Back to Journals » Psychology Research and Behavior Management » Volume 16

The Relationship Between College Students’ Interpersonal Relationship and Mental Health: Multiple Mediating Effect of Safety Awareness and College Planning

Authors Sun Y 

Received 5 November 2022

Accepted for publication 23 January 2023

Published 28 January 2023 Volume 2023:16 Pages 261—270

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S396301

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Igor Elman



Yujin Sun

School of Management, Suzhou University, Suzhou City, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence: Yujin Sun, School of Management, Suzhou University, Suzhou City, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]

Purpose: The research intends to find the internal influence mechanism of interpersonal relationship on college students’ mental health. College students have many mental health problems, which can easily lead to extreme events. It is of great research value to explore the relationship among interpersonal relationship, safety awareness, college planning, and mental health.
Participants and Methods: GHQ, WHOQOL-BREF, SWBS-CC, LSIB, and TSCS scales were used, revised questionnaire for cluster sampling of college students, 1661 valid samples. SPSS 26.0 and PROCESS V4.1 were used for analysis, and nonparametric Bootstrap method was used to test the significance level of the mediating effect.
Results: There are significant differences in interpersonal relationship, safety awareness, and college planning between high mental health group and low mental health group. There are differences in safety awareness between genders. There is a positive correlation among interpersonal relationship, safety awareness, college planning, and mental health. Interpersonal relationship has a positive predictive effect on mental health. There are three mediating pathways of interpersonal relationship on mental health: independent mediating effect pathway of safety awareness, independent mediating effect pathway of college planning, and chain mediating effect pathway through safety awareness and college planning.
Conclusion: This study reveals the Influence mechanism of interpersonal relationships on college students’ mental health. The relationship between interpersonal relationship and mental health is affected by the multiple mediating effects of safety awareness and college planning. It provides a new perspective for preventing and intervening mental health problems. College students’ personality has plasticity, which can be interfered by mediating mechanism. The present findings could help college students actively participate in interpersonal communication, improve safety awareness, and make a good college planning, so as to enhance the mental health level of college students.

Keywords: interpersonal relationship, safety awareness, college planning, mental health, chain mediating effect

Introduction

In an environment full of multiple uncertain risks,1 social competition is becoming more and more fierce, and there is an increasing emphasis on mental health.2,3 Mental health is a state of working, studying, and living effectively in the face of pressure.4,5 College students have frequent mental health problems,6,7 such as insomnia, depression, and academic obstacles.8,9 Suicide deaths of college students account for 47.2% of the abnormal deaths.10 WHO data show that mental health problems easily lead to extreme events, which is one of the main causes of suicide.11 Many empirical studies in the United States, the United Kingdom, Greece, Japan, and other countries have been confirmed.12–15

According to ecosystem theory, individual development is influenced by different environmental systems,16,17 from inside to outside, they are microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, and macrosystem.17,18 Based on ecological theory,19 mental health can be studied from four aspects: individual, family, school, and social factors.20 The factors that affect college students’ mental health are stress, emotion, and self-esteem at the individual dimension.21,22 The family dimension is income, parenting style, and so on.23,24 At the school dimension, there are factors such as physical exercise, interpersonal relationship, academic support, learning environment.25–28 At the social dimension, there are covid-19, technology, and other factors.14,15,29,30 School is the microsystem that has the most influence on college students.31–33 It is of high research value to explore what factors will affect college students’ mental health and study the influencing mechanism of mental health, which is also the focus of scholars’ attention.34

This study focuses on the impact of interpersonal relationships on the mental health of college students. Interpersonal relationship has an impact on college students’ mental health,35 and establishing friendly interpersonal relationship is one of the criteria of mental health.36,37 Interpersonal skills are an individual’s ability to successfully interact with others,38 interpersonal relationship can get social support,39 and interpersonal relationship dilemma will affect mental health.40 Interpersonal relationship mainly includes parent–child relationship, peer relationship, and teacher–student relationships. School is the principal place that affects individual development, and the peer relationship formed in the school context is the primary social relationship of college students.41 Peer relationships are crucial to mental health,42 and the interpersonal relationship in this study mainly refers to peer relationship. It is of great practical significance to explore the process of interpersonal relationship affecting college students’ mental health, find out which mediating variables have effects on the process between them, and build a multiple mediating effect model to study the mechanism between interpersonal relationship and college students’ mental health. Only by finding out the mechanism path can the conclusion have pertinence value for improving the mental health level of college students.

Friendly interpersonal relationship is a way for college students to gain safety awareness,43 which can increase their sense of security.44 According to the Hierarchy of Needs theory of psychological humanistic psychologist Maslow, people will pursue spiritual security after obtaining physical security, that is, mental health security.45 Security can meet the needs of college students’ love and interpersonal relationship,46 and people’s sense of security is threatened, leading to loneliness and double division, resulting in psychological problems.47 It is necessary to cultivate safety awareness of college students and guide them to integrate into the collective to enhance their sense of security,48 which is conducive to their mental health.23

The main pressure of college students during the school is study and future problems.49,50 Learning will bring psychological pressure,51,52 dissatisfaction with their majors will easily lead to suicidal ideation.53 COVID-19 will cause uncertainty and confusion about the future.54,55 Planning can clarify goals, reduce the occurrence of problem behaviors, and predict mental health.56 Planning can deal with uncertainty, relieve psychological pressure, and improve mental health.57

To sum up, there are many studies on influencing factors of college students’ mental health, but with interpersonal relationships as the predictive variable, and there are few researches on the influencing mechanism of college students’ mental health. Previous studies have studied the relationship among the four variables of college students’ interpersonal relationship, safety awareness, study planning, and mental health, but the relationship between only two of the four variables has been studied, less discussion of its internal mechanism, and more or less ignores the complexity of the problem. This study investigates the influence mechanism of interpersonal relationship on college students’ mental health to increase the profound understanding of this issue. To explore the multiple mediating roles of safety awareness and college planning in the influence of interpersonal relationship on mental health, analyzes the influencing mechanism of interpersonal relationship on mental health from independent mediating role and chain mediating role, and provides suggestions from interpersonal relationship, safety awareness, and academic planning to improve the mental health level of college students.

Participants and Methods

Participants

A questionnaire survey was carried out at L University, which is a full-time general undergraduate school in the Yangtze River Delta region of China, which can be used as a typical representative of local universities. The scientific nature of questionnaires comes from representative sampling.58,59 Cluster sampling method was adopted in this study, 2000 questionnaires were distributed to freshmen in L University, and 1675 questionnaires were recovered, with a recovery rate of 83.75%,60 and the survey quality is ensured.61 After data cleaning, 1661 valid samples were retained, among which 675 were male (40.6%), 986 were female (59.4%), 503 were liberal arts students (30.3%), 436 were science students (26.2%), 473 were engineering students (28.5%), 183 were art students (11%) and 66 were sports students (4%).

Tools

General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)

GHQ questionnaire was used for mental health level. GHQ was originally compiled by Goldberg and widely used,62 which is a good psychological measurement tool.63 It was later revised into GHQ-12, GHQ-20, GHQ-28 and other versions,64 among which GHQ-12 is widely used all over the world.65

World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF)

WHOQOL-BREF is compiled by WHO. WHOQOL-BREF covers four areas, including mental health and social relationships. It has good reliability and is equivalent among different countries,66 mainly adopting its interpersonal relationship, life satisfaction, and security.

Subjective Well-Being Scale for Chinese Citizens (SWBS-CC)

SWBS-CC, compiled by Xing Z, includes multiple subscales for mental health, relationships, safety, and the future. It is widely used to measure satisfaction and happiness.67

Life Satisfaction Index B (LSIB)

LSIB is a part of life satisfaction scales, life satisfaction scales were established in 1961 by Neugarten BL, Havighurst RJ, Tobin SS, including Life satisfaction rating scales, LSIA and LSIB, LSIB can be used to measure subjective life satisfaction.68,69

Tennessee Self-Concept Scale (TSCS)

TSCS was first compiled by Fitts in 1965 and revised by Lin B in 1978, including self-satisfaction and self-awareness.70

Through literature research, the main influencing factors of college students’ mental health are interpersonal relationship, safety awareness, college planning, and so on, which are also the components of college students’ mental health standards.71 Revised based on the above classical scale, selected interpersonal relationship, psychological status, satisfaction, safety awareness, and college planning as the questionnaire validity criteria, consulted experts for subjective test, and tried to investigate 30 samples for objective test. Combined with subjective test opinions and objective test results, we completed the revision.72 The core variables adopt Likert scoring method, and the assignment rules are as follows: very bad-1, bad-2, average-3, good-4, and very good-5. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.811, good internal consistency, high credibility, the KMO was 0.927, Bartlett’s sphericity test has a significance of 0, the structure validity is good. The sample quality and representativeness are high.

Data Processing

SPSS26.0 was used for descriptive analysis and correlation analysis. The PROCESS V4.1 made by Hayes was used to analyze the chain mediation effect with Model6 in the program.73 The significance level of mediating effect was tested by nonparametric Bootstrap method.74 A total of 5000 Bootstrap samples are selected to estimate the 95% confidence interval of multiple mediating effects, and whether the mediating effect is significant or not is determined according to the interval estimation results.

Common Method Bias

Harman’s single-factor test was used to investigate the existence of common method bias.75 Factor analysis showed that the first unrotated factor explained 29.760% of the variance of variables, not more than 40%, and there was no serious common method bias.76

Results

Difference of Variables

Independent sample t-test showed differences in safety awareness between different genders. The samples were divided into high mental health group and low mental health group. From Table 1, it can be seen that there are significant differences in interpersonal relationship, safety awareness, and college planning.

Table 1 Difference Comparison Results of Each Variable

The effect size Cohen’s d is calculated, and Cohen’s d can reflect the difference effect when the difference is significant.77 The results showed that there was significant difference between the high mental health group and the low mental health group, and the difference in safety awareness between male and female existed but was small.

Correlation Analysis Among Variables

Table 2 shows the correlation among variables, interpersonal relationship, safety awareness, college planning, and mental health are all correlated, and mental health is significantly positively correlated with interpersonal relationship, safety awareness, and college planning, which provides a basis for the test of chain mediation effect.78

Table 2 Correlation Analysis Results of Interpersonal Relationship, Safety Awareness, College Planning and Mental Health

Mediation Effect Test

Mental health as variable Y, interpersonal relationship as variable X, safety awareness and college planning as multiple mediating variables, safety awareness as M1 and college planning as M2, gender as control variable S, and mediation analysis was performed.

According to the results of regression analysis among variables in Table 3, three models can be constructed. The first is that the prediction variable is interpersonal relationship (β=0.308, p<0), safety awareness is the outcome variable, and the fitting degree R2 is 0.130, which can be extended to all. In the second, interpersonal relationship (β=0.147, p<0) and safety awareness (β=0.105, p<0) were used as predictive variables, and college planning was used as outcome variable, and the fitting degree R2 was 0.097, which had positive predictive effect. When interpersonal relationship, safety awareness and college planning simultaneously predict mental health (β=0.328, p<0), safety awareness (β=0.281, p<0) and college planning (β=0.133, p<0) have significant positive predictive effects on mental health (β=0.147), and the third model with R2 of 0.302 is constructed.

Table 3 Regression Analysis Among Variables

The nonparametric Bootstrap method was used to test the mediating effect. Table 4 of the test results shows that safety awareness and college planning have partial mediating effects between interpersonal relationship and mental health, and the mediating effect is 0.110. The mediating effect is produced by three mediating chains. Bootstrap test results show no 0 between BootLLCI and BootULCI, and the mediating effect is significant. One is indirect effect: interpersonal relationship → safety awareness → mental health, and safety awareness plays a significant mediating role; Second, indirect effect: interpersonal relationship → college planning → mental health, college planning plays a significant mediating role; The third is indirect effect: interpersonal relationship → safety awareness → college planning → mental health, which shows that safety awareness and college planning play a significant role in chain multiple mediation between interpersonal relationship and mental health. The effect values of the three pathways were 0.087, 0.020 and 0.004, and the relative mediating effects were 19.82%, 4.56%, and 0.91%. The specific path of the chain mediation effect of college students’ interpersonal relationship on mental health is shown in Figure 1.

Table 4 Mediating Effects of Safety Awareness and College Planning on Interpersonal Relationship and Mental Health

Figure 1 Chain-mediated effect path.

Note: **P < 0.01.

Discussion

The results show differences in safety awareness between genders, which is consistent with previous research results.43 There are significant differences in interpersonal relationship, safety awareness, and college planning between high mental health group and low mental health group. The research results can be explained by Schema theory. High and low mental health groups will form their self-schemas; act according to context schemas in interpersonal relationship, safety awareness, college planning; and have their strategic schemas and emotion schemas, which form related schema towers.43,79

The results show that interpersonal relationship, safety awareness, college planning, and mental health of college students are positively correlated, which shows that interpersonal relationship, safety awareness and college planning can actively promote mental health and influence each other. On the correlation between interpersonal relationships and mental health, result is consistent with the interpersonal theory. Sullivan argues that interpersonal relationship is the main manifestation of people’s sociality,80 and bad interpersonal relationship will affect mental health.81 Han believes that mental health education should include interpersonal relationship education.82 Zhang and Jiang argue that college students’ mental health is related to interpersonal relationship26,83; this is consistent with our research. On the correlation between interpersonal relationship and safety awareness, Hu thinks that interpersonal conflict is related to safe behavior,84 Huang Y believes that good interpersonal relationship is the way to obtain safety awareness,43 our study confirms these results. On the correlation between interpersonal relationship and college planning, Chen thinks that interpersonal relationship and college planning are related dimensions.85 In terms of the correlation between other variables, Wang discussed the relationship between safety awareness and college planning.86 Gustafsson and Ren found that safety awareness is closely related to mental health.47,48 Jin H and others analyzed global doctoral survey data and concluded that planning is closely related to mental health,27,47 which is consistent with this study.

The results of regression analysis showed that interpersonal relationship, safety awareness, and college planning significantly positively predicted mental health. Interpersonal relationship, safety awareness, and college planning can form positive psychological capital, which is an important index to measure mental health,87 and this is consistent with our findings. Interpersonal relationships can help college students gain recognition and attention, and it is a positive attitude that can get emotion. Reasonable handling of interpersonal relationship can reduce social anxiety.88 Safety awareness is personal cognition, and college planning is a planning behavior for the future, improving safety awareness and college planning will bring a sense of certainty,57 and then there is the pursuit of spiritual safety, which is mental health safety, which also verifies the hierarchy of needs theory.45

Further research shows that interpersonal relationship has three mediating effects on mental health: independent mediating effect path of safety awareness, independent mediating effect path of college planning and chain mediating effect path through safety awareness and college planning. Safety awareness and college planning play a mediating role in the influence of interpersonal relationship on mental health, and both can improve the level of mental health. Allport argues that healthy personality should include self-expansion ability, good interpersonal relationship, security emotion.89 The results of this study are consistent with it. The decrease in interpersonal trust level will lead to lack of security, affect mental health,90 and interpersonal conflict will affect safe behavior.84 In crisis events, interpersonal relationship changes obviously,91 which is consistent with the research results of safety awareness independent intermediary effect path. It is the responsibility and obligation of colleges and universities to pay attention to the safety and health of college students.92 Individual self-realization needs the mediating effect of studies, which is closely related to mental health and needs to be respond actively.84,93 Students’ career planning can promote students to form positive interpersonal relationships, thus promoting students’ mental health development.94 The independent mediating effect path of college planning verifies the research results. The chain mediating effect of safety awareness and college planning between interpersonal relationship and mental health shows how interpersonal relationship affects college students’ mental health through multiple mediating variables, and explains the inner mechanism of interpersonal relationship’s influence on mental health. College students actively carry out interpersonal communication, improve their safety awareness level, and do college planning well, which is helpful to improve the level of individual mental health.

Exploring the influence mechanism of college students’ mental health is helpful to evaluate college students’ psychological problems and risks. College students’ personality has plasticity,95 which can be interfered by mediating mechanism. Colleges and families should actively encourage college students to participate in interpersonal communication, improve interpersonal communication skills, build good interpersonal relationships, do a good job in safety education, create campus safety culture, improve college students’ safety awareness in a way that students like, and guide college students to make effective academic planning and life planning, which is not only conducive to improving college students’ comprehensive quality and mental health level but also conducive to improving college students’ happiness.96

Limitations and Implications

This study reveals the Influence mechanism of interpersonal relationships on college students’ mental health. It provides a new perspective for preventing and intervening mental health problems of college students and improving their mental health level. Only one university is selected for cluster sampling. In the future, students from different regions and universities will be selected for investigation to improve the validity.97 This study uses cross-sectional data, which have limitations in causal inference, and can collect longitudinal data for verification in the future.98 Besides safety awareness and college planning, whether there are other mediators in the influence mechanism of interpersonal relationship on mental health of college students needs further research in the future.99

Conclusion

There are significant differences in interpersonal relationship, safety awareness, and college planning between high mental health group and low mental health group, and the difference effect is obvious. There are differences in safety awareness between genders; interpersonal relationships, safety awareness, college planning, and mental health are all positively correlated; interpersonal relationship has a positive predictive effect on mental health. There are three mediating pathways of interpersonal relationship on mental health: independent mediating effect pathway of safety awareness, independent mediating effect pathway of college planning, and chain mediating effect pathway through safety awareness and college planning.

Ethical Statement and Informed Consent

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The Ethics Committee of Suzhou University approved the study. Participants were informed that their responses to the task would be anonymous and confidential.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the editors and reviewers.

Funding

This study was supported by Anhui University Humanities and Social Sciences Research Project (SK2019A0532); Anhui Universities Quality Engineering Project (2021shsjkc024); The Ministry of Education’s Industry-University Cooperation Collaborative Education Project (202101291015); Anhui Province Social Science Innovation and Development Research Project (2021CX119); Anhui Universities Quality Engineering Project (2018mooc586); Key scientific research projects of Suzhou University(2021yzd14).

Disclosure

The author reports no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Zhang Y. Recovery growth and uncertain risks interweave: retrospect of world economy in 2021 and the outlook. Contemp World. 2022;(1):17–23. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-4206.2022.01.004

2. Fang X, Yuan X, Hu W, Deng L, Lin X. The development of college students mental health screening scale. Stud Psychol Behav. 2018;16(1):111–118. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2018.01.015

3. Thomas S, Jenkins R, Burch T, et al. Promoting mental health and preventing mental illness in general practice. Lond J Prim Care. 2016;8(1):3–9. doi:10.1080/17571472.2015.1135659

4. Depression WHO. Other Common Mental Disorders: Global Health Estimates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017:24.

5. Shannon S, Breslin G, Haughey T, et al. Predicting student-athlete and non-athletes’ intentions to self-manage mental health: testing an integrated behaviour change model. Ment Health Prev. 2019;13:92–99. doi:10.1016/j.mhp.2019.01.006

6. Mandracchia JT, Pendleton S. Understanding college students’ problems: dysfunctional thinking, mental health, and maladaptive behavior. J Coll Stud Ret. 2015;17(2):226–242. doi:10.1177/1521025115578235

7. Shorey S, Ng ED, Wong CH. Global prevalence of depression and elevated depressive symptoms among adolescents: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Br J Clin Psychol. 2022;61(2):287–305. doi:10.1111/bjc.12333

8. Zochil ML, Thorsteinsson EB. Exploring poor sleep, mental health, and help‐seeking intention in university students. Aust J Psychol. 2018;70(1):41–47. doi:10.1111/ajpy.12160

9. Bruffaerts R, Mortier P, Kiekens G, et al. Mental health problems in college freshmen: prevalence and academic functioning. J Affect Disord. 2018;225:97–103. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.044

10. Yang Z, Li Y. An analysis on unnatural deaths of college students. Stud Psychol Behav. 2015;13(5):698–701. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2015.05.017

11. Chen Y, Zhang Y, Yu G. Prevalence of mental health problems among college students in Chinese mainland from 2010 to 2020:A meta-analysis. Adv Psychol Sci. 2022;30(5):991–1004. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2022.5.xlxdt202205004

12. Kitzrow MA. The mental health needs of today’s college students: challenges and recommendations. J Stud Aff Res Pract. 2003;41(1):167–181.

13. Macaskill A. The mental health of university students in the United Kingdom. Br J Guid Counc. 2013;41(4):426–441. doi:10.1080/03069885.2012.743110

14. Patsali ME, Mousa DPV, Papadopoulou EV, et al. University students’ changes in mental health status and determinants of behavior during the COVID-19 lockdown in Greece. Psychiatry Res. 2020;292:113298. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113298

15. Ueda M, Nordström R, Matsubayashi T. Suicide and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. J Public Health. 2022;44(3):541–548. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdab113

16. Baumeister RF, Campbell JD, Krueger JI, Vohs KD. Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2003;4(1):1–44. doi:10.1111/1529-1006.01431

17. Bronfenbrenner U, Ceci SJ. Nature-nuture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: a bioecological model. Psychol Rev. 1994;101(4):568. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.568

18. Bronfenbrenner U. Ecology of the family as a context for human development: research perspectives. Dev Psychol. 1986;22(6):723. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.22.6.723

19. Bronfenbrenner U. Making Human Beings Human: Bioecological Perspectives on Human Development. Sage; 2005.

20. Diab SY, Palosaari E, Punamäki RL. Society, individual, family, and school factors contributing to child mental health in war: the ecological-theory perspective. Child Abuse Negl. 2018;84:205–216. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.07.033

21. Beiter R, Nash R, McCrady M, et al. The prevalence and correlates of depression, anxiety, and stress in a sample of college students. J Affect Disord. 2015;173:90–96. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.054

22. Gloria CT, Steinhardt MA. Relationships among positive emotions, coping, resilience and mental health. Stress Health. 2016;32(2):145–156. doi:10.1002/smi.2589

23. Wang Y, Fan X, Zhang L, Xu Q. Influence of family income on college students’ mental health: the role of self-concept and collective self-esteem. Psychol Res. 2022;15(1):70–77. doi:10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2022.01.009

24. Zhang H, Li Z, Chang K. The Effect of Parenting style on mental health of college students in Beijing: the mediating role of adult attachment. Chin J Health Stat. 2022;39(1):71–76. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-3674.2022.01.015

25. Xu W. Physical exercise and depression in college students: the Multiple mediating roles of mindfulness and social support. Soc Sci. 2021;2:148–155.

26. Jiang H, Wu Z, Duan Z. Correlation analysis between interpersonal relationship and mental health score of a medical college student. Chin J School Health. 2011;32(7):849+853. doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2011.07.039

27. Jin H, Yang P. On protective effect of academic supports on doctoral students’ mental health problems: a comparative study based on a global doctoral student survey. J Grad Educ. 2021;(5):9–16+24. doi:10.19834/j.cnki.yjsjy2011.2021.05.02

28. Salimi N, Gere B, Talley W, Irioogbe B. College students mental health challenges: concerns and considerations in the COVID-19 pandemic. J College Stud Psychother. 2021;1–13. doi:10.1080/87568225.2021.1890298

29. Kaparounaki CK, Patsali ME, Mousa DPV, Papadopoulou EV, Papadopoulou KK, Fountoulakis KN. University students’ mental health amidst the COVID-19 quarantine in Greece. Psychiatry Res. 2020;290:113111. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113111

30. Lattie EG, Lipson SK, Eisenberg D. Technology and college student mental health: challenges and opportunities. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:246. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00246

31. Nie Q, Zhang D, Teng Z, Guo C. How students perceived school climate effect on subjective and objective academic achievement: the mediating role of psychological suzhi. Psychol Develop Educ. 2018;34(6):715–723. doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2018.06.10

32. Bronfenbrenner U, Evans GW. Developmental science in the 21st century: emerging questions, theoretical models, research designs and empirical findings. Soc Develop. 2000;9(1):115–125. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00114

33. Eccles JS, Roeser RW. Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. J Res Adolesc. 2011;21(1):225–241. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00725.x

34. Pedrelli P, Nyer M, Yeung A, Zulauf C, Wilens T. College students: mental health problems and treatment considerations. Acad Psychiatry. 2015;39(5):503–511. doi:10.1007/s40596-014-0205-9

35. Zhang D, Zhu Z. The characteristics and influencing factors of college students’ psychological qualities: based on an analysis of online survey data of college students. Educ Res. 2022;43(7):126–139.

36. Chu C, Buchman-Schmitt JM, Stanley IH, et al. The interpersonal theory of suicide: a systematic review and meta-analysis of a decade of cross-national research. Psychol Bull. 2017;143(12):1313. doi:10.1037/bul0000123

37. Liao Y, He W, Wu ZA. Meta-analysis of the factors affecting mental health of Chinese college students. J Yangzhou Univ. 2017;21(5):41–46. doi:10.19411/j.cnki.1007-8606.2017.05.009

38. Argyle M. The Psychology of Interpersonal Behaviour. Penguin UK; 1994.

39. Jiang Y, Tian L, Xue L. Self-regulated learning and mental health of middle school students: the role of academic control and interpersonal relationships. Stud Psychol Behav. 2020;18(6):798–804. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2020.06.016

40. Guo BY. A new interpretation of Sullivan's theory of interpersonal psychoanalysis. J Nanjing Norm Univ. 2017;(3):86–96. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4608.2017.03.010

41. Wu M, Zhou X, Ye P, Sun L. The influence of teacher-student relationship, peer relationship and parent-child relationship on the psychological capital among rural primary school boarders: a moderated mediation model. Chin J Clin Psychol. 2021;29(2):230–235. doi:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2021.02.003

42. Zhang Z, Guo BD. Peer relationship and mental health in perspective of social network. Adv Psychol Sci. 2016;24(4):591. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00591

43. Huang Y. Safety consciousness present situation of local college students and counter measures. Mod Educ Manag. 2015;(8):115–119. doi:10.16697/j.cnki.xdjygl.2015.08.019

44. Kim HHS. School context, friendship ties and adolescent mental health: a multilevel analysis of the Korean Youth Panel Survey (KYPS). Soc Sci Med. 2015;145:209–216. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.002

45. Maslow AH. Motivation and Personality. Prabhat Prakashan; 1981.

46. Ou Y. The influence of social support on college students’mental health. Youth Stud. 2003;(3):29–33+38. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-1437.2003.03.005

47. Gustafsson K, Krickel-Choi NC. Returning to the roots of ontological security: insights from the existentialist anxiety literature. Eur J Int Relat. 2020;26(3):875–895. doi:10.1177/1354066120927073

48. An RG. IM-based SQTM for college students. China Saf Sci J. 2014;24(10):21–27. doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2014.10.005

49. Wang F, Mao M. Research on stress among engineering college student. Chin J Appl Psychol. 2001;(1):31–36. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2001.01.006

50. Gao S. Quantitative and comprehensive analysis of the relationship between life events and mental health of Chinese college students. Mod Prevent Med. 2018;45(10):1812–1815+1821.

51. Fan F, Li W. Psychological stress and coping style of college students: a survey in Tsinghua University. Youth Stud. 2000;6:40–45.

52. Wang Y, Teng Y, Peng K, Hu X. The influencing factors and intervention strategies of mental health of Chinese International Students during COVID-19. Chin J Appl Psychol. 2022;28(2):134–146. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2022.02.005

53. Chen J, Geng R. Factors affecting psychological health and suicidal behavior: based on a survey of 10340 medical students from three universities. J South Med Univ. 2020;40(11):1689–1693. doi:10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2020.11.24

54. Chen K, Xing C, Zhang J, et al. Investigation on health and professional consciousness and mental health of military medical students during coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic. Anesth Analg. 2022;43(6):704–708. doi:10.16781/j.CN31-2187/R.20200236

55. Ajzen I. Perceived behavioral control, self‐efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior 1. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2002;32(4):665–683. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x

56. Skorikov V, Vondracek FW. Positive career orientation as an inhibitor of adolescent problem behaviour. J Adolesc. 2007;30(1):131–146. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.02.004

57. Mackie SA, Bates GW. Contribution of the doctoral education environment to PhD candidates’ mental health problems: a scoping review. High Educ Res Dev. 2019;38(3):565–578. doi:10.1080/07294360.2018.1556620

58. Ren L, Qiu Z, Ding H, Yan J. Research on survey quality: evaluation of the representativeness of survey responses. Chin J Sociol. 2014;34(1):196–214. doi:10.15992/j.cnki.31-1123/c.2014.01.007

59. Kruskal W, Mosteller F. Representative sampling, III: the current statistical literature. Revue Internationale de Statistique. 1979;1:245–265.

60. Feng X. Is high response rate better? Another understanding on response rates for social survey. Social Stud. 2007;(3):121–135+244. doi:10.19934/j.cnki.shxyj.2007.03.007

61. Dong H, Li X. Standardization of questionnaire survey: necessity, dilemma and solution. J Soc Sci Hunan Norm Univ. 2021;50(2):135–143. doi:10.19503/j.cnki.1000-2529.2021.02.015

62. Goldberg P. The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire. Maudsley monograph; 1972.

63. Andrich D, Van Schoubroeck L. The general health questionnaire: a psychometric analysis using latent trait theory. Psychol Med. 1989;19(2):469–485. doi:10.1017/S0033291700012502

64. Goldberg DP. User’s Guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor; 1988.

65. Ruiz FJ, García-Beltrán DM, Suárez-Falcón JC. General Health Questionnaire-12 validity in Colombia and factorial equivalence between clinical and nonclinical participants. Psychiatry Res. 2017;256:53–58. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.06.020

66. Hao Y, Fang J, J PM, Wu S, Zhu S. The Equivalence of WHOQOL-BREF among 13 Culture Versions. Chin Mental Health J. 2006;(2):71–75. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-6729.2006.02.001

67. Xing Z. The development of the revised subjective well-being scale for Chinese citizens (SWBS-CC) and its nationwide norms. Psychol Sci. 2008;31(6):1484–1488. doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2008.06.058

68. Hsieh CM. Counting importance: the case of life satisfaction and relative domain importance. Soc Indic Res. 2003;61(2):227–240. doi:10.1023/A:1021354132664

69. Neugarten BL, Havighurst RJ, Tobin SS. The measurement of life satisfaction. J Gerontol. 1961. doi:10.1093/geronj/16.2.134

70. Marsh HW, Richards GE. Tennessee Self Concept Scale: reliability, internal structure, and construct validity. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;55(4):612. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.4.612

71. Peoples Network. The standard of mental health of college students. People’s Tribune. 2020;23:123.

72. Wang X, Feng X. Methodological implications of the perspective of multi-subject construction for surveys. Nanjing J Soc Sci. 2017;(5):46–52+80. doi:10.15937/j.cnki.issn1001-8263.2017.05.007

73. Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford publications; 2017.

74. Wen Z, Fang J, Xie J, Ouyang J. Methodological research on mediation effects in China’s mainland. Adv Psychol Sci. 2022;30(8):1692–1702. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2022.8.xlxdt202208003

75. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

76. Zhou H, Long L. Statistical remedies for common method biases. Adv Psychol Sci. 2004;(6):942–950. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2004.06.018

77. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge; 2013.

78. Jia X, Zhang Y, Qiu J. The impact of mindsets on emotional well-being of college students: a Chain mediating model of perceived stress and resilience. J Southwest Univ. 2022;48(4):202–209. doi:10.13718/j.cnki.xdsk.2022.04.020

79. Torney-Purta J. Schema theory and cognitive psychology: implications for social studies. Theory Res Soc Educ. 1991;19(2):189–210. doi:10.1080/00933104.1991.10505636

80. Sullivan HS. The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. In: An Introduction to Theories of Personality. Psychology Press; 2014:137–156.

81. Sullivan HS. The Psychiatric Interview. WW Norton & Company; 1954.

82. Han Z. Current college students mental health problems and coping strategies. People’s Tribune. 2020;(23):121–123. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-3381.2020.23.037

83. Zhang S, Liu T, Xia F, Li Y. A social network analysis approach to interpersonal relationship and mental health in college students. Chin Mental Health J. 2020;34(10):855–859. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2020.10.010

84. Hu J, Zhang Q, Wang H. Interpersonal conflict and safety work behavior: the multiple mediation effects of anger and revenge motivation. Stud Psychol Behav. 2020;18(6):826–832. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2020.06.020

85. Chen H, Zhang M, Ni Y, Huo Z, Practical A. Research of adaptability between cross-straits college students-based on the survey of South China Normal University and Changhua University of Education. Psychol Explorat. 2018;38(3):241–247. doi:10.7666/d.y1373142

86. Wang H. Discussion on Life Safety Education in college physical education. Heilongjiang Res Higher Educ. 2013;31(5):183–185.

87. Luthans F, Luthans KW, Luthans BC. Positive psychological capital: beyond human and social capital; 2004.

88. Ye B, Ma T. The relationship between social support and college students’ depression: a moderated mediation model. Psychol Explorat. 2020;40(5):465–471.

89. Allport GW. Pattern and growth in personality; 1961.

90. Chen J. The Influence, cause and reconstruction of interpersonal trust crisis in college students: based on the perspective of mental health education. Soc Sci. 2010;(5):59–61. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-3240.2010.05.016

91. Jin J, Yu G. Analysis of mental health condition of Chinese secondary vocational students: perspective of major crisis event effect. J Southwest Minzu Univ. 2022;43(1):208–215. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-3926.2022.01.024

92. Deng J, Liu R. The coping strategy of university student Department to public health safety emergencies from the perspective of social governance. Party Build Ideological Edu School. 2020;(20):64–66. doi:10.19865/j.cnki.xxdj.2020.20.022

93. He A, Wan J, Hui Q. The relationship between mobile phone dependence and mental health in adolescents: the mediating role of academic burnout and the moderating role of coping style. Psychol Develop Educ. 2022;38(3):391–398. doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2022.03.10

94. Wang F. On function of career planning to psychological health of students in higher vocational colleges. Theory PractEduc. 2012;32(6):29–30.

95. Dai M, Liu X, Wang B, et al. Follow-up observation of mental health status of college students. Chin Mental Health J. 1998;(3):46–47. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-6729.1998.03.021

96. Li Y, Zhang Y, Yang Y, et al. The relationship between authenticity and subjective well-being in college students: a chain mediating effect of mindfulness and self-determination. Chin J Clin Psychol. 2021;29(6):1276–1280+1285. doi:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2021.06.031

97. Tang H, Chen Q, Wu J. The relationship between college student’s social development level and mental health: the mediating role of alexithymia and the gender difference. Psychol Develop Educ. 2021;37(5):735–742. doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.05.15

98. Liu L, Chen Y, Zhang L. Thirty years of quantitative group studies: taking papers published in sociology studies as examples. J Jiangsu Administrat Inst. 2018;(2):75–84. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-8860.2018.02.010

99. Jiang T. Mediating effects and moderating effects in causal inference. China Industr Eco. 2022;(5):100–120. doi:10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2022.05.005

Creative Commons License © 2023 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.