Are patient-reported outcomes useful in post-treatment follow-up care for women with early breast cancer? A scoping review
Received 26 November 2018
Accepted for publication 30 January 2019
Published 27 March 2019 Volume 2019:10 Pages 117—127
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Ms Justinn Cochran
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Lynne Nemeth
Cathrine Lundgaard Riis,1–3 Troels Bechmann,1,2 Pernille Tine Jensen,4,5 Angela Coulter,2,3,6 Karina Dahl Steffensen1–3
1Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark; 2Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; 3Center for Shared Decision Making, Vejle, Denmark; 4Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; 5Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; 6Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are frequently used to evaluate treatment effects and quality of life in clinical trials. The application of PROs in breast cancer clinics is evolving but their use to generate real-time information for use in follow-up care is uncommon. This proactive use might help to shift healthcare delivery toward a more patient-centered approach by acting as a screening tool for unmet needs or a dialogue tool to discuss issues proposed by the patient.
Aims: This review aims to determine the effects and feasibility of using PROs proactively during follow-up care in early breast cancer.
Materials and methods: A systematic search was conducted in January 2019 in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and CINAHL. Studies that exclusively concerned women treated for early breast cancer where PROs were used as a proactive tool during follow-up were included.
Results: The search revealed a total of 653 records and four eligible studies were identified; three of which concerned the use of PROs both as a screening tool and as a dialogue tool, and one study in which PROs were used solely as a screening tool. The studies explored the feasibility of collecting and integrating PROs in the clinic and their ability to detect otherwise unrecognized problems. All of the included studies were prone to bias, but they point to potential benefits in respect of better symptom management in follow-up care.
Conclusion: Our search identified a small number of low to moderate quality studies of the proactive use of PROs during follow-up after treatment for early stage breast cancer. The limited evidence available suggests that PROs may be useful for providing a more complete picture of the patient’s symptoms and problems, possibly leading to improvements in symptom management.
Keywords: proactive, patient-reported outcome, PRO, breast cancer, follow-up
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]