Back to Journals » Journal of Blood Medicine » Volume 16

Comparison of Platelet Indices, Lymphocyte, and Systemic Inflammation Indices on Days 1 and 8 in Surviving and Non-Surviving COVID-19 Patients at Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia

Authors Harti GF, Maulida SN ORCID logo, Susandi E ORCID logo, Fadjari TH, Sumardi U ORCID logo, Alisjahbana B ORCID logo, Wijaya I ORCID logo

Received 6 November 2024

Accepted for publication 21 January 2025

Published 4 February 2025 Volume 2025:16 Pages 61—74

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S499023

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Martin H Bluth



Gusti Fungani Harti,1 Syifa Nur Maulida,2 Evan Susandi,3 Trinugroho Heri Fadjari,1 Uun Sumardi,3 Bachti Alisjahbana,2,3 Indra Wijaya1

1Division of Hemato and Oncology Medic, Department of Internal Medicine, Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia; 2Research Center for Care and Control of Infectious Disease, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia; 3Division of Tropical and Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia

Correspondence: Indra Wijaya, Division of Hemato and Oncology Medic, Department of Internal Medicine, Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran, Pasteur No. 38, Bandung, West Java, 40161, Indonesia, Email [email protected]

Purpose: This study aimed to compare platelet count, platelet indices, lymphocyte, and systemic inflammation indices between surviving and non-surviving COVID-19 patients, measured at admission and on the eighth day of hospitalization.
Patients and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on COVID-19 patients hospitalized at Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, from March to December 2020. Patient characteristics and laboratory data were sourced from medical records and the Clinical Pathology Laboratory. Bivariate analysis was performed to determine the comparison of platelet indexes between Surviving and Non-Surviving COVID-19 patients depending on data distribution. Significantly correlated variables in Bivariate analysis were included in the ROC analysis, with the AUC used to identify optimal threshold values for laboratory parameters.
Results: Data from 132 patients were analyzed, with 106 (80.3%) surviving and 32 (19.7%) not surviving. Non-surviving patients had lower platelet count, PLTCT, and lymphocyte levels but higher MPV and PDW compared to survivors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that on day 1, lymphocytes had a higher area under the curve (AUC) than MPV. On day 8, lymphocytes had the highest AUC, followed by platelet count, MPV, PLTCT, and PDW.
Conclusion: Platelet indices, lymphocyte counts, and systemic inflammation index have the potential to distinguish the severity of COVID-19.

Keywords: mortality, platelet indices, thrombocytopenia, SII, NLR

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was first detected in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared it a global pandemic. By March 2022, there were 474,805,725 confirmed cases and 6,123,387 deaths globally, with 154,000 deaths reported in Indonesia.1,2 The mortality rate for COVID-19 reached 61.5% among confirmed cases.

The severity of COVID-19 symptoms varies from mild to moderate and severe.3 A meta-analysis of over 50,000 cases showed that 18.1% of infections resulted in severe illness.4 Clinical manifestations of COVID-19 are correlated with various laboratory parameters, emphasizing the importance of simple hematological analyses, such as complete blood count (CBC).5 These analyses are widely utilized in both large and small laboratories, as well as in outpatient and inpatient settings.6 The inexpensive and accessible laboratory tests can provide valuable insights into disease severity and guide treatment decisions.6–9

Monitoring hematological markers, such as platelet indices,10–21 lymphocyte,22–29 and neutrophil25,26,30,31 levels, is crucial for assessing clinical progression and detecting potential deterioration in patient conditions.5 The platelet index serves as a key marker of platelet activation and reflects platelet quality. It includes measurements of total platelet count, morphology, and proliferation.12 The lifespan of platelets, typically 7–10 days, aligns with the estimated duration of COVID-19, which ranges from 7 to 14 days from the onset of symptoms to clinical manifestations.8 During this period, infections can cause changes in platelets, which are detectable through the platelet index as a marker of activation.14,32 Monitoring changes in platelet count from day 1 of disease onset and throughout treatment is crucial for assessing the disease’s clinical progression.13

The relationship between lymphocytes and COVID-19 is being explored, with hypotheses suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 may directly infect T cells, leading to a reduction in CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes.33 Numerous concurrent studies have also indicated that hematologic parameters, such as platelet indices10–21 and lymphocyte22–29 correlate with the severity and mortality of COVID-19 cases.

On the other hand, several parameters have been introduced to estimate the severity of COVID-19. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)25,26,30,31,34,35 and systemic inflammation index (SII)34,36–39 is an inflammatory parameter that can estimate the severity of symptoms of COVID-19. The SII is obtained by calculating the number of lymphocytes, neutrophils, and platelets. A higher score of SII indicated a poor prognostic marker in several malignancies.40 During the COVID-19 pandemic, SII has been used to predict the in-hospital mortality of the disease.34 It is a marker to predict the need for invasive ventilators and poor patient outcomes.41

This study aimed to compare platelet indices, lymphocyte, and systemic inflammation index on admission and day 8 of hospitalization between surviving and non-surviving COVID-19 patients.

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Participants

This retrospective cohort study was conducted on COVID-19 patients hospitalized at Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, from March to December 2020. We collected secondary data from day 1 (admission day) to day 812,42 of hospitalization, including patient characteristics and final outcomes from medical records. Laboratory data were obtained from the electronic records of the Clinical Pathology Laboratory at the hospital. Patients were categorized into two groups based on survival outcomes: survivors and non-survivors.

Inclusion criteria included confirmed COVID-19 patients over 18 years old with complete hematological and platelet index data in their medical records. Patients were excluded if they had autoimmune or hematologic disorders; were pregnant women; had malignant diseases, human immunodeficiency virus, or chronic liver; or were immunocompromised and receiving immunosuppressive therapy.

Data Collection

Data from days 1 and 8 of hospitalization for COVID-19 patients were gathered from the hospital’s information system. Patient characteristics such as age, gender, comorbidities, treatment, COVID-19 outcomes, severity levels, and laboratory results were collected. Laboratory data included hemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocyte count, segmented neutrophils, total neutrophils, total platelets, absolute lymphocytes, and platelet indices. MPV reflects the average platelet size, PDW indicates variability in platelet size and anisocytosis, and PLTCT represents total platelet mass, calculated using the following formula: platelet count × MPV / 10,000. Systemic inflammatory index (SII) was calculated as platelet count × neutrophil count/lymphocyte count. COVID-19 diagnosis was confirmed through reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using nasal swabs. COVID-19 severity was classified as mild, moderate, or severe. Severe cases included patients with oxygen saturation below 94% without oxygen supplementation, PaO2/FiO2 ratio under 300 mmHg, rapid breathing (over 30 breaths per minute), more than 50% lung infiltration, acute respiratory distress syndrome, septic shock, or those requiring invasive ventilation or vasopressor therapy. Moderate patients were classified as patients with clinical signs of pneumonia, including fever, cough, dyspnea, and rapid breathing, without evidence of severe pneumonia. These patients generally do not exhibit signs of respiratory failure or significant hypoxia, while mild cases were classified as patients with non-specific clinical signs such as fever, cough, sore throat, nasal congestion, malaise, headache, and muscle aches.43

Statistical Analysis

Demographic and clinical data were presented as the median and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables and as frequencies and proportions for categorical variables. The normality of data distribution was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Statistical comparisons between the survived and non-survived groups were made using the Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, unpaired t-test for normal distributed data, and Mann–Whitney test for skewed data, with a p-value of <0.05 considered statistically significant.

Significantly correlated variables in bivariate analysis were included in the ROC analysis, with the AUC used to identify optimal threshold values for laboratory parameters. Cut-off points, sensitivity, and specificity were determined using ROC analysis and were presented as descriptive statistics. All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS version 27, GraphPad PRISM version 9, and MedCalc version 20.011.

Ethical Consideration

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Health Research Ethics Committee of Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, with ethics number LB.02.01/X.6.5/451/2022 with the approval date of 13 December 2022, and performed with a waiver of informed consents, as it utilized anonymized secondary data and had no additional examination directly contact to the patients.

Results

We screened data from 691 confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted from March to December 2020. Most patients (559) had incomplete records of hematological and platelet indices, leaving 132 patients who met the inclusion criterion for the study (Figure 1). This group consisted of 106 (80.3%) survivors and 26 (19.7%) non-survivors. The characteristics of the group are detailed in Table 1. The non-survivors had a significantly older median age compared to the survivors. Males predominated in both groups, comprising 59.4% of the survivors and 88.4% of the non-survivors. Hypertension was the most prevalent risk factor in both groups. The non-survivors also had a higher proportion of severe cases compared to the survivors, with rates of 65.4% and 28.3%, respectively, which was statistically significant.

Table 1 Comparison of Background Characteristics of Subjects

Figure 1 Subject selection process.

Abbreviations: COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; IQR, Interquartile range.

From the hematological parameters, the levels of segmented neutrophils, total neutrophils, and absolute neutrophils were higher in the non-survivor group, with values of 75.5 (IQR, 65.6–84.0), 76.5 (IQR, 66.0–84.0), and 5.885 (IQR, 3725–8380), respectively, compared to the survivor group, which had values of 84.5 (IQR, 73.8–89.3), 84.5 (IQR, 74.0–90.0), and 7.160 (IQR, 5.445–12.763). These differences were statistically significant. In contrast, the total lymphocyte count and absolute lymphocytes were lower in the non-survivor group, with values of 2.0 (IQR, 6.0–17.3) and 872 (IQR, 513–1.142), respectively, compared to the survivor group, which had values of 16.0 (IQR, 10.0–24.0) and 1.188 (IQR, 847–1.638), respectively, and these differences were also statistically significant. The non-survivor also shows a statistically higher NLR and SII, with a value of 12.6 (IQR, 5.2–15.0) and 2129.3 (IQR, 1128.9–3918.1), respectively, compared to the survivors with a value of 4.7 (IQR, 2.8–8.6) and 1149.8 (IQR, 563–2422), respectively.

The differences in platelet indices between the survived and non-survived groups on day 1 and day 8 of treatment are shown in Table 2. Our study indicated that platelet levels were lower in the non-survivor group than in the survivor group on both day 1 and day 8 of admission (Table 2). However, only the platelets measured on day 8 showed statistical significance (p = <0.001) (Figure 2A). PLTCT counts were lower in the non-survivor group compared to the survivor group on day 1 and day 8 as well, with only the day 8 results being statistically significant (p = 0.002) (Figure 2B).

Table 2 Comparison of Hematology Parameters, NLR, and Systemic Inflammation Indices in Survived and Non-Survived COVID-19 Patients

Figure 2 Boxplot distribution on day 1 and day 8 for survived and non-survived COVID-19 patients. (A) platelet count, (B) PLTCT, (C) MPV, (D) PDW, (E) total lymphocyte, (F) absolute lymphocyte, (G) NLR, and (H) SII.

Notes: *p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005, ****p < 0.001.

Compared to the survivor group, the MPV levels were higher in the non-survivor group on both day 1 and day 8 of treatment, with p-values of 0.039 and 0.001, respectively (Figure 2C). The PDW levels were also higher in the non-survivor group compared to the survivor group, but statistical significance was only observed on day 8 with a p-value of 0.009 (Figure 2D).

Figure 2E illustrates that total lymphocyte levels were lower in the non-survivor group than in the survivor group on both day 1 and day 8 of treatment, with statistically significant p-values of <0.001 for both days. The absolute lymphocyte levels were similarly lower in the non-survivor group compared to the survivor group on day 1 and day 8 (Figure 2F), with significant differences on both days, yielding p-values of 0.003 and <0.001, respectively.

Additionally, NLR and SII also exhibited a statistically higher value in the non-survivor group compared to the survivor group on both day 1 and day 8 of treatment with the p-values of <0.001 from both days for NLR (Figure 2G), and <0.006* and <0.001, respectively for SII (Figure 2H).

The ROC analysis was conducted on total lymphocytes, absolute lymphocytes, MPV, NLR, and SII, for the non-survivor group on day 1 of treatment and on total lymphocytes, absolute lymphocytes, platelet count, MPV, PLTCT, PDW, NLR, and SII for the non-survivor group on day 8. This analysis aimed to identify the most reliable hematologic indicator for predicting mortality in COVID-19 patients. The NLR value exhibited the highest AUC of 0.740 as a mortality predictor on day 1 of treatment, with a cutoff of >12.4, a sensitivity of 53.8%, and a specificity of 90.6% (Figure 3A). This was followed by total lymphocyte, absolute lymphocytes, SII and MPV, which had AUCs of 0.729, 0.691, 0.674, and 0.631, respectively (Figure 3B–E). On day 8, the total lymphocyte value showed the highest AUC of 0.814 as a mortality predictor, with a cutoff value of ≤9103/µL, sensitivity of 88.5%, and specificity of 64.2% (Figure 4A) followed by NLR, absolute lymphocyte, platelet count, SII, MPV, PLTCT, and PDW with AUCs of 0.813, 0.750, 0.747, 0.726, 0.701, 0.691, and 0.665 respectively (Figure 4).

Figure 3 ROC curves of day 1 treatment of non-survived COVID-19 patients. (A) NLR, (B) total lymphocyte, (C) absolute lymphocyte, (D) SII, and (E) MPV. The blue line represents the ROC curve based on sensitivity and specificity calculations at various cutoff levels.

Figure 4 ROC curves of day 8 treatment of non-survived COVID-19 patients. (A) total lymphocyte, (B) NLR, (C) absolute lymphocyte, (D) platelet count, (E) SII, (F) MPV, (G) PLTCT, and (H) PDW. The blue line represents the ROC curve based on sensitivity and specificity calculations at various cutoff levels.

Discussion

In this study, we noted variations in platelet indices, lymphocytes, NLR, and SII between COVID-19 patients who survived and those who did not. The non-survivor group exhibited lower levels of platelet count, PLTCT, and lymphocytes, along with higher levels of MPV, PDW, NLR, and SII compared to the survivor group.

The platelet count and PLTCT in the non-survivor group were significantly lower than in the survivor group on day 8 of treatment. A meta-analysis indicated that thrombocytopenia was associated with a threefold increased risk of severe COVID-19, with lower platelet counts associated with higher mortality.44 Wang et al identified a correlation between thrombocytopenia and mortality. In contrast, Guclu et al reported that thrombocytopenia was more common in non-survivors than in survivors but found no correlation between platelet levels and mortality.17 Additionally, Huang et al observed no significant difference in platelet counts between COVID-19 patients in ICU and non-ICU settings, which may be attributed to the limited sample size in their study.4

It has been reported that mortality increases as platelet count decreases.11 Immunopathological damage to lung tissues has led to histological examination of platelet activation and aggregation in the lungs.45,46 Studies from post-mortem examinations of COVID-19 patients revealed elevated platelet–fibrin thrombin in the small arteries and capillaries of the pulmonary vasculature, indicating a hypercoagulable state that can increase the risk of both venous and arterial thrombosis in critically ill COVID-19 patients, resulting in reduced platelet count and PLTCT.47–50

We found that the non-survivor group had a lower lymphocyte count than the survivor group on days 1 and 8 of treatment, with a statistically significant difference. A study indicated that lymphocyte levels were notable lower in severe cases and in patients requiring ICU care, serving as a prognostic marker for COVID-19 patients.29,31,51 The meta-analysis showed that patients with severe COVID-19 experienced a decrease in lymphocytes. Additionally, other studies found that lymphopenia is associated with a threefold increased risk of severe COVID-19 infection.24 However, another study noted an increase in lymphocyte count from day 1 to day 7 in non-survivor COVID-19 patients, although this increase was not statistically significant.22

Lymphocytes are crucial for regulating immune responses during inflammation. Changes in lymphocyte counts during COVID-19 may result from an inflammatory cytokine storm and T-cell interference.28 Tan et al proposed several potential mechanisms for the changes in lymphocytes during COVID-19 infection: the virus targets the ACE2 receptor on lymphocytes, causing their death, and it may also directly damage lymphatic organs.23,52–54 Another study indicated that the virus can suppress bone marrow function or trigger immune-mediated destruction of lymphocytes.27,55–59 These mechanisms may collectively contribute to lymphopenia. Based on these findings, lymphocyte count could be an effective tool for quickly assessing the prognosis of COVID-19 patients.

In this study, the non-survivor group exhibited higher levels of MPV and PDW, with MPV being significant on both days 1 and 8 of treatment, while PDW was only significant on day 8. Similar findings were reported by Guclu et al and Sertbas et al, indicating a relationship between MPV, PDW, and mortality.13 Their research showed that a one-unit increase in MPV was linked to a 1.76 times higher risk of mortality.17 However, other studies found no significant differences in MPV values among COVID-19 patients in the ICU, despite observing an increase in MPV that was not statistically significant.9,60

A study found that inflammatory cytokines might promote thrombopoiesis through various mechanisms, leading to the release of large and active platelets that could cause thromboembolism.13 Three hypotheses regarding platelet count and structure are proposed: First, thrombocytopenia may result from the infection of the bone marrow, similar to other coronaviruses. Second, platelet destruction may occur due to the immune system. Third, platelet consumption may arise from aggregation in the lungs. Generally, as platelet count decreases, platelet production increases, which may account for the increase in MPV and PDW.17 In addition to its inflammatory effects, COVID-19 has been shown to influence the hematopoietic system and hemostasis.61 The study suggests that findings related to platelet count, PLTCT, MPV, and PDW may serve as prognostic indicators for predicting mortality in COVID-19 patients.

Based on the multicellular involvement in the pathophysiology of COVID-19, it was no surprise that more indicators were developed, such as the systematic immunoinflammatory index (SII).34,62 This indicator is calculated based on the NLR and platelet count and is used to predict COVID-19 severity and mortality.63,64 Our study found that both NLR and SII were significantly higher in the non-survived group compared to the survived group. These findings align with those of previous studies, which reported significantly higher SII values in non-survived patients compared to those who recovered.65 Xue et al also showed that severe symptoms patients had an elevated SII compared to mild to moderate patients with SII.66 Furthermore, a study also found that SII was an independent prognostic marker for hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the intensive care unit.38 Recently, it has also been reported that the SII was significantly altered in COVID-19 patients when compared to healthy controls, suggesting a diagnostic role in SARS-CoV2-infected patients.67

Additionally, T lymphocytes CD4+ and CD8+ decrease is associated with disease severity, leading to increased NLR values, which have been reported to be a more sensitive biomarker of inflammation than the individual levels of neutrophils and lymphocytes.68 In COVID-19 infection, neutrophil activation stimulates the formation of neutrophil extracellular trap (NET), platelet aggregation, and cell damage.69 In addition, lymphopenia is a major immunological disorder in most severe COVID-19 patients and is significantly associated with mortality. Lymphopenia can cause immunosuppression and trigger a cytokine storm, which plays an important role in viral persistence, replication, multiorgan failure, and eventually death.70 Platelets are also crucial in the severity of the development of COVID-19 and responsible for hemostasis and thrombus formation that can induced by the proinflammatory microenvironment, contributing to the existence of cytokine storm that characterizes the aggressive course of COVID-19.71 In this context, NLR and SII value may serve as reliable predictors of severity in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

The ROC analysis revealed that NLR showed the highest AUC, followed by lymphocytes, SII, and MPV on the first day of hospitalization. On the eighth day of follow-up, lymphocytes showed the highest AUC, followed by NLR, platelet count, SII, MPV, PLTCT, and PDW, indicating that NLR was more effective in predicting mortality in COVID-19 patients on eight days of hospitalization.

This study has some limitations. It is a retrospective cohort study based on existing data with a relatively small sample size. Additionally, less than half of the registered COVID-19 patients were included, and the sample primarily consists of hospitalized male patients under 60 years old with mild to moderate symptoms.

Conclusion

Platelet indices, lymphocyte counts, NLR, and systemic inflammation index have the potential to distinguish the severity of COVID-19.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the support of the staff of Hasan Sadikin General Hospital for this study.

Funding

There is no funding to report.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Surendra H, Elyazar IR, Djaafara BA, et al. Clinical characteristics and mortality associated with COVID-19 in Jakarta, Indonesia: a hospital-based retrospective cohort study. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021;9. doi:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100108

2. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(8):727–733. doi:10.1056/nejmoa2001017

3. Kilercik M, Demirelce Ö, Serdar MA, Mikailova P, Serteser M. A new haematocytometric index: predicting severity and mortality risk value in COVID-19 patients. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0254073. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0254073

4. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497–506. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5

5. Wang C, Deng R, Gou L, et al. Preliminary study to identify severe from moderate cases of COVID-19 using combined hematology parameters. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(9):593. doi:10.21037/atm-20-3391

6. Tahir Huyut M, Huyut Z, İlkbahar F, Mertoğlu C. What is the impact and efficacy of routine immunological, biochemical and hematological biomarkers as predictors of COVID-19 mortality? Int Immunopharmacol. 2022;105:108542. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2022.108542

7. Sayed AA. The cost-effectiveness of requesting a Complete Blood Count (CBC) in the management of COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia. Healthcare. 2022;10(9):1780. doi:10.3390/healthcare10091780

8. Huyut MT, İlkbahar F. The effectiveness of blood routine parameters and some biomarkers as a potential diagnostic tool in the diagnosis and prognosis of Covid-19 disease. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021;98:107838. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107838

9. Asan A, Üstündağ Y, Koca N, et al. Do initial hematologic indices predict the severity of covid-19 patients? Turk J Med Sci. 2021;51(1):39–44. doi:10.3906/sag-2007-97

10. Barrett TJ, Bilaloglu S, Cornwell M, et al. Platelets contribute to disease severity in COVID-19. J Thromb Haemost. 2021;19(12):3139–3153. doi:10.1111/jth.15534

11. Yang X, Yang Q, Wang Y, et al. Thrombocytopenia and its association with mortality in patients with COVID-19. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(6):1469–1472. doi:10.1111/jth.14848

12. Liu Y, Sun W, Guo Y, et al. Association between platelet parameters and mortality in coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective cohort study. Platelets. 2020;31(4):490–496. doi:10.1080/09537104.2020.1754383

13. Sertbas Y. Mean Platelet Volume as an early predictor for the complication of COVID-19. Haydarpasa Numune Training Res Hosp Med J. 2021. doi:10.14744/hnhj.2020.90582

14. Zhang S, Cui YL, Diao MY, Chen DC, Lin ZF. Use of platelet indices for determining illness severity and predicting prognosis in critically ill patients. Chin Med J. 2015;128(15):2012–2018. doi:10.4103/0366-6999.161346

15. Gao Y, Li Y, Yu X, et al. The impact of various platelet indices as prognostic markers of septic shock. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e103761. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103761.g001

16. Mezgebe M, Jacobson BF, Mayne ES, Louw S. Change in platelet indices in patients with Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): a reflection of platelet activation and contribution to immunothrombosis? Int J Lab Hematol. 2022;44(1):e46–e48. doi:10.1111/ijlh.13705

17. Güçlü E, Kocayiğit H, Okan HD, et al. Effect of COVID-19 on platelet count and its indices. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2020;66(8):1122–1127. doi:10.1590/1806-9282.66.8.1122

18. Çavuş Z, Tezdönen M, Çekme M, Türkmen ÜA. Determination of plateletcrit, mean platelet volume in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. J Immunol Clin Microbiol. 2021;6:81–89.

19. Shankaralingappa A, Tummidi S, Arun Babu T. Diagnostic value of platelet indices in COVID 19 infection: a case-control study from a single tertiary care center. Egypt J Intern Med. 2022;34(1). doi:10.1186/s43162-022-00123-x

20. Rizk M, El Assal M, Khalil F, El Hamed Ould Ahmed EM, Afifi M. Relationship between platelet indices and severity of COVID-19 infection. Benha Med J. 2023. doi:10.21608/bmfj.2023.221152.1848

21. Bao C, Tao X, Cui W, et al. SARS-CoV-2 induced thrombocytopenia as an important biomarker significantly correlated with abnormal coagulation function, increased intravascular blood clot risk and mortality in COVID-19 patients. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2020;9(1):16. doi:10.1186/s40164-020-00172-4

22. Rezaei M, Marjani M, Mahmoudi S, Mortaz E, Mansouri D. Dynamic changes of lymphocyte subsets in the course of COVID-19. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2021;182(3):254–262. doi:10.1159/000514202

23. Tan L, Wang Q, Zhang D, et al. Lymphopenia predicts disease severity of COVID-19: a descriptive and predictive study. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5(1). doi:10.1038/s41392-020-0148-4

24. Zhao Q, Meng M, Kumar R, et al. Lymphopenia is associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Inter J Infect Dis. 2020;96:131–135. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.086

25. Bintoro SUY, Dwijayanti NMI, Pramudya D, et al. Hematologic and coagulopathy parameter as a survival predictor among moderate to severe COVID-19 patients in non- ICU ward: a single-center study at the main referral hospital in Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia. F1000Res. 2021;10:791. doi:10.12688/f1000research.53803.1

26. Ravindra R, Ramamurthy P, Aslam S SM, et al. Platelet indices and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) as markers for predicting COVID-19 infection severity. Cureus. 2022. doi:10.7759/cureus.28206

27. He Z, Zhao C, Dong Q, et al. Effects of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus infection on peripheral blood lymphocytes and their subsets. Inter J Infect Dis. 2005;9(6):323–330. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2004.07.014

28. Tavakolpour S, Rakhshandehroo T, Wei EX, Rashidian M. Lymphopenia during the COVID-19 infection: what it shows and what can be learned. Immunol Lett. 2020;225:31–32. doi:10.1016/j.imlet.2020.06.013

29. Wagner J, DuPont A, Larson S, Cash B, Farooq A. Absolute lymphocyte count is a prognostic marker in Covid-19: a retrospective cohort review. Int J Lab Hematol. 2020;42(6):761–765. doi:10.1111/ijlh.13288

30. Cahyani C, Novida H, Soelistijo SA, Hadi U, Siagian N. Correlation between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio with disease severity in diabetic patients with COVID-19 at tertiary referral hospital in Indonesia. J Hunan Univ Nat Sci. 2021;48.

31. Kong M, Zhang H, Cao X, Mao X, Lu Z. Higher level of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte is associated with severe COVID-19. Epidemiol Infect. 2020;148. doi:10.1017/S0950268820001557

32. Guclu E, Durmaz Y, Karabay O. Effect of severe sepsis on platelet count and their indices. Afr Health Sci. 2013;13(2):333–338. doi:10.4314/ahs.v13i2.19

33. Cohen A, Harari E, Cipok M, et al. Immature platelets in patients hospitalized with Covid-19. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021;51(3):608–616. doi:10.1007/s11239-020-02290-6

34. Fois AG, Paliogiannis P, Scano V, et al. The systemic inflammation index on admission predicts in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients. Molecules. 2020;25(23):5725. doi:10.3390/molecules25235725

35. Fuad M, Oehadian A, Prihatni D, Marthoenis M. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and Covid-19 symptom-based severity at admission. Althea Med J. 2021;8(1). doi:10.15850/amj.v8n1.2255

36. Lashgari R, Shangwen P, Aslani MR. Role of leukocytes and systemic inflammation indexes (NLR, PLR, MLP, DNLR, NLPR, AISI, SIR-I, and SII) on admission predicts in-hospital mortality in non-elderly and elderly COVID-19 patients.

37. Pramantik DN, Aryani D. Assessment of systemic immune inflammation index to predict SARS-CoV-2 infection. Indones J Clin Pathol Med Lab. 2021;27(3):238–243. doi:10.24293/ijcpml.v27i3.1707

38. Nalbant A, Demirci T, Kaya T, Aydın A, Altındiş M, Güçlü E. Can prognostic nutritional index and systemic immune‐inflammatory index predict disease severity in COVID‐19? Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75(10). doi:10.1111/ijcp.14544

39. Li H, Huang J, Pan W, et al. Systemic Immune-Inflammatory Index predicts prognosis of patients with COVID-19: a retrospective study. Res Square. 2020. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-30701/v1

40. Zhong JH, Huang DH, Chen ZY. Prognostic role of systemic immune-inflammation index in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(43):75381–75388. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.18856

41. Muhammad S, Fischer I, Naderi S, et al. Systemic inflammatory index is a novel predictor of intubation requirement and mortality after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Pathogens. 2021;10(1):58. doi:10.3390/pathogens10010058

42. He J, Wei Y, Chen J, Chen F, Gao W, Lu X. Dynamic trajectory of platelet-related indicators and survival of severe COVID-19 patients. Crit Care. 2020;24(1). doi:10.1186/s13054-020-03339-x

43. Kementrian Kesehatan RI. Pedoman pencegahan dan pengendalian coronavirus disease (COVID-19). 2020.

44. Lippi G, Plebani M, Henry BM. Thrombocytopenia is associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections: a meta-analysis. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;506:145–148. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2020.03.022

45. Xu Z, Shi L, Wang Y, et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(4):420–422. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30076-X

46. Yang M, Ng MHL, Chi KL. Thrombocytopenia in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (review). Hematology. 2005;10(2):101–105. doi:10.1080/10245330400026170

47. Wichmann D, Sperhake JP, Lütgehetmann M, et al. Autopsy findings and venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173(4):268–277. doi:10.7326/M20-2003

48. Dolhnikoff M, Duarte-Neto AN, de Almeida Monteiro RA, et al. Pathological evidence of pulmonary thrombotic phenomena in severe COVID-19. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(6):1517–1519. doi:10.1111/jth.14844

49. Menter T, Haslbauer JD, Nienhold R, et al. Postmortem examination of COVID-19 patients reveals diffuse alveolar damage with severe capillary congestion and variegated findings in lungs and other organs suggesting vascular dysfunction. Histopathology. 2020;77(2):198–209. doi:10.1111/his.14134

50. Fox SE, Akmatbekov A, Harbert JL, Li G, Quincy Brown J, Vander Heide RS. Pulmonary and cardiac pathology in African American patients with COVID-19: an autopsy series from New Orleans. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(7):681–686. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30243-5

51. Odabasi MS, Ozkaya G, Serin E, Akkus A, Yilmaz P, Sayan I. Laboratory findings in predicting intensive care need and death of COVID-19 patients. Int J Med Biochem. 2021;4(2):77–84. doi:10.14744/ijmb.2021.53315

52. Xu H, Zhong L, Deng J, et al. High expression of ACE2 receptor of 2019-nCoV on the epithelial cells of oral mucosa. Int J Oral Sci. 2020;12(1). doi:10.1038/s41368-020-0074-x

53. Liao YC, Liang WG, Chen FW, Hsu JH, Yang JJ, Chang MS. IL-19 induces production of IL-6 and TNF-and results in cell apoptosis through TNF-1. J Immunol. 2002;169(8):4288–4297. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.169.8.4288

54. Fischer K, Hoffmann P, Voelkl S, et al. Inhibitory effect of tumor cell-derived lactic acid on human T cells. Blood. 2007;109:3812–3819. doi:10.1182/blood-2006-07

55. Yang M, Li CK, Li K, et al. Hematological findings in SARS patients and possible mechanisms. Int J Mol Med. 2004;14:311–315.

56. Zheng M, Gao Y, Wang G, et al. Functional exhaustion of antiviral lymphocytes in COVID-19 patients. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020;17(5):533–535. doi:10.1038/s41423-020-0402-2

57. Zheng HY, Zhang M, Yang CX, et al. Elevated exhaustion levels and reduced functional diversity of T cells in peripheral blood may predict severe progression in COVID-19 patients. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020;17(5):541–543. doi:10.1038/s41423-020-0401-3

58. Sarzi-Puttini P, Giorgi V, Sirotti S, et al. COVID-19, cytokines and immunosuppression: what can we learn from severe acute respiratory syndrome? Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2020;38(2):337–342.

59. Xie M, Chen Q. Insight into 2019 novel coronavirus—an updated interim review and lessons from SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. Inter J Infect Dis. 2020;94:119–124. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.071

60. Aktaş A, Sener K, Yılmaz N, Tunç M, Yolcu S. Is mean platelet volume useful for predicting the prognosis of COVID-19 diagnosed patients? IJRSMHS. 2020;5:8–11.

61. Magro C, Mulvey JJ, Berlin D, et al. Complement associated microvascular injury and thrombosis in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19 infection: a report of five cases. Transl Res. 2020;220:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.trsl.2020.04.007

62. Citu C, Gorun F, Motoc A, et al. The predictive role of NLR, d-NLR, MLR, and SIRI in COVID-19 mortality. Diagnostics. 2022;12(1):122. doi:10.3390/diagnostics12010122

63. Sayed AA. Assessing the diagnostic values of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and systematic immunoinflammatory index (SII) as biomarkers in predicting COVID-19 severity: a multicentre comparative study. Medicina. 2024;60(4):602. doi:10.3390/medicina60040602

64. Ghobadi H, Mohammadshahi J, Javaheri N, Fouladi N, Mirzazadeh Y, Aslani MR. Role of leukocytes and systemic inflammation indexes (NLR, PLR, MLP, dNLR, NLPR, AISI, SIR-I, and SII) on admission predicts in-hospital mortality in non-elderly and elderly COVID-19 patients. Front Med. 2022;9. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.916453

65. Luo X, Zhou W, Yan X, et al. Prognostic value of C-reactive protein in patients with coronavirus 2019. Clinl Infect Dis. 2020;71(16):2174–2179. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa641

66. Xue G, Gan X, Wu Z, et al. Novel serological biomarkers for inflammation in predicting disease severity in patients with COVID-19. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020;89:107065. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2020.107065

67. Usul E, Şan İ, Bekgöz B, Şahin A. Role of hematological parameters in Covid-19 patients in the emergency room. Biomarker Med. 2020;14(13):1207–1215. doi:10.2217/bmm-2020-0317

68. Chan AS, Rout A. Use of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios in COVID-19. J Clin Med Res. 2020;12(7):448–453. doi:10.14740/jocmr4240

69. Iliadi V, Konstantinidou I, Aftzoglou K, Iliadis S, Konstantinidis TG, Tsigalou C. The emerging role of neutrophils in the pathogenesis of thrombosis in COVID-19. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(10):5368. doi:10.3390/ijms22105368

70. Jafarzadeh A, Jafarzadeh S, Nozari P, Mokhtari P, Nemati M. Lymphopenia an important immunological abnormality in patients with COVID‐19: possible mechanisms. Scand J Immunol. 2021;93(2). doi:10.1111/sji.12967

71. Esparza-Ibarra EL, Ayala-Luján JL, Mendoza-Almanza B, et al. The role of platelet in severe and fatal forms of COVID-19. Curr Mol Med. 2022;22(7):572–583. doi:10.2174/1566524021666210910112404

Creative Commons License © 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, 3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.