Back to Browse Journals » Clinical Epidemiology » Volume 7

Ethical aspects of registry-based research in the Nordic countries

Authors Ludvigsson JF, Håberg SE, Knudsen GP, Lafolie P, Zoega H, Sarkkola C, von Kraemer S, Weiderpass E, Nørgaard M

Received 16 June 2015

Accepted for publication 4 September 2015

Published 23 November 2015 Volume 2015:7 Pages 491—508

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S90589

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewers approved by Dr Ivy Shiue

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Professor Vera Ehrenstein

Jonas F Ludvigsson,1,2 Siri E Håberg,3 Gun Peggy Knudsen,3 Pierre Lafolie,4,5 Helga Zoega,6 Catharina Sarkkola,7 Stephanie von Kraemer,7 Elisabete Weiderpass,1,7–10 Mette Nørgaard11

1Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 2Department of Pediatrics, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden; 3Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway; 4Department of Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, 5The Stockholm Regional Ethical Review Board, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 6Center of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland; 7Genetic Epidemiology Group, Folkhälsan Research Center, Helsinki, Finland; 8Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, 9The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, 10Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; 11Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

Abstract: National health care registries in the Nordic countries share many attributes, but different legal and ethical frameworks represent a challenge to promoting effective joint research. Internationally, there is a lack of knowledge about how ethical matters are considered in Nordic registry-based research, and a lack of knowledge about how Nordic ethics committees operate and what is needed to obtain an approval. In this paper, we review ethical aspects of registry-based research, the legal framework, the role of ethics review boards in the Nordic countries, and the structure of the ethics application. We discuss the role of informed consent in registry-based research and how to safeguard the integrity of study participants, including vulnerable subjects and children. Our review also provides information on the different government agencies that contribute registry-based data, and a list of the major health registries in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden. Both ethical values and conditions for registry-based research are similar in the Nordic countries. While Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden have chosen different legal frameworks, these differences can be resolved through mutual recognition of ethical applications and by harmonizing the different systems, likely leading to increased collaboration and enlarged studies.

Keywords: ethical review, ethics, institutional review board, Nordic countries, registry-based research, informed consent

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]

 

Other articles by this author:

Clinical validation of immunoglobulin A nephropathy diagnosis in Swedish biopsy registers

Jarrick S, Lundberg S, Welander A, Fored CM, Ludvigsson JF

Clinical Epidemiology 2017, 9:67-73

Published Date: 31 January 2017

Prevalence and comorbidity of relapsing polychondritis

Ludvigsson JF, van Vollenhoven R

Clinical Epidemiology 2016, 8:361-362

Published Date: 30 September 2016

Readers of this article also read:

Validity of a hospital-based obstetric register using medical records as reference

Brixval CS, Thygesen LC, Johansen NR, Rørbye C, Weber T, Due P, Koushede V

Clinical Epidemiology 2015, 7:509-515

Published Date: 26 November 2015

Patient and parent preferences for characteristics of prophylactic treatment in hemophilia

Furlan R, Krishnan S, Vietri J

Patient Preference and Adherence 2015, 9:1687-1694

Published Date: 23 November 2015

The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential

Schmidt M, Schmidt SAJ, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT

Clinical Epidemiology 2015, 7:449-490

Published Date: 17 November 2015

Incidence, morbidity, mortality, and prevalence of diabetes in Denmark, 2000–2011: results from the Diabetes Impact Study 2013

Green A, Sortsø C, Jensen PB, Emneus M

Clinical Epidemiology 2015, 7:421-430

Published Date: 23 October 2015

Methacrylic-based nanogels for the pH-sensitive delivery of 5-Fluorouracil in the colon

Ashwanikumar N, Kumar NA, Nair SA, Kumar GS

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5769-5779

Published Date: 15 November 2012

Cross-linked acrylic hydrogel for the controlled delivery of hydrophobic drugs in cancer therapy

Deepa G, Thulasidasan AK, Anto RJ, Pillai JJ, Kumar GS

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:4077-4088

Published Date: 27 July 2012

Crystallization after intravitreal ganciclovir injection

Pitipol Choopong, Nattaporn Tesavibul, Nattawut Rodanant

Clinical Ophthalmology 2010, 4:709-711

Published Date: 14 July 2010