Differential Diagnosis Of Multiple-System Atrophy With Parkinson’s Disease By External Anal- And Urethral-Sphincter Electromyography
Authors Qiu F, Wang K, Li T, Song D, Wang Z, Zhang H, Liu J, Ren M, Qi X
Received 2 June 2019
Accepted for publication 2 October 2019
Published 5 November 2019 Volume 2019:15 Pages 3061—3067
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Jun Chen
Feng Qiu,1,* Kunyu Wang,1,* Tingting Li,2 Dandan Song,3 Zhiwei Wang,1 Hailing Zhang,4 Jianguo Liu,1 Ming Ren,5 Xiaokun Qi1
1Department of Neurology, Sixth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100048, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Gastroenterology, Second Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Medicine, Beijing Northern Hospital of China North Industries Group Corporation, Beijing 100089, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Neurology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai 200433, People’s Republic of China; 5Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Xiaokun Qi
Department of Neurology, Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, 6 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100048, People’s Republic of China
Tel +86 139 1079 7081
Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, Beihang University, 37 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, People’s Republic of China
Tel +86 139 1079 7081
Background: The differential diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease (PD) with multiple-system atrophy (MSA) is difficult because of their similarity in symptoms and signs. The objective of this study was to investigate the value of external anal-sphincter electromyography (EAS-EMG) and urethral-sphincter electromyography (US-EMG) in differentiating MSA from PD.
Methods: A total of 201 patients, — 101 MSA and 100 PD — were recruited in this study. Average duration and amplitude of motor unit potentials (MUPs), percentage of polyphasic MUPs, amplitude during strong contractions, and recruitment patterns during maximal voluntary contractions were recorded and analyzed to assess diagnostic efficiency of EAS-EMG and US-EMG for MSA.
Results: Significant differences in average MUP duration and recruitment patterns during maximal voluntary contractions were found between patients with MSA and patients with PD using both EAS-EMG (P<0.001, P<0.001) and US-EMG (P<0.001, P<0.001). The percentage of polyphasic MUPs and amplitude during strong contractions showed significant differences in MSA and PD using only EAS-EMG (P<0.001, P=0.005). Cutoff points for average MUP duration in EAS-EMG and US-EMG for differential diagnosis of MSA with PD were 10.9 and 11.1 milliseconds, respectively. With average MUP duration of EAS-EMG and US-EMG being applied jointly, sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing MSA from PD were 83.2% and 71.8%, respectively.
Conclusion: EAS-EMG and US-EMG were sensitive and specific methods for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of MSA, and the combination of both would improve the diagnostic rate of MSA compared to only one method being used.
Keywords: differential diagnosis, MSA, PD, EAS-EMG, US-EMG
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]