Back to Journals » Clinical Epidemiology » Volume 10

Maternal use of thyroid hormone replacement therapy before, during, and after pregnancy: agreement between self-report and prescription records and group-based trajectory modeling of prescription patterns

Authors Frank AS, Lupattelli A, Matteson DS, Nordeng H

Received 30 May 2018

Accepted for publication 3 October 2018

Published 3 December 2018 Volume 2018:10 Pages 1801—1816


Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Professor Vera Ehrenstein

Video abstract presented by Anna S Frank.

Views: 83

Anna S Frank,1,2 Angela Lupattelli,1 David S Matteson,2,3 Hedvig Nordeng1,4

1Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway; 2Department of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; 3Department of Statistical Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; 4Department of Child Health and Development, National Institute of Public Health, 0403 Oslo, Norway

Purpose: A reliable definition of exposure and knowledge about long-term medication patterns is important for drug safety studies during pregnancy. Few studies have investigated these measures for thyroid hormone replacement therapy (THRT). The purpose of this study was to 1) calculate the agreement between self-report and dispensed prescriptions of THRT and 2) classify women with similar adherence patterns to THRT into disjoint longitudinal trajectories.
Methods: Our analysis used data from the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa), a prospective population-based cohort study. MoBa was linked to prescription records from the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD). We estimated Cohen’s kappa coefficients (k) and approximate 95% CIs for agreement between self-report and prescription records for the 6-month period prior to pregnancy and for each pregnancy trimester. Using group-based trajectory models (GBTMs), we estimated adherence trajectories among women who self-reported and had a THRT prescription.
Results: There were 56,148 women in MoBa, who had both a record in NorPD and available prescription history up to 1 year prior to pregnancy. Of these, 1,171 (2.1%) self-reported and received a prescription for THRT. Agreement was “perfect” in the 6-month period prior to pregnancy (k=0.86; CI 0.85–0.88), in the first (k=0.83; CI 0.82–0.85) and in the second trimesters (k=0.89; CI 0.87–0.90), while this was moderate (k=0.57; CI 0.54–0.59) in the third trimester. Among the subset of the 1,171 women, we identified four disjoint GBTM adherence groups: Constant-High (50.2%), Constant-Medium (32.9%), Increasing-Medium (11.0%), and Decreasing-Low (5.8%).
Conclusion: Agreement between self-report and prescription records was high for THRT in the early pregnancy period. Based on our GBTM results, about one in two women with hypothyroidism had adequate adherence to prescribed THRT throughout pregnancy. Given the potential consequences, evidence of low adherence in 5.8% of pregnant women with hypothyroidism is of concern.

Keywords: group-based trajectory models, k, hypothyroidism, pregnancy, MoBa, NorPD

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]