Back to Journals » Risk Management and Healthcare Policy » Volume 1

30-days mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer: A national audit

Authors Anne Nakano, Jørgen Bendix, Sven Adamsen, Daniel Buck, Jan Mainz, et al

Published 30 November 2008 Volume 2008:1 Pages 31—38

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S4486

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 2

Anne Nakano1,4, Jørgen Bendix2, Sven Adamsen3, Daniel Buck4, Jan Mainz5, Paul Bartels1, Bente Nørgård4,6

1The Danish National Indicator Project, Regionshuset Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark; 2Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery L, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; 3Digestive Disease Center, Section for Gastrointestinal Surgery, Copenhagen, Denmark; University Hospital Herlev, Denmark; 4Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; 5Department of Psychiatry Region North, Denmark and Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; 6Center for National Clinical Databases, South, Odense University Hospital, and Epidemiology, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

Background: In 2005, The Danish National Indicator Project (DNIP) reported findings on patients hospitalized with perforated ulcer. The indicator “30-days mortality” showed major discrepancy between the observed mortality of 28% and the chosen standard (10%).

Rationale: An audit committee was appointed to examine quality problems linked to the high mortality. The purpose was to (i) examine patient characteristics, (ii) evaluate the appropriateness of the standard, and (iii) audit all cases of deaths within 30 days after surgery.

Methods: Four hundred and twelve consecutive patients were included and used for the analyses of patient characteristics. The evaluation of the standard was based on a literature review, and a structured audit was performed according to the 115 deaths that occurred.

Results: The mean age was 69.1 years, 42.0% had one co-morbid disease and 17.7% had two co-morbid diseases. 45.9% had an American Association of Anaesthetists score of 3–4. We found no results on mortality in studies similar to ours. The audit process indicated that the postoperative observation of patients was insufficient.

Discussion: As a result of this study, the standard for mortality was increased to 20%, and the new indicators for postoperative monitoring were developed. The DNIP continues to evaluate if these initiatives will improve the results on mortality.

Keywords: mortality, perforated peptic ulcer, ulcer, audit

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]

 

Readers of this article also read:

Disruption of human papillomavirus 16 E6 gene by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat/Cas system in human cervical cancer cells [Corrigendum]

Yu L, Wang XL, Zhu D, Ding WC, Wang LM, Zhang CL, Jiang XH, Shen H, Liao SJ, Ma D, Hu Z, Wang H

OncoTargets and Therapy 2015, 8:365-366

Published Date: 4 February 2015

Efficient gene delivery system mediated by cis-aconitate-modified chitosan-g-stearic acid micelles

Yao JJ, Du YZ, Yuan H, You J, Hu FQ

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2014, 9:2993-3003

Published Date: 18 June 2014

Metabolic biomarkers for predicting cardiovascular disease

Montgomery JE, Brown JR

Vascular Health and Risk Management 2013, 9:37-45

Published Date: 29 January 2013

The potential benefit of stem cell therapy after stroke: an update

Banerjee S, Williamson DA, Habib N, Chataway J

Vascular Health and Risk Management 2012, 8:569-580

Published Date: 10 October 2012

Clinical differences between influenza A (H1N1) virus and respiratory infection between the two waves in 2009 and 2010

Zarogoulidis P, Glaros D, Kioumis I, Terzi E, Porpodis K, Tsiotsios A, Kallianos A, Trakada G, Machairiotis N, Stylianaki A, Sakas A, Rapti A, Courcoutsakis N, Constantinidis TC, Maltezos E, Zarogoulidis K

International Journal of General Medicine 2012, 5:675-682

Published Date: 13 August 2012

The causes, consequences, and treatment of left or right heart failure

Pazos-Lopez P, Peteiro-Vazquez J, Garcia-Campos A, Garcia-Bueno L, Abugattas-de-Torres JP, Castro-Beiras A

Vascular Health and Risk Management 2011, 7:237-254

Published Date: 4 April 2011

Medical complications in patients with stroke: data validity in a stroke registry and a hospital discharge registry

Annette Ingeman, Grethe Andersen, Heidi H Hundborg, et al

Clinical Epidemiology 2010, 2:5-13

Published Date: 23 March 2010

Once daily levocetirizine for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria

E Nettis, G F Calogiuri, E Di Leo, F Cardinale, L Macchia, et al

Journal of Asthma and Allergy 2009, 2:17-23

Published Date: 16 December 2008