Back to Journals » Patient Preference and Adherence » Volume 14

Assessing Preferences for Rare Disease Treatment: Qualitative Development of the Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria Patient Preference Questionnaire (PNH-PPQ©)

Authors Kaiser K, Yount SE, Martens CE, Webster KA, Shaunfield S, Sparling A, Peipert JD, Cella D, Rottinghaus ST, Donato BMK, Wells R, Tomazos I

Received 8 October 2019

Accepted for publication 5 February 2020

Published 5 April 2020 Volume 2020:14 Pages 705—715


Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Johnny Chen

Karen Kaiser,1 Susan E Yount,1 Christa E Martens,1 Kimberly A Webster,1 Sara Shaunfield,1 Amy Sparling,1 John Devin Peipert,1 David Cella,1 Scott T Rottinghaus,2 Bonnie MK Donato,2 Richard Wells,3 Ioannis Tomazos2

1Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; 2Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc, Boston, MA, USA; 3Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada

Correspondence: Karen Kaiser
Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 N. Michigan Ave. Suite 2700, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
Tel +1 312-503-3521
Fax +1 312-503-4800

Purpose: To develop a patient preference questionnaire (PPQ) assessing eculizumab and ravulizumab treatment for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH).
Patients and Methods: The development of the PNH-PPQ© was consistent with Food and Drug Administration guidelines for patient-reported outcome measure development, and included 1) a targeted literature review; 2) PNH expert clinician input on treatment preferences; 3) review of existing qualitative data on the PNH treatment and disease experience; 4) concept elicitation interviews with 8 PNH patients who received eculizumab and/or ravulizumab; 5) translatability review; and 6) cognitive debriefing with 5 patients. Interview participants were recruited through a United Kingdom PNH patient advocacy group and a Canadian clinical site involved in clinical trial ALXN1210-PNH-302.
Results: Six themes were identified as most relevant to the PNH treatment experience from the concept elicitation interviews: disease symptoms (n=8/8); treatment frequency (n=7/8); quality of life impact of treatment/disease (n=7/8); treatment burden (n=7/8); treatment efficacy (n=5/8); and treatment side effects (n=5/8). An initial list of 88 preference questions was reduced to 11 highly relevant and non-redundant questions reflecting the 6 themes. Cognitive interview participants unanimously agreed that the PNH-PPQ instructions were clear; response options were understandable, easy to use, and provided enough choices; and the questions captured the factors that inform treatment preferences.
Discussion: When new drugs have similar efficacy to existing medications, documenting patient preferences is important for confirming patient benefit from the new medication. Understanding what matters most to patients is essential for delivering patient-centered care and may play a particularly significant role in treatment decision making. The availability of such a tool may be especially important as new orphan drugs are developed and patients with rare diseases have more than one treatment option to consider.
Conclusion: The PNH-PPQ provides a patient-centered approach for evaluating preferences for the treatment of PNH. The PNH-PPQ has subsequently assessed patient preference in the clinical trial sub-study ALXN1210-PNH-302s.

Keywords: paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, questionnaire development, ravulizumab, eculizumab, treatment experience

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]