Back to Journals » Open Access Surgery » Volume 6

Comparison of two ultrasonic coagulating shears in sealing pulmonary vessels

Authors Raghavan D, Howington J, Broughton D, Henderson C, Clymer J

Received 19 January 2013

Accepted for publication 15 February 2013

Published 21 March 2013 Volume 2013:6 Pages 15—21

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OAS.S42968

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 3


Devanathan Raghavan,1 John A Howington,2 Duan Broughton,1 Cortney E Henderson,1 Jeffrey W Clymer1

1Preclinical Research, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH, USA; 2NorthShore University HealthSystem, Chicago, IL, USA

Abstract: Ultrasonic cutting and coagulating devices have been used successfully in thoracic applications such as pulmonary resection or artery harvesting, but few studies have evaluated their use in sealing pulmonary vessels. In this study we compared two commercially available devices, Harmonic Ace+ (HAR, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., Cincinnati OH, USA) and SonoSurg (SS, Olympus America, Center Valley, PA, USA), in a canine preclinical model. There were three sections to the study: acute, survival, and ex vivo (burst pressure). Hemostasis of sealed pulmonary arteries and veins was assessed for the initial application and during a simulated hypertensive crisis, both immediately after vessel sealing and after a survival period of 30 days. Other intraoperative measures were also evaluated, including transection time, tissue sticking, tissue tags, and char on the seal. Histological evaluation was performed both after initial sealing and after the survival period. Burst pressure of sealed vessels was measured ex vivo. For both devices, hemostasis was excellent, including those measurements made under simulated hypertensive crisis. There were no differences in any of the intraoperative measures or thermal damage evaluated histologically. Wound healing was normal. The burst pressures for ex vivo vessels sealed by HAR (median 619.2 mmHg) were significantly higher than those of SS (350.3 mmHg, P = 0.022). Both devices displayed acceptable characteristics in sealing canine pulmonary arteries and veins. The only difference observed was that HAR produced burst pressures 76.8% greater than SS, which may lead to a lower percentage of failures in the region of physiological interest. Use of ultrasonic devices in thoracic applications provides a high rate of initial hemostasis, supraphysiological burst pressures, and durable seals that heal normally.

Keywords: ultrasonic sealing, thoracic, pulmonary vessels, burst pressure, hemostasis

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]