A Revised PADMA Scoring System for Predicting in-Hospital Mortality in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patient [Corrigendum]

Bernardus R, Pramudyo M, Akbar MR. Int J Gen Med. 2023;16:3747-3756.

On page 3747, In the results part of the abstract, the last 2 sentences should be “PADMA MSI score > 8 has a sensitivity of 67.92% and specificity of 84.01% for predicting all-cause death. The range of the PADMA MSI score is 0 to 19. The AUC between the PADMA MSI and PADMA SI scores did not differ significantly (AUC difference 0.022)” instead of “PADMA SI score > 8 has a sensitivity of 67.92% and specificity of 84.01% for predicting all-cause death. The range of the PADMA SI score is 0 to 19. The AUC between the PADMA MSI and PADMA SI scores did not differ significantly (p=0.022)”.

On page 3748, Results section, 5^th sentence should be “The majority of those studied had no congestion (71.3%) and stable hemodynamics, with blood pressure greater than 100 mmHg (77.1%), a heart rate of less than 100 bpm (89.7%), and modified shock index 0.57 to 0.97 (62.4%).” instead of “The majority of those studied had no congestion (71.3%) and stable hemodynamics, with blood pressure greater than 100 mmHg (77.1%), a heart rate of less than 100 bpm (89.7%), and modified shock index (SI) 0.57 to 0.97 (62.4%)”.

On page 3749, Table 1, 1^st column, 2^nd MSI, “<=0.56” should have been “≤0.56”.

Page 3749, second line “MSI < 0.56 and > 0.97” should have been MSI ≤0.56 and > 0.97.

On page 3751, Table 3, 1^st column, Modified score index, the values presented are the same as for Tables 1 and 2, “≤0.56, 0.57 - 0.97 and > 0.97” instead of “<0.70, 0.71- 1.00 and >1.00”.

On page 3754, Discussion section, last paragraph, 2^nd sentence “Vani et al” in the sentence “According to a study by Vani et al, MSI has a sensitivity of 61.1% and a specificity of 73.7% for predicting hospital mortality as opposed to SI’s 49% and 85%.” should be “Pramudyo et al” instead.

The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused by these errors and for any confusion that may have arisen as a result. We would like to assure the readers that these corrections do not affect the results or conclusions of the paper and are intended only to improve the accuracy of the methodology and data presentation.