Back to Journals » Patient Intelligence » Volume 2 » Default

Collaborative decision-making and promoting treatment adherence in pediatric chronic illness

Authors Dennis Drotar D, Crawford P, Bonner M

Published 26 March 2010 Volume 2010:2(Default) Pages 1—7


Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 2

Dennis Drotar, Peggy Crawford, Margaret Bonner

Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Abstract: Collaborative or shared decision-making between health care providers and families can facilitate treatment adherence, health outcomes, and satisfaction with care in the management of pediatric chronic illness, but raises special challenges. Barriers such as authoritarian models of medical care as well as absence of time and opportunity for dialogue limit collaborative decision making and can disrupt treatment adherence. However, models of provider-family communication that emphasize communication and shared goal-setting inform an anticipatory guidance model of collaborative decision-making that can enhance treatment adherence. Salient challenges and strategies involved in implementing collaborative decision-making in pediatric chronic illness care are described. Research is needed to: 1) describe the communication and decision-making process in the management of pediatric chronic illness; and 2) evaluate the impact of interventions that enhance collaborative decision-making on provider-family communication, illness management, and treatment adherence.

Keywords: collaborative decision-making, shared decision-making, treatment adherence, pediatric chronic illness

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF] 


Readers of this article also read:

Advances in cancer pain from bone metastasis

Zhu XC, Zhang JL, Ge CT, Yu YY, Wang P, Yuan TF, Fu CY

Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2015, 9:4239-4245

Published Date: 18 August 2015

Complex role of HIF in cancer: the known, the unknown, and the unexpected

Tiburcio PD, Choi H, Huang LE

Hypoxia 2014, 2:59-70

Published Date: 18 June 2014

Cross-linked acrylic hydrogel for the controlled delivery of hydrophobic drugs in cancer therapy

Deepa G, Thulasidasan AK, Anto RJ, Pillai JJ, Kumar GS

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:4077-4088

Published Date: 27 July 2012

Crystallization after intravitreal ganciclovir injection

Pitipol Choopong, Nattaporn Tesavibul, Nattawut Rodanant

Clinical Ophthalmology 2010, 4:709-711

Published Date: 14 July 2010