Back to Journals » Patient Preference and Adherence » Volume 2

Are symbols useful and culturally acceptable in health-state valuation studies? An exploratory study in a multi-ethnic Asian population

Authors Hwee-Lin, Wee, Shu-Chuen Li, Xu-Hao Zhang, Feng Xie, David Feeny, et al

Published 2 October 2008 Volume 2008:2 Pages 271—276

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S4142

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 1

Hwee-Lin, Wee1, Shu-Chuen Li2, Xu-Hao Zhang1, Feng Xie3, David Feeny4, Nan Luo5, Yin-Bun Cheung6, David Machin7, Kok-Yong Fong8, Julian Thumboo8

1Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore; 2Discipline of Pharmacy and Experimental Pharmacology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia; 3McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; 4Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA; 5Department of Community, Occupational and Family Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, NUS, Singapore; 6Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Research Unit, Singapore; 7School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; 8Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore

Background: Symbols have been used in health state valuation studies to help subjects distinguish the severity of various characteristics of a given health state. Symbols used in such studies need to be evaluated for their cross-cultural appropriateness because a given symbol may have different meanings or acceptability in different cultures, which may affect results of such studies.

Objectives: To evaluate if using symbols to differentiate health states of different severity is useful and culturally acceptable in a multi-ethnic, urban Asian population.

Methods: Using in-depth interviews with adult Chinese, Malay, and Indian Singaporeans conducted in English/mother-tongue, subjects were shown a health state with 6 levels (Health Utilities Index 3 vision), each displayed with a symbol, and asked (1a) if symbols were useful in differentiating severity of each level (measured using dichotomous and 0–10 visual analog scale [VAS] scales) or (1b) offensive and (2) to assess 7 alternative sets of symbols.

Results: Of 63 subjects (91% response rate), 18 (29%) felt symbols were useful in differentiating severity of each level. Reported usefulness of symbols was fair (median VAS score: 3.0, score exceeding 5.0 for 33% of subjects). One Malay subject felt symbols were offensive.

Conclusions: Use of symbols for health state valuation was culturally acceptable and useful for some subjects.

Keywords: Asian, Southeastern, culture, health status, questionnaires, Singapore

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF] 

 

Readers of this article also read:

Spectral domain optical coherence tomography study of pearl-like lesions in the anterior chamber

Soliman W, Wasfi EI, Ali OM

Clinical Ophthalmology 2012, 6:903-907

Published Date: 13 June 2012

Associated congenital anomalies between neonates with short-gap and long-gap esophageal atresia: a comparative study

Aslanabadi S, Ghabili K, Rouzrokh M, Hosseini MB, Jamshidi M, Adl FH, Shoja MM

International Journal of General Medicine 2011, 4:487-491

Published Date: 23 June 2011

Design and development of a decision aid to enhance shared decision making by patients with an asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm

Dirk T Ubbink, Anouk M Knops, Sjaak Molenaar, Astrid Goossens

Patient Preference and Adherence 2008, 2:315-322

Published Date: 2 November 2008

Impact of clinical pharmacy services on renal transplant recipients’ adherence and outcomes

Marie A Chisholm-Burns, Christina A Spivey, Charlene Garrett, Herbert McGinty, Laura L Mulloy

Patient Preference and Adherence 2008, 2:287-292

Published Date: 17 October 2008

Physician and patient management of type 2 diabetes and factors related to glycemic control in Spain

Nicole Rae Yurgin, Kristina Secnik Boye, Tatiana Dilla, Núria Lara Suriñach, Xavier Badia Llach

Patient Preference and Adherence 2008, 2:87-95

Published Date: 8 April 2008

Mediterranean diet and prevention of coronary heart disease in the elderly

Anastasios S Dontas, Nicholas S Zerefos, Demosthenes B Panagiotakos, Dimitrios A Valis

Clinical Interventions in Aging 2007, 2:109-115

Published Date: 15 April 2007