Back to Journals » OncoTargets and Therapy » Volume 9

Benefit of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients undergoing definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Authors Xu Y, Guo Q, Lin J, Chen B, Wen J, Lu T, Xu Y, Zhang M, Pan J, Lin S

Received 20 July 2016

Accepted for publication 12 September 2016

Published 4 November 2016 Volume 2016:9 Pages 6835—6841

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S117676

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewers approved by Dr Akshita Wason

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Samir Farghaly


Yun Xu,1,2 Qiaojuan Guo,1,2 Jin Lin,1,2 Bijuan Chen,1,2 Jiangmei Wen,1,2 Tianzhu Lu,1,2 Yuanji Xu,1,2 Mingwei Zhang,1,2 Jianji Pan,1,2 Shaojun Lin1,2

1Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, 2Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, People’s Republic of China

Background and aim: To evaluate the impact of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube on nutritional status, treatment-related toxicity, and treatment tolerance in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) who underwent chemoradiotherapy.
Patients and methods: We enrolled 133 consecutive non-metastatic NPC (III/IV stage) patients, who were treated with prophylactic PEG feeding before the initiation of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) between June 1, 2010 and June 30, 2014. Meanwhile, another 133 non-PEG patients, who were matched for age, gender, and tumor, node, metastases stage, were selected as historical control cohort. Weight and nutritional status changes from pre-radiotherapy to the end of radiotherapy were evaluated, and treatment tolerance and related acute toxicities were analyzed as well.
Results: We found that significantly more patients (91.73%) in the PEG group could finish two cycles of CCRT, when compared with those in the non-PEG group (57.89%) (P<0.001). We also indicated that more patients (50.38%) in the non-PEG group experienced weight loss of ≥5%, while the phenomenon was only found in 36.09% patients in the PEG group (P=0.019). In addition, the percentage of patients who lost ≥10% of their weight was similar in these two groups. Changes in albumin and prealbumin levels during radiotherapy in the non-PEG group were higher than those obtained for the PEG group with significant differences (P-values of 0.023 and <0.001, respectively). Furthermore, patients in the PEG group had significantly lower incidence of grade III acute mucositis than those in the non-PEG group (22.56% vs 36.84%, P=0.011). Tube-related complications occurred only in 14 (10.53%) patients in the PEG group, including incision infection of various degrees.
Conclusion: PEG and intensive nutrition support may help to minimize body weight loss, maintain nutritional status, and offer better treatment tolerance for patients with locally advanced NPC who underwent CCRT.

Keywords: locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, chemoradiotherapy, nutritional status, treatment-related toxicity

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]