Back to Journals » Infection and Drug Resistance » Volume 19

Clinical Characteristics and Drug Resistance Profile of Mycobacterium colombiense Infection: A Study of 22 Cases

Authors Mei L ORCID logo, Liang F, Liu S ORCID logo, Chen H

Received 13 October 2025

Accepted for publication 16 January 2026

Published 29 January 2026 Volume 2026:19 572058

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S572058

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Hazrat Bilal



Lin Mei,1,2,* Feng Liang,1,* Shengsheng Liu,2 Hua Chen1

1Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Tuberculosis, Anhui Chest Hospital, Hefei, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Hua Chen, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, No. 62 Hengzhigang Road, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-13570550192, Fax +86- 02083595977, Email [email protected]

Purpose: Mycobacterium colombiense, a rare yet clinically significant species within the Mycobacterium avium complex, demonstrates a marked propensity for disseminated disease and is associated with high mortality. However, data on its clinical characteristics and drug resistance profiles remain scarce. This study aims to conduct an in-depth analysis of the clinical characteristics and drug resistance profile of Mycobacterium colombiense disease, providing insights for optimizing its diagnosis and treatment strategies.
Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 22 HIV-negative patients diagnosed with Mycobacterium colombiense disease at Guangzhou Chest Hospital from April 2021 to April 2024. Data included clinical manifestations, laboratory findings, and treatment regimens.
Results: Among the 22 confirmed cases, disseminated Mycobacterium colombiense disease accounted for 63.6% (14/22), primarily involving the lungs, bones and joints, serous cavities, and lymph nodes. Common symptoms included cough/sputum production, fatigue/weight loss, fever, bone pain, and subcutaneous abscesses/skin ulcers. All patients tested positive for Mycobacterium colombiense via tNGS, while 19 cases were concurrently confirmed through culture of sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid as part of the Mycobacterium avium complex. All patients received combined anti-nontuberculous mycobacterial therapy. Drug susceptibility testing performed in 11 cases revealed high sensitivity to bedaquiline, clofazimine, rifabutin, ethambutol, and rifampin.
Conclusion: Mycobacterium colombiense infection is prone to causing disseminated disease, affecting multiple organ systems with diverse clinical presentations. Timely therapeutic intervention can improve patient prognosis to some extent. This study offers valuable references for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of Mycobacterium colombiense infection, underscoring its practical significance in clinical practice.

Keywords: Mycobacterium colombiense, disseminated infection, drug susceptibility testing, nontuberculous mycobacteria, clinical characteristics

Introduction

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) refer to a broad category of mycobacteria excluding the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and Mycobacterium leprae. To date, approximately 200 species of NTM have been identified.1–6 The incidence of NTM infections has been increasing annually. Among these, Mycobacterium colombiense, a rare species within the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), has been infrequently reported in the literature and is associated with a higher mortality rate compared to other MAC species.6–9 This pathogen is characterized by its tendency to cause disseminated infections, involving multiple organs even in immunocompetent hosts, and it is difficult to differentiate from other MAC species using conventional culture methods.7–9 Current treatment strategies generally follow MAC guidelines, but the drug resistance profile of Mycobacterium colombiense has not been systematically evaluated, leading to considerable challenges in clinical management and high mortality rates.6,10

Due to the rarity of Mycobacterium colombiense, previous studies have been limited to case reports with small sample sizes, lacking comprehensive analyses of clinical features and drug resistance patterns. These studies have primarily focused on immunocompromised populations.7–11 This study retrospectively analyzes the clinical characteristics and drug resistance profiles of 22 clinically confirmed HIV-negative patients with Mycobacterium colombiense infection, aiming to provide insights for the diagnosis and treatment of this disease.

Materials and Methods

Study Subjects

Patients hospitalized or visiting the outpatient department of Guangzhou Chest Hospital from April 2021 to April 2024 were enrolled. Those suspected of mycobacterial infection underwent targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) of specimens such as sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), or bone aspirates to identify Mycobacterium colombiense infection. This retrospective study was conducted using clinical data obtained from previously hospitalized patients. All data were anonymized before analysis. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Guangzhou Chest Hospital (Approval No. KY-2024-046). Due to the use of anonymized data and the study’s retrospective design, the ethics committee granted an exemption from obtaining informed consent. Accordingly, this investigation was designed as a retrospective study utilizing anonymized electronic health record data.

Research Methods

Analysis of Clinical Characteristics

Inclusion Criteria: (1) Patients diagnosed with nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) disease according to the Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines for Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Diseases;2,3 (2) Detection of Mycobacterium colombiense-specific nucleic acid sequences via NGS in ≥1 specimen site (after excluding contamination), (3) adults of either gender presenting with relevant symptoms and confirmed by M. colombiense diagnostic method, (4) For patients with multiple positive cultures (eg, sputum, BALF, bone aspirate, skin pus, lymph node biopsy, blood) identified as the same species, only data from the initial diagnosis were analyzed.

Exclusion Criteria: (1) Patients with incomplete clinical data; (2) Those with NTM colonization (ie, meeting bacteriological criteria but not clinical diagnostic standards); (3) Key data missing (eg, lack of etiological confirmation or treatment follow-up records).

Clinical data including gender, age, symptoms, signs, comorbidities, imaging findings, and laboratory results were recorded.

Bacterial Identification and Drug Susceptibility Testing

Bacterial Identification
Culture and Identification Method

In accordance with the Technical Guidelines for Tuberculosis Laboratory Testing, mycobacterial culture was performed using the BD BACTEC MGIT 960 system (Becton, Dickinson and Company, USA).12 Isolates obtained from culture were further identified to species or complex level using the Mycobacterium Species Identification Kit (DNA microarray method) manufactured by Chengdu Boao Jingxin Biotechnology Co., Ltd. All experimental procedures strictly followed the manufacturer’s instructions for both instruments and reagents. The routine quality control included the use of negative controls (sterile medium) and positive controls with the reference strain Mycobacterium avium (ATCC 700898) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv (ATCC 27294) in each batch.

tNGS Identification Method

Specimens were processed and analyzed using the Guangzhou KingMed Clinical Laboratory’s KM MiniSeqDx-CN system (Guangzhou Jinqi Ruí Biotechnology Co., Ltd). The procedure involved sample processing, nucleic acid extraction, library construction, and sequencing to generate valid data. Valid sequencing data refers to the data generated when the cluster density on the sequencing instrument interface is between 590 and 800 K/mm2, the Q30 score is ≥85%, and the data output (in million reads) calculated based on the instrument’s final data yield (in MB) and the sequencing read length (76 bp) meets or exceeds 90% of the expected yield. This included the use of a non-template control (deionized, sterile, nuclease-free water) during the nucleic acid extraction step to monitor for contamination. Library quality was assessed via agarose gel electrophoresis, with the target fragment size approximately 350 bp, and quantified using a Qubit 4.0 Fluorometer. Dual-indexed barcodes were employed for detection during the sequencing run.

Drug Susceptibility Testing

The p-nitrobenzoic acid (PNB) method was used to differentiate between Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and NTM. For strains identified as MTBC, drug susceptibility testing was conducted using the liquid culture method. The following 12 drugs were tested: isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RFP), ethambutol (EMB), amikacin (AMK), rifabutin (RFB), capreomycin (CPM), levofloxacin (LEV), linezolid (LZD), prothionamide (PTO), clofazimine (CFZ), moxifloxacin (MFX), and bedaquiline (BDQ). Interpretation criteria followed the guidelines provided in the drug susceptibility testing kit. The reference strain Mycobacterium avium (ATCC 700898) was included in each batch to validate drug potency, following standard laboratory protocols.12

Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 24.0). Categorical variables were expressed as frequency, percentage (%), or proportion.

Results

General Characteristics

A total of 22 patients with Mycobacterium colombiense disease were included after excluding cases of colonization and those with incomplete data. Among them, 14 cases (63.6%) had disseminated infection, and 8 cases (36.4%) had isolated pulmonary disease, as shown in Table 1. The cohort consisted of 12 females (54.5%) and 10 males (45.5%), with an age range of 22–73 years. The mean age was 55.36 years, and the median age was 58 years. Nine patients (40.9%) were over 60 years old. Geographically, 18 patients (81.8%) were from Guangdong Province, 2 from Guangxi, and 1 each from Fujian and Zhejiang Province.

Table 1 Demographic Data of Disseminated and Non-Disseminated Infections

The involved anatomical sites included the lungs (22 cases), bones and joints (12 cases), serous cavities (pleural, pericardial, peritoneal, and meningeal; 12 cases), lymph nodes (superficial or mediastinal lymphadenopathy; 9 cases), skin (subcutaneous abscesses/skin ulcers; 6 cases), and liver (1 case), as given in Table 2.

Table 2 Involved Sites of Mycobacterial Infection

All 22 patients tested positive for Mycobacterium colombiense via tNGS. Additionally, 19 patients were concurrently confirmed through culture as part of the MAC.

Clinical Features

Comorbidities

Among the 14 patients with disseminated infection, extrapulmonary comorbidities included sepsis (7 cases), cardiac/hepatic/renal dysfunction (4 cases), anti-interferon-γ autoantibody positivity (3 cases), systemic lupus erythematosus (2 cases), hemophagocytic syndrome (1 case), thalassemia (1 case), multiple osteomyelitis (1 case), and lacunar cerebral infarction (1 case), as shown in Table 3. Pulmonary comorbidities included pneumoconiosis (1 case, 4.5%), Scedosporium prolificansinfection (1 case, 4.5%), and disseminated Talaromyces marneffei infection (2 cases, 9.1%). Among the 8 patients with isolated pulmonary infection, extrapulmonary comorbidities included ankylosing spondylitis (1 case) and hypertension (1 case). Pulmonary comorbidities included pulmonary aspergillosis (1 case).

Table 3 Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Mycobacterium colombiense Infection

Clinical Manifestations and Signs

The clinical symptoms of Mycobacterium colombiense infection are nonspecific, primarily manifesting as cough, expectoration, fatigue/weight loss, fever, and others, as shown in Table 3. Among the 22 patients, cough/expectoration was observed in 18 cases, fatigue/weight loss in 10 cases, fever in 6 cases, subcutaneous abscesses/skin ulcers in 5 cases, bone pain in 5 cases, chest tightness in 5 cases, hemoptysis/blood-tinged sputum in 4 cases, and headache in 1 case. Of these 22 patients, 12 exhibited bone and joint involvement, primarily presenting as bone destruction and/or abscess formation, with involvement of the ribs (6 cases), vertebrae (5 cases), clavicles (4 cases), scapulae (2 cases), and radius (1 case), either concurrently or in isolation. Lymph node involvement was noted in 9 cases, mainly presenting as superficial and mediastinal lymphadenopathy, including mediastinal lymphadenopathy (6 cases) and superficial lymphadenopathy (3 cases). Serous cavity involvement with effusion (pleural/pericardial/abdominal) was observed in 6 cases, pericardial/pleural thickening in 5 cases, and subcutaneous abscesses/skin ulcers in 5 cases. One patient developed disseminated infection involving the liver and meninges, and another presented with bone destruction accompanied by the formation of a cold abscess that ruptured through the body surface.

Imaging Features

All patients demonstrated pulmonary involvement. Chest CT findings primarily included patchy opacities, nodular shadows, bronchiectasis, mediastinal lymphadenopathy, pleural effusion, and others (Figure 1A–D). Among the 14 patients with disseminated infection, 12 underwent CT/MRI examinations of bones and joints, which mainly revealed patchy bone destruction, cystic bone destruction, and surrounding soft tissue swelling (Figure 1G–I). Electronic bronchoscopy was performed in 12 of the 22 patients, revealing mild chronic bronchitis in 7 cases, luminal stenosis (due to edematous narrowing, neoplastic obstruction, or granulomatous necrotic material) in 7 cases (Figure 1E and F), and essentially normal findings in 1 case.

Figure 1 Imaging Findings of the Patients (AD) Chest CT scans demonstrate varied pulmonary abnormalities. (A) Patient 1 exhibits a pulmonary nodule. (B) Patient 2 shows cavities in both upper lobes accompanied by cylindric bronchiectasis. (C) Patient 3 presents scattered patchy opacities in both lungs. (D) Patient 4 reveals an irregular soft tissue mass at the anterior basal segment of the left lower lobe, extending across the fissure. (E and F) Bronchoscopy of Patient 3 identifies swelling in the apical segment of the left upper lobe with the formation of viscous purulent secretions. (G and H) Abdominopelvic CT scans reveal thickening of the peritoneum, omentum, and mesentery, with strand-like opacities within the abdominal cavity and retroperitoneal fat spaces. Subcutaneous edema of the thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic walls is noted, along with multiple abscesses in the right anterior pelvic wall, bilateral sacroiliac muscles, and the muscle groups surrounding the femora and within intermuscular spaces, suspected to be caused by non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection. (I) CT of the acromioclavicular joint demonstrates multiple bony destructions in the proximal clavicle and scapula, with relatively well-defined margins and sclerotic rims observed in most lesions.

Laboratory Findings

Elevated inflammatory markers were observed as follows: CRP >10 mg/L in 19 cases (86.4%), elevated white blood cell count (>10×109/L) in 16 cases (72.7%), neutrophil count >6.3×109/L in 15 cases (68.2%), and markedly elevated white blood cell count (>20×109/L) in 4 cases (18.2%). Hemoglobin and albumin levels were reduced in all 18 patients tested, with 4 patients exhibiting severe anemia (hemoglobin >30 g/L and ≤60 g/L), and 3 patients having moderate anemia (hemoglobin >60 g/L and ≤90 g/L). Lymphocyte subset analysis was performed in 18 patients, showing CD4+ T-cell counts ranging from 172 to 1168 cells/μL (median: 482 cells/μL). Only 2 patients had CD4+ T-cell counts <300 cells/μL, 7 patients had counts between 300 and 500 cells/μL, and 9 patients had counts >500 cells/μL. Notably, the two deceased patients had CD4+ T-cell counts of 1168 and 816 cells/μL, respectively. Anti-interferon-γ antibody testing was performed in 3 patients, all of whom tested positive.

Drug Resistance Analysis

Drug susceptibility testing was performed in 11 patients, as shown in Table 4. The results showed susceptible to bedaquiline (0%), clofazimine (9.1%), rifabutin (18.2%), ethambutol (18.2%), and rifampin (27.3%). Notably, no resistance to bedaquiline was observed, and only one case (9.1%) exhibited resistance to clofazimine.

Table 4 Results of Drug Resistance Testing

In contrast, the results showed resistant to levofloxacin (100%), linezolid (100%), amikacin (100%), isoniazid (100%), capreomycin (100%), moxifloxacin (90.9%), and prothionamide (81.8%). Specifically, the results of drug resistance indicate that the majority of patients (≥90.9%) were resistant to levofloxacin, linezolid, amikacin, isoniazid, and capreomycin and moxifloxacin.

Treatment and Outcomes

All enrolled patients received anti-nontuberculous mycobacterial therapy, primarily consisting of combination regimens, as shown in Table 5. The selection of therapeutic agents, including macrolides (eg, clarithromycin or azithromycin), ethambutol, rifampin, amikacin, levofloxacin, and linezolid. Currently, there is no unified international treatment consensus specifically for Mycobacterium colombiense infections. In our study, the treatment regimens were primarily formulated with reference to the guidelines for slow-growing nontuberculous mycobacteria outlined in the ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA clinical practice guidelines and the Chinese Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Diseases (2020 Edition) issued by the Tuberculosis Branch of the Chinese Medical Association.2,3 Eight patients with disseminated infection underwent surgical interventions, such as excision of subcutaneous masses, debridement of skin ulcers, and vertebral fixation. Following the treatment, clinical improvement was achieved in 20 patients, while two patients died. Regarding the two patient fatalities, both individuals were of advanced age and presented with disseminated infections complicated by severe comorbidities; we posit that this clinical profile substantially contributed to their mortality. Conversely, the clinical improvement observed in the remaining 20 patients can be primarily attributed to the implementation of personalized multidrug regimens and a comprehensive therapeutic strategy, which included surgical intervention where indicated.

Table 5 Results of Medication and Surgery Treatment Regimen for the 22 Patients

Discussion

Mycobacterium colombiense is a rare subspecies within the MAC. In 2006, Murcia et al first isolated M. colombiense from sputum and blood samples, though no clinical characteristics or drug susceptibility data were provided.3 Since then, only a few cases of M. colombiense infection have been reported.4–7 A 2012 French study identified 6 cases of M. colombiense among 67 MAC isolates, accounting for 9.0%.13 A 2022 study in mainland China reported 14 cases of M. colombiense out of 287 MAC isolates, representing 4.9%.14 A 2024 European multicenter study found 1 case of M. colombiense among 386 MAC isolates, accounting for 0.2%.15 A 2025 Thai study identified 5 cases of M. colombiense out of 66 MAC isolates, representing 7.6%.12 Although the incidence of M. colombiense is low, it is associated with high mortality. A 2017 study reported a higher mortality rate for M. colombiense infection compared to M. aviumsubsp. Hominissuis (MAH) infection (50% vs 4%).14 The present study demonstrates that M. colombiense carries a high risk of disseminated infection. A 2024 European study of 187 MAC patients reported 40 cases of disseminated infection, accounting for 21.4%, which is significantly lower than the 63.6% (14/22) observed in our study.15 This distinctive feature significantly differs from other MAC subtypes, suggesting that M. colombiense may possess unique invasive properties and specific virulence factors.13–15

Demographic characteristics revealed a median age of 58 years (40.9% ≥60 years), which is consistent with the typical age distribution of MAC-infected populations.1,10,14 The predominant symptoms observed in this study included cough/expectoration (18 cases), fatigue/weight loss (10 cases), fever (6 cases), subcutaneous abscesses/skin ulcers (5 cases), and bone pain (5 cases), among others. The diversity of these clinical manifestations reflects the multi-system invasiveness of M. colombiense infection.3–9 Notably, bone and joint involvement was prominent (54.54%, 12/22 cases), a characteristic feature that may be associated with the pathogen’s specific pathogenic mechanisms. Previous studies have suggested that certain NTM strains can produce specific enzymes or toxins that disrupt normal bone tissue structure, leading to osteolysis and destruction.13–15 However, the exact mechanism by which M. colombiense causes skeletal lesions requires further investigation.

Chest CT imaging revealed pulmonary involvement in all 22 patients, with common radiological findings including patchy opacities, nodular shadows, bronchiectasis, mediastinal lymphadenopathy, and pleural effusion. These manifestations are nonspecific and difficult to distinguish from other pulmonary infectious diseases or tuberculosis.8–10 Additionally, bone CT/MRI examinations of patients with skeletal involvement showed that the ribs, vertebrae, and clavicles were the most frequently affected sites, with imaging features such as patchy low-density lesions, cystic low-density shadows, sclerotic margins, surrounding soft tissue swelling, and the formation of cold abscesses.13–15 These thoracic and osteoarticular imaging characteristics closely resemble those of tuberculosis, indicating that imaging alone cannot reliably distinguish between tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases.16

As for laboratory findings, according to existing reports, the clearance of NTM primarily relies on CD4+ T cell-mediated Th1 immune responses, with interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) serving as the key effector molecule.1,3,10 IFN-γ activates macrophages, promoting lysosomal fusion and reactive oxygen species generation, thereby eliminating intracellular mycobacteria.1,3,10 In this study, the average CD4+ count among 18 patients was 546 cells/μL (only one case <200 cells/μL), ruling out severe cellular immunodeficiency. However, three patients with disseminated infection tested positive for anti-interferon-gamma autoantibodies (AIGA). AIGA neutralizes IFN-γ, impairs macrophage activation, and disrupts the Th1 immune pathway, consistent with previously reported cases of AIGA-associated disseminated NTM disease.15,17 Therefore, patients with disseminated M. colombiense infection, particularly those with normal CD4+ T-cell counts, should undergo testing for AIGA.

In this study, 54.5% of patients exhibited bone and joint destruction/abscesses, a proportion significantly higher than that observed in other disseminated nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infections.17–20 The most frequently involved extrapulmonary sites in disseminated M. colombiense infection were bone and joint (54.5%) and poly-serositis (31.8%), distinguishing it from other NTM species.17–20 All patients with bone and joint infections in this study received combined surgical and pharmacological intervention. Consistent with existing literature on NTM osteoarticular infections, a 13-year Korean study of 29 patients reported that all cases required surgical intervention in addition to antibiotic therapy.21 Moreover, relevant guidelines and studies recommend that NTM skeletal infections generally require combined pharmacological and surgical management. A minimum of 6 months of multidrug antibiotic therapy is typically advised, with the exact duration dependent on the antibiotic susceptibility of the pathogen. Surgical treatment involves resection of all infected tissue and may require repeated debridement and/or continuous drainage.21–24

As for bacterial identification, conventional mycobacterial culture methods can only identify isolates to the MAC level, without further speciation. In molecular identification, 16S rRNA gene sequencing alone can only classify isolates to the MAC complex level; additional analysis of hsp65 or rpoB genes is required for accurate subspecies identification.1,3,10 In this study, the average turnaround time for tNGS was 2 days, demonstrating its value in facilitating rapid diagnosis and subspecies-level identification of NTM.

As for drug resistance, different subspecies within MAC exhibit variations in both virulence and drug susceptibility. Highly virulent strains may demonstrate higher innate drug sensitivity.25 Studies have shown that virulence differs among various MAC subspecies.26–29 Even within the same subspecies, genetic diversity may exist — a Japanese study reported distinct genetic profiles between isolates from patients with pulmonary disease and those with disseminated disease.30 Therefore, accurate subspecies-level identification of MAC and individualized drug susceptibility testing are crucial. Currently, most studies only compare drug susceptibility between M. avium and M. intracellulare, with limited research on the differential drug susceptibility patterns among various MAC subspecies. Consequently, the latest 2020 treatment guidelines for MAC pulmonary disease recommend a uniform treatment approach for all MAC pulmonary disease patients, without subspecies-specific stratification.2

This study revealed that a resistance rate of below 27.3% was observed for bedaquiline, clofazimine, rifabutin, ethambutol, and rifampin. In contrast, over 90% resistance rates was observed for levofloxacin, linezolid, amikacin, isoniazid, capreomycin, and moxifloxacin. Specifically, the lowest resistance rates were noted for bedaquiline (0%) and clofazimine (9.1%). According to previous studies, the low resistance to bedaquiline and clofazimine in M. colombiense may be attributed to the absence of pre-existing resistance mutations in target genes (eg, atpE) or regulatory regions (eg, Rv0678), which are typically associated with drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Furthermore, the limited clinical exposure to these drugs due to the rarity of M. colombiense infections may have reduced the evolutionary pressure for resistance development.31–34 Previous studies on overall drug resistance patterns in MAC isolates reported resistance rates of 10.8% for amikacin, 47.84% for linezolid, and 53.60% for moxifloxacin.14 While linezolid and moxifloxacin showed 100% resistance rates, amikacin and clarithromycin demonstrated relatively lower resistance.14 These differential resistance profiles suggest distinct characteristics between M. colombiense and other MAC subspecies.12–15,35 This retrospective study of 22 patients with Mycobacterium colombiense infection demonstrated low rates of resistance to both bedaquiline and clofazimine in vitro, observed consistently across patients with both disseminated and non-disseminated disease. These findings suggest that bedaquiline and clofazimine may represent viable therapeutic alternatives for inclusion in treatment regimens when first-line options recommended by current guidelines prove ineffective or are poorly tolerated.

In summary, the study of 22 patients with Mycobacterium colombiense disease indicates that this disease primarily affects the elderly. Patients mostly presented with disseminated infection. Besides pulmonary involvement, bone and joint as well as serous cavities were the most commonly affected sites. Due to the limited sample size, comprehensive statistical analysis was not possible. It is preliminarily inferred that advanced age and multiple underlying diseases may be significant risk factors for Mycobacterium colombiense infection.

Conclusion

This study analyzed the clinical characteristics and drug resistance profiles of 22 patients with M. colombiense infection. The findings indicate that M. colombiense infection is prone to disseminated disease, involving multiple organ systems with diverse clinical manifestations. Targeted next-generation sequencing played a valuable role in early and accurate pathogen identification. In this study, in vitro drug susceptibility testing revealed a unique resistance profile for Mycobacterium colombiense, characterized by near-universal resistance to fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, moxifloxacin), linezolid, and aminoglycosides (amikacin), but comparatively high susceptibility to bedaquiline, clofazimine, and rifamycins (rifampin, rifabutin). Treatment of this disease remains challenging, with few reported cases achieving complete clinical cure. Individualized therapy based on drug susceptibility testing (prioritizing regimens containing clofazimine and bedaquiline) may improve outcomes. This study provides valuable insights for future prevention and treatment strategies against M. colombiense infection.

Nevertheless, this study has inherent limitations as a single-center, retrospective investigation with a limited sample size, which may constrain the generalizability of the findings. Future multicenter studies with larger cohorts are warranted for further validation.

Data Sharing Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

This research adhered to the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and followed applicable guidelines. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Guangzhou Chest Hospital (Approval No. KY-2024-046). In this retrospective investigation, which utilized de-identified patient data extracted from medical records, participant confidentiality was thoroughly protected, and the study did not present any additional risks to subjects. As the analysis was based on anonymized data and followed a retrospective design, the ethics committee granted an exemption from obtaining informed consent.

Funding

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou (Grant No. 2025A03J3604).

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. van Ingen J, Turenne CY, Tortoli E, Wallace RJ B-EBA Jr. A definition of the Mycobacterium avium complex for taxonomical and clinical purposes, a review. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018;68(11):3666–14. doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.003026

2. Chinese Society for Tuberculosis, Chinese Medical Association. Diagnosis and treatment guideline for nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases (2020 edition). Chin J Tuberc Respir Dis. 2020;43(11):918–946.

3. Daley CL, Iaccarino JM, Lange C, et al. Treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: an official ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA clinical practice guideline. Eur Respir J. 2020;56(1):e1–36. doi:10.1183/13993003.00535-2020

4. Vuorenmaa K, Ben Salah I, Barlogis V, Chambost H, Drancourt M. Mycobacterium colombiense and pseudotuberculous lymphadenopathy. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15(4):619–620. doi:10.3201/eid1504.081436

5. Esparcia O, Navarro F, Quer M, Coll P. Lymphadenopathy caused by Mycobacterium colombiense. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(5):1885–1887. doi:10.1128/JCM.01441-07

6. Conyers LE, Saunders BM. Treatment for non-tuberculous mycobacteria: challenges and prospects. Front Microbiol. 2024;15:1394220. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1394220

7. Ying C, Zhang L, Jin X, Zhu D, Wu W. Advances in diagnosis and treatment of non-tuberculous mycobacterial lung disease. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024;109(2):116254. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116254

8. Gonzalez P, Dominguez J, Del Cid P, Rosas S, Magallon-Tejada A. Non-tuberculous mycobacterial isolates from Panama: a retrospective 5-year analysis (2017-2021). J Infect Public Health. 2024;17(5):780–788. doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2024.03.004

9. Nohrenberg M, Wright A, Krause V. Non-tuberculous mycobacterial skin and soft tissue infections in the Northern Territory, Australia, 1989-2021. Int J Infect Dis. 2023;135:125–131. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2023.07.031

10. Lee MR, Chien JY, Huang YT, et al. Clinical features of patients with bacteraemia caused by Mycobacterium avium complex species and antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates at a medical centre in Taiwan, 2008-2014. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017;50(1):35–40. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.02.016

11. Barretto AR, Felicio JS, Sales LHM, Yamada ES, Lopes ML, da Costa ARF. A fatal case of pulmonary infection by Mycobacterium colombiense in Para State, Amazon Region, Brazil. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;85(3):344–346. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.02.011

12. Woods GL, Brown-Elliott BA, Conville PS, et al. Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacteria, Nocardiae, and Other Aerobic Actinomycetes. 2nd ed. Wayne (PA) 2011.

13. Despierres L, Cohen-Bacrie S, Richet H, Drancourt M. Diversity of Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis mycobacteria causing lymphadenitis, France. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31(7):1373–1379. doi:10.1007/s10096-011-1452-2

14. Li Y, Liu C, Ma A, et al. Identification and drug susceptibility testing of the subspecies of Mycobacterium avium complex clinical isolates in mainland China. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2022;31:90–97. doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2022.05.027

15. Wetzstein N, Diricks M, Anton TB, et al. Clinical and genomic features of Mycobacterium avium complex: a multi-national European study. Genome Med. 2024;16(1):86. doi:10.1186/s13073-024-01359-8

16. Hogan JI, Hurtado RM, Nelson SB. Mycobacterial Musculoskeletal Infections. Thorac Surg Clin. 2019;29(1):85–94. doi:10.1016/j.thorsurg.2018.09.007

17. Tang M, Zeng W, Qiu Y, et al. Clinical features of rare disseminated Mycobacterium colombiense infection in nine patients who are HIV-negative in Guangxi, China. Int J Infect Dis. 2023;128:321–324. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2023.01.002

18. Poulin S, Corbeil C, Nguyen M, et al. Fatal Mycobacterium colombiense/cytomegalovirus coinfection associated with acquired immunodeficiency due to autoantibodies against interferon gamma: a case report. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:24. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-13-24

19. Tang M, Huang J, Zeng W, et al. Retrospective analysis of 10 cases of disseminated nontuberculous mycobacterial disease with osteolytic lesions. Infect Drug Resist. 2021;14:4667–4679. doi:10.2147/IDR.S337956

20. Chubachi K, Taima K, Ishidoya M, Tanaka Y, Kurose A, Tasaka S. Disseminated non-tuberculous mycobacteriosis with a skull lesion controlled by resection after exacerbation during antimicrobial chemotherapy in a patient positive for anti-IFN-gamma-neutralizing autoantibodies. Intern Med. 2024;63(14):2053–2057. doi:10.2169/internalmedicine.2151-23

21. Park JW, Kim YS, Yoon JO, et al. Non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection of the musculoskeletal system: pattern of infection and efficacy of combined surgical/antimicrobial treatment. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(11):1561–1565. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.33427

22. Goldstein N, St Clair JB, Kasperbauer SH, Daley CL, Lindeque B. Nontuberculous mycobacterial musculoskeletal infection cases from a tertiary referral center, Colorado, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25(6):1075–1083. doi:10.3201/eid2406.181041

23. Shimizu H, Mizuno Y, Nakamura I, Fukushima S, Endo K, Matsumoto T. Vertebral osteomyelitis caused by non-tuberculous mycobacteria: case reports and review. J Infect Chemother. 2013;19(5):972–977. doi:10.1007/s10156-013-0550-8

24. Murcia MI, Tortoli E, Menendez MC, Palenque E, Garcia MJ. Mycobacterium colombiense sp. nov. a novel member of the Mycobacterium avium complex and description of MAC-X as a new ITS genetic variant. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006;56(Pt 9):2049–2054. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.64190-0

25. van Ingen J, Boeree MJ, van Soolingen D, Iseman MD, Heifets LB, Daley CL. Are phylogenetic position, virulence, drug susceptibility and in vivo response to treatment in mycobacteria interrelated? Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12(4):832–837. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2011.10.006

26. Boyle DP, Zembower TR, Reddy S, Qi C. Comparison of clinical features, virulence, and relapse among mycobacterium avium complex species. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191(11):1310–1317. doi:10.1164/rccm.201501-0067OC

27. Han XY, Tarrand JJ, Infante R, Jacobson KL, Truong M. Clinical significance and epidemiologic analyses of Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare among patients without AIDS. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(9):4407–4412. doi:10.1128/JCM.43.9.4407-4412.2005

28. Koh WJ, Jeong BH, Jeon K, et al. Clinical significance of the differentiation between Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare in M avium complex lung disease. Chest. 2012;142(6):1482–1488. doi:10.1378/chest.12-0494

29. Tateishi Y, Hirayama Y, Ozeki Y, et al. Virulence of Mycobacterium avium complex strains isolated from immunocompetent patients. Microb Pathog. 2009;46(1):6–12. doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2008.10.007

30. Uchiya K, Takahashi H, Yagi T, et al. Comparative genome analysis of Mycobacterium avium revealed genetic diversity in strains that cause pulmonary and disseminated disease. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e71831. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071831

31. Sonnenkalb L, Carter JJ, Spitaleri A, et al. Bedaquiline and clofazimine resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: an in-vitro and in-silico data analysis. Lancet Microbe. 2023;4(5):e358–e368. doi:10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00002-2

32. Wang M, Men P, Zhang W, et al. Bedaquiline susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium abscessus complex and Mycobacterium avium complex: a meta-analysis study. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2024;37:135–140. doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2024.03.009

33. Pang Y, Zheng H, Tan Y, Song Y, Zhao Y. In vitro activity of bedaquiline against nontuberculous mycobacteria in China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61(5). doi:10.1128/AAC.02627-16

34. Consortium CR. Quantitative measurement of antibiotic resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis reveals genetic determinants of resistance and susceptibility in a target gene approach. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):488. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-44325-5

35. Sawaswong V, Wongjarit K, Petsong S, et al. Diversity and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Mycobacterium avium complex clinical isolates in Thailand based on whole genome comparative analysis. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):772. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-84511-z

Creative Commons License © 2026 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.