Back to Browse Journals » Patient Preference and Adherence » Volume 9
What do patients take into account when they choose their dentist? Implications for quality improvement
Authors Ungureanu MI, Mocean F
Received 12 August 2015
Accepted for publication 15 October 2015
Published 27 November 2015 Volume 2015:9 Pages 1715—1720
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S94310
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Doris Leung
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Johnny Chen
Marius-IonuΕ£ Ungureanu,1,2 Floarea Mocean1
1Department of Public Health and Management, Iuliu HaΕ£ieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 2Center for Health Policy and Public Health, College of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences, BabeΕ-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Background: From dental care providers’ perspective, it is vital to put efforts into improving the quality of services delivered. Therefore, the exploration of patients’ satisfaction with dental services and their preferences with regard to the factors involved in their dental care choices should be one of the main areas of focus in a dental care office, by focusing on the quality management.
Aims: The aim of this research was to determine the factors that patients consider important when choosing a dentist, and bring evidence on the importance of implementing a quality management system for dental care.
Methods and participants: The data analysis was conducted on a national representative sample of patients who had visited a dentist at least once in the last 12 months, in Romania. Using a survey which explored patients’ satisfaction with their dental care visits, data were collected between October and November 2012 with the help of computer-assisted telephone interviews. Information about socio-demographics, frequency of accessing dental care, factors associated with choosing a dentist, and the level of patients’ satisfaction were collected.
Results: Out of the 1,650 people who agreed to participate in the study, 724 respondents (43.8%) represented the sample who visited a dentist at least once in the last 12 months and whose responses were analyzed in this article. The majority of the respondents were satisfied with the quality of dental services received, with 85.91% of them rating their satisfaction with 5, on a scale from 1 to 5. According to a high majority of the patients (n=680, 93.92%), the communication with their dentist was extremely easy. The most frequently mentioned factors that respondents took into account when choosing a dentist were the dentist’s competence (22.22%), the recommendation from someone known (20.56%), and the overall quality of the service provided (19.72%). Among the other factors mentioned were patience and respect.
Conclusion: The factors patients consider important when choosing a dentist are the dentist’s competence, the recommendation from someone known, and the overall quality of the service provided, but interpersonal factors such as patience and respect are also valued. Our results are relevant for dental education providers, who should consider shaping their curricula as to ensure they train future dentists in a manner that will meet patients’ expectations and increase patient satisfaction levels.
Keywords: patient preference, dental care, quality improvement, patient satisfaction
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
Readers of this article also read:
What are judgment skills in health literacy? A psycho-cognitive perspective of judgment and decision-making research
Riva S, Antonietti A, Iannello P, Pravettoni G
Patient Preference and Adherence 2015, 9:1677-1686
Published Date: 23 November 2015
Causative factors for formation of toxic islet amyloid polypeptide oligomer in type 2 diabetes mellitus
Jeong HR, An SSA
Clinical Interventions in Aging 2015, 10:1873-1879
Published Date: 19 November 2015
Hematuria following Botox treatment for upper limb spasticity: a case report
Lo TC, Yeung ST, Lee S, Chang EY
Journal of Pain Research 2015, 8:619-622
Published Date: 14 September 2015
Mutations in presenilin 2 and its implications in Alzheimer’s disease and other dementia-associated disorders
Cai Y, An SSA, Kim SY
Clinical Interventions in Aging 2015, 10:1163-1172
Published Date: 14 July 2015
Green synthesis of water-soluble nontoxic polymeric nanocomposites containing silver nanoparticles
Prozorova GF, Pozdnyakov AS, Kuznetsova NP, Korzhova SA, Emel’yanov AI, Ermakova TG, Fadeeva TV, Sosedova LM
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2014, 9:1883-1889
Published Date: 16 April 2014
Methacrylic-based nanogels for the pH-sensitive delivery of 5-Fluorouracil in the colon
Ashwanikumar N, Kumar NA, Nair SA, Kumar GS
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5769-5779
Published Date: 15 November 2012
Cross-linked acrylic hydrogel for the controlled delivery of hydrophobic drugs in cancer therapy
Deepa G, Thulasidasan AK, Anto RJ, Pillai JJ, Kumar GS
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:4077-4088
Published Date: 27 July 2012
Particle size reduction to the nanometer range: a promising approach to improve buccal absorption of poorly water-soluble drugs
Rao S, Song Y, Peddie F, Evans AM
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2011, 6:1245-1251
Published Date: 20 June 2011
Crystallization after intravitreal ganciclovir injection
Pitipol Choopong, Nattaporn Tesavibul, Nattawut Rodanant
Clinical Ophthalmology 2010, 4:709-711
Published Date: 14 July 2010
Characterization of complexation of poly (N-isopropylacrylamide-co-2-(dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate) thermoresponsive cationic nanogels with salmon sperm DNA
Jim Moselhy, Tasnim Vira, Fei-Fei Liu, et al
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2009, 4:153-164
Published Date: 24 August 2009
