Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane
Received 10 August 2018
Accepted for publication 15 October 2018
Published 26 November 2018 Volume 2018:12 Pages 2409—2414
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Jie Zhang
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser
Ryo Yomoda, Hiroki Sasaki, Jiro Kogo, Akira Shiono, Tatsuya Jujo, Reio Sekine, Naoto Tokuda, Yasushi Kitaoka, Hitoshi Takagi
Department of Ophthalmology, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare straight and angled incisions in 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy in patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM).
Methods: Seventy-three eyes of 68 patients with ERM who underwent straight (35 eyes) or angled incision (38 eyes) for 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy were retrospectively evaluated.
Results: No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in postoperative logarithm of minimal angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity. The intraocular pressure and rate of hypotony 1 day postoperatively did not differ between the straight- and angled-incision groups (intraocular pressure: 11.5 vs 13.4 mmHg, respectively; rate of hypotony: 20% vs 8%, respectively). Surgical wound closing occurred by postoperative day 10 in both groups.
Conclusion: A straight incision is as safe and useful in ERM vitrectomy as an angled one.
Keywords: 27-gauge vitrectomy, MIVS, epiretinal membrane, straight incision, angled incision, anterior segment OCT
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]