Questioning patient engagement: research scientists’ perceptions of the challenges of patient engagement in a cardiovascular research network
Authors Carroll SL, Embuldeniya G, Abelson J, McGillion M, Berkesse A, Healey JS
Received 23 February 2017
Accepted for publication 4 July 2017
Published 13 September 2017 Volume 2017:11 Pages 1573—1583
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Johnny Chen
Sandra L Carroll,1 Gayathri Embuldeniya,1 Julia Abelson,2 Michael McGillion,1 Alexandre Berkesse,3 Jeff S Healey4
1Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, 2Faculty of Health Sciences, Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, 3Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, 4Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
Background: Patient engagement in research is a dominant discourse in clinical research settings as it is seen as a move toward sustainable and equitable health care systems. In Canada, a key driver is the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, which asserts that meaningful patient engagement can only be fostered when stakeholders understand its value. This study assessed researchers’ perceptions of the meaning and value of patient engagement in research within a Canadian cardiovascular research network. In doing so, the secondary aim was to inform the development of a structured patient engagement initiative by identifying potential challenges and related mitigation strategies.
Methods: We employed a multi-method strategy involving electronic surveys and semi-structured telephone interviews with network research scientists across Canada. Interview data were analyzed using thematic and content analysis. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Results: Thirty-eight electronic surveys (response rate =33%) and 16 interviews were completed with network members. Some participants were uncertain about the meaning and value of patient engagement. While voicing guarded support, four challenges relating to patient engagement were identified from the interviews: 1) identification of representative and appropriate patients, 2) uncertainty about the scope of patients’ roles given concerns about knowledge discrepancies, 3) a perceived lack of evidence of the impact of patient engagement, and 4) the need for education and culture change as a prerequisite for patient engagement. Research scientists were largely concerned that patients untrained in science and tasked with conveying an authentic patient experience and being a conduit for the voices of others might unsettle a traditional model of conducting research.
Conclusion: Concerns about patient involvement in research were related to a lack of clarity about the meaning, process, and impact of involvement. This study highlights the need for education on the meaning of patient engagement, evidence of its impact, and guidance on practical aspects of implementation within this research community.
Keywords: patient oriented research, health policy, medical culture, patient-centered care, stroke
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]