Facet-sparing lumbar decompression with a minimally invasive flexible MicroBlade Shaver<sup>&reg;</sup> versus traditional decompression: quantitative radiographic assessment

Carl Lauryssen; Sigurd Berven; Ronnie Mimran; Christopher Summa; Michael Sheinberg; Larry E Miller; Jon E Block

doi:10.2147/CIA.S32536

open access to scientific and medical research

Back to Journals » Clinical Interventions in Aging » Volume 7

Original Research

Facet-sparing lumbar decompression with a minimally invasive flexible MicroBlade Shaver^® versus traditional decompression: quantitative radiographic assessment

Total article views		HTML views	PDF downloads	Totals
19,518	Dovepress*	14,195+	2,206	16,401
	PubMed Central*	5,323	689	6,012
	Totals	19,518	2,895	22,413
*Since 20 July 2012 +Since July 2016

Total mentioned	Facebook	Delicious	Reddit	Twitter	Others
3	0	0	0	1	2

View citations on PubMed Central and Google Scholar

In order to provide our website visitors and registered users with a service tailored to their individual preferences we use cookies to analyse visitor traffic and personalise content. You can learn about our use of cookies by reading our Privacy Policy. We also retain data in relation to our visitors and registered users for internal purposes and for sharing information with our business partners. You can learn about what data of yours we retain, how it is processed, who it is shared with and your right to have your data deleted by reading our Privacy Policy.

If you agree to our use of cookies and the contents of our Privacy Policy please click 'accept'.

Facet-sparing lumbar decompression with a minimally invasive flexible MicroBlade Shaver® versus traditional decompression: quantitative radiographic assessment

Facet-sparing lumbar decompression with a minimally invasive flexible MicroBlade Shaver^® versus traditional decompression: quantitative radiographic assessment