Back to Journals » Cancer Management and Research » Volume 11

Relationship between bone mineral density and the risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of ten cohort studies

Authors Chen JH, Yuan Q, Ma YN, Zhen SH, Wen DL

Received 20 September 2018

Accepted for publication 5 January 2019

Published 13 February 2019 Volume 2019:11 Pages 1453—1464


Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Dr Antonella D'Anneo

Jian-Hua Chen,1 Quan Yuan,1 Ya-Nan Ma,2 Shi-Han Zhen,2 De-Liang Wen2

1Department of Orthopaedics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China; 2Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, China

Purpose: The evidence from recent epidemiological studies investigating the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and the risk of breast cancer (BC) remains inconsistent.
Materials and methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched by two independent authors to identify related cohort studies from the inception of the databases through January 31, 2018. Similarly, two researchers separately extracted the data from the selected studies, and any differences were resolved by discussion. Summarized relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were summarized via inverse variance weighted random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed with the I² statistic.
Results: Ten studies with 1,522 BC patients among 81,902 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Compared to the participants with the lowest BMD at the lumbar spine, those with the highest BMD had a significantly lower RR for BC (RR =0.75; 95% CI =0.60–0.93; I2=23.0%). In the subgroup analyses, although the directions of the results were consistent with those of the main findings, not all showed statistical significance. We failed to detect an association between BMD at the femoral neck or total hip and the risk of BC (RR =0.94; 95% CI =0.66–1.33; I2=72.5%). Furthermore, the results of the dose–response analysis did not show a significant association between BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, or total hip and the risk of BC. Funnel plot and statistical analyses showed no evidence of publication bias.
Conclusion: There is no relationship between BMD and the risk of BC. More prospective cohort studies are warranted to further investigate this issue.

Keywords: bone mineral density, breast cancer, cohort studies, meta-analysis, risk

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]