Back to Journals » International Journal of General Medicine » Volume 18

Correlation Between Skeletal Muscle Mass and Different Pathological Types of Colorectal Polyp in Chinese Asymptomatic Population

Authors Li W, Wang N ORCID logo, Ye H, Chen M

Received 21 November 2024

Accepted for publication 13 February 2025

Published 20 February 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 927—938

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S503137

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Xudong Zhu



Wenya Li,1,* Na Wang,2,* Huajun Ye,3 Mengjun Chen3

1Ultrasound Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China; 2Healthcare Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China; 3Gastroenterology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Mengjun Chen, Gastroenterology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Nan Bai Xiang Street, Ouhai District, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325002, People’s Republic of China, Tel/Fax +86-577-55579122, Email [email protected]

Background: Low relative muscle mass was identified to be related to ascending risk of pre-cancerous polyps (adenoma) in recent cohort study. Our study aimed to dig out the correlation between muscle mass and different pathological types of colorectal polyps in Chinese asymptomatic population.
Methods: In all, 5923 adults were included. The effects of low skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) on colorectal polyp occurrence, including different pathological types, and the effects modification of age and BMI were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression.
Results: Lower SMI was connected with the lower occurrence of colorectal polyp (OR: 0.810, 95% CI: 0.683~0.960, p=0.015). Considering different pathological types of colorectal polyps, lower SMI was associated with lower occurrence of inflammatory polyp (OR: 0.633, 95% CI: 0.434~0.898, p=0.013), rather than conventional adenoma and serrated polyp (all p> 0.05). Besides, SMI was positively related to the occurrence of 2 pathological types of colorectal polyp in males: inflammatory polyp (OR: 1.237, 95% CI: 1.058~1.444, p=0.007) and serrated polyp (OR: 1.288, 95% CI: 1.143~1.456, p< 0.001). The interaction effect of BMI and SMI on occurrence of inflammatory polyp after adjusting age and smoking status was significant (p=0.015). For individuals with low SMI (compared with the normal SMI group), the incidence of inflammatory polyp was reduced from 8.95% to 3.50% in the low BMI quartile (Q1) in the adjusted model (OR of 0.332, 95% CI: 0.005– 0.061, p< 0.001). It was noticeable for males rather than females that individuals with colorectal polyps had higher levels of SMI (p=0.003). In addition, individuals with inflammatory polyps as well as serrated polyps possessed higher levels of SMI in males (all p< 0.05).
Conclusion: Generally, especially in Chinese asymptomatic males, low SMI kept independent effect on the presence of inflammatory polyp and serrated polyp, rather than conventional adenoma.

Keywords: SMI, colorectal inflammatory polyp, Chinese asymptomatic males, BMI, bioelectrical impedance analysis, colonoscopy

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fifth most common malignancy and the second-leading cause of cancer-related mortality, with an estimated 1 million CRC new cases and 0.5 million CRC-related deaths occurring in 2020 worldwide.1 The incidence and mortality rates of CRC have significantly increased since 2000 in China.2 Most CRCs derive from pre-cancerous polyps, including conventional adenomas and serrated polyps.3 Thus, colonoscopy screening and removal of polyps are effective strategies to reduce the CRC-related incidence and mortality.4,5 Colonoscopy surveillance is recommended at specified intervals, relying on risk stratification.6 A Chinese randomized controlled trial identified that risk-adapted screening might be more effective than traditional screening strategies.7 Currently, risk-score systems use simple risk factors, such as age, sex, family history, smoking and drinking habits.8–10 However, a great number of researchers have proposed that other risk factors might be associated with colorectal polyps, including body fatness, physical activity and daily diet.11–13 Therefore, discovery of new risk factors could be helpful for modifying risk-score systems.

Sarcopenia, a geriatric disease characterized by the progressive loss of muscle mass and increased amount of visceral fat, despite maintaining a relatively stable body weight.14 Several underlying mechanisms have been elucidated, including insulin resistance, alteration of hormonal status, chronic inflammatory reaction and redox imbalance.15–17 Colorectal adenoma and sarcopenia may share similar pathological mechanisms.18,19 Muscle tissue is the primary site, in which glucose disposed mediated by insulin, therefore low muscle mass could aggravate insulin resistance.20 Insulin resistance might be a risk factor for the development of colorectal neoplasia.21–23 A recent large cohort study has found that low relative muscle mass was concerned with ascending risk of occurrence of advanced adenoma and overall adenoma at follow-up colonoscopy.24 However, there are few studies that have discussed the relationship between low muscle mass and other different pathological types of colorectal polyps up to now.

Our study intended to dig out the correlation between muscle mass and different pathological types of colorectal polyps in Chinese asymptomatic group.

Methods

Study Population

We conduct a cross-sectional study at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University between January 2017 and June 2018. The study enrolled the participants aged 18 years or older, who underwent bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and colonoscopies. Twenty patients with histories of colorectal surgeries were excluded.

Data Collection

Baseline characteristics, involving age, sex, drinking and smoking habits, diseases history, were acquired by self-administered questionnaires. Men with alcohol consumptions >140 g per week or women with alcohol consumptions >70 g per week were regarded as heavy drinkers. Smoking status was divided into 2 categories: current smoker or ex-smoker (has been smoking for at least 6 months) and non-smoker. The anthropometric measurement, fasting blood and biochemical parameters were detected in the morning.

The appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM, kg) was measured using a BIA (InBody770; InBody Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan). The skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) was calculated using ASM (kg)/height2 to evaluate the skeletal muscle mass. According to diagnostic criteria of Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) 2019 Consensus,25 males with SMI<7.0 kg/m2 and females with SMI<5.7 kg/m2 were regarded as having low muscle mass (low SMI).

The endoscopic characteristics of colorectal polyps were recorded and analyzed, including the number, size and pathological type. Advanced adenoma was defined as the presence of at least 1 of the following features: with size over 10 mm in diameter, tubulovillous or villous structure, and high-grade dysplasia. Advanced neoplasm was defined as the presence of colorectal cancer or advanced adenoma.

Statistical Analysis

Category variables were compared by Pearson χ2 tests and displayed as frequencies (percentages). The normal distribution of continuous variables was tested by Shapiro–Wilk test. Continuous variables not fitting the normal distribution were compared by Wilcox test and displayed as median (range), while continuous variables fitting the normal distribution were compared by t test. The correlation between two random variables was performed by Spearman correlation analyses. The effects of low SMI on colorectal polyp occurrence, including different pathological types, and the effects modification of age and BMI were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Variables with p<0.1 in univariate analysis were involved in the subsequent multivariate analysis. SMI of individuals with or without colorectal polyp was compared by Kruskal–Wallis test.

All statistical analyses were carried on by R version 3.6.1 (https://www.r-project.org/). All analyses were two-tailed, with p value<0.05 considered significant.

Results

Baseline Characteristics Between Normal SMI and Low SMI Groups

In all, we included 5923 individuals, of which 3767 (63.60%) were males, and 851 (14.37%) were in low SMI group (Table 1). The median of SMI was 7.29 kg/m2, with a range from 3.12 to 19.08 kg/m2(Table 1). Two thousand one hundred and ninety individuals were diagnosed with colorectal polyps (Table 2), with the incidence rate of 36.97%. Among those, 12 individuals were diagnosed with high-grade dysplasia, and 7 individuals were diagnosed with CRCs. Main pathological types included conventional adenoma (N=1050), inflammatory polyp (N=332), serrated polyp (N=680) and mixed type (N=108).

Table 1 Baseline Characteristics According to Skeletal Muscle Mass Hierarchy

Table 2 Baseline Characteristics According to Different Pathological Type of Colorectal Polyps [Median (Range) or n (%)]

There was no statistical difference between normal and low SMI groups regarding age, smoking status, and diabetes mellitus (shown in Table 1, all p>0.05). The low SMI group showed a lower percentage of males than the normal SMI group (Table 1, p<0.001). BMI levels were higher in the normal SMI group (Table 1, p<0.001). In the low SMI group, the proportions of heavy drinkers, hypertension, dyslipidemia and hyperuricemia were lower than the normal SMI groups (Table 1, all p<0.05).

In individuals with colorectal polyps, there were statistical differences between the four different pathological types of colorectal polyps referring to age, ASM, SMI, smoking status, hyperuricemia and polyp size (Table 2, all p<0.05).

Correlation Between SMI and Colorectal Polyp and Its Different Pathological Types

We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine the effect of low SMI on colorectal polyp and different pathological types, respectively (Table 3 and Supplementary Table 1). The univariable and multivariable analyses revealed that low SMI was correlated with the lower occurrence of colorectal polyp [odds ratio (OR): 0.810, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.683~0.960, p=0.015]. Besides, considering different pathological types of colorectal polyps, low SMI was associated with lower occurrence of inflammatory polyp with OR of 0.633 (95% CI: 0.434~0.898) and p value of 0.013.

Table 3 Univariable and Multivariable Logistic Regression Analyses to Examine the Effect of Low Skeletal Muscle Mass* on Colorectal Polyps and Different Pathological Types

When SMI was included in the univariable and multivariable analyses as a continuous variable (Table 4, Supplementary Tables 2 and 3), it was identified that each unit of SMI increasing was associated with a 15.7% augment of the presence of colorectal polyp in males, with p value of 0.014. In addition, SMI was positively associated with the occurrence of 2 pathological types of colorectal polyp in males: inflammatory polyp (OR: 1.237, 95% CI: 1.058~1.444, p=0.007) and serrated polyp (OR: 1.288, 95% CI: 1.143~1.456, p<0.001). However, there was no correlation found between SMI and colorectal polyp, and their different pathological types in females (all p>0.05).

Table 4 Univariable and Multivariable Logistic Regression Analyses to Examine the Effect of Skeletal Muscle Mass Index on Colorectal Polyps and Different Pathological Types

Interaction of SMI, Age and BMI for Colorectal Polyp and Its Different Pathological Types in Male

By Spearman test, it was revealed that both age and BMI had correlation with SMI, which was displayed in Figure 1 and supplement Table 4.

Figure 1 Matrix Scatter plots: association between SMI, Age and BMI.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SMI, skeletal muscle mass index.

Notes: Numbers in top-right corner of the 3 figures were correlation coefficients. The 3 figures in the diagonal line were density figures for age, SMI and BMI, respectively. The 3 figures in left-bottom corner were scatter figures.

Considering SMI was associated with the occurrence of inflammatory polyp and serrated polyp in males, we examined the interaction effect of SMI and age (or BMI) on inflammatory polyp and serrated polyp (Figure 2). The interaction effect of BMI and SMI on occurrence of inflammatory polyp after adjusting age and smoking status was significant (Figure 2, p=0.015).

Figure 2 Effect modification of age or BMI on low SMI in occurrence of colorectal inflammatory polyp or serrated polyp in male. (A), effect modification of age on low SMI in occurrence of inflammatory polyp. (B), effect modification of BMI on low SMI in occurrence of inflammatory polyp. (C), effect modification of age on low SMI in occurrence of serrated polyp. (D), effect modification of BMI on low SMI in occurrence of serrated polyp.*, adjusted for age and smoking status. †, adjusted for age, smoking status and DM.

Abbreviations: P, prevalence; SMI, skeletal muscle mass index.

Table 5 further quantifies the effect modification of BMI on efficacy of low SMI in occurrence of colorectal polyp in males, including inflammatory polyp or serrated polyp. For individuals with low SMI (compared with the normal SMI group), the incidence of inflammatory polyp was reduced from 8.95% to 3.50% in the low BMI quartile (Q1), with OR of 0.332 (95% CI: 0.005–0.061) and p value<0.001 in the adjusted model. However, in the high BMI quartiles (Q2 to Q4), the effect of SMI on inflammatory polyp was insignificant (OR: 1.028, 95% CI: 0.508–1.886, p=0.934). A test of interaction between BMI and SMI group on inflammatory polyp was statistically significant (p=0.018). For colorectal polyp (p=0.483) and serrated polyp (p=0.102), interaction between BMI and SMI group was not observed.

Table 5 Effect Modification of BMI on Low Muscle Mass in Occurrence of Colorectal Polyps in Males

Different SMI in Individuals with and without Colorectal Polyps

As for males, it was noticeable that individuals with colorectal polyps had higher levels of SMI (p=0.003). Besides, it showed that the males with inflammatory polyps as well as serrated polyps possessed higher levels of SMI (Figure 3, all p<0.05). As for females, there was no significant association found between individuals with and without colorectal polyps and different pathological types (all p>0.05).

Figure 3 SMI of individuals with and without colorectal polyp or different pathological types were compared. (A), SMI of individuals with and without colorectal polyp; (B), SMI of individuals with and without conventional adenoma; (C), SMI of individuals with and without inflammatory polyp; (D), SMI of individuals with and without serrated polyp; (E), SMI of individuals with and without advanced adenoma; (F), SMI of individuals with and without advanced neoplasm.

Abbreviations: SMI, skeletal muscle mass index.

Discussion

In this large, cross-sectional research, we discovered a significant correlation between skeletal muscle mass and colorectal inflammatory polyp, in Chinese asymptomatic population. Besides, as an index to evaluate muscle mass, SMI was positively associated with incidence of colorectal polyp, especially inflammatory and serrated polyp, in Chinese males. Furthermore, distinct patterns between BMI Q1 and BMI Q2 to Q4 in terms of the association with colorectal inflammatory polyp and effect modification on low SMI efficacy were observed in this study. Taken together, our results indicated that among Chinese asymptomatic males with low BMI, the occurrence of colorectal inflammatory polyp was reduced by low skeletal muscle mass. These findings could be helpful for targeting those who were at high risk of colorectal inflammatory polyp and who would be suited to maintain relatively low muscle mass.

Our study differed from previous studies containing an association between low skeletal muscle mass and prevalence of colorectal polyp. A number of researches had found that low skeletal muscle mass was associated with an increased prevalence of colorectal neoplasia.26–28 Study by Ji Taek Hong et al proposed that sarcopenia was progressively associated with the risk of advanced colorectal neoplasm.27 Yoon Suk Jung et al discovered that relative muscle mass was negatively associated with colorectal neoplasm prevalence.26 Our study offered different results to evaluate the effect of skeletal muscle mass modified by BMI on colorectal inflammatory polyp. Colorectal inflammatory polyps, though generally benign, can be indicators of underlying chronic inflammation, such as inflammatory bowel disease,29–31 which if left untreated, may lead to more serious complications such as malabsorption, or even the development of neoplastic changes over time.29 Therefore, accurate identification and monitoring of inflammatory polyps through colonoscopy are crucial for early intervention and prevention of potential adverse outcomes. In addition, the presence of inflammatory polyps serves as a reminder of the need for comprehensive patient care, including lifestyle modifications, medical management of inflammatory bowel disease, and regular follow-up colonoscopies to monitor for changes in polyp size, number, or malignant transformation.

We do not know the exact mechanisms by which skeletal muscle mass index was positively associated with occurrence of colorectal inflammatory polyp. Previous studies about colorectal inflammatory polyp are very rare. A Chinese research mentioned that elevated fasting blood glucose was a protective factor for inflammatory polyp, while patients with fasting glucose≥6.5 mmol/L had a significantly lower risk of inflammatory polyps than those with <5.6 mmol/L.32 Increased glucose is one of essential elements for metabolic syndrome; meanwhile, loss of muscle mass is closely linked to insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome.33 It appears that metabolic syndrome containing increased glucose may be an underlying mechanism for the association between colorectal inflammatory polyp and skeletal muscle mass. In addition, gut microbiota dysbiosis might play an important part. Previous experiment in animal models provided evidence that proportions of Porphyromonadaceae were significantly more abundant in colorectal inflammatory polyp-affected miniature dachshunds.34 Also, elevated gut microbiome abundance of Porphyromonadaceae was identified to be associated with reduced visceral adipose tissue and healthier metabolic profile.35,36 And decreased visceral adipose tissue and healthier metabolic surroundings were also related to more powerful skeletal muscle.37,38 Thus, the presence of “skeletal muscle-gut axis” may explain the association between colorectal inflammatory polyp and muscle mass, whereby gut microbiota may act as mediators.39–42

This study also found that BMI played an important role in the association between colorectal inflammatory polyp and low muscle mass. As BMI decreased, the skeletal muscle mass also decreased.43 As Table 1 in our study showed, there was a relatively low BMI in low muscle mass group (p<0.001). Moreover, it was well-known that BMI was positively associated with higher risk of colorectal polyp.12,24,44–46 Thus, our results about correlation between muscle mass and colorectal polyps might be associated with BMI. Obesity, often measured by an elevated BMI, is recognized as a major public health concern due to its association with various chronic diseases, including colorectal cancer.47,48 The link between obesity and colorectal polyps, including adenoma that can progress to malignancy if left untreated, has been consistently observed in epidemiological studies.49,50 Individuals with higher BMI have an increased risk of developing colorectal polyp, potentially due to chronic inflammation caused by imbalanced metabolism, distinct immune cells, cytokines, and other immune mediators.48 However, the exact mechanism by which BMI may be influential in the association between SMI and colorectal inflammatory polyp was not fully understood.

Our present study showed that low skeletal muscle mass can reduce the incidence of colorectal inflammatory polyp by 63.1% in males with BMI<22.69kg/m2. Such a significant incidence reduction in this subgroup demonstrated a sex difference in the association between skeletal muscle mass and colorectal polyp. To identify whether this sex difference was a result of gonadal hormones or not, we evaluated the effect of skeletal muscle mass index on colorectal polyp in postmenopausal women (n=805). The skeletal muscle mass index did not have a significant association with colorectal polyp, including different pathological types (all p>0.05, Supplementary Table 5), which indicated that it was not due to gonadal hormones. Other gender-related habits like dietary and exercise histories might be associated with this sex difference in the correlation between skeletal muscle mass and colorectal polyp. However, in our study, data about dietary and exercise habits were lacking. A further study about the underlying mechanism of gender-specific correlation is requisite in the future.

Skeletal muscle mass could be easily detected by BIA or dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), is an indispensable part for diagnosis of sarcopenia.25 Our results of this study demonstrated that detection of skeletal muscle may be helpful for the prediction of colorectal inflammatory polyp before colonoscopy.

Offering direct colonoscopy screening for the entire eligible population is not feasible in China, because of limited capacity of national health insurance and restricted public awareness of colorectal polyp. Thus, targeting high-risk population after risk-based stratification is a more efficient approach. Currently, most existing risk-based stratifications for colorectal cancer were developed based on the following risk factors: age, gender, family history, smoking, drinking and BMI.8,51 However, there is no risk-score to predict colorectal inflammatory polyp up to now. Our results provided a new associated-factor (low muscle mass) to evaluate the presence of colorectal inflammatory polyp.

However, our study has the following limitations. Firstly, it was a cross-sectional study that could not define causality. Secondly, some data was absent, like exercise habit, measurement of muscle strength and family history of CRC. Finally, it was a single-center study, while the results need to be further validated in a multi-center study.

Conclusion

Generally, skeletal muscle mass could be helpful to identify the presence of colorectal polyp in Chinese asymptomatic population, especially in males. Additionally, low SMI kept independent effect on presence of inflammatory polyp and serrated polyp, rather than conventional adenoma. Moreover, there was an effect modification of BMI in terms of the association between skeletal muscle mass and colorectal inflammatory polyp.

Data Sharing Statement

The data could be acquired from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics Statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Due to its cross-sectional nature, the consent was waived by the IRB and the data was anonymous. All data was extracted from electronic medical records and analyzed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Wenzhou Municipal Sci-Tech Bureau’s Program (No. Y20220364).

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL. et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660

2. Xia C, Dong X, Li H, et al. Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants. Chin Med J. 2022;135(5):584–590. doi:10.1097/CM9.0000000000002108

3. Nguyen LH, Goel A, Chung DC. Pathways of colorectal carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(2):291–302. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.059

4. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(8):687–696. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1100370

5. Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R, et al. Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. Gut. 2001;48(6):812–815. doi:10.1136/gut.48.6.812

6. Sung JJY, Chiu H-M, Lieberman D, et al. Third Asia-Pacific consensus recommendations on colorectal cancer screening and postpolypectomy surveillance. Gut;2022. 2152–2166. 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327377

7. Chen H, Lu M, Liu C, et al. Comparative evaluation of participation and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy vs fecal immunochemical test vs risk-adapted screening in colorectal cancer screening: interim analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (TARGET-C). Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115(8):1264–1274. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000000624

8. Yeoh KG, Ho K-Y, Chiu H-M, et al. The Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening score: a validated tool that stratifies risk for colorectal advanced neoplasia in asymptomatic Asian subjects. Gut. 2011;60(9):1236–1241. doi:10.1136/gut.2010.221168

9. Corte C, Zhang L, Chen J, et al.. Validation of the Asia Pacific Colorectal Screening (APCS) score in a Western population: an alternative screening tool. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;31(2):370–375. doi:10.1111/jgh.13196

10. Sung JJY, Wong MCS, Lam TYT, et al. A modified colorectal screening score for prediction of advanced neoplasia: a prospective study of 5744 subjects. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;33(1):187–194. doi:10.1111/jgh.13835

11. Bailie L, Loughrey MB, Coleman HG. Lifestyle risk factors for serrated colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(1):92–104. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.09.003

12. He X, Wu K, Ogino S, et al. Association between risk factors for colorectal cancer and risk of serrated polyps and conventional adenomas. Gastroenterology. 2018;155(2):355–373.e18. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.04.019

13. Ochiai Y, Inoshita N, Iizuka T, et al. Clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps and risk of colorectal cancer in acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol. 2020;182(3):313–318. doi:10.1530/EJE-19-0813

14. Papadopoulou SK. Sarcopenia: a contemporary health problem among older adult populations. Nutrients. 2020;12(5):1293. doi:10.3390/nu12051293

15. Picca A, Calvani R. Molecular mechanism and pathogenesis of sarcopenia: an overview. Int J mol Sci. 2021;22(6):3032. doi:10.3390/ijms22063032

16. Cleasby ME, Jamieson PM, Atherton PJ. Insulin resistance and sarcopenia: mechanistic links between common co-morbidities. J Endocrinol. 2016;229(2):R67–81. doi:10.1530/JOE-15-0533

17. Maltais ML, Desroches J, Dionne IJ. Changes in muscle mass and strength after menopause. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2009;9(4):186–197.

18. Khandekar MJ, Cohen P, Spiegelman BM. Molecular mechanisms of cancer development in obesity. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11(12):886–895. doi:10.1038/nrc3174

19. Tran TT, Naigamwalla D, Oprescu AI, et al. Hyperinsulinemia, but not other factors associated with insulin resistance, acutely enhances colorectal epithelial proliferation in vivo. Endocrinology. 2006;147(4):1830–1837. doi:10.1210/en.2005-1012

20. Srikanthan P, Karlamangla AS. Relative muscle mass is inversely associated with insulin resistance and prediabetes. findings from the third national health and nutrition examination survey. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(9):2898–2903. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-0435

21. Ortiz AP, Thompson CL, Chak A, et al. Insulin resistance, central obesity, and risk of colorectal adenomas. Cancer. 2012;118(7):1774–1781. doi:10.1002/cncr.26454

22. Keku TO, Lund PK, Galanko J, et al. Insulin resistance, apoptosis, and colorectal adenoma risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14(9):2076–2081. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0239

23. Kim EH, Kim H-K, Bae SJ, et al. Fasting serum insulin levels and insulin resistance are associated with colorectal adenoma in K oreans. J Diabetes Investig. 2014;5(3):297–304. doi:10.1111/jdi.12178

24. Yoo KM, Yang H-J, Park S-K, et al. Skeletal muscle mass and risk of advanced adenoma in surveillance colonoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;35(12):2088–2095. doi:10.1111/jgh.15082

25. Chen LK, Woo J, Assantachai P, et al. Asian working group for sarcopenia: 2019 consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21(3):300–307.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.012

26. Jung YS, Kim NH, Ryu S, Park JH, Park DI, Sohn CI. et al. Association between low relative muscle mass and the risk of colorectal neoplasms. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017;51(10):e83–e89. doi:10.1097/MCG.0000000000000724

27. Hong JT, Kim TJ, Pyo JH, et al. Impact of sarcopenia on the risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;34(1):162–168. doi:10.1111/jgh.14309

28. Park YS, Kim JW, Kim BG, et al. Sarcopenia is associated with an increased risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017;32(4):557–565. doi:10.1007/s00384-016-2738-8

29. Balázs M. Giant inflammatory polyps associated with idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease. An ultrastructural study of five cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;33(9):773–777. doi:10.1007/BF02052325

30. Ashktorab H, Brim H, Hassan S, et al. Inflammatory polyps occur more frequently in inflammatory bowel disease than other colitis patients. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020;20(1):170. doi:10.1186/s12876-020-01279-y

31. He DG, Chen X-J, Huang J-N, et al. Increased risk of colorectal neoplasia in inflammatory bowel disease patients with post-inflammatory polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022;14(1):348–361. doi:10.4251/wjgo.v14.i1.348

32. Qin M, Wang HP, Song B, et al. [Relationship between insulin resistance, serum VCAM-1, FGF19, IGF-1 and colorectal polyps]. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2021;43(5):553–562. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20210219-00146

33. Nishikawa H, Asai A, Fukunishi S, et al. Metabolic syndrome and sarcopenia. Nutrients. 2021;13(10). doi:10.3390/nu13103519

34. Igarashi H, Ohno K, Horigome A, et al. Fecal dysbiosis in miniature dachshunds with inflammatory colorectal polyps. Res Vet Sci. 2016;105:41–46. doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2016.01.005

35. Tavella T, Rampelli S, Guidarelli G, et al. Elevated gut microbiome abundance of christensenellaceae, porphyromonadaceae and rikenellaceae is associated with reduced visceral adipose tissue and healthier metabolic profile in Italian elderly. Gut Microbes. 2021;13(1):1–19. doi:10.1080/19490976.2021.1880221

36. Palmas V, Pisanu S, Madau V, et al. Gut microbiota markers associated with obesity and overweight in Italian adults. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):5532. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-84928-w

37. Wedell-Neergaard AS, Lang Lehrskov L, Christensen RH, et al. Exercise-induced changes in visceral adipose tissue mass are regulated by IL-6 signaling: a randomized controlled trial. Cell Metab. 2019;29(4):844–855.e3. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2018.12.007

38. Seaborne RA, Sharples AP. The Interplay between exercise metabolism, epigenetics, and skeletal muscle remodeling. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2020;48(4):188–200. doi:10.1249/JES.0000000000000227

39. Bilski J, Pierzchalski P, Szczepanik M, et al. Multifactorial mechanism of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity. role of physical exercise, microbiota and myokines. Cells. 2022;11(1). doi:10.3390/cells11010160

40. Liu C, Cheung W-H, Li J, et al. Understanding the gut microbiota and sarcopenia: a systematic review. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021;12(6):1393–1407. doi:10.1002/jcsm.12784

41. de Sire R, Rizzatti G, Ingravalle F, et al.. Skeletal muscle-gut axis: emerging mechanisms of sarcopenia for intestinal and extra intestinal diseases. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2018;64(4):351–362. doi:10.23736/S1121-421X.18.02511-4

42. Ehlers L, Bannert K, Rohde S. et al. Preclinical insights into the gut-skeletal muscle axis in chronic gastrointestinal diseases. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24(15):8304–8314. doi:10.1111/jcmm.15554

43. Akazawa N, Kishi M, Hino T, et al. Using GLIM criteria, cutoff value for low BMI in Asian populations discriminates high or low muscle mass: a cross-sectional study. Nutrition. 2021;81:110928. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2020.110928

44. Chao G, Zhu Y, Fang L. Retrospective study of risk factors for colorectal adenomas and non-adenomatous polyps. Transl Cancer Res. 2020;9(3):1670–1677. doi:10.21037/tcr.2020.01.69

45. Lee K, Kim YH. colorectal polyp prevalence according to alcohol consumption, Smoking and Obesity. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(7).

46. Ashktorab H, Paydar M, Yazdi S, et al. BMI and the risk of colorectal adenoma in African-Americans. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.). 2014;22(5):1387–1391. doi:10.1002/oby.20702

47. Capuozzo M, Celotto V, Landi L, et al. Beyond body size: adiponectin as a key player in obesity-driven cancers. Nutr Cancer. 2023;75(10):1848–1862. doi:10.1080/01635581.2023.2272343

48. Pietrzyk L, Torres A, Maciejewski R, et al. Obesity and obese-related chronic low-grade inflammation in promotion of colorectal cancer development. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(10):4161–4168. doi:10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.10.4161

49. Sun G, Ma X, Xu S, et al. Mediation role of body mass index in the relationship between food-specific serum immunoglobulin G reactivity and colorectal adenomas in a Chinese population: a cross-sectional study. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024;17:17562848241307601. doi:10.1177/17562848241307601

50. Yamanouchi Y, Osawa M, Senbonmatsu T, et al. Risk factors for colorectal adenoma and cancer in comprehensive health checkups: usefulness of gamma-glutamyltransferase. J Pers Med. 2024;14(11):1082. doi:10.3390/jpm14111082

51. Chiu HM, Ching JYL, Wu KC, et al. A risk-scoring system combined with a fecal immunochemical test is effective in screening high-risk subjects for early colonoscopy to detect advanced colorectal neoplasms. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(3):617–625.e3. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.11.042

Creative Commons License © 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, 3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.