Back to Journals » International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease » Volume 8

Noninvasive mechanical ventilation with high pressure strategy remains a “double edged sword”?

Authors Esquinas A, Siscaro G, Enrico M.Clini

Received 10 January 2013

Accepted for publication 29 January 2013

Published 27 May 2013 Volume 2013:8 Pages 255—258


Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 5

Antonio M Esquinas,1 Gherardo Siscaro,2 Enrico M Clini2

1Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, 2Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena, Pavullo-Modena, Italy

We read with great interest the original work by Murphy et al analyzing the effects of two treatment strategies for delivery of noninvasive mechanical ventilation in hypercapnic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.1 High pressure and high intensity noninvasive mechanical ventilation were compared in a short-term crossover trial to assess whether high intensity noninvasive mechanical ventilation (inspiratory pressure > 25 cm H2O associated with a high backup ventilator rate) may improve adherence, physiological, and subjective outcomes when compared with delivery of high pressure noninvasive mechanical ventilation (without elevated backup respiratory rate). The authors concluded that both strategies are equivalent in all the recorded outcomes, showing thus that driving pressure, but not backup respiratory rate, is essential to gain physiological and clinical benefits in this population when in a chronic stable condition.

View original paper by Murphy and colleagues.

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]


Other articles by this author:

Readers of this article also read:

Simvastatin enhances Rho/actin/cell rigidity pathway contributing to mesenchymal stem cells’ osteogenic differentiation

Tai IC, Wang YH, Chen CH, Chuang SC, Chang JK, Ho ML

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2015, 10:5881-5894

Published Date: 21 September 2015

Acquired hemophilia A: emerging treatment options

Janbain M, Leissinger CA, Kruse-Jarres R

Journal of Blood Medicine 2015, 6:143-150

Published Date: 8 May 2015

Proliferation and stemness preservation of human adipose-derived stem cells by surface-modified in situ TiO2 nanofibrous surfaces

Tan AW, Tay L, Chua KH, Ahmad R, Ali Akbar S, Pingguan-Murphy B

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2014, 9:5389-5401

Published Date: 21 November 2014

The potential benefit of stem cell therapy after stroke: an update

Banerjee S, Williamson DA, Habib N, Chataway J

Vascular Health and Risk Management 2012, 8:569-580

Published Date: 10 October 2012

Crystallization after intravitreal ganciclovir injection

Pitipol Choopong, Nattaporn Tesavibul, Nattawut Rodanant

Clinical Ophthalmology 2010, 4:709-711

Published Date: 14 July 2010