Back to Journals » Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology » Volume 16

Direct and Indirect Roles of Men in Determining Women Decision to Use Laser Procedures for Skin Care

Authors Teresa A

Received 28 December 2022

Accepted for publication 22 February 2023

Published 12 March 2023 Volume 2023:16 Pages 617—633

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S398685

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Dr Jeffrey Weinberg



Astrid Teresa

Medical Faculty, Palangka Raya University, Palangka Raya, Indonesia

Correspondence: Astrid Teresa, Kampus UPR, Jalan Yos Sudarso, Palangka Raya, Central Kalimantan, 73111, Indonesia, Email [email protected]

Abstract: Laser procedures for skin care is becoming increasingly popular and used by the global community and affect many aspects of human life. However, there is very little research on the role of men in women’s decision to follow this dermatological procedure. This study aimed to identify the role of men in motivating women to choose laser-based procedure. A systematic literature review research design was applied in this study. A total of 27 papers were obtained by searching PubMed Central for the 2013– 2022 editions. The extraction of samples and the motivation of patients or research respondents in choosing laser procedures for cosmetic treatments were conducted to obtain clues about the role of men in making these decisions. Only six studies explicitly reveal the role of men as motivators of women to perform laser-based dermatological procedures. Four of these six studies were conducted in Asia in countries with a high degree of collectivism. The remaining two studies reveal a minor role for men in women’s motivation to choose dermatological procedures. Other studies only indirectly implicate the role of men through intrasexual competition, increased self-esteem, and the needs of the world of work. Limitations of the study lies in the non-specificity of the study sample in the female population, laser-based treatments, and the role of men in motivating women. The role of men in motivating women to perform laser-based skin care procedures is stated explicitly in collectivist cultures while only implicitly in individualist cultures. These findings indicate that the strategy of utilizing the added value of men to laser treatment procedures should be directed at the relationship between men and women in real terms in collective cultured countries.

Keywords: laser treatment, dermatologic procedure, beautification, culture, intrasexual competition

Introduction

The beauty industry has become one of the most crisis-resistant industries.1 Various marketing strategies are carried out to get consumers in the beauty sector. Various technologies are also utilized to support this strategy.2 Social media allows millions of people to follow the latest fashion and makeup trends.3,4 In addition, the emergence of information technology allows the existence of selfie portraits and filtered images to produce faces that are prettier than they are.5 In addition, skincare is another cheap option that can be applied directly to the skin. In choosing the type of skincare, women use the traditional approach, which is trial and error, and the efficacy-based approach. The traditional approach uses subjective analysis wherein a person tries one product and switches to another when that product fails. The efficacy-based approach uses skin biophysical parameters and imaging techniques to get a suitable product. Recently, a precision approach has been developed that uses biomarkers.6

The use of lasers is an alternative to skincare-using creams. Laser technology has evolved dramatically in the last six decades to use for cosmetic purposes.7 Significant changes have occurred, especially since the advent of picosecond laser technology in the late 1980s, where targeted destruction of specific tissues was possible without damaging the surrounding tissue using selective photothermolysis.7 The picosecond laser works with a specific wavelength in a controlled manner on the target (hemoglobin or melanin) in a brief time interval (10–12 seconds), shorter than the time required for the target to cool after irradiation.7 The picosecond laser, initially used for tattoo removal, has begun to treat acne scarring, photoaging, and benign pigmented lesions/disorders.8

Researchers have found that women’s efforts to beautify themselves have sexual roots from a biological and sociocultural point of view.9–11 Although the roots of this behavior are well understood, there is still not a complete review of the role of the opposite sex in encouraging someone to decide to beautify themselves using laser technology. So far, the research has focused more on cultural and social factors which have not led to the sexual roots of these factors.12,13 This study will aim to answer the following research question – what is the role of men in the choice of laser procedures for skin care by women? The results of this study allowed us to formulate the added value that men provided in developing this procedure.

Theory

Men demand to women for improving their physical appearance can be explained from a biological and cultural perspective.14 Biologically, men prioritize the physical attractiveness of the opposite sex in building long-term romantic relationships.15 Women respond to the needs by performing beautification, a manipulation of physical attractiveness. However, beautification is only associated with short-term sexual attraction.10 Short-term sexual relationships are also sociosexual as they target society, not specific individuals.11

The sociocultural perspective on beauty care behavior looks at the role of social factors in encouraging cosmetic surgery.16–18 From a sociocultural perspective, human behavior in caring for the body is related to personal values and beliefs and the conditions of the cultural environment in which humans live.19 Every culture has standards for a decent woman’s appearance.20 For example, cultural factors are beauty standards in different times and places are also different. From prehistoric times to the early modern century, tall women were seen as more attractive because they reflected fertility and guaranteed the species’ survival. When the industrial era emerged with abundant food but health risks, slim women were considered more attractive than obese women. Recently, as the food industry has become more compliant with health standards, obese women have begun to be considered more attractive.21

Similarly, women with tattoos are considered good in one culture but bad in another.22,23 In the West, women’s tattoos signal openness and interest in sexual intercourse.24 Women with tattoos are stigmatized because, in contemporary culture, women who have multiple sexual partners are considered bad.25–27 Although tattoos are considered works of art by modern consensus, remnants of the past that were symbols of aggression, violence, and crime still linger on many people in the West.22 Therefore, even though it is considered harmful, society also recognizes that women with tattoos look more robust and independent than women without tattoos.22

In individual cultures, the self-concept of each person prioritizes independence from their group. In contrast, in collectivist cultures, the individual’s self-concept is tied to an awareness of interdependence with the group.28 Values and norms become highly emphasized in collective culture to maintain community cohesion in one unit. These values and norms regulate one of which is taking care of the body and behaving sexually between men and women. These cultural differences have implications for the strong emphasis on relationships between individuals and other individuals or society in motivating behaviors such as performing dermatological treatments in countries with collective cultures. Individuals in individualist countries will emphasize individual problems such as physical, social, and emotional well-being as behavioral motivations to cover up other people’s roles in these behaviors. However, because the sexual selection is universal, the role of cultural orientation here is more of a justification for this essentially sexually motivated behavior.

Women who do not have the physical qualities men want can win the competition by utilizing several perceptual adaptation tricks, including coloring, cosmetics, and clothing.29 Studies have shown that cosmetic products and procedures can enhance men’s desired qualities, such as youth, femininity, health, and general attractiveness.30 Makeup, for example, can make older women look younger.19 Makeup manipulates sensory aspects such as touch, smell, and sight, which are essential for stimulating positive and psychological stimulation.31 The protrusion of women’s feminine facial features in makeup creates a halo effect where the viewer assumes that the woman also has other positive traits.32 Using makeup allows women to attract more potential romantic partners, thereby obtaining high-quality romantic partners.19 Research has shown that women who use makeup are more sexualized and more sexually active than women without makeup.11,33

On the other hand, women also develop the ability to recognize their rival’s perceptual adaptation tricks.34 This ability to recognize tricks explains the emergence of the cosmetic surgery paradox.1 On the one hand, cosmetic surgery is a popular trend for women to improve the quality of their beauty. Nevertheless, on the other hand, the public also considers this engineering a forgery and does not accept any body modifications for the sake of beauty. As a result, cosmetic surgery is often a private procedure kept secret by the people who undergo it.

Competing for a partner can hurt women’s psychology because it shows a failure to build a sense of agency. This negative impact can result in irregular eating patterns and lead to problems such as obesity or malnutrition.35 Competition for a partner that is too high impacts body image dissatisfaction.36 Women are willing to do beautification to gain self-confidence even though sometimes the procedures applied can pose a risk of physical injury.37

Some social critics take issue with the objectification of women in cross-gender relations. Objectification assesses women based on their physical attributes or body parts rather than personality and other more profound aspects of humanity.33,38,39 According to objectification theory, beautification is oppressive and disempowering to women.40 In line with this, women with makeup are more likely to experience objectification than women who do not use makeup due to the presence of association of makeup use with sex.33,38,39,41–43 Research shows that objectified women are dehumanized.33

However, studies show that women can feel confident when they are made sexual objects to the extent that their romantic partners do.44 Women their partners ask to wear attractive clothes and makeup, for example, experience increased assertiveness and positive mood.40 This increase in self-confidence arises because women feel valued, even though the award is more on the physical or sexual aspects.44

Even if this partner is not yet available, women can objectify or sexualize themselves and experience a sense of comfort, freedom, and empowerment.45 Self-sexualization is sexual behavior that is clear and considered normal with a mindset of an intention to increase sexual attractiveness.45 Self-sexualization is the primary psychological motivation to attract potential romantic partners and beat romantic competitors.46 This behavior is, for example, sharing sexual portraits or images online.46

This positive effect makes women try to allow themselves to be objects (pressured to appear according to their wishes and beauty standards) by their partners in sexual moments.45 Beautification provides positive experiences for women, especially during stressful economic downturns.46 As a result, there is a so-called lipstick effect, namely the tendency to increase beautification practices and consumption of cosmetics when economic problems occur.40

Since skin care can have a sexual motivation, there is an indirect relationship between women and men in encouraging women to use laser skin care. The gender role of men (man, masculine) or romantic/sexual partners can be directly seen in women’s motivational narratives or implicitly in the primary goal of increasing beauty or skin smoothness. This issue will be explored further in this study by reviewing the previous research literature.

Materials and Methods

The literature search and analysis were systematically carried out by minimizing the subjectivity factor and maintaining methodological precision and completeness. This methodological precision and completeness were ensured using the PRISMA framework (Figure 1). The search is carried out by critical actions in keyword identification and search databases. Articles selection using the PRISMA framework determines the assessment. The synthesis was then done using data extraction and categorization (Table 1). Next, the analysis is carried out by comparing the results and drawing conclusions from the data.

Table 1 Summary of Articles

Figure 1 Study protocol flow diagram.75

Note: Adapted from Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6(6): e1000097.doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097.

Before starting a search through the database, it is important to determine the scope of the research and identify the appropriate keywords to be used during the search process. A literature search was conducted at PubMed Central with the keywords “laser” or “minimally invasive aesthetic procedures” and “motivations”. In addition, keywords such as “male”, “opposite sex”, “opposite gender”, “partner”, “husband”, “romantic”, “man”, “beauty”, “attractive”, and “boyfriend” were used. If the keyword refers to a specific reference, that reference is included. Research is included if there is a description of how motivated the decision to use laser procedures is. In addition, to carry out the broadest possible literature analysis and obtain as many research papers related to the research topic as possible, a paper search was also conducted on similar articles recommended by PubMed Central.

Papers retrieved during the search were evaluated, and the PRISMA framework for paper selection was followed. Limits include publication dates within the last ten years and in English. The ten-year limit was chosen because laser-based beauty technology has developed rapidly in the last decade and is therefore relevant for obtaining the latest research. Older studies may be included in the reference list if they provide meaningful content. This study does not distinguish excluding review articles and book chapters but excludes conference proceedings and non-English papers.

Content analysis is performed on the articles found in the search. Data from the selected articles were extracted and categorized according to country of location, the sample size and proportion of women in the sample, type of care, motivation, and the role of men in that motivation. This type of treatment can be more common than laser procedures, but laser procedures must fall within the type of treatment studied by the paper. For example, laser procedures are minimally invasive aesthetic surgery and are therefore included. To the extent that the paper does not limit it to a particular type of minimally invasive aesthetic surgery, it is acceptable for further analysis.

Results

A total of 138 entries were considered duplicates of the 992 search results. Many articles were then excluded because they did not meet the criteria based on the title and abstract. Furthermore, some articles were issued as irrelevant (Figure 1). The remaining 27 articles were discussed and commented on (Table 1). It should be noted that none of the studies specifically focused on lasers alone but covered many types of cosmetic treatments.

The research reviewed in this study comes from some countries such as Nepal, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Iran, Turkey, Russia, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom, China, East Asia, Thailand, Singapore, Australia, Colombia, and the United States. A total of nine studies were conducted exclusively in the United States, seven in Asian countries, one in Australia, and four in Europe. One study used samples from countries on three continents at once: America (Colombia), Europe (Russia), and Asia (Thailand, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates).47 The remaining five studies are non-empirical. It can be seen that there is a gap in the sample of the population on the African continent. The African population is crucial because it has its ethnic skin in laser-based treatments.48

Studies conducted in Asia have a marked difference from studies conducted in America and Europe, where the male influence is more directly visible in Asia. There is only one study in America that shows men directly motivate women to choose laser procedures,49 while in Europe none at all. On the other hand, four out of seven studies in Asia, involving samples from East Asia and West Asia, indicated explicitly that men were the reason women chose laser procedures.50–53 It is also interesting to note that the only study in Australia also shows direct male influence, in the form of partners in close relationships, as a source of motivation for choosing cosmetic procedures.54

Discussion

Several studies included in this review used an entirely female sample.73,74 Most studies use a mixed sample in which women dominate. The percentage of women can even reach more than 90% in some studies. However, some studies use relatively balanced samples and male dominance.56 There are also articles in the form of content analysis in brochures or literature reviews.61,67,68,70

There are no studies that focus entirely on laser procedures. The motivation for following a laser procedure is the same as for any other dermatological procedure. This equal treatment is questionable, based on the only study specific to the motivation for each type of treatment by Maisel et al.64 The study specifically reviewed motivations for dermatological treatment across 16 types of treatment, including five that were explicitly laser-based. They found that patients who requested laser treatment for pigmentation or erythema were most motivated by cosmetic appearances, including the desire to have brighter, younger, more beautiful skin and to remove the damage to their appearance. In addition, patients who are interested in using lasers for brown spots are more important to maintain their appearance. In contrast, lasers for red spots users are more motivated to look good without wearing makeup. The results mean that the use of lasers as a dermatological procedure strongly favors cosmetic needs. This trend differs from other procedures such as liposuction, non-invasive fat reduction, and cellulite which generally focus on emotional well-being and increasing self-confidence.

Tattoo removal is a dermatological procedure with a different motivation from other laser-based procedures. The common reasons put forward are not related to cosmetic needs but rather to the needs of the world of work, such as a job or career changes.60 Other reasons that arise from tattoo removal efforts that cannot be found in other laser procedures are the need to show a specific image in the workplace or social environment. Other reasons are negative feelings about tattoos, maturity, readiness to change a life, negative attention, increasing quality of life, self-confidence, less obsession with worry, and restriction related to having to wear only specific clothing or hairstyle.60,62,64

The male partner’s role was generally not disclosed in the studies reviewed. Only a few studies have shown this role as a spouse, significant other, or potential husband. A study in Saudi Arabia with a sample of 90.5% women showed that 28.6% of respondents chose cosmetic procedures to look younger than their spouse, and 27.0% said to look younger than their age/friend. In addition, 2.8% stated the goal to please a significant other, and 2.0% stated to accompany a milestone, which includes a wedding.50 A study in the United Arab Emirates with a sample of 91% of women also revealed that 26.4% of respondents believed that if they were caught doing cosmetic procedures, they would have more difficulty finding a marriage partner. On the contrary, 1.1%, or just two respondents, believed that this disclosure would increase the likelihood of getting married.51

A Chinese study with 63.3% of women sample revealed that the reasons for finding a mate were chosen by 11 or 5.0% of the sample.52 Another study that took samples from five countries in East Asia with female proportions between 54.3% to 70.8% revealed that 9.2% or 136 respondents performed aesthetic procedures because they were suggested by a partner, family member, or friend.53 A study in Australia on a sample of 96.6% of women showed that some patients believe that minor cosmetic procedures will make people close to them want to be seen with them and their close relationships will improve.54 Finally, a study in the United States on a sample that included 97.2% of women stated that two or 2.7% of patients said they took cosmetic procedures because of pressure from their spouses.49 As the proportion in the research extremely low, the number could be used to argue that sexual factors do not play a significant role in the respondents’ motivation to choose cosmetic procedures. Even so, the main reason in the research, namely mental health, can be triggered by sexual problems such as dissatisfaction in relationships or failure to meet social expectations regarding what is expected in sex, gender roles, and sexual attitudes and norms.26

In addition to the above aspects, it is also known that four of the six studies that reveal the role of men in aesthetic procedures come from Asia, namely Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and East Asian countries. This finding seems to contradict the view that the dehumanizing effect of sexualization is most intense in Western countries.33 However, one research shows no difference in the effects of dehumanization in Western and Eastern countries.76 The problem lies more in the cultural characteristics of collectivism in the East. Communities in collectivist cultures emphasize the aspects of togetherness and identification of a person as a group member so that individuals are more strongly bound to social standards or norms regarding what is permitted in sexual behavior.28 Individualism scores (as opposed to collectivism) for these countries are much lower than Australia (scored 90) and the USA (scored 91), namely 48 for Saudi Arabia, 36 for the United Arab Emirates, 20 for China, 25 for Hong Kong, 17 for Taiwan, 18 for South Korea, and 46 for Japan.77 Studies in Australia show that the male partner’s motivation also has a shallow score. In the study, the mean for “people close to me will want to be seen with me” was 1.55, while the score for “my close relationships will improve” was 1.72. This mean value is much lower than the value of intrinsic motivation items above 2.50.54 It can be concluded that the collectivist cultural orientation factor plays a vital role in making explicit the role of men in using laser procedures for women for skin care.

In line with the role of collectivism in making explicit the sexual motivations of cosmetic procedures, individualism encourages this sexual motivation to be implicit by focusing these motivations on individual rather than relational aspects. Study reveals aspects of intrasexual competition in encouraging negative judgments about age concealment for romantic purposes.57 Intrasexual competition causes a woman to feel displeased with other women of the same age because she is a competitor in the mating strategy. This competition gives rise to the phenomenon of MWD (Madonna-Whore Dichotomy), where a woman is judged in two extreme poles: very good or very bad. MWD monitors and limits women’s sexual expressions, including expressions in the form of age concealment, on their influence and power over men and reduces solidarity between women.78 Women who feel competitive “slut shaming” other women who are considered too beautiful.78 MWD is not productive for laser-based beauty businesses or other technologies because the women who use the procedure will not tell other women about it. In married women, MWD decreases relationship satisfaction because women become focused on beating competitors. On the other hand, this phenomenon has an influential male role because it supports patriarchal ideology and strengthens male power over women.78

The rest of the studies reviewed indirectly express the role of men with the word beauty, such as have a clear looking or beautiful skin or looking young or fresher.47,55,64 Other reasons are to look better, prettier, or more attractive to oneself.55,64 Although the narrative is self-directed, the theory of sexual selection emphasizes that this is a sexual signal to the opposite sex.32 The statement to look beautiful for oneself is a mating strategy to attract men who are driven to like beautiful young women.79 By showing a fresher appearance, women bring themselves into a sexualized condition and experience objectification.80 This action, however, poses a risk of dehumanization, especially from other women who feel rivaled, but can reward the desired sexual attraction of a male partner.44 As a result, women face two risks: adverse events due to cosmetic procedures and being challenged by rival women and irresponsible men.81 Adverse events can be bruising, bump (nodule), infection, discoloration, scarring, burn, ulceration/necrosis, misplacement of product, skin deformity, nerve damage, and facial droop.81 The risk of dehumanization can be in the form of sexual harassment and slut shaming.78

Other factors that appear to be sexually unrelated, such as self-esteem and employment, can have sexual roots. Increased self-esteem is a positive impact commonly found in minimally invasive facial cosmetic procedures.82 Self-esteem can be seen more as body esteem or shame, related to self-objectification.36 That is, the feeling of self-esteem appears as a form of positive body image which will attract the attention of the opposite sex.

Meanwhile, work requirements often require female workers to look psychosexually attractive, for example, by wearing high heels or having clean and smooth skin.37 In this case, the world of work utilizes men’s sexual instincts to gain business benefits without violating the norms of gender equality and not appearing to exploit women. This emphasis on the world of work is in line with the neoliberal emphasis on investing in oneself, one of which is improving appearance to be more attractive.58,83

Improving mental and emotional health is also a common reason individuals use cosmetic procedures.52,61 Men pay more attention to the appearance of their potential partners, and the media also portrays the version of beauty that men like. These two factors provide mental and emotional pressure on women to look attractive through cosmetic procedures. Success in meeting these two demands leads to better mental and emotional health in women.

Increased social well-being can occur when women gain greater freedom in choosing a partner due to beauty procedures. The reduction in aging produced by dermatological procedures also promotes social well-being by bringing in more potential partners that women can select to get the best quality men they want. Increased social well-being results in better social functioning and confidence.61

The added value of men in laser procedures can be drawn from how men take a role, either consciously or unconsciously, in motivating women to make decisions. This added value may vary depending on the culture. As has been shown in this study, women from collective countries tend to be more explicit in attributing the role of men in encouraging them to make dermatological treatment decisions. The reason is either to show a younger appearance than their partner, pressure women to improve themselves, and tend to be closer, will improve a close relationship with the woman, give advice on following aesthetic procedures, marry the woman, be happier, and become more romantic. The promotion of dermatological procedures with the added value of this male role will provide more significant benefits for businesses operating in collectivist cultured countries. The promotion of the role of men indirectly through increasing self-confidence and employment opportunities for women is an added value for the promotion of dermatological procedures in Western countries. That is, the role of men becomes an added value to the collective culture directly and to the individualist culture indirectly. In line with the research findings and support from the theory of sexual selection, if the role of men is shown differently in different cultures, it will add value to the promotion of dermatological procedures for beauty. In this case, the role of men becomes a social value that describes the added value of product offerings to the community. This value-added information enables women to be more interested in following laser procedures offered by service providers as far as relevant to the cultural orientation prevailing in their country. If it is not relevant, then there is a possibility of resistance due to intrasexual competition in individualist countries and reluctance in collectivist countries.

Conclusion

The demand for laser-based cosmetic procedures has increased as lasers for dermatological therapy have become increasingly safe. However, no systematic literature review assesses the motivation of people, especially women, to use lasers for dermatological treatment. We tried to determine the role of men in motivating women to perform minimally invasive cosmetic procedures using lasers. This systematic literature review suggests that men directly or indirectly motivate women to use cosmetic procedures. Men directly motivate women to use cosmetic procedures by putting pressure to the women to beautify herself, using his power as a spouse, friend, significant other, husband, future husband, mate, or partner in close relationship. Indirectly, men motivate women to use cosmetic procedures by valuing women facial and body appearance as important in social-closeness.

However, this literature review is limited by the non-specificity of the study sample in the female population, laser-based treatments, and the role of men in motivating women. While majority of the studies almost exclusively women oriented, some other studies have more balanced proportion of sex. For the sake of the research purpose, which is oriented toward women motivation in relation to men pressure, the balanced sex sample would skew the result since some samples were men and the research reviewed did not delineate between men and women motivation. Almost all of the reviewed research, except one, study women motivation to do general cosmetic treatments, not specific to laser-based treatment. Finally, no research mentioned explicitly that men motivated women to performs laser treatment. Researcher should infer the conclusion from clues such as husband, partner, and spouse. All of these limitations called for future empirical research that address all the limitation in this research in a comprehensive manner. A research on the women motivation to perform laser-based treatment, which qualitatively explored the men’s role in the decision, accounted for cultural differences such as performed in collectivist and individualist countries is the logical consequences of the limitations of this research.

The important thing that must be applied in the marketing practice of laser procedures for skin care is to emphasize the relationship between women and men in East and South American countries with collectivist cultures. Meanwhile, for an individualist country, marketing efforts need to emphasize individual aspects such as self-esteem and employment. This strategy will take advantage of the added value of sexual selection by men over women in the beauty industry, particularly those involving laser technology. More vigorous research on this role and added value can be done through empirical studies involving human samples, especially from the female population, and content analysis studies on skin care service brochures.

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to the support of the Medical Faculty of Palangka Raya University based at Palangka Raya, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia.

Disclosure

The author reports no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Bonell S, Barlow FK, Griffiths S. The cosmetic surgery paradox: toward a contemporary understanding of cosmetic surgery popularisation and attitudes. Body Image. 2021;38:230–240. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.04.010

2. Nagy A. Beauty and physics — physics projects based on modern aesthetic and medical treatments. J Phys Conf Ser. 2021;1929(1):012027. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1929/1/012027

3. Ceci L. YouTube: most subscribed beauty content creators 2022. Hamburg: Statista Inc.; 2022. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/627448/most-popular-youtube-beautychannels-ranked-by-subscribers. Accessed October 13, 2022.

4. Meisel M. Top beauty, wellness & lifestyle influencers on social media for 2022. Montvale, NJ: Happi; 2022. Available from: https://www.happi.com/contents/view_online-exclusives/2022-08-26/top-beautywellness-lifestyle-influencers-on-social-media-for-2021. Accessed October 13, 2022.

5. Maymone MBC, Laughter M, Dover J, Vashi NA. The malleability of beauty: perceptual adaptation. Clin Dermatol. 2019;37(5):592–596. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2019.05.002

6. Jiang B, Jia Y, He C. Promoting new concepts of skincare via skinomics and systems biology—from traditional skincare and efficacy‐based skincare to precision skincare. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018;17(6):968–976. doi:10.1111/jocd.12663

7. Alster TS, Li MK. Dermatologic laser side effects and complications: prevention and management. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020;21(5):711–723. doi:10.1007/s40257-020-00530-2

8. Torbeck RL, Schilling L, Khorasani H, Dover JS, Arndt KA, Saedi N. Evolution of the picosecond laser: a review of literature. Dermatol Surg. 2019;45(2):183–194. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000001697

9. Prokop P, Dylewski Ł, Woźna JT, Tryjanowski P. Cues of woman’s fertility predict prices for sex with prostitutes. Curr Psychol. 2020;39(3):919–926. doi:10.1007/s12144-018-9807-9

10. Bradshaw HK, Leyva RP, Nicolas SCA, Hill SE. Costly female appearance-enhancement provides cues of short-term mating effort: the case of cosmetic surgery. Personal Individ Differ. 2019;138:48–55. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.019

11. Batres C, Russell R, Simpson JA, Campbell L, Hansen AM, Cronk L. Evidence that makeup is a false signal of sociosexuality. Personal Individ Differ. 2018;122:148–154. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.023

12. Wu Y, Alleva JM, Broers NJ, Mulkens S. Attitudes towards cosmetic surgery among women in China and the Netherlands. PLoS One. 2022;17(4):e0267451. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267451

13. Milothridis P. The elective nature of cosmetic medicine. In: Cosmetic Patient Selection and Psychosocial Background. Springer International Publishing; 2020:1–9. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-44725-0_1

14. Davis AC. Resolving the tension between feminism and evolutionary psychology: an epistemological critique. Evol Behav Sci. 2021;15(4):368–388. doi:10.1037/ebs0000193

15. Walter KV, Conroy-Beam D, Buss DM, et al. Sex differences in mate preferences across 45 countries: a large-scale replication. Psychol Sci. 2020;31(4):408–423. doi:10.1177/0956797620904154

16. Arthur LC, Brooks RC, Blake KR. Female self-sexualization covaries with mate value but not mate availability. Adapt Hum Behav Physiol. 2020;6(3):277–291. doi:10.1007/s40750-020-00133-5

17. Blake KR, Brooks RC. Status anxiety mediates the positive relationship between income inequality and sexualization. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019;116(50):25029–25033. doi:10.1073/pnas.1909806116

18. Takács K. Discounting of evolutionary explanations in sociology textbooks and curricula. Front Sociol. 2018;3:24. doi:10.3389/fsoc.2018.00024

19. Davis AC, Arnocky S. An evolutionary perspective on appearance enhancement behavior. Arch Sex Behav. 2022;51(1):3–37. doi:10.1007/s10508-020-01745-4

20. Gill R, Orgad S. The shifting terrain of sex and power: from the ‘sexualization of culture’ to # MeToo. Sexualities. 2018;21(8):1313–1324. doi:10.1177/1363460718794647

21. Sanjak JS, Sidorenko J, Robinson MR, Thornton KR, Visscher PM. Evidence of directional and stabilizing selection in contemporary humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115(1):151–156. doi:10.1073/pnas.1707227114

22. Broussard KA, Harton HC. Tattoo or taboo? Tattoo stigma and negative attitudes toward tattooed individuals. J Soc Psychol. 2018;158(5):521–540. doi:10.1080/00224545.2017.1373622

23. Skoda K, Oswald F, Brown K, Hesse C, Pedersen CL. Showing skin: tattoo visibility status, egalitarianism, and personality are predictors of sexual openness among women. Sex Cult. 2020;24(6):1935–1956. doi:10.1007/s12119-020-09729-1

24. Sevi B, Aral T, Eskenazi T. Exploring the hook-up app: low sexual disgust and high sociosexuality predict motivation to use Tinder for casual sex. Personal Individ Differ. 2018;133:17–20. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.053

25. Zestcott CA, Tompkins TL, Kozak Williams M, Livesay K, Chan KL. What do you think about ink? An examination of implicit and explicit attitudes toward tattooed individuals. J Soc Psychol. 2018;158(1):7–22. doi:10.1080/00224545.2017.1297286

26. Marks MJ, Young TM, Zaikman Y. The sexual double standard in the real world: evaluations of sexually active friends and acquaintances. Soc Psychol. 2019;50(2):67–79. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000362

27. Muggleton NK, Tarran SR, Fincher CL. Who punishes promiscuous women? Both women and men are prejudiced towards sexually-accessible women, but only women inflict costly punishment. Evol Hum Behav. 2019;40(3):259–268. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.12.003

28. Sánchez-Fuentes M, Moyano N, Gómez-Berrocal C, Sierra JC. Invariance of the sexual double standard scale: a cross-cultural study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1569. doi:10.3390/ijerph17051569

29. Mafra AL, Varella MAC, Defelipe RP, Anchieta NM, de Almeida CAG, Valentova JV. Makeup usage in women as a tactic to attract mates and compete with rivals. Personal Individ Differ. 2020;163:110042. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110042

30. Russell R, Batres C, Courrèges S, et al. Differential effects of makeup on perceived age. Br J Psychol. 2019;110(1):87–100. doi:10.1111/bjop.12337

31. Batres C, Kramer SS, DeAngelis CG, Russell R. Examining the ‘cosmetics placebo effect. PLoS One. 2019;14(1):e0210238. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210238

32. Borau S, Bonnefon JF. Gendered products act as the extended phenotype of human sexual dimorphism: they increase physical attractiveness and desirability. J Bus Res. 2020;120:498–508. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.007

33. Bernard P, Content J, Servais L, Wollast R, Gervais S. An initial test of the cosmetics dehumanization hypothesis: heavy makeup diminishes attributions of humanness-related traits to women. Sex Roles. 2020;83(5–6):315–327. doi:10.1007/s11199-019-01115-y

34. Yarosh D. Perception and deception: human beauty and the brain. Behav Sci. 2019;9(4):34. doi:10.3390/bs9040034

35. Arnocky S, Locke A. Jealousy mediates the link between women’s upward physical appearance comparison and mate retention behavior. Evol Psychol. 2020;18(4):147470492097399. doi:10.1177/1474704920973990

36. Karsay K, Knoll J, Matthes J. Sexualizing media use and self-objectification: a meta-analysis. Psychol Women Q. 2018;42(1):9–28. doi:10.1177/0361684317743019

37. Barnish M, Morgan HM, Barnish J. The 2016 HIGh Heels: health effects And psychosexual BenefITS (HIGH HABITS) study: systematic review of reviews and additional primary studies. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):37. doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4573-4

38. Kellie D, Blake K, Brooks R. Behind the makeup: the effects of cosmetics on women’s self-objectification, and their objectification by others. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2021;51(4–5):703–721. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2767

39. Bernard P, Gervais SJ, Klein O. Objectifying objectification: when and why people are cognitively reduced to their parts akin to objects. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2018;29(1):82–121. doi:10.1080/10463283.2018.1471949

40. Blake KR, Brooks R, Arthur LC, Denson TF. In the context of romantic attraction, beautification can increase assertiveness in women. PLoS One. 2020;15(3):e0229162. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229162

41. Cogoni C, Carnaghi A, Silani G. Reduced empathic responses for sexually objectified women: an fMRI investigation. Cortex. 2018;99:258–272. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.11.020

42. Bernard P, Rizzo T, Hoonhorst I, et al. The neural correlates of cognitive objectification: an ERP study on the body inversion effect associated with sexualized bodies. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2018;9(5):550–559. doi:10.1177/1948550617714582

43. Vaes J, Cristoforetti G, Ruzzante D, Cogoni C, Mazza V. Assessing neural responses towards objectified human targets and objects to identify processes of sexual objectification that go beyond the metaphor. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):6699. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-42928-x

44. Meltzer AL. Women can benefit from sexual and physical valuation in the context of a romantic relationship. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020;46(2):243–257. doi:10.1177/0146167219854443

45. Choi D, DeLong M. Defining female self sexualization for the twenty-first century. Sex Cult. 2019;23(4):1350–1371. doi:10.1007/s12119-019-09617-3

46. Blake KR, Bastian B, Denson TF, Grosjean P, Brooks RC. Income inequality not gender inequality positively covaries with female sexualization on social media. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115(35):8722–8727. doi:10.1073/pnas.1717959115

47. Redaelli A, Siddiqui Syed S, Liu X, et al. Two multinational, observational surveys investigating perceptions of beauty and attitudes and experiences relating to aesthetic medical procedures. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19(11):3020–3031. doi:10.1111/jocd.13349

48. Woolery-Lloyd H, Tolbert D, Onumah N. Lasers for ethnic skin. In: Nouri K, editor. Handbook of Lasers in Dermatology. Springer London; 2014:387–400. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-5322-1

49. Sobanko JF, Taglienti AJ, Wilson AJ, et al. Motivations for seeking minimally invasive cosmetic procedures in an academic outpatient setting. Aesthet Surg J. 2015;35(8):1014–1020. doi:10.1093/asj/sjv094

50. Alharethy SE. Trends and demographic characteristics of Saudi cosmetic surgery patients. Saudi Med J. 2017;38(7):738–741. doi:10.15537/smj.2017.7.18528

51. Amiri L, Galadari H, Al Mugaddam F, Souid A, Stip E, Javaid S. Perception of cosmetic procedures among middle eastern youth. J Clin Aesthetic Dermatol. 2021;14(12):E74–E83.

52. Jin X, Twayigira M, Zhang W, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of minimally invasive facial cosmetic surgery in Chinese college students. BMC Psychiatry. 2022;22(1):27. doi:10.1186/s12888-021-03676-3

53. Kwon SH, Lao WWK, Lee CH, et al. Experiences and attitudes toward aesthetic procedures in East Asia: a cross-sectional survey of five geographical regions. Arch Plast Surg. 2021;48(06):660–669. doi:10.5999/aps.2020.02565

54. Pikoos TD, Rossell SL, Tzimas N, Buzwell S. Assessing unrealistic expectations in clients undertaking minor cosmetic procedures: the development of the aesthetic procedure expectations scale. Facial Plast Surg Aesthetic Med. 2021;23(4):263–269. doi:10.1089/fpsam.2020.0247

55. Agrawal H, Agrawal S. Impact of social media and photo-editing practice on seeking cosmetic dermatology care. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2021;14:1377–1385. doi:10.2147/CCID.S322859

56. Chen J, Chow A, Fadavi D, et al. The zoom boom: how video calling impacts attitudes towards aesthetic surgery in the COVID-19 era. Aesthet Surg J. 2021;41(12):NP2086–NP2093. doi:10.1093/asj/sjab274

57. Childs MJ, Jones A. Perceptions of individuals who engage in age concealment. Evol Behav Sci. 2022. doi:10.1037/ebs0000305

58. Dobosz M, Rogowska P, Sokołowska E, Szczerkowska‐Dobosz A. Motivations, demography, and clinical features of body dysmorphic disorder among people seeking cosmetic treatments: a study of 199 patients. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;jocd.14890. doi:10.1111/jocd.14890

59. Fabi S, Dover JS, Tanzi E, Bowes LE, Tsai Fu F, Odusan A. A 12‐week, prospective, non‐comparative, non‐randomized study of magnetic muscle stimulation for improvement of body satisfaction with the abdomen and buttocks. Lasers Surg Med. 2021;53(1):79–88. doi:10.1002/lsm.23348

60. Goh CL, Ho S. Lasers for tattoo removal. In: Lahiri K, De A, Sarda A, editors. Textbook of Lasers in Dermatology. Jaypee; 2016:123–133.

61. Hoffman L, Fabi S. Look better, feel better, live better? The impact of minimally invasive aesthetic procedures on satisfaction with appearance and psychosocial wellbeing. J Clin Aesthetic Dermatol. 2022;15(5):47–58.

62. Huang S, Blissett G, Pei BA, Balac N, Bogner J, Reilly JM. A descriptive analysis of the epidemiology and motivations for laser tattoo removal in an underserved population. J Community Health. 2022;47(1):127–135. doi:10.1007/s10900-021-01024-w

63. Khunger N, Pant H. Cosmetic procedures in adolescents: what’s safe and what can wait. Indian J Paediatr Dermatol. 2021;22(1):12. doi:10.4103/ijpd.IJPD_53_20

64. Maisel A, Waldman A, Furlan K, et al. Self-reported patient motivations for seeking cosmetic procedures. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154(10):1167. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.2357

65. Martínez-González MC, Martínez-González RA, Guerra-Tapia A. Aesthetic dermatology and emotional well-being questionnaire. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2014;13(4):336–345. doi:10.1111/jocd.12109

66. McKeown DJ. Impact of minimally invasive aesthetic procedures on the psychological and social dimensions of health. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;9(4):e3578. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000003578

67. Merianos A, Vidourek R, King K. Medicalization of female beauty: a content analysis of cosmetic procedures. Qual Rep. 2015. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2013.1440

68. Pearlman RL, Wilkerson AH, Cobb EK, et al. Factors associated with likelihood to undergo cosmetic surgical procedures among young adults in the United States: a narrative review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2022;15:859–877. doi:10.2147/CCID.S358573

69. Ramirez S, Scherz G, Smith H. Characteristics of patients seeking and proceeding with non-surgical facial aesthetic procedures. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2021;14:197–207. doi:10.2147/CCID.S296970

70. Sarwer DB. Body image, cosmetic surgery, and minimally invasive treatments. Body Image. 2019;31:302–308. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.01.009

71. Shah P, Rangel LK, Geronemus RG, Rieder EA. Cosmetic procedure use as a type of substance-related disorder. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84(1):86–91. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.08.123

72. Waldman A, Maisel A, Weil A, et al. Patients believe that cosmetic procedures affect their quality of life: an interview study of patient-reported motivations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(6):1671–1681. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.01.059

73. Walker CE, Krumhuber EG, Dayan S, Furnham A. Effects of social media use on desire for cosmetic surgery among young women. Curr Psychol. 2021;40(7):3355–3364. doi:10.1007/s12144-019-00282-1

74. Yazdandoost RY, Hayatbini N, Farid AAA, Gharaee B, Latifi NA. The body image dissatisfaction and psychological symptoms among invasive and minimally invasive aesthetic surgery patients. World J Plast Surg. 2016;5(2):148–153.

75. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine 6(6): e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097

76. Wollast R, Puvia E, Bernard P, Tevichapong P, Klein O. How sexual objectification generates dehumanization in western and eastern cultures: a comparison between Belgium and Thailand. Swiss J Psychol. 2018;77(2):69–82. doi:10.1024/1421-0185/a000209

77. Hofstede Insight. Compare countries. Helsinki: Hofstede insight; 2022. Available from: https://www.hofstede-insights.com/fi/product/compare-countries. Accessed October 13, 2022.

78. Bareket O, Kahalon R, Shnabel N, Glick P. The Madonna-Whore dichotomy: men who perceive women’s nurturance and sexuality as mutually exclusive endorse patriarchy and show lower relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles. 2018;79(9–10):519–532. doi:10.1007/s11199-018-0895-7

79. Wagstaff DL. Comparing mating motivations, social processes, and personality as predictors of women’s cosmetics use. Evol Behav Sci. 2018;12(4):367–380. doi:10.1037/ebs0000119

80. Morris KL, Goldenberg J, Boyd P. Women as animals, women as objects: evidence for two forms of objectification. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018;44(9):1302–1314. doi:10.1177/0146167218765739

81. Rossi AM, Wilson B, Hibler BP, Drake LA. Nonphysician practice of cosmetic dermatology: a patient and physician perspective of outcomes and adverse events. Dermatol Surg. 2019;45(4):588–597. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000001829

82. Imadojemu S, Sarwer DB, Percec I, et al. Influence of surgical and minimally invasive facial cosmetic procedures on psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(11):1325. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6812

83. Shimoni S. ‘Third Age’ under neoliberalism: from risky subjects to human capital. J Aging Stud. 2018;47:39–48. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2018.10.004

Creative Commons License © 2023 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.