Back to Journals » Clinical Interventions in Aging » Volume 10

Mild cognitive impairment and its management in older people

Authors Eshkoor SA, Hamid TA, Mun CY, Ng CK

Received 7 September 2014

Accepted for publication 12 November 2014

Published 10 April 2015 Volume 2015:10 Pages 687—693

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S73922

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Dr Richard Walker


Sima Ataollahi Eshkoor, Tengku Aizan Hamid, Chan Yoke Mun, Chee Kyun Ng

Institute of Gerontology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia

Abstract: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a common condition in the elderly. It is characterized by deterioration of memory, attention, and cognitive function that is beyond what is expected based on age and educational level. MCI does not interfere significantly with individuals’ daily activities. It can act as a transitional level of evolving dementia with a range of conversion of 10%–15% per year. Thus, it is crucial to protect older people against MCI and developing dementia. The preventive interventions and appropriate treatments should improve cognitive performance, and retard or prevent progressive deficits. The avoidance of toxins, reduction of stress, prevention of somatic diseases, implementation of mental and physical exercises, as well as the use of dietary compounds like antioxidants and supplements can be protective against MCI. The modification of risk factors such as stopping smoking, as well as the treatment of deficiency in vitamins and hormones by correcting behaviors and lifestyle, can prevent cognitive decline in the elderly. The progressive increase in the growth rate of the elderly population can enhance the rate of MCI all over the world. There is no exact cure for MCI and dementia; therefore, further studies are needed in the future to determine causes of MCI and risk factors of progression from MCI to dementia. This will help to find better ways for prevention and treatment of cognitive impairment worldwide.

Keywords: AD, Alzheimer’s disease, cognition, dementia, MCI

Background

The improvement of health care support has greatly extended the average life expectancy, which has resulted in a substantial increase in the number of individuals aged 65 years and above. Memory impairment is the usual consequence of the ageing process in the elderly1 and can be a marker of Alzheimer’s disease (AD)2 and dementia. It presents with declines in both episodic and immediate memory. Episodic memory is the ability to recall recent experiences and events, and it decreases in the early stages of adulthood. Immediate memory also decreases with advancing age, and it is characterized by a lower ability of thinking and deciding.3

The rate of memory impairment varies among different populations, which can be explained by the possible effects of factors including average age of respondents, type of questions asked, sex differences, educational level, and depression.1 With the substantial increase in the incidences of dementia, early detection of possible precursors, diagnosis, treatment, and control of modifiable risk factors are important to reduce the rate of disease.4

Cognition is a bodily function that is decreased by ageing when there is the impairment of memory, judgment, language, and attention.5 It can occur due to neurodegenerative, vascular, and dysthymia/dysphoria problems.6 Impaired cognition and reduced cognitive abilities can affect social, functional, and occupational activities.5 The estimated prevalence of cognitive impairment, which varies widely in different research, can be attributed to the use of different definitions. Age-associated memory impairment and cognitive impairment–no dementia are more prevalent than mild cognitive impairment (MCI).1

The prevalence of MCI is about four-times greater than dementia.1 Petersen et al were the pioneers in introducing MCI.7 MCI characteristics are declining and disturbance of cognition, minimal impairment of complex activities, ability to perform regular daily functions, and absence of dementia.4 In typical MCI, memory impairment810 as well as cognitive decline are at a greater rate than expected for an individual’s age9,10 and educational level9 without impairing daily activities.8,9 MCI is a transitional level between normal state of brain and dementia7,1114 with different features including amnestic MCI (aMCI), single-domain non-amnestic MCI, and multiple domain MCI.6 The amnestic type is a prodromal stage of dementia7,9 and presents itself predominantly with memory impairment.6 While memory gets damaged in aMCI,7,15 general cognitive function and daily activities are normal.7,15,16 Non-amnestic MCI accompanies deficits in cognition7 and motor performances17 without affecting memory.7 Memory loss and cognitive decline occur in multiple-domain MCI.6 Amnestic and multiple-domain pose an equal risk for progression towards AD.6

Although MCI has a greater risk of progression to dementia,1,9,18 sometimes it reverts to normal status or has no progression to dementia.11,18 It has been reported that up to 44% of patients with MCI at their first visit are estimated to return to normal after a year.19 Various research indicate that the progression rate of MCI to dementia depends on factors such as the return to normal state,19 the definitions of MCI applied, sample size, geographic region, the nature of individuals, cultural background, length of follow-up, neuropsychiatric symptoms, assessment procedures, and cutoff points when considering age and education.18,20

Cognitive impairment is a common problem in the elderly21,22 that is associated with age,8,21,23 with an occurrence rate of approximately 21.5–71.3 per 1,000 person-years in seniors.8 MCI rates range from 3% to as high as 42% in population studies,8 and from 6% to 85% in clinical settings.6,24 The MCI conversion rate to dementia is about 10% per year,1,6,16,21,2527 which is increased to 80%–90% after approximately 6 years.28 It is estimated that a new case of dementia is added each 7 seconds.21 The prevalence of dementia in the elderly population is between 1% to 2% per year.11,29 It is forecast that number of cases in the developing world will increase by 100% between 2001 and 2040.21 It seems that the rate of dementia will increase from 9.4% in 2000 to 23.5% by 2050 in the population over 60 years of age.30

It is projected that the number of elderly people in the world will increase by 21% in the next 50 years. The elderly population in the developing and developed countries will increase by 140% and 51% respectively. The growing rate of elderly people in the Asian and Pacific regions is faster than the past. Asia–Pacific is a region near the Western Pacific Ocean containing much of East Asia as well as Southeast Asia countries such as Australia, New Zealand, Pakistan, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Japan, India, Singapore, People’s Republic of China, Thailand, Sri Lanka, South Korea, Hong Kong SAR, and Chinese Taipei.30 Among Asian countries, the difference in prevalence of MCI is greater than five-fold.8,20 The prevalence of MCI is increasing among developed and developing countries. Rapid demographic ageing in low- and middle-income countries makes it a priority to identify the people at the risk of developing dementia at early stages for targeting preventive interventions. MCI is an intermediate phase between normal ageing-related cognitive decline and dementia; therefore, the identification of MCI can play an important role in early intervention, prevention,20 and proper treatments.16

Until now, data are scarce for determining the type of cognitive decline, MCI, or dementia. It is necessary to investigate MCI in-depth and find new therapeutic methods and modifiable risk factors.4 Although there are many risk factors (Table 1), the greatest risk factor for cognitive decline is age, but the exact cause is still unknown.31

Table 1 Some of the possible mild cognitive impairment risk factors in the elderly

The identification of genetic risk factors increases the ability to identify individuals at a higher risk for developing cognitive impairment and/or its progression to dementia.22 The progression into dementia is faster when there are concurrent co-morbid medical conditions32 and gross pathological changes.6 MCI proceeds into dementia when amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles deposit in the neocortex of the brain.14 Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) epsilon 4 carrier can also enhance the risk of conversion from MCI to AD in individuals with cognitive decline.6 Cognitive and genetic characteristics of people with aMCI1 and amnestic multiple-domain MCI13 elevate the risk of progression to dementia.22 Due to environmental effects33 as well as genetic complexity,6 finding a responsible single gene or allele to generate MCI seems difficult. Until now, only a small proportion of genetic-related late-life cognitive impairment has been identified.22

The different fields of science such as psychiatry, neurology, neuropathology, neuroimaging, neuropsychology, geriatrics, clinical trials, and ethics are working eagerly to summarize the current state of MCI.16 This present review intends to provide an up-to-date overview on MCI management.

Framework of MCI diagnosis

MCI is an intermediate stage of dementia, which increases the need for diagnostic tests and markers such as neuropsychological tests, neuroimaging, and biological markers.6 The lack of specific tests, gradual loss of memory, health issues changing memory;34 the absence of exact pathological changes in the brain;12 and the lack of similar signs and symptoms make it more difficult to diagnose MCI. Consideration of memory loss as a normal event and a part of ageing is another limit in identifying MCI cases.34 The individuals diagnosed with MCI have no dementia and no medical, neurologic, or psychiatric problem to cause memory loss. Diagnosis of MCI is based on subjective complaint of memory loss, memory impairment based on brief cognitive or neuropsychological testing, decline in normal function, and unchanged basic daily functioning.8 However, there are some ways to diagnose MCI. One of the methods relies on asking questions about memory (language skills, recall, attention span, and visual-spatial abilities), medications, health status, and comorbidities (depression and emotional health concerns). Interviews with family members and close friends can also increase the chance to ascertain information about the patients’ memory, personality, and behavior changes. Diagnosis can be assured when this method is combined with additional tests and brain imaging techniques.34

Biomarker assessment, clinical measurements, and imaging techniques are extra methods.35 Biological markers such as tau protein increase the specificity and acuity of diagnosis to predict the risk of cognitive decline.35 Acute phase proteins, cytokines, cholesterol, isoprostanes, homocysteine, and ApoE4 allele are more potential biomarkers for MCI and AD diagnosis.36

The low plasma levels of amyloid beta (Aβ) including Aβ1–40, Aβ1–42, and Aβ1–42/Aβ1–40 ratio can indicate cognitive decline.36 Aβ and tau levels such as Aβ1–42 and tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (P-tau181p) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are also used to diagnose MCI and AD with at least 85% sensitivity and 80% specificity.37 Aβ42 factor is more important than P-tau181p in the diagnosis of MCI.37 The levels of Aβ and tau in MCI are less than those in AD.38,39 In addition, these biomarkers can predict the risk of functional decline and MCI conversion to AD.37 The lower level of Aβ in CSF and a high ratio of total-tau/Aβ can support the diagnosis of prodromal AD in cases with MCI.18 Furthermore, finding plasma biomarkers such as epigenetic regulators including microRNA are useful to better diagnose individuals at a higher risk of MCI and developing AD in future.40 Neuroimaging techniques are also used to diagnose MCI by measuring structural and functional parts of the brain (Table 2).6 Imaging tests can show hippocampal volume loss and temporal lobe atrophy in MCI.37 There are amyloid abnormalities in CSF and imaging tests in approximately 70%–74% of subjects with aMCI.18

Table 2 List of some neuroimaging techniques to diagnose mild cognitive impairment
Abbreviation: MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

The combination of MRI and CSF tau/Aβ42 can provide a better prediction of MCI and its progression to AD37 that is extremely helpful in developed countries compared to in the developing world.37 Such difference is due to resource limitations and different cultural values, which limits the utility of MRI and CSF tests.12,35 Clinical assessment is used along with other methods to determine cognitive decline (Table 3).12 Clinical tests are based on interviews to be used in clinical judgment and third-party information. Such tests can help to recognize any psychosocial impairment and the problems of neuropsychological function involving orientation, aphasia, apraxia, memory, calculation, constructional abilities, verbal abilities, and intellectual abilities.28

Table 3 List of some clinical tests to diagnose mild cognitive impairment

All tests are used to identify cognitive decline, brain changes, and transitional phase towards AD, which lead to a proper characterization of disease, and its progressive phase in providing effective interventions.12 Recognition of MCI makes it possible to delay the onset of dementia or even prevent disease via early diagnosis and probably potential treatment.16 However, an accurate diagnosis is the key element in the practice of medicine for MCI, although etiological heterogeneity41 limits the development of specific diagnostic criteria, specific therapeutic approaches, and the predictions of clinical progression.42 MCI screening for early clinical dementia is recommended particularly for older persons above 75 years of age using blood tests and simple neuroimaging such as computed tomography brain scans.43 It is, of course, not possible to use all tests; however, as much as possible, these tests give a good guideline for assessment of MCI.6

Treatments

MCI has a greater risk of progression to dementia; therefore, it needs to be prevented or lowered.1,8 A suitable treatment is based on choosing the effective and appropriate strategies for the specific etiology of cognitive disorder.1 At this time, there is no cure for MCI that stops or reverses it.6 It has been suggested that antioxidants such as vitamin E, vitamin C, gingko biloba, and curcumin (from turmeric) are useful at the initial stages to reduce oxidative stress levels and ageing consequences.6 For example, vitamin E is a dietary compound that can prevent or treat MCI or AD due to strong antioxidant properties.44,45 It seems that intake of antioxidants helps to reduce cognitive decline despite inconsistency among epidemiology data on antioxidants and cognitive function.46

Pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments6 are used to prevent more reduction of cognition in MCI11 via focusing better and thinking clearly.6 Pharmacotherapy is preferably limited to the patients who are at higher risk of transition to AD.11,47 Factors including limited options, medications side-effects, uncertain prognosis, and inappropriate social, psychological, and ethical consequences restrict the pharmacological treatment of MCI.47 Some chemicals are suggested to treat MCI and prevent its conversion to AD (Table 4). A medication that is used to improve cognition is galantamine. This medication increases the rate of death and has no effect on the conversion rate from MCI to dementia; therefore, the balance of risks and benefits should be concerned for prescription. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors are used in ApoE4 allele-positive patients with aMCI, who are at a higher risk of developing AD. However, the more popular treatments of MCI are nonpharmacological6 such as autonomic training, eating habits, exercise (aerobic exercise), thinking processes, and social activities.11 Such treatment can control psychological and physical comorbidities by having positive impacts on hyperlipidemia, isolation, depression, sleep quality, weight gain, social networking, and vascular risk factors like hypertension.6

Table 4 List of some chemicals suggested for mild cognitive impairment treatment

Appropriate strategies to treat MCI and prevent the progressive decline of cognitive functions are the periodic monitoring of patients, providing lifestyle guidance, treating lifestyle-related diseases, and training on cognitive function.11 Cognitive activities and training programs such as crossword puzzles, novels, and sudoku can also improve cognitive ability or slow down cognitive decline.6 The preventive effect of intellectual activities on MCI or dementia48 is achieved by protecting against cognitive impairment,49 brain disease, and severe neuropathology. The contribution of family members and close friends in the treatment of MCI is via their support, encouragement, patience, and respect.34 However, the risk of MCI can be reduced by a Mediterranean diet50 and moderate exercise as well as by interactive and mentally challenging activities.51

The promotion of independence in communication and activities of daily living, control of vascular risk factors (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus), having a healthy lifestyle (physical activity, healthy diet, enough sleep, limited alcohol intake, smoking cessation), along with mental exercises (practicing puzzles, playing scrabble, reading, learning languages, playing musical instruments) are effective factors in the treatment of MCI.52 Furthermore, periodic physician care of patients in 3–6 months intervals will help to improve cognition and delay the progression of disease into dementia.

Limitations and strengths of MCI research

There are some limitations that can affect studies about MCI. First, there is the lack of a specific tool for MCI diagnosis and determining its prevalence, especially in cases who delay or refuse to answer survey questions. Second, the exact classification of MCI requires more extensive measuring tests that are expensive and time consuming. The distribution of patients in the medical clinics is not equal; hence, it is difficult to categorize disease based on types and prescribed medications. In addition, the large population of patients limits the ability to clinically classify all in one study. Heterogeneity of samples also affects MCI studies due to their differences in origins, locations and cultures. The other limitation is the cross-sectional design of studies, which makes it difficult to identify the exact type and cause of MCI as well as the survival of patients. A confounding factor is the return of disease to a normal situation. The lack of specific criteria and specific cutoff points for MCI operationalization can restrict studies about the impairment of cognition. Thus, a wide heterogeneity in diagnosis, type of prescribed medications, severity of illness, and number of patients, as well as a variety of assessment tools can cause great impacts that limit such research. Despite all limitations, the studies about MCI are important to prevent its progression to dementia in future interventions. Research about MCI can be strengthened by having a large sample size containing a wide range of populations with cultural, economic, and social diversity. Pre-validated and standardized measurements strongly increase internal validity in studies and elevate consistency between countries, which can result in a common algorithm used to define MCI.

Conclusion and future works

All data from different countries can reflect the diversity of MCI in different regions in relation to demographic and cultural influences. Such information can be beneficial for both clinical and educational purposes. Our review has potential to improve the knowledge of a large group of people, including health care providers, policy-makers, MCI patients, and family members. In addition, it can increase the ability to identify variations in the utility of clinical diagnostic criteria. This review sheds light on the fundamental issue of developing MCI, although it seems relatively simple. It is necessary to investigate more on risk factors. It will be necessary in the future to determine standardized definitions and the diagnostic criteria for MCI and prodromal stages of AD in population-based studies and clinical trials. It is also necessary to find specific biomarkers, which help to correctly diagnose MCI and MCI converters to dementia. Clinical evidences and anatomical changes in the brain in specific cognitive deficits promote the improvement of imaging techniques, which results in a better assessment of different stages and types of MCI.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.


References

1.

DeCarli C. Mild cognitive impairment: prevalence, prognosis, aetiology, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2003;2:15–21.

2.

Ritchie K, Touchon J. Mild cognitive impairment: conceptual basis and current nosological status. Lancet. 2000;355:225–228.

3.

Kester JD, Benjamin AS, Castel AD, Craik FIM. Memory in elderly people. In: Baddeley AD, Kopelman MD, Wilson BA, editors. The handbook of memory disorder. 2nd ed. London: Wiley; 2002:543–567.

4.

Etgen T, Sander D, Bickel H, Förstl H. Mild cognitive impairment and dementia: the importance of modifiable risk factors. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011;108:743–750.

5.

Woodford HJ, George J. Cognitive assessment in the elderly: a review of clinical methods. QJM. 2007;100:469–484.

6.

Pinto C, Subramanyam AA. Mild cognitive impairment: The dilemma. Indian J Psychiatry. 2009;51 Suppl 1:S44–S51.

7.

Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol. 1999;56:303–308.

8.

Tricco AC, Soobiah C, Lillie E, et al. Use of cognitive enhancers for mild cognitive impairment: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2012;1:25.

9.

Gauthier S, Reisberg B, Zaudig M, et al. Mild cognitive impairment. Lancet. 2006;367:1262–1270.

10.

Razali R, Baharudin A, Jaafar NRN, et al. Factors Associated with Mild Cognitive Impairment among Elderly Patients Attending Medical Clinics in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre. Sains Malaysiana. 2012;41:641–647.

11.

Odawara T. Cautious notification and continual monitoring of patients with mild cognitive impairment. Psychogeriatrics. 2012;12:131–132.

12.

Albert MS, Blacker D. Mild cognitive impairment and dementia. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2006;2:379–388.

13.

Irish M, Lawlor BA, Coen RF, O’Mara SM. Everyday episodic memory in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a preliminary investigation. BMC Neurosci. 2011;12:80.

14.

Morris JC, Price JL. Pathologic correlates of nondemented aging, mild cognitive impairment, and early-stage Alzheimer’s disease. J Mol Neurosci. 2001;17:101–118.

15.

Crook T, Bartus RT, Ferris SH, Whitehouse P, Cohen GD, Gershon S. Age-associated memory impairment: Proposed diagnostic criteria and measures of clinical change – report of a national institute of mental health work group. Dev Neuropsychol. 1986;2(4):261–276.

16.

Petersen RC, Stevens JC, Ganguli M, Tangalos EG, Cummings JL, DeKosky ST. Practice parameter: early detection of dementia: mild cognitive impairment (an evidence-based review). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2001;56:1133–1142.

17.

Kluger A, Gianutsos JG, Golomb J, Wagner A Jr, Wagner D, Scheurich S. Clinical features of MCI: motor changes. Int Psychogeriatr. 2008;20:32–39.

18.

Ward A, Arrighi HM, Michels S, Cedarbaum JM. Mild cognitive impairment: disparity of incidence and prevalence estimates. Alzheimers Dement. 2012;8:14–21.

19.

Wada-Isoe K, Uemura Y, Nakashita S, et al. Prevalence of Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment in the Rural Island Town of Ama-cho, Japan. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Extra. 2012;2:190–199.

20.

Sosa AL, Albanese E, Stephan BC, et al. Prevalence, distribution, and impact of mild cognitive impairment in Latin America, China, and India: a 10/66 population-based study. PLoS medicine. 2012;9:e1001170.

21.

Rashid A, Azizah A, Rohana S. Cognitive impairment among the elderly Malays living in rural Malaysia. Med J Malaysia. 2012;67:187–189.

22.

Reitz C, Mayeux R. Use of genetic variation as biomarkers for mild cognitive impairment and progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;19:229–251.

23.

Eshkoor SA, Hamid TA, Nudin SS, Mun CY. Does substance abuse contribute to further risk of falls in dementia. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2014;21:317–324.

24.

Visser PJ. Mild Cognitive Impairment. Maastricht: Neuropsych Publishers. 2000;13:496–497.

25.

Bruscoli M, Lovestone S. Is MCI really just Is MCI really just early dementia? A systematic review of conversion early dementia? A systematic review of conversion studies. Int Psychogeriatr. 2004;16:129–140.

26.

Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med. 2004;256:183–194.

27.

Panza F, D’Introno A, Colacicco AM, et al. Current epidemiology of mild cognitive impairment and other predementia syndromes. Am J Geriat Psychiatry. 2005;13:633–644.

28.

Busse A, Angermeyer MC, Riedel-Heller SG. Progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia: a challenge to current thinking. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;189:399–404.

29.

Smith GE, Petersen RC, Parisi JE, et al. Definition, course, and outcome of mild cognitive impairment. Aging Neuropsychol C. 1996;3:141–147.

30.

Nizamuddin M. Population ageing: policy responses to population ageing in Asia and the Pacific. Fifth Asian and Pacific Population Conference. 2000;2025:95.

31.

Ellison JM. A 60-year-old woman with mild memory impairment: review of mild cognitive impairment. JAMA. 2008;300:1566–1574.

32.

Lopez OL, Kuller LH, Becker JT, et al. Incidence of dementia in mild cognitive impairment in the cardiovascular health study cognition study. Arch Neurol. 2007;64:416–420.

33.

Eshkoor SA, Hamid TA, Nudin SS, Mun CY. The effects of sleep quality, physical activity, and environmental quality on the risk of falls in dementia. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2013;28:403–407.

34.

Austrom MG, Lu Y. Long term caregiving: helping families of persons with mild cognitive impairment cope. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2009;6:392–398.

35.

Lam LC, Tam CW, Lui VW, et al. Screening of mild cognitive impairment in Chinese older adults – a multistage validation of the Chinese abbreviated mild cognitive impairment test. Neuroepidemiology. 2008;30:6–12.

36.

Song F, Poljak A, Smythe GA, Sachdev P. Plasma biomarkers for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res Rev. 2009;61:69–80.

37.

Trojanowski JQ, Vandeerstichele H, Korecka M, et al. Update on the biomarker core of the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative subjects. Alzheimers Dement. 2010;6:230–238.

38.

Andreasen N, Blennow K. CSF biomarkers for mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2005;107:165–173.

39.

Blennow K. CSF biomarkers for mild cognitive impairment. J Intern Med. 2004;256:224–234.

40.

Sheinerman KS, Tsivinsky VG, Crawford F, Mullan MJ, Abdullah L, Umansky SR. Plasma microRNA biomarkers for detection of mild cognitive impairment. Aging (Albany NY). 2012;4:590–605.

41.

Dubois B, Albert ML. Amnestic MCI or prodromal Alzheimer’s disease? Lancet Neurol. 2004;3:246–248.

42.

Petersen RC, Doody R, Kurz A, et al. Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol. 2001;58:1985–1992.

43.

Dai DL. Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Clinical Approach. Med Bull. 2008;13(9):11–16.

44.

Farina N, Isaac MG, Clark AR, Rusted J, Tabet N. Vitamin E for Alzheimer’s dementia and mild cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:CD002854.

45.

Dysken MW, Sano M, Asthana S, et al. Effect of vitamin E and memantine on functional decline in Alzheimer disease: the TEAM-AD VA cooperative randomized trial. JAMA. 2014;311:33–44.

46.

Wong SH, Rajikan R, Das S, et al. Antioxidant intake and mild cognitive impairment among elderly people in Klang Valley: a pilot study. Sains Malaysiana. 2010;39:689–696.

47.

Dale W, Hougham GW, Hill EK, Sachs GA. High interest in screening and treatment for mild cognitive impairment in older adults: A pilot study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:1388–1394.

48.

Håkansson K, Rovio S, Helkala EL, et al. Association between mid-life marital status and cognitive function in later life: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2009;339:b2462.

49.

Chenderes RM, Podea DM, Nanu PD, Mila C. P03-95 Mild cognitive impairment and intellectual activity in the elderly. Eur Psychiatry. 2009;24:S1094.

50.

Roberts RO, Geda YE, Cerhan JR, et al. Vegetables, unsaturated fats, moderate alcohol intake, and mild cognitive impairment. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2010;29:413–423.

51.

Geda YE, Roberts RO, Knopman DS, et al. Physical exercise, aging, and mild cognitive impairment: a population-based study. Arch Neurol. 2010;67:80–86.

52.

Ambigga D, Suthahar A, Ramli A, Ng K, Radziah A, Marymol K. Diagnosis and Management of Mild Cognitive Impairment in the Community: What is the Role of Primary Care Physician? Malays Fam Physician. 2011;6:74–78.

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]