated percent tissue altered (PTA) was 38%±6% (range: 30%–47%).
Conclusion: A majority of reported ectasia cases occurred in patients with subclinical keratoconus. These conditions may be exacerbated by SMILE and should be considered absolute contraindications to the procedure. Three patients were identified to have high risk based on the ERSS, and one patient exhibited a PTA ≥40%. We formulated a modification to the current calculation of PTA that takes into account the differences in tissue altered between SMILE and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). More studies are needed to fully quantify the risk of ectasia. For now, we propose adopting the same exclusion criteria used for LASIK in the SMILE procedure until more specific metrics have been validated.

Keywords: SMILE, small-incision lenticule extraction, ectasia, keratoconus, percent tissue altered, Ectasia Risk Score System

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]

 

Other articles by this author:

Corneal biomechanical properties after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy

Hwang ES, Stagg BC, Swan R, Fenzl CR, McFadden M, Muthappan V, Santiago-Caban L, Mifflin MD, Moshirfar M

Clinical Ophthalmology 2017, 11:1785-1789

Published Date: 3 October 2017

Stereoacuity after small aperture corneal inlay implantation

Linn SH, Skanchy DF, Quist TS, Desautels JD, Moshirfar M

Clinical Ophthalmology 2017, 11:233-235

Published Date: 24 January 2017

Short-term visual result after simultaneous photorefractive keratectomy and small-aperture cornea inlay implantation

Moshirfar M, Wallace RT, Skanchy DF, Desautels JD, Linn SH, Hoopes Jr PC, Durrie DS

Clinical Ophthalmology 2016, 10:2265-2270

Published Date: 11 November 2016

Rainbow glare after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis: a review of literature

Moshirfar M, Desautels JD, Quist TS, Skanchy DF, Williams MT, Wallace RT

Clinical Ophthalmology 2016, 10:2245-2249

Published Date: 9 November 2016

Six-month visual outcomes for the correction of presbyopia using a small-aperture corneal inlay: single-site experience

Moshirfar M, Quist TS, Skanchy DF, Wallace RT, Linn SH, Hoopes Jr PC

Clinical Ophthalmology 2016, 10:2191-2198

Published Date: 2 November 2016

Use of angle kappa in myopic photorefractive keratectomy

Khakshoor H, McCaughey MV, Vejdani AH, Daneshvar R, Moshirfar M

Clinical Ophthalmology 2015, 9:193-195

Published Date: 29 January 2015

Accuracy of corneal trephination depth using the Moria single-use adjustable depth vacuum trephine system

Fenzl CR, Gess AJ, Moshirfar M

Clinical Ophthalmology 2014, 8:2391-2396

Published Date: 27 November 2014

What we know about ocular manifestations of Ebola

Moshirfar M, Fenzl CR, Li Z

Clinical Ophthalmology 2014, 8:2355-2357

Published Date: 21 November 2014

Rate of ectasia and incidence of irregular topography in patients with unidentified preoperative risk factors undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK

Moshirfar M, Smedley JG, Muthappan V, Jarsted A, Ostler EM

Clinical Ophthalmology 2014, 8:35-42

Published Date: 10 December 2013

Laser in situ keratomileusis in patients with collagen vascular disease: a review of the literature

Simpson RG, Moshirfar M, Edmonds JN, Christiansen SM, Behunin N

Clinical Ophthalmology 2012, 6:1827-1837

Published Date: 5 November 2012

Anesthetic keratopathy presenting as bilateral Mooren-like ulcers

Khakshoor H, Moshirfar M, Simpson RG, Gharaee H, Vejdani AH, Christiansen SM, Edmonds JN, Behunin NL

Clinical Ophthalmology 2012, 6:1719-1722

Published Date: 26 October 2012

Laser in-situ keratomileusis in patients with diabetes mellitus: a review of the literature

Simpson RG, Moshirfar M, Edmonds JN, Christiansen SM

Clinical Ophthalmology 2012, 6:1665-1674

Published Date: 12 October 2012

The effect of preoperative keratometry on visual outcomes after moderate myopic LASIK

Christiansen SM, Neuffer MC, Sikder S, Semnani RT, Moshirfar M

Clinical Ophthalmology 2012, 6:459-464

Published Date: 21 March 2012

Radial keratotomy associated endothelial degeneration

Moshirfar M, Ollerton A, Semnani RT, Hsu M

Clinical Ophthalmology 2012, 6:213-218

Published Date: 2 February 2012

Bilateral total Descemet's membrane detachments after strangulation

Moshirfar M, Betts BS, Hsu M, Holz HHA, McEntire W

Clinical Ophthalmology 2011, 5:1221-1222

Published Date: 29 August 2011

In vivo and in vitro analysis of topographic changes secondary to DSAEK venting incisions

Moshirfar M, Lependu MT, Church D, Neuffer MC

Clinical Ophthalmology 2011, 5:1195-1199

Published Date: 25 August 2011

Comparison of Hanna and Hessburg-Barron trephine and punch systems using histological, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, and elliptical curve fitting models

Moshirfar M, Calvo CM, Kinard KI, Williams LB, Sikder S, Neuffer MC

Clinical Ophthalmology 2011, 5:1121-1125

Published Date: 12 August 2011

Femtosecond-assisted preparation of donor tissue for Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis

Moshirfar M, Neuffer MC, Kinard K, Lependu MT, Sikder S

Clinical Ophthalmology 2011, 5:1017-1020

Published Date: 22 July 2011

A prospective, contralateral comparison of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus thin-flap LASIK: assessment of visual function

Hatch BB, Moshirfar M, Ollerton AJ, Sikder S, Mifflin MD

Clinical Ophthalmology 2011, 5:451-457

Published Date: 21 April 2011

Complications of NewColorIris implantation in phakic eyes: a review

Sikder S, Davis SW, Holz H, Moshirfar M

Clinical Ophthalmology 2011, 5:435-438

Published Date: 5 April 2011

Corrigendum: Softec HD hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens: biocompatibility and precision

Espandar L, Sikder S, Moshirfar M

Clinical Ophthalmology 2011, 5:159-160

Published Date: 6 February 2011

Softec HD hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens: biocompatibility and precision

Ladan Espandar, Shameema Sikder, Majid Moshirfar

Clinical Ophthalmology 2011, 5:65-70

Published Date: 10 January 2011

Epithelial growth over the optic surface of the type 1 Boston Keratoprosthesis: histopathology and implications for biointegration

Yousuf M Khalifa, Don Davis, Nick Mamalis, et al

Clinical Ophthalmology 2010, 4:1069-1071

Published Date: 17 September 2010