Assessing capacity to consent for research in cognitively impaired older patients
Authors Gilbert T, Bosquet A, Thomas-Antérion C, Bonnefoy M, Le Saux O
Received 16 May 2017
Accepted for publication 7 July 2017
Published 26 September 2017 Volume 2017:12 Pages 1553—1563
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Richard Walker
Thomas Gilbert,1 Antoine Bosquet,2 Catherine Thomas-Antérion,3,4 Marc Bonnefoy,1 Olivia Le Saux1
1Geriatric Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Sud Hospital, Pierre-Bénite, France; 2Internal Medicine Unit, AP-HP – Louis Mourier Hospital, Colombes, France; 3Plein Ciel, Lyon, France; 4Laboratory for the Study of Cognitive Mechanisms, Lyon 2 University, Lyon, France
Background: The number of clinical trials including older patients, and particularly patients with cognitive impairment, is increasing. While statutory provisions exist to make sure that the capacity to consent is assessed systematically for each patient, many gray areas remain with regard to how this assessment is made or should be made in the routine practice of clinical research.
Objectives: The aim of this review was to draw up an inventory of assessment tools evaluating older patients’ capacity to consent specifically applicable to clinical research, which could be used in routine practice.
Methods: Two authors independently searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases between November 2015 and January 2016. The search was actualized in April 2017. We used keywords (MeSH terms and text words) referring to informed consent, capacity to consent, consent for research, research ethics, cognitive impairment, vulnerable older patients, and assessment tools. Existing reviews were also considered.
Results: Among the numerous existing tools for assessing capacity to consent, 14 seemed potentially suited for clinical research and six were evaluated in older patients. The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR) was the most frequently cited.
Conclusion: The MacCAT-CR is currently the most used and the best validated questionnaire. However, it appears difficult to use and time-consuming. A more recent tool, the University of California Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC), seems interesting for routine practice because of its simplicity, relevance, and applicability in older patients.
Keywords: aged, assessment tools, clinical research, decision-making capacity
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]