Transcranial direct current stimulation plus concurrent activity may influence task prioritization during walking in people with Parkinson’s disease – initial findings
Authors Criminger C, Swank C, Almutairi S, Mehta J
Received 6 January 2018
Accepted for publication 22 March 2018
Published 25 May 2018 Volume 2018:8 Pages 25—32
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Peter Hedera
Christina Criminger,1 Chad Swank,2 Sattam Almutairi,2 Jyutika Mehta3
1Department of Physical Therapy, Winston-Salem State University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; 2School of Physical Therapy, Texas Woman’s University, Dallas, TX, USA; 3Department of Communication Science and Disorders, Texas Woman’s University, Dallas, TX, USA
Introduction: Walking for people with Parkinson’s disease (PD) degrades during motor–cognitive interplay (ie, dual-task conditions). Current management of PD improves motor symptoms but inadequately addresses cognitive function, indicating a necessity for novel interventions. In this pilot study, we examined bi-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with concurrent activity and dual-task walking in people with PD.
Methods: Participants received 3 sessions (tDCSsitting, tDCSbike, tDCSWii) of bilateral tDCS (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; left = anode, right = cathode) at 2 mA and 1 sham session (tDCSsham). Sessions were randomized, single-blinded, and performed during medication “ON” times separated by 7±2 days. Following each session, participants performed Timed Up and Go (TUG) single, dual-task conditions (TUGalone, TUGmotor, TUGcognitive).
Results: Sixteen participants with PD completed this study (mean age=68.13±9.76 years, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale mean=40.31±18.27, Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status mean=84.13 [13th percentile]). No differences were observed for TUG conditions between tDCS sessions. Dual task cost for TUGmotor, 14.73% (tDCSSitting), 17.78% (tDCSBike), 15.97% (tDCSWii)), 19.02% (tDCSSham); for TUGcognitive (walking), 20.01% (tDCSSitting), 18.7% (tDCSBike), 31.18% (tDCSWii), 20.01% (tDCSSham); for TUGcognitive (cognitive), 33.72% (tDCSSitting), 14.99% (tDCSBike), 4.42% (tDCSWii), 19.11% (tDCSsham).
Conclusion: Our bi-hemisphere tDCS paired with concurrent activities did not lessen dual-task cost in participants with PD but appeared to influence task prioritization. Further investigation with a larger sample size is warranted.
Keywords: dual task interference, gait, executive function, non-invasive brain stimulation, novel task, motor-cognitive interplay
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]