Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit of Cervical Cancer Screening with Liquid Based Cytology Compared with Conventional Cytology in Germany
Authors Armstrong SF, Guest JF
Received 12 October 2019
Accepted for publication 22 January 2020
Published 17 March 2020 Volume 2020:12 Pages 153—166
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Samer Hamidi
Stephanie F Armstrong,1 Julian F Guest1,2
1Catalyst Consultants, Rickmansworth, UK; 2Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College, London, UK
Correspondence: Julian F Guest
Catalyst Consultants, 7 Gilham Court, Ebury Road, Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire WD3 1FZ, UK
Tel +44 1923 450045
Fax +44 1923 450046
Objective: To assess the health economic impact of cervical screening with liquid based cytology (LBC) compared with conventional cytology (CC) in Germany.
Methods: An economic model was constructed depicting the management of a hypothetical cohort of women aged ≥ 20 years who undergo cervical screening in Germany. The model estimated the cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit of LBC compared with CC at 2017/18 prices over a time-horizon of 70 years.
Results: Performing cervical screens with LBC instead of CC is expected to increase the probability of detecting a true positive over a subject’s lifetime by 73% (0.038 versus 0.022) and of diagnosing a subject with stage 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN3) (0.019 versus 0.011). Women screened with LBC instead of CC are expected to have a 57% reduction in the probability of having undetected CIN3 (0.006 versus 0.014) and to experience a 44% reduction in the probability of transitioning into disease progression (from 0.018 to 0.010). The mean discounted lifetime cost of healthcare resource use associated with performing cervical screens with LBC and CC was estimated at € 4852 and € 7523 per subject respectively. For every Euro invested in cervical screening with LBC instead of CC, the German healthcare system could potentially save ∼€ 170 over a subject’s lifetime.
Conclusion: Within the study’s limitations, the analysis showed that LBC affords a cost-effective cervical screening test compared with CC in Germany, since it improves detection rates and has the potential to lead to a reduction in disease progression for less cost.
Keywords: cancer, cervical screening, conventional cytology, cost-effectiveness, liquid based cytology, Germany, Papanicolaou
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]