Back to Journals » Open Access Emergency Medicine » Volume 11

Can Venous Blood Gas Be Used as an Alternative to Arterial Blood Gas in Intubated Patients at Admission to the Emergency Department? A Retrospective Study

Authors Schütz N, Roth D, Schwameis M, Röggla M, Domanovits H

Received 1 September 2019

Accepted for publication 15 November 2019

Published 23 December 2019 Volume 2019:11 Pages 305—312

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S228420

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Hans-Christoph Pape


Nikola Schütz, Dominik Roth, Michael Schwameis, Martin Röggla, Hans Domanovits

Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna A-1090, Austria

Correspondence: Nikola Schütz
Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna A-1090, Austria
Tel +4314040019640
Fax +4314040019650
Email nikola.schuetz@meduniwien.ac.at

Objective: Blood gas analysis plays an important role in both diagnosis and subsequent treatment of critically ill patients in the emergency department and the ICU. Historically, arterial blood is predominantly used for blood gas analysis. The puncture is painful and complications may occur. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the agreement between arterial and venous blood gas analysis and whether the sole use of venous blood gas analysis would have changed therapy.
Methods: Adult patients who were intubated in the field and received an arterial and venous blood gas analysis within 15 mins after admission to the ED were eligible for inclusion. The values for pH, pCO2, HCO3-, base excess and lactate levels were collected retrospectively. Mean differences were calculated by subtracting venous from arterial values. The agreement between venous and arterial measurements was assessed using the method of Bland and Altman. Blood gases were assessed by two independent physicians using a standardized questionnaire to determine whether the use of venous blood gases would have led to a different interpretation of the situation (other diagnostic path) or a change of therapy (eg. respirator adjustment). Acceptable limits were defined before the collection of data started.
Results: Fifty patients (62% male, median age 63years) who were treated at the Emergency Department between June 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014 were included in the study. Following average differences and limits of agreement (LOA) were documented: pH 0.02312 with LOA from −0.048 to 0.094; pCO2 −3.612 mmHg with LOA from −15 to 8.1 mmHg; BE −0.154 mmol/l with LOA from −3.7 to 3.4 mmol/l; HCO3−0.338 mmol/l with LOA from −2.27 to 2.9 mmol/l; Lactate −0.124 mg/dl with LOA from −2.28 to 2.03 mg/dl. Using venous blood gas results 100% of the patients with metabolic alkalosis were correctly diagnosed. Metabolic acidosis was detected with a high sensitivity (80.64%), specificity (89.47%) and positive predictive value (92.59%). The answers to lactate and acidosis due to AKI showed a specificity and positive predictive value of 100%. The respiratory adjustment showed a high sensitivity (91.89%) but a low specificity (38.46%).
Conclusion: For pH, bicarbonate, BE and lactate venous blood gases can be used as surrogates for arterial measurements. Venous pCO2 can be used for screening of hypercapnia and trending. Respirator adjustments may be done too often if the venous blood gas is used.

Keywords: blood gas analysis, intubation, venous and arterial blood sampling, questionnaire

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]