Back to Journals » International Journal of Women's Health » Volume 17
Impact of Intraoperative Postural Transitions on Internal Carotid Artery Blood Flow During Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery
Authors Tan X, Sun W, Zhou H, Zhang L, Dong C
Received 3 June 2025
Accepted for publication 23 August 2025
Published 12 September 2025 Volume 2025:17 Pages 2969—2977
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S540634
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Vinay Kumar
Xi Tan,1 Wenyi Sun,1 Hao Zhou,1 Li Zhang,2 Chaoxuan Dong1
1Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 5106303, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Clinical Medicine, The International School of Jinan University, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Chaoxuan Dong, Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 13354712423, Fax +86 20 38688779, Email [email protected]
Objective: Reduced internal carotid artery (ICA) blood flow can cause cerebral hypoperfusion, increasing the risk of intraoperative or postoperative cerebral ischemia. In laparoscopic surgery, postural changes and pneumoperitoneum may further compromise ICA hemodynamics. This study aims to evaluate the effects of intraoperative postural transitions on ICA blood flow in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.
Methods: A single-center, prospective, non-randomized observational study was performed. Measurements of ICA blood flow, heart rate (HR), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were obtained at eight intraoperative time points: upon arrival to the operating table while awake (T1), post-induction of anesthesia in the supine position (T2), following pneumoperitoneum in the supine position (T3), immediately after placement in the Trendelenburg position (T4), 10 minutes (T5) and 20 minutes (T6) after Trendelenburg positioning, upon return to the supine position (T7), and at the conclusion of surgery (T8).
Results: A total of 79 patients were enrolled in this study. A significant reduction in ICA blood flow was observed at T2 compared to T1 (263.8 ± 11.4 vs 323.5 ± 12.0 mL/min, p < 0.001), with further reduction at T3 (237.2 ± 9.8 vs 323.5 ± 12.0 mL/min [T1], p < 0.001, vs T1). No statistically significant changes were observed from T4 to T6. Upon transitioning from the Trendelenburg position to supine (T7), ICA blood flow further decreased (202.1 ± 7.5 vs 237.2 ± 9.8 mL/min, p = 0.004), accompanied by reductions in HR (60.0 ± 0.7 vs 66.9 ± 1.0 beats/min, p < 0.001) and MAP (82.8 ± 12.4 vs 93.6 ± 13.5 mmHg, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Intraoperative postural transitions during gynecologic laparoscopic surgery are associated with fluctuations in ICA blood flow. The return from the Trendelenburg to the supine position results in a marked decrease in ICA blood flow, HR, and MAP.
Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=178094, Identifier: ChiCTR2200065104, Registered October 27, 2022.
Plain Language Summary: This prospective observational study was conducted to enhance the understanding of intraoperative hemodynamic changes associated with postural transitions in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Utilizing Doppler ultrasound, fluctuations in internal carotid artery blood flow induced by positional changes were characterized, providing clinically relevant insights for perioperative management and patient safety.
Keywords: gynecologic laparoscopic surgery, internal carotid artery blood flow, intraoperative posture changes, Trendelenburg position
Introduction
In gynecologic laparoscopic surgery, the use of anesthesia, induction of pneumoperitoneum, and intraoperative postural transitions, particularly the rapid transition from Trendelenburg to supine position, may induce significant hemodynamic fluctuations that can compromise cerebral autoregulation and consequently affect cerebral blood flow (CBF) perfusion. This specific postural transition carries substantial clinical significance, as the rapid redistribution of blood volume following prolonged Trendelenburg positioning may exacerbate the risk of cerebral hypoperfusion. The creation of pneumoperitoneum increases intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), which exerts mechanical compression on abdominal vasculature, thereby impeding venous return, reducing perfusion of abdominal organs, and diminishing cardiac output.1,2 In addition, carbon dioxide (CO2) retention or the onset of hypercapnia may induce cerebral vasodilation, contributing to a secondary elevation in intracranial pressure (ICP).3 However, postural adjustments during surgery can aggravate these physiological changes.4 An additional rise in ICP and IAP may increase the risk of cerebral edema, compromise the integrity of the blood-brain barrier, and lead to potential neurological injury through reduced cerebral perfusion and oxygenation.5,6
Direct monitoring of CBF in clinical settings remains limited, with available modalities including near-infrared spectroscopy, jugular venous bulb saturation (SjvO2), and transcranial Doppler ultrasonography.7,8 Given the internal carotid artery (ICA) serves as a primary conduit for cerebral perfusion, changes in its diameter and blood flow velocity may serve as surrogate markers for alterations in CBF.9,10 Carotid ultrasonography is commonly used to assess ICA stenosis, evaluate risk of occlusion, and aid in inferring the cause of ischemic stroke.11 Doppler ultrasound, in particular, has demonstrated utility in detecting intraoperative variations in ICA blood flow, providing a feasible method for indirect assessment of CBF.11 The present study aims to investigate intraoperative changes in ICA blood flow among patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery, using Doppler ultrasound as a monitoring modality.
Materials and Methods
Participant Selection
This non-randomized, prospective, observational study was approved by the institutional ethics committee (Approval number KY-2022-125) and registered with the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry prior to participant enrollment (https://www.chictr.org.cn, registration number: ChiCTR2200065104, October 27, 2022). Written, informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to study inclusion.
Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I or II; (2) Age between 18 and 60 years; (3) Body mass index (BMI) between 18 kg/m2 and 30 kg/m2; (4) Scheduled for elective gynecologic laparoscopic surgery at the study hospital.
Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Presence of neck skin conditions (eg trauma, scarring, dressings) that precluded adequate acoustic evaluation of the ICA; (2) Known conditions affecting cerebral hemodynamics, such as intracranial tumors, cerebrovascular malformations, aneurysms, moyamoya disease, or arterial dissection; (3) Evidence of carotid artery pathology, including stenosis, occlusion, atherosclerosis, or plaque formation, as detected by preoperative cervical Doppler ultrasonography; (4) History of endovascular procedures involving the ICA, thyroid surgery, or any prior cervical vascular or neck surgeries; (5) History of severe cardiac, hepatic, pulmonary, or renal dysfunction; (6) Untreated or uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes mellitus; (7) Current participation in another clinical study; (8) Any other condition deemed inappropriate for inclusion by the investigator.
Intraoperative Protocols
All anesthetic and surgical procedures were conducted in accordance with institutional protocols. Anesthesia was induced using sufentanil (0.4 μg/kg), propofol (2 mg/kg), and cisatracurium besilate (0.2 mg/kg). Maintenance of anesthesia was achieved with continuous infusions of remifentanil (0.1–0.2 μg/kg/h), propofol (4–6 mg/kg/h), and cisatracurium besilate (0.2–0.3 mg/kg). Anesthetic depth was adjusted to maintain a bispectral index (BIS) between 40 and 60. Anesthesia monitoring included pulse oximetry, HR, three-lead electrocardiography, and blood pressure (systolic, diastolic, and MAP) at five-minute intervals.
Mechanical ventilation was administered with a tidal volume of 6–8 mL/kg based on ideal body weight, respiratory rate of 12–15 beats/min, and an inspiratory-to-expiratory ratio of 1:2. Airway pressures were maintained between 20–24 cmH2O, and ventilatory parameters were adjusted to maintain an end-tidal CO2 partial pressure (PETCO2) of 35–40 cmH2O. Laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum was maintained using CO2 insufflation at an IAP of 12 mmHg. Fluid management was achieved using a balanced crystalloid solution containing sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, and glucose. Vasopressors, including ephedrine and phenylephrine, were intermittently administered to maintain MAP above 65 mmHg.
Measurements
ICA blood flow was the primary outcome measure. Bilateral ICA blood flow measurements were independently recorded and analyzed using averaged bilateral values. All Doppler ultrasound measurements were performed by a single trained anesthesiologist, with sonographers blinded to intraoperative hemodynamic parameters during image acquisition to minimize measurement bias. Additional cerebrovascular measurements included mean ICA velocity, peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), and ICA diameter. ICA blood flow was calculated by multiplying the ICA beat volume by the heart rate (measured by electrocardiography). Beat volume was calculated from ICA blood velocity and vessel diameter. A Doppler ultrasound system (Mindray, Z6, 7L4A liner probe, 7.5 MHz) was used to assess mean ICA velocity (Vmean) approximately 2 cm above the carotid bifurcation, with an insonation angle of 60°. The ICA diameter was measured concurrently at the insonation site. Measurements were obtained at eight predefined intraoperative time points: upon arrival to the operating table while awake (T1), post-induction of anesthesia in the supine position (T2), following pneumoperitoneum in the supine position (T3), immediately after placement in the Trendelenburg position (T4), 10 minutes (T5) and 20 minutes (T6) after Trendelenburg positioning, upon return to the supine position (T7), and at the conclusion of surgery (T8). For each time point, ICA vascular variables were recorded over five consecutive cardiac cycles, and the average value was used for analysis.
The following physiological parameters were monitored concurrently: HR, MAP, PETCO2, peak airway pressure, respiratory rate, and BIS using the Bene Vision N12 (Mindray, China). A protractor was affixed to the operating table with the supine position set as the 0° reference to document the Trendelenburg angle accurately.
Statistical Analysis
Pilot data from 16 patients indicated that ICA blood flow following the Trendelenburg position was approximately 25% lower than after returning to the supine position. Based on this finding, a sample size of at least 62 patients was calculated to achieve 90% statistical power with a two-sided α= 0.05. To account for an anticipated dropout rate of 20%, a total of 78 patients were enrolled.
Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM), and categorical variables are presented as percentages, unless otherwise specified. Changes in ICA blood flow and other variables across eight time points were assessed using one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Bonferroni post hoc tests for multiple comparisons. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS® Statistics for Windows, version 27.0 (IBM Corp. New York. USA).
Results
From November 2022 to January 2023, a total of 117 patients scheduled for gynecologic laparoscopic surgery at the study institution were screened for eligibility. Following application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 85 patients met the eligibility requirements. Of these, 6 patients were excluded during the study period—2 due to intraoperative conversion to laparotomy and 4 due to surgical durations of less than 20 minutes. Procedures shorter than 20 minutes were excluded to ensure adequate assessment of hemodynamic stability across at least two complete surgical phases (eg, pneumoperitoneum establishment and positional transition). Ultimately, 79 patients were included in the final analysis (Figure 1). The mean age of the study cohort was 37.5 ± 1.0 years. The mean duration of anesthesia was 148.2 ± 5.3 minutes, and the mean operation time was 108 ± 5.0 minutes. The average degree of head-down tilt was 14.8 ± 0.4 degrees. Baseline characteristics, including age, weight, height, and BMI, as well as perioperative variables such as anesthesia and operative times are presented in Table 1. Intraoperative cerebrovascular and respiratory measurements across predefined time points are summarized in Table 2.
|
Table 1 Baseline Characteristics of the Study Participants |
|
Table 2 Intraoperative Cerebrovascular and Respiratory Variables During Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery |
|
Figure 1 Trial profile of the study. |
ICA Blood Flow
ICA blood flow was the primary outcome measure of this study. Repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated a significant reduction in ICA blood flow at all intraoperative time points (T2-T8) compared to the baseline (T1, awake state) (p < 0.001). Notably, ICA blood flow decreased further at T3 compared to T1. No significant differences in ICA blood flow were observed between T3 and subsequent Trendelenburg positions (T4-T6). However, a significant reduction was observed upon return to the supine position at T7 (202.1 ± 7.5 vs 237.2 ± 9.8 mL/min, p < 0.001), with a further decrease at T8 (166.8 ± 8.0 vs 237.2 ± 9.8 mL/min, p < 0.001) (Figure 2).
A subgroup analysis, based on head-down tilt angle (≤ 15° and > 15°), indicated no statistically significant difference in ICA blood flow changes between the two groups (Table 3)
|
Table 3 Comparison of Head-Down Tilt Angle and ICA Blood Flow Between T4 and T7 |
Heart Rate (HR)
HR values across intraoperative time points (T2–T8) were significantly lower compared to the awake baseline (T1) (p < 0.001). A significant reduction was also noted at T3 compared to T2 (72.8 ± 1.2 vs 66.9 ± 1.0 beats/min, p < 0.001). No significant difference in HR were detected during the Trendelenburg phase (T4–T6) relative to T3. HR further declined upon return to the supine position at T7 (60.0 ± 0.7 vs 66.9 ± 1.0 at T3 beats/min, p < 0.001), with the lowest HR observed at T8 (57.8 ± 0.6 vs 66.9 ± 1.0 at T3 beats/min, p < 0.001) (Figure 2).
Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)
MAP increased significantly at T2 compared to T1 (100.8 ± 13.6 vs 92.4 ± 11.4 mmHg, p < 0.001). A significant decrease occurred at T3 93.6 ± 13.5 mmHg (p < 0.001), although the difference from T1 was not statistically significant (Figure 2). Unlike ICA blood flow and HR trends, MAP increased significantly at the onset of the Trendelenburg position (T4) compared to T3 (99.1 ± 12.3 vs 93.6 ± 13.5 mmHg, p < 0.001). No significant difference were observed at T5 and T6 relative to T3. MAP decreased significantly upon return to the supine position at T7 (82.8 ± 12.4 vs 93.6±13.5 at T3, P< 0.001), reaching its lowest value at T8 (81.3 ± 9.8 mmHg, p < 0.001 vs T3) (Figure 2).
Discussion
The results of this study demonstrated that in patients with ASA physical status I–II undergoing elective gynecologic laparoscopic surgery, ICA blood flow and HR decreased significantly following the induction of anesthesia. After pneumoperitoneum, further reductions in HR and MAP were observed compared to post-induction values. Although no significant changes in cerebrovascular or hemodynamic variables were noted during the Trendelenburg position (T4–T6), a marked decline in ICA blood flow, HR, and MAP occurred upon returning to the supine position (T7), with the lowest values recorded at the end of surgery (T8). While ICA blood flow during Trendelenburg did not differ significantly from post-pneumoperitoneum levels, it remained lower than values recorded in the awake state. Additionally, variations in the degree of Trendelenburg positioning, did not result in statistically significant differences in ICA blood flow.
A particularly novel finding of this study is the significant reduction in ICA blood flow, HR, and MAP during the transition from the Trendelenburg to supine position. Most existing studies have primarily examined cerebral hemodynamic changes following postural adjustments, with limited attention to the physiological consequences of postural recovery. It is well-established that during abrupt fluctuation in arterial pressure, CBF may more closely parallel MAP, particularly when cerebral autoregulatory capacity is compromised.12 Kurazumi et al reported that rapid postural changes enhance the synchronization and coherence between arterial pressure and CBF.13 Moreover, mild hypercapnia and changes in cerebrospinal fluid dynamics could weaken autoregulatory function.14
In the present study, ICA blood flow did not significantly decline during 10 minutes of Trendelenburg positioning when compared to post-induction levels, nor was it affected by the degree of head-down tilt within the observed range. However, this finding contrasts with that of Yu et al, who reported significantly lower ICA blood flow in patients undergoing robotic-assisted prostatectomy in a steep Trendelenburg position (45° head-down tilt)15 Several factors may account for this discrepancy. The current study included a larger cohort of patients with ASA I–II status, likely representing a population with preserved cerebral autoregulatory function. Additionally, the use of refined intraoperative time points allowed for a more detailed characterization of hemodynamic transitions. The anesthetic agents selected—known for minimal effects on CBF—were consistent with standard practice in the study institution and minimized the confounding impact of pharmacologic variation.16–18
Finally, the smaller degree of head-down tilt employed during gynecologic laparoscopic procedures, as compared to that used in robotic prostatectomy, may also contribute to differences in ICA blood flow responses. These findings suggest that postural recovery, particularly the transition from Trendelenburg to the supine position, may represent a critical period of vulnerability for cerebral hemodynamics.
Intraoperative hemodynamic fluctuations represent a crucial factor influencing CBF. According to the Lassen autoregulatory curve, CBF is maintained through autoregulation when MAP is within the range of 50–160 mmHg; however, intraoperative MAP ≤ 65 mmHg is commonly defined as intraoperative hypotension (IOH).9 In this study, MAP was maintained at ≥ 65 mmHg during surgery to preserve adequate perfusion of the brain and vital organs, and to evaluate changes in ICA blood flow under conditions approximating normal physiological function.19 PETCO2 was controlled within the range of 35–40 mmHg to minimize sympathetic stimulation, preserve neurovascular coupling, and stabilize cerebrovascular reactivity.20,21 While therapeutic-dose propofol induces systemic hypotension, it preserves both static cerebral autoregulation and cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity,22 suggesting that drug-specific effects may persist independently of PETCO2 regulation. In addition, IAP was maintained at ≤ 12mmHg, consistent with current recommendations for minimizing reductions in mesenteric perfusion, avoiding disruption of visceral microcirculation, reducing hemodynamic instability, and lowering the risk of carbon dioxide embolism during laparoscopic surgery.23 By rigorously controlling anesthetic agents, PETCO2, and IAP, this study aimed to minimize confounding variables and better isolate the effects of postural changes on in ICA blood flow. These findings offer a potential reference point for optimizing intraoperative management strategies to support cerebral perfusion during laparoscopic procedures.
Conclusion
The results of this study demonstrate that intraoperative postural changes during gynecologic laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia significantly influence ICA blood flow. Although CBF is generally maintained through autoregulatory mechanisms such as cerebral autoregulation, neurovascular coupling, and vasomotor responsiveness, the application of these mechanisms may be impaired under general anesthesia. Postural transitions during anesthesia can exacerbate fluctuations in CBF, potentially compromising cerebral perfusion and increasing the risk of perioperative neurological complications. Further large-scale studies are warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms by which postural changes and anesthetic factors interact to influence intraoperative CBF, with the goal of improving perioperative cerebral protection strategies. Future investigations should incorporate standardized neurologic outcome assessments, such as the postoperative Montreal Cognitive Assessment, to correlate intraoperative ICA flow variations with cognitive outcomes. Additionally, advanced neuroimaging (eg, postoperative diffusion-weighted MRI) could help identify subclinical ischemic changes associated with prolonged cerebral hypoperfusion during positional transitions.
In gynecologic laparoscopic surgery, intraoperative postural transitions are associated with fluctuations in ICA blood flow. Notably, repositioning from the Trendelenburg to the supine position results in a significant decrease in ICA blood flow, heart rate, and mean arterial pressure. Additionally, the induction of general anesthesia is associated with a marked reduction in both ICA blood flow and heart rate.
Abbreviations
ICA, internal carotid artery; HR, Heart rate; CBF, cerebral blood flow; IAP, intra-abdominal pressure; CO2, carbon dioxide; ICP, intracranial pressure; SjvO2, jugular venous bulb saturation; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; BIS, bispectral index; PETCO2, end-tidal CO2 partial pressure; SV, peak systolic velocity; EDV, end-diastolic velocity; BMI, body mass index.
Data Sharing Statement
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this article. Further enquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as was revised in 2013). The study was approved by Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University (Approval number: KY-2022-125). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Acknowledgments
We are particularly grateful to all the people who have given us help on our article.
Funding
National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant number: 81503167); Science and Technology program of Guangzhou (Grant number: 2023A03J0619).
Disclosure
The authors declare that they have no competing interests in this work.
References
1. Bloomfield GL, Ridings PC, Blocher CR, Marmarou A, Sugerman HJ. Effects of increased intra-abdominal pressure upon intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressure before and after volume expansion. J Trauma. 1996;40(6):936–41;discussion41–3. doi:10.1097/00005373-199606000-00012
2. Kitano Y, Takata M, Sasaki N, Zhang Q, Yamamoto S, Miyasaka K. Influence of increased abdominal pressure on steady-state cardiac performance. J Appl Physiol. 1999;86(5):1651–1656. doi:10.1152/jappl.1999.86.5.1651
3. Claassen J, Thijssen DHJ, Panerai RB, Faraci FM. Regulation of cerebral blood flow in humans: physiology and clinical implications of autoregulation. Physiol Rev. 2021;101(4):1487–1559. doi:10.1152/physrev.00022.2020
4. Jin D, Yu H, Li H, et al. Hemodynamic changes of anesthesia, pneumoperitoneum, and head-down tilt during laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(14):1177. doi:10.21037/atm-21-3407
5. Li Y, Huang D, Su D, Chen J, Yang L. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction after robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with cerebral oxygen monitoring an observational prospective cohort pilot study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;19(1):202. doi:10.1186/s12871-019-0877-5
6. O’Leary E, Hubbard K, Tormey W, Cunningham AJ. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: haemodynamic and neuroendocrine responses after pneumoperitoneum and changes in position. Br J Anaesth. 1996;76(5):640–644. doi:10.1093/bja/76.5.640
7. Tsaousi G, Tramontana A, Yamani F, Bilotta F. Cerebral perfusion and brain oxygen saturation monitoring with: jugular venous oxygen saturation, cerebral oximetry, and transcranial doppler ultrasonography. Anesthesiol Clin. 2021;39(3):507–523. doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2021.03.009
8. van Sinderen K, Schwarte LA, Schober P. Diagnostic criteria of postoperative cognitive dysfunction: a focused systematic review. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2020;2020:7384394. doi:10.1155/2020/7384394
9. Lassen NA. Cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption in man. Physiol Rev. 1959;39(2):183–238. doi:10.1152/physrev.1959.39.2.183
10. Schmidek HH, Auer LM, Kapp JP. The cerebral venous system. Neurosurgery. 1985;17(4):663–678. doi:10.1227/00006123-198510000-00024
11. Takekawa H, Tsukui D, Kobayasi S, Suzuki K, Hamaguchi H. Point-of-care ultrasound for stroke patients in the emergency room. J Med Ultrason. 2022;49(4):581–592. doi:10.1007/s10396-021-01185-0
12. Birch AA, Dirnhuber MJ, Hartley-Davies R, Iannotti F, Neil-Dwyer G. Assessment of autoregulation by means of periodic changes in blood pressure. Stroke. 1995;26(5):834–837. doi:10.1161/01.STR.26.5.834
13. Kurazumi T, Ogawa Y, Yanagida R, Morisaki H, Iwasaki KI. Non-invasive intracranial pressure estimation during combined exposure to CO(2) and head-down tilt. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2018;89(4):365–370. doi:10.3357/AMHP.5015.2018
14. Kurazumi T, Ogawa Y, Yanagida R, Morisaki H, Iwasaki KI. Dynamic cerebral autoregulation during the combination of mild hypercapnia and cephalad fluid shift. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2017;88(9):819–826. doi:10.3357/AMHP.4870.2017
15. Yu J, Park JY, Hong JH, Hwang JH, Kim YK. Effect of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position on internal carotid artery blood flow measured by ultrasound during robotic prostatectomy. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2022;42(2):139–145. doi:10.1111/cpf.12742
16. Schlunzen L, Juul N, Hansen KV, Cold GE. Regional cerebral blood flow and glucose metabolism during propofol anaesthesia in healthy subjects studied with positron emission tomography. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56(2):248–255. doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02561.x
17. Drummond JC, McKay LD, Cole DJ, Patel PM. The role of nitric oxide synthase inhibition in the adverse effects of etomidate in the setting of focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Anesth Analg. 2005;100(3):841–846. doi:10.1213/01.ANE.0000146519.85312.21
18. Fodale V, Schifilliti D, Pratico C, Santamaria LB. Remifentanil and the brain. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52(3):319–326. doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01566.x
19. Tan CO. Defining the characteristic relationship between arterial pressure and cerebral flow. J Appl Physiol. 2012;113(8):1194–1200. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00783.2012
20. Lin SL, Yeh SJ, Chen CK, et al. Comparisons of the nonlinear relationship of cerebral blood flow response and cerebral vasomotor reactivity to carbon dioxide under hyperventilation between postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome patients and healthy subjects. J Clin Med. 2020;9(12):4088. doi:10.3390/jcm9124088
21. Hatipoglu S, Akbulut S, Hatipoglu F, Abdullayev R. Effect of laparoscopic abdominal surgery on splanchnic circulation: historical developments. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(48):18165–18176. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i48.18165
22. Juhasz M, Pall D, Fulesdi B, Molnar L, Vegh T, Molnar C. The effect of propofol-sufentanil intravenous anesthesia on systemic and cerebral circulation, cerebral autoregulation and CO(2) reactivity: a case series. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2021;71(5):558–564. doi:10.1016/j.bjane.2021.04.002
23. Gutt CN, Oniu T, Mehrabi A, et al. Circulatory and respiratory complications of carbon dioxide insufflation. Dig Surg. 2004;21(2):95–105. doi:10.1159/000077038
© 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
