Back to Browse Journals » Medicolegal and Bioethics » Volume 1

An analysis of the Bateson Review of research using nonhuman primates

Authors Greek R, Hansen LA, Menache A

Published 6 December 2011 Volume 2011:1 Pages 3—22

DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MB.S25938

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 2

Ray Greek1, Lawrence A Hansen2, Andre Menache1
1Americans for Medical Advancement, Goleta, 2Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA

Abstract: An analysis of the use of nonhuman primates in biomedical research in the UK, the Review of Research Using Non-Human Primates (the "Bateson Review") was released in 2011. The review was applauded, to varying degrees, by most of the stakeholders in the controversy over using nonhuman primates in biomedical research. However, there has not been a scientific analysis of the review. In this paper, the Bateson Review is examined for both methodology and the science relevant to the use of nonhuman primates in biomedical research. The relevant science includes complexity theory, evolutionary biology, genetics, empirical evidence regarding the reliability of interspecies extrapolation, and the value of basic biomedical research in general in making discoveries that lead to human treatments. The authors of this paper conclude that the Bateson Review does not meet the criteria for a scientific assessment, in part, because it fails to consider the current science that impacts on the practice of using animals, in general, and nonhuman primates, specifically, in biomedical research. This lack of scientific consideration has legal and ethical ramifications. Since the Bateson Review fails as a scientific evaluation, the ethical and legal recommendations that are based on science are also suspect.

Keywords:
medicine, complex, evolution, ethics, primate, research

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF] 

 

Readers of this article also read:

Real-world effectiveness of amlodipine/valsartan and amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide in high-risk patients and other subgroups

Assaad-Khalil SH, Najem R, Sison J, Kitchlew AR, Cho BL, Ueng KC, DiTommaso S, Shete A

Vascular Health and Risk Management 2015, 11:71-78

Published Date: 21 January 2015

Target-controlled infusion and population pharmacokinetics of landiolol hydrochloride in patients with peripheral arterial disease

Kunisawa T, Yamagishi A, Suno M, Nakade S, Honda N, Kurosawa A, Sugawara A, Tasaki Y, Iwasaki H

Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management 2015, 11:107-114

Published Date: 17 January 2015

The mediating role of cytokine IL-6 on the relationship of FEV1 upon 6-minute walk distance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Baldi S, Jose PE, Bruschi C, Pinna GD, Maestri R, Rezzani A, Bellinzona E, Fracchia C, Dacosto E, Crotti P, Montemartini S

International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2014, 9:1091-1099

Published Date: 7 October 2014

Direct electrochemical oxidation of S-captopril using gold electrodes modified with graphene-AuAg nanocomposites

Pogacean F, Biris AR, Coros M, Lazar MD, Watanabe F, Kannarpady GK, Al Said SA Farha, Biris AS, Pruneanu S

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2014, 9:1111-1125

Published Date: 25 February 2014

Anterior segment biometry using ultrasound biomicroscopy and the Artemis-2 very high frequency ultrasound scanner

Al-Farhan HM, AlMutairi RN

Clinical Ophthalmology 2013, 7:141-147

Published Date: 16 January 2013

REACH, animal testing, and the precautionary principle

Menache A, Nastrucci C

Medicolegal and Bioethics 2012, 2:13-29

Published Date: 6 August 2012

Corrigendum

Schneider EW, Johnson MW

Clinical Ophthalmology 2011, 5:1315-1316

Published Date: 16 September 2011