Back to Browse Journals » Patient Preference and Adherence » Volume 9
Treatment adherence in multiple sclerosis: a survey of Belgian neurologists
Authors Decoo D, Vokaer M
Received 8 July 2015
Accepted for publication 25 September 2015
Published 19 November 2015 Volume 2015:9 Pages 1669—1676
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S91973
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Safaa Khaled
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Johnny Chen
Danny Decoo,1 Mathieu Vokaer2
1Department of Neurology and Neurorehab, AZ Alma, Sijsele, Belgium; 2Multiple Sclerosis Clinic, Edith Cavell Hospital, CHIREC group, Brussels, Belgium
Background: Poor treatment adherence is common among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). This survey evaluated neurologists’ perception of treatment adherence among MS patients.
Materials and methods: This questionnaire-based survey of Belgian neurologists treating MS patients was conducted between June and July 2014. Face-to-face interviews with the neurologists were based on a semistructured questionnaire containing questions regarding the perception of the treatment-adherence level.
Results: A total of 41 neurologists participated in the survey. Of these, 88% indicated frequent discussions about treatment adherence as beneficial for treatment efficacy. The mean time spent on the treatment-adherence discussion during the initial consultation was 11 minutes, with 24% of doctors spending 5 minutes and 24% of doctors spending 10 minutes discussing this issue. The majority of neurologists (56%) perceived the adherence level in MS as good, and 12% perceived it as excellent. The majority of neurologists (64%) indicated intolerance as a main cause of poor adherence, and all neurologists reported insufficient efficacy as a consequence of nonadherence. The importance of adherence in the neurologists’ practice was evaluated on a scale of 1–10, with 1= “not very important” and 10= “very important”: 44% of doctors indicated a score of 10, and the mean score was 9.0.
Conclusion: Belgian neurologists consider treatment adherence in MS as essential for the benefits of therapies. However, although neurologists are aware of the consequences of nonadherence, they generally spend limited time discussing the importance of treatment adherence with their patients.
Keywords: multiple sclerosis, treatment adherence, physician survey
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
Readers of this article also read:
Causative factors for formation of toxic islet amyloid polypeptide oligomer in type 2 diabetes mellitus
Jeong HR, An SSA
Clinical Interventions in Aging 2015, 10:1873-1879
Published Date: 19 November 2015
Long-term safety and efficacy of infliximab for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis
Elalouf O, Elkayam O
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management 2015, 11:1719-1726
Published Date: 19 November 2015
Mutations in presenilin 2 and its implications in Alzheimer’s disease and other dementia-associated disorders
Cai Y, An SSA, Kim SY
Clinical Interventions in Aging 2015, 10:1163-1172
Published Date: 14 July 2015
Green synthesis of water-soluble nontoxic polymeric nanocomposites containing silver nanoparticles
Prozorova GF, Pozdnyakov AS, Kuznetsova NP, Korzhova SA, Emel’yanov AI, Ermakova TG, Fadeeva TV, Sosedova LM
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2014, 9:1883-1889
Published Date: 16 April 2014
Methacrylic-based nanogels for the pH-sensitive delivery of 5-Fluorouracil in the colon
Ashwanikumar N, Kumar NA, Nair SA, Kumar GS
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5769-5779
Published Date: 15 November 2012
A novel preparation method for silicone oil nanoemulsions and its application for coating hair with silicone
Hu Z, Liao M, Chen Y, Cai Y, Meng L, Liu Y, Lv N, Liu Z, Yuan W
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5719-5724
Published Date: 12 November 2012
Cross-linked acrylic hydrogel for the controlled delivery of hydrophobic drugs in cancer therapy
Deepa G, Thulasidasan AK, Anto RJ, Pillai JJ, Kumar GS
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:4077-4088
Published Date: 27 July 2012
Particle size reduction to the nanometer range: a promising approach to improve buccal absorption of poorly water-soluble drugs
Rao S, Song Y, Peddie F, Evans AM
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2011, 6:1245-1251
Published Date: 20 June 2011
Crystallization after intravitreal ganciclovir injection
Pitipol Choopong, Nattaporn Tesavibul, Nattawut Rodanant
Clinical Ophthalmology 2010, 4:709-711
Published Date: 14 July 2010
Characterization of complexation of poly (N-isopropylacrylamide-co-2-(dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate) thermoresponsive cationic nanogels with salmon sperm DNA
Jim Moselhy, Tasnim Vira, Fei-Fei Liu, et al
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2009, 4:153-164
Published Date: 24 August 2009
