Back to Browse Journals » Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials » Volume 4

Is Patch It® better than placebo in alleviating swelling and ache in the lower legs and feet? A randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind, crossover, sequential trial

Authors Shakeel A, Hui HK, Patil CS, Chaudhari MV, Kadam YD, Pensalwar SV, Erande SG, Kewalramani RM

Published Date April 2012 Volume 2012:4 Pages 21—29

DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAJCT.S29426

Received 23 December 2011, Accepted 15 February 2012, Published 24 April 2012

Aliya Shakeel1, Hoong Keong Hui2, Chetan S Patil3, Manojkumar V Chaudhari4, Yogesh D Kadam5, Shrikant V Pensalwar6, Suhas G Erande7, Rajesh M Kewalramani8
1Vedic Lifesciences Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India; 2Nutriworks Limited, Kowloon, Hong Kong; 3Muktai Hospital, Nasik, 4Bhagirathi Medical Foundation, 5Poona Diabetes Center, 6Balaji Clinic, Mumbai, 7Akshay Hospital, Pune, 8Shanti Niketan, Kandar Pada, Dahisar, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Background: Existing therapeutic measures for swelling, aching and discomfort in the lower limbs, which include compression stockings and leg elevation, are difficult to use and inconvenient. Patch It®, a proprietary herbomineral patch is an easy-to-use alternative therapy. This trial was conducted to compare it's efficacy against that of a placebo in swollen and aching lower legs and feet.
Methods: This randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind, crossover, sequential trial was conducted in the private clinics of physicians. A total of 100 patients (24 men and 76 women), aged 25 to 60 years, with recurring swelling in the feet and (optionally) up to two more related complaints, having an average visual analog score (VAS) of at least 60 (scale 0–100) for each complaint were recruited into the study. Patches (active or placebo) were applied to both soles overnight for 8 weeks: 4 consecutive weeks each with active or placebo in randomized sequence. Outcome measures included the average VAS score (baseline to week 4, and week 5 to week 8), preference for either patch (difference of >5 mm in average VAS score reduction), ankle figure-of-eight measures, investigator's global assessment (good, fair, poor), patient's willingness to continue using the patch after the trial (yes, no), and adverse events.
Results: Out of 100 patients, 86 completed the trial, while ten were excluded for noncompliance, three withdrew, and one was lost to follow-up. The active placebo boundary of the sequential chart was crossed when 82 patients completed the trial. Active patch was also superior to placebo patch by mean reductions in average VAS scores (13.14 versus 9.6, P = 0.02), mean reduction in figure-of-eight ankle measurements (1.21 cm versus 0.79 cm, P = 0.003), investigator's global assessment (P < 0.01), and by proportion of patients willing to continue using the patch after the trial (P < 0.01). Ten percent of patients experienced localized itching with each patch, but this did not require interruption of treatment.
Conclusion: Patch It had greater efficacy than the placebo in alleviating recurring swelling and aching in the legs and feet, and is well tolerated.

Keywords: ankle swelling, leg ache, dermal patch, reflexology, sequential analysis, figure-of-eight

Download Article [PDF] 

Creative Commons License This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php

Readers of this article also read:

On controversial statistical issues in clinical research

Chow SC, Song FY

Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials 2015, 7:43-51

Published Date: 2 May 2015

Visual fields in a chloroquine treatment

García-Domene MC, Díez-Ajenjo MA, de Fez MD, Luque MJ

Clinical Optometry 2014, 6:59-70

Published Date: 30 September 2014

Differences in daily disposable circle lens performance characteristics

Schafer JM, Reindel WT, Rah MJ, Chan O, Zhang L

Clinical Optometry 2014, 6:37-42

Published Date: 3 April 2014

Publication bias: what is it? How do we measure it? How do we avoid it?

Song F, Hooper L, Loke YK

Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials 2013, 5:71-81

Published Date: 4 July 2013

Reinventing your primary care practice: becoming an MDCEO™

Conard SE, Courtney MR

Journal of Healthcare Leadership 2013, 5:1-8

Published Date: 7 March 2013

Profile of bosutinib and its clinical potential in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia

Keller-von Amsberg G, Koschmieder S

OncoTargets and Therapy 2013, 6:99-106

Published Date: 4 March 2013

Non-contraceptive benefits of oral contraceptives

Dhont M

Open Access Journal of Contraception 2011, 2:119-126

Published Date: 17 October 2011

Free radicals in the aqueous humor of patients with glaucoma

Eiki Oshida, Yukihiro Matsumoto, Kiyomi Arai

Clinical Ophthalmology 2010, 4:653-660

Published Date: 21 June 2010