Cisplatin concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs adjuvant radiation in stage IB/IIA cervical cancer with intermediate risk factors, treated with radical surgery: a retrospective study
Authors Sun H, Tang Q, Chen J, Lv X, Tu Y, Yan D
Received 27 November 2017
Accepted for publication 16 January 2018
Published 6 March 2018 Volume 2018:11 Pages 1149—1155
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Ingrid Espinoza
Hai-Yan Sun, Qiu Tang, Jian-Hong Chen, Xiao-Juan Lv, Ye-Qiang Tu, Ding-Ding Yan
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
Purpose: To determine if postoperative cisplatin concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) improves the outcome in stage IA/IIB cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors, when compared with radiation therapy (RT) alone, and identify the potential eligible populations for this treatment.
Patients and methods: We reviewed medical records of 1,240 patients with stage IA/IIB cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in our hospital between January 2008 and December 2011. Of the 1,240 patients, 436 displayed 1 or more intermediate risk factors. Of these, we screened 306 patients who underwent RT only or CCRT. We analyzed the effects of CCRT on survival and prognosis.
Results: The 5-year progress-free survival (PFS) in the CCRT group was superior to that in the RT-only group (96.0% vs 89.0%, respectively; P=0.031). The 5-year overall survivals (OSs) were not different between the 2 groups (P=0.141). Compared with RT-only group, CCRT did not improve PFS or OS in patients with 1 risk factor, large tumor size, or deep stromal invasion (P>0.05). Compared with RT-only group, CCRT improved PFS (97.9% vs 82.8%; P=0.017) but did not increase OS (97.9% vs 89.7%; P=0.109) in patients with lymphovascular space invasion plus deep stromal invasion/large tumor size. OS (92.3% vs 70.6%; P=0.048) and PFS (92.3% vs 64.7%; P=0.020) in the CCRT group were superior to those in the RT-only group with 3 risk factors. Compared with RT-only group, CCRT was an independent prognostic factor for favorable PFS (hazard ratio [HR] =0.238; 95% CI =0.0827–0.697, P=0.009) and OS (HR =0.192; 95% CI =0.069–0.533, P=0.002).
Conclusion: Postoperative CCRT improved survival in stage IA/IIB cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors. Patients with 2 or more intermediate risk factors, including lymphovascular space invasion, may benefit from CCRT.
Keywords: cervical cancer, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, intermediate risk factors
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]