Back to Journals » Infection and Drug Resistance » Volume 12

Cycloserine for treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a retrospective cohort study in China

Authors Li Y, Wang F, Wu L, Zhu M, He G, Chen X, Sun F, Liu Q, Wang X, Zhang W

Received 22 November 2018

Accepted for publication 3 January 2019

Published 29 March 2019 Volume 2019:12 Pages 721—731

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S195555

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Joachim Wink


Yang Li,1,* Fei Wang,2,* Limin Wu,3 Min Zhu,4 Guiqing He,5 Xinchang Chen,1 Feng Sun,1 Qihui Liu,1 Xiaomeng Wang,2 Wenhong Zhang1

1Department of Infectious Diseases, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; 2Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310051, China; 3Hangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310021, China; 4Tuberculosis Treatment Center, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou 310003, China; 5Department of Infectious Diseases, Wenzhou Center Hospital, Wenzhou 325000, China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Purpose: Cycloserine has been used in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment since the 1950s. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of cycloserine and sought to clarify the role of cycloserine for treatment of simple MDR-TB, pre-extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (pre-XDR-TB), and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB).
Materials and methods: A retrospective observational study was performed in Zhejiang Province, China. We enrolled 144 cycloserine-treated and 181 cycloserine-nontreated patients consecutively and determined the treatment outcome as the primary outcome. The proportion of patients with sputum culture conversion and the frequency of adverse drug reactions were also assessed.
Results: One-hundred (69.4%) out of 144 patients in the cycloserine group successfully completed treatment. The HR of any unfavorable treatment outcome after the introduction of cycloserine was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.38–0.86, P=0.008). Subgroup analysis showed that cycloserine could benefit simple MDR-TB cases reducing the risk of unfavorable treatment outcomes (HR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24–0.76, P=0.004), but not pre-XDR-TB (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.30–1.38, P=0.263) or XDR-TB (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.22–2.37, P=0.589). The culture conversion rate at the intensive phase was similar whether cycloserine was administered or not (P=0.703). Of the 144 patients treated with cycloserine, a total of 16 (11.1%) patients experienced side effects attributed to cycloserine.
Conclusion: Cycloserine is an attractive agent for the treatment of MDR-TB, and its safety profile warrants its use in most MDR-TB cases. Cycloserine significantly improved the chance of a favorable outcome for patients with simple MDR-TB but not pre-XDR-TB and XDR-TB. Thus, more aggressive regimens might be required for pre-XDR-TB or XDR-TB patients.

Keywords: cycloserine, multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, efficacy, safety, extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis, treatment outcome


Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]