Back to Journals » Patient Preference and Adherence » Volume 11

Efficacy and safety of fixed-combination bimatoprost/timolol ophthalmic solution

Authors Moon SB, Han SB 

Received 15 May 2017

Accepted for publication 23 May 2017

Published 26 June 2017 Volume 2017:11 Pages 1069—1070

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S141868

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Editor who approved publication: Dr Johnny Chen



Suk Bae Moon,1 Sang Beom Han2

1Department of Surgery, Kangwon National University Hospital, Kangwon National University Graduate School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea, 2Department of Ophthalmology, Kangwon National University Hospital, Kangwon National University Graduate School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea

We read, with interest, the article by Sun et al1 entitled “Patient satisfaction with fixed-combination bimatoprost/timolol ophthalmic solution: a survey study in patients with glaucoma in China”. This observational multicenter study with excellent design was undoubtedly well conducted, and the authors successfully demonstrated that fixed-combination bimatoprost/timolol ophthalmic solution can provide the glaucoma patients with improved satisfaction.1

View the original paper by Sun and colleagues.


Dear editor

We read, with interest, the article by Sun et al1 entitled “Patient satisfaction with fixed-combination bimatoprost/timolol ophthalmic solution: a survey study in patients with glaucoma in China”. This observational multicenter study with excellent design was undoubtedly well conducted, and the authors successfully demonstrated that fixed-combination bimatoprost/timolol ophthalmic solution can provide the glaucoma patients with improved satisfaction.1

However, we would like to point out that the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) would have been necessary for better evaluation of IOP lowering the efficacy of the regimen. Considering that normal-tension glaucoma is more prevalent than high-tension glaucoma in Asian patients,2 subjective assessment of IOP control could sometimes be inaccurate. IOP measurement in individual patients might be difficult due to this study including a large population residing in multiple areas. In this situation, review of medical records or survey with the participating physicians could be helpful.

Moreover, for more precise evaluation of tolerance and comfort, assessment of subjective symptom indices, such as ocular surface disease index and visual analog scale, would be beneficial.3 If possible, investigation of ocular surface signs using indices including tear film break-up time, Schirmer test and fluorescein stain score would also be helpful, considering that ocular surface disease is associated with increased severity of glaucoma and higher exposure to benzalkonium chloride.4

In addition, follow-up period of 1–3 months could be relatively short for the development of side effects. Therefore, we believe further studies with long-term follow-up including more precise parameters would be helpful for elucidation of efficacy and safety of fixed-combination bimatoprost/timolol ophthalmic solution.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this communication.


References

1.

Sun X, Lin M, Duan X, Zhang C, Ming J. Patient satisfaction with fixed-combination bimatoprost/timolol ophthalmic solution: a survey study in patients with glaucoma in China. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:845–852.

2.

Cho HK, Kee C. Population-based glaucoma prevalence studies in Asians. Surv Ophthalmol. 2014;59(4):434–447.

3.

Han SB, Hyon JY, Wee WR, Lee JH, Lee YJ, Yun PY. Reduced corneal sensitivity in patients with primary Sjogren’s syndrome. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010;88(7):e277–e278.

4.

Skalicky SE, Goldberg I, McCluskey P. Ocular surface disease and quality of life in patients with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(1):1–9. e2.

Dove Medical Press encourages responsible, free and frank academic debate. The content of the Patient Preference and Adherence ‘letters to the editor’ section does not necessarily represent the views of Dove Medical Press, its officers, agents, employees, related entities or the Patient Preference and Adherence editors. While all reasonable steps have been taken to confirm the content of each letter, Dove Medical Press accepts no liability in respect of the content of any letter, nor is it responsible for the content and accuracy of any letter to the editor.

Creative Commons License © 2017 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.