Back to Journals » Patient Preference and Adherence » Volume 14
![Highly-accessed](assets/img/article_icons/highly-accessed.png)
Nonadherence to Treatment and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Psoriasis During the COVID-19 Epidemic: A Web-Based Survey
Authors Wang Q , Luo Y, Lv C, Zheng X , Zhu W , Chen X, Shen M , Kuang Y
Received 21 May 2020
Accepted for publication 16 July 2020
Published 7 August 2020 Volume 2020:14 Pages 1403—1409
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S263843
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr Naifeng Liu
Qiaolin Wang,1– 3 Yan Luo,1– 3 Chengzhi Lv,4 Xuanwei Zheng,1– 3 Wu Zhu,1– 3 Xiang Chen,1– 3 Minxue Shen,1– 3,5 Yehong Kuang1– 3
1Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, People’s Republic of China; 2National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders (Xiangya Hospital), Changsha 410008, People’s Republic of China; 3Hunan Engineering Research Center of Skin Health and Disease, Hunan Key Laboratory of Skin Cancer and Psoriasis (Xiangya Hospital), Changsha 410008, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Psoriasis, Dalian Dermatosis Hospital, Dalian, Liaoning 116021, People’s Republic of China; 5Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha 410078, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Yehong Kuang; Minxue Shen
Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan, People’s Republic of China
Email [email protected]; [email protected]
Purpose: The COVID-19 epidemic has caused difficulties in continuous treatment for patients with chronic diseases and resulted in nonadherence to treatment and adverse health outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the associations of nonadherence to treatment with patient-reported outcomes of psoriasis during the COVID-2019 epidemic.
Methods: A cross-sectional study among Chinese patients with psoriasis was conducted through a web-based questionnaire survey during 25 Feb 2020 and 6 Mar 2020. Demographic and clinical data, nonadherence to treatment, and patient-reported outcomes were collected. The outcomes included deterioration of the disease condition, perceived stress, and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Logistic regression was used to investigate the associations.
Results: A total of 926 questionnaires were collected. A total of 634 (68.5%) reported nonadherence to treatment, and worse adherence was found among patients receiving systemic treatment (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.67; 95% CI: 1.40– 5.10) and topical treatment (AOR: 4.51; 95% CI: 2.66– 7.65) compared to biological treatment. Nonadherence to treatment (less than two weeks and more than two weeks) was significantly associated with deterioration of psoriasis (aOR: 2.83 to 5.25), perceived stress (AOR: 1.86 to 1.57), and symptoms of anxiety (AOR: 1.42 to 1.57) and depression (AORs: 1.78). Subgroup analysis by treatment showed consistent results in general.
Conclusion: Nonadherence to treatment was associated with the aggravation of psoriasis conditions, perceived stress, and symptoms of anxiety and depression.
Keywords: psoriasis, coronavirus disease 2019, patient-reported outcome, treatment adherence
Introduction
The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has now spread all over the world during the past few months and has brought profound impacts on people’s daily life.1 To save limited medical resources and avoid nosocomial infection, many hospitals in China closed the outpatient service during February and March 2019, which led to the difficulties and inconvenience in continuous treatment among patients with chronic conditions and resulted in nonadherence to treatment and aggravation of diseases. Psoriasis, a chronic inflammatory skin disease with prevalence rate varying from 0.5% to 11.4% globally, is affecting over 125 million people worldwide.2–4 The prevalence of psoriasis in China has increased from 0.12% to 0.47% during the past two decades.5,6 Psoriasis has a significant negative impact on health-related quality of life,7–10 and nonadherence to treatment is a pivotal risk factor for aggravation of psoriasis conditions.11 The current study aimed to investigate the association of nonadherence to treatment with the patient-reported outcomes of psoriasis, including the aggravation of psoriasis conditions, stress, anxiety, and depression during the period of COVID-19 epidemic.
Methods
Study Design and Participants
We performed a cross-sectional study among Chinese patients with psoriasis. An online survey link was created and posted on social media platforms (teledermatology platforms and WeChat groups) for psoriatic patients who were diagnosed by one or more experienced dermatologists. The patients were introduced to the platforms by certified physicians with permissions. Each participant was allowed to submit a questionnaire once by IP address in order to avoid repeated submissions. The participants needed to complete all the questions before submitting the questionnaire successfully. The survey was conducted between 25 Feb 2020 and 6 Mar 2020. The study was reviewed and approved by the institutional research ethics boards of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University (Changsha, China); approval number: 202002024. Electronic informed consent was gathered from all patients.
Exposure Variable
We defined the adherence to the primary treatment as the exposure variable, measured by a single question “During the epidemic, were you adhere to the medication or treatment prescribed by the physician?” with the following three responses: “(1) Yes, I followed my doctor’s instruction”, “(2) No, I reduced the dosage of medication on my own”, “(3) No, I totally stopped the treatment on my own”. If a patient responded (2) or (3), a question “How long have you done this?” with two responses including “less than two weeks” and “more than two weeks” was further inquired. Those who reduced the dosage or stopped the treatment were defined as nonadherence to treatment. This question was after another question inquiring about the primary treatment they were receiving.
Patient-Reported Outcomes
The primary outcome was aggravation of psoriasis, measured by the Global Rating of Change (GRC). Patients responded to the following question “Overall, has there been any change in how your psoriasis bothers you during the past two weeks?” using the following five options: much improvement, moderate improvement, no change, moderate deterioration, much deterioration. We defined deteriorated disease condition as the reportedly moderate-to-much deterioration.
The secondary outcomes included perceived stress and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Perceived stress during the past two weeks was assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS), which was previously validated by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS14) with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.9–0.93 and a cutoff of 6.8–7.2.12,13 We defined significant perceived stress with the cutoff ≥7. Anxious and depressive symptoms were measured by the two-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) and the two-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2), respectively. The cut-off points of both scales were ≥3 according to validation studies.14,15
Covariates
Clinical and demographic information including gender, age, educational level (middle school and below, high school, college and above), annual income (Chinese yuan, CNY), marital status (unmarried, married, divorced, widowed), type of psoriasis (psoriasis vulgaris, psoriatic arthritis, pustular psoriasis, erythrodermic psoriasis), course of disease (<1 year, 1–5 years, >5 years), body surface area of psoriatic lesions (self-rated palm size, <3%, 3–10%, >10%), and treatment received (biological treatment, systemic treatment, topical treatment, other) were collected and analyzed as covariates.
Statistical Analysis
The data were exported from the online survey system and analyzed with SPSS 23 (IBM, SPSS Statistics 23). Continuous variables with normal distribution were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and compared with analysis of variance (ANOVA). Categorical variables were summarized as counts (percentages) and compared using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Logistic regression was used to estimate the associations of exposure and outcomes with adjustments for potential confounders. Effect size of association was presented as adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
We collected 926 valid questionnaires. The IP addresses of the respondents covered all the provinces of mainland China. One patient reported confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2. The mean age of the patients was 39.1±12.2 years, and 584 (63.1%) were male. The characteristics of the participants by treatment adherence are shown in Table 1. The course of psoriasis and body surface area of skin lesion were significantly different across the groups.
![]() |
Table 1 Characteristics of the Patients, by Reported Treatment Adherence During the Period of COVID-19 Epidemic |
A total of 292 (31.5%) reported adherence to treatment, while 289 (31.2%) reported nonadherence to the treatment, either stopped the medication or reduced the prescribed dosage, for less than two weeks, and 345 (37.3%) for more than two weeks, respectively. The prevalence of single use of biological, systemic, and topical treatment was 9.0%, 9.5%, and 37.1%, respectively. Others reported phototherapy, Chinese medicine, other treatment, or no treatment. The prevalence of nonadherence was 37.3%, 63.7%, and 71.2% for biological, systemic, and topical treatment, respectively. Patients receiving systemic treatment (AOR=2.67; 95% CI: 1.40–5.10; P=0.003) or topical treatment (AOR=4.51; 95% CI: 2.66–7.65; P<0.001) reported worse adherence compared to those receiving biological treatment.
The proportions of perceived stress, anxiety, and depression were 18.4%, 66.3%, and 68.1%, respectively. As shown in Table 2, nonadherence to the treatment was significantly associated with the deterioration of psoriasis determined by the self-reported GRC (AORs: 2.83 to 5.25) in a clear dose–response manner. Nonadherence was also associated with the secondary outcomes, including perceived stress (AOR: 1.86 to 1.57), and symptoms of anxiety (AORs: 1.42 to 1.57) and depression (AORs: 1.78).
![]() |
Table 2 Associations of Nonadherence to Treatment with Patient-Reported Outcomes of Psoriasis |
Subgroup analysis for nonadherence by the type of treatment is shown in Table 3. The associations remained consistent in general. Perceived stress was positively associated with nonadherence to biological treatment (AORs: 3.26 to 10.31). Symptom of depression was associated with nonadherence to systemic treatment (AORs: 3.26 to 9.18) and topical treatment (AORs: 2.18 to 2.64).
![]() |
Table 3 Subgroup Analysis of Associations of Nonadherence with Patient-Reported Outcomes of Psoriasis by Main Treatment |
Discussion
Through the analysis of 926 valid questionnaires, we found that nonadherence to treatment was found prevalent during the outbreak of COVID-19. Patients receiving systemic or topical treatment reported worse adherence than those receiving biological treatment. The prevalence rates of perceived stress, anxiety, and depression were high among the patients, and nonadherence to treatment was significantly associated with the deterioration of psoriasis and other patient-reported outcomes including stress, anxiety, and depression.
Among our participants, the proportion of male patients was substantially higher (63%), and this was consistent with a previous study reporting that the prevalence of psoriasis in males (0.54%) was higher than females (0.44%) in China.5 The increase in the prevalence of psoriasis in China in recent three decades might be attributable to behavioral factors and the increase of comorbid noncommunicable diseases. And the male predilection may be explained by smoking behavior, stress, and unobserved factors. As a result, the high proportion of male patients should not be regarded as a consequence of selection bias.
We reported an overall nonadherence rate of 68.5%. Patients receiving biological treatment reported less nonadherence compared to those receiving systemic or topical treatment, and this was consistent with previous reports.11,16,17 Studies reported varied prevalence of nonadherence to treatment among psoriatic patients owing to differences in inclusion criteria, sample size, tools to assess adherence, etc. The study by Thorneloe et al suggested that prevalence of nonadherence among the patients using a conventional systemic was 29.2%, higher than those using adalimumab or etanercept (16.4%).18 Esposito et al conducted an observational study among 650 adult psoriatic patients and found that the global adherence to anti-TNF-α blockers was 73% after 28.9 months.19 Adherence reported by Zaghloul et al was 46% with systemic treatment and 71.9% with topical treatment.20 Rates of nonadherence among psoriatic patients treated with topical corticosteroids in western dermatology outpatient clinics varied from 8% to 88%.21 The rate of adherence among psoriatic patients in China was reported as 41.5%.22 Non-adherence to topical treatments was the highest in our study, consistent with many previous studies.23,24 Low efficiency, time consumption, and visibility of topical agents were the most frequently mentioned reasons for nonadherence.25,26 Besides, contradiction between quick consumption and insufficient supplement of topical agents might be another reason during the pandemic. In summary, we identified a higher prevalence of nonadherence compared to the data reported by many previous studies, indicating that the epidemic might have adverse impacts on patients’ adherence to treatment.
Mental health problems were prevalent during the epidemic, and early mental health intervention was suggested.27–31 However, no study investigated the associations of nonadherence to treatment with mental well-being status among psoriatic patients during the COVID-19 pandemic yet. It is well known that patients with psoriasis have higher risks of mental disorders and suicidal behaviors. In addition, many studies indicated the importance of adherence to treatment for alleviating psoriasis conditions,11,32 while few studies investigated the impact of nonadherence on the symptoms of anxiety and depression. In addition, many hospitals in China temporarily closed their outpatient service to avoid nosocomial infection and save limited medical resources during the pandemic. This may lead to the inconvenience and difficulties in healthcare utilization for patients with psoriasis. Moreover, many people underwent income loss or even unemployment. This further placed psoriatic patients at risks of poverty and poor health.33 These may help explain the association between nonadherence and deterioration of psoriasis in addition to stress, anxiety, and depression. To prevent the deterioration and adverse outcomes of the disease, accessibility to medication and healthcare service as well as enhancement of adherence to treatment are critical for patients with psoriasis during the pandemic, in addition to mental health interventions. Dermatologists, primary care practitioners, and decision-makers could help improve the patients’ health outcomes through telemedicine, health education, and maintained drug supply at the individual, community, and regional levels.
The limitations of the study included selection bias of online survey, recall bias of patient-reported outcome, a lack of generalizability to pediatric or geriatric patients who were less accessible to the internet or social media.
Conclusion
Nonadherence to treatment was prevalent among Chinese patients with psoriasis during the COVID-19 epidemic and was associated with the aggravation of psoriasis conditions, perceived stress, and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Nonadherence in biologics was lower than systemic and topical treatment. Strategies targeting the adherence to treatment, including but not limited to telemedicine, health education, and drug supplies, are necessary for patients with psoriasis, in addition to mental health interventions.
Ethics Approval
Reviewed and approved by the institutional research ethics boards of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University (Changsha, China); approval #202002024.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Psoriatic Patient Blog (URL: https://www.yxb365.com/portal.php) and the Psoriasis Blog New Media (WeChat Official Account ID: yxbnpx8) for their assistance in the online survey. We would also like to thank Professor Jin Zhang and Dr. Xin Guan for their contribution to the data collection.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest for this work.
References
1. Shereen MA, Khan S, Kazmi A, Bashir N, Siddique R. COVID-19 infection: origin, transmission, and characteristics of human coronaviruses. J Adv Res. 2020;24:91–98. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2020.03.005
2. Michalek IM, Loring B, John SM. A systematic review of worldwide epidemiology of psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(2):205–212.
3. Parisi R, Symmons DP, Griffiths CE, et al. Global epidemiology of psoriasis: a systematic review of incidence and prevalence. J Invest Dermatol. 2013;133(2):377–385. doi:10.1038/jid.2012.339
4. Takeshita J, Grewal S, Langan SM, et al. Psoriasis and comorbid diseases: epidemiology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(3):377–390. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2016.07.064
5. Ding X, Wang T, Shen Y, et al. Prevalence of psoriasis in China: a population-based study in six cities. Eur J Dermatol. 2012;22(5):663–667. doi:10.1684/ejd.2012.1802
6. Shao CG, Zhang GW, Wang GC. Distribution of psoriasis in China: a nationwide screening. Proc Chin Acad Med Sci Peking Union Med Coll. 1987;2(2):59–65.
7. Rapp SR, Feldman SR, Exum ML, Fleischer AB
8. Palijan TZ, Kovacevic D, Vlastelica M, Dadic-Hero E, Sarilar M. Quality of Life of Persons Suffering from Schizophrenia, Psoriasis and Physical Disabilities. Psychiatr Danub. 2017;29(1):60–65. doi:10.24869/psyd.2017.60
9. Cohen BE, Martires KJ, Ho RS. Psoriasis and the Risk of Depression in the US Population: national Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009–2012. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152(1):73–79. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.3605
10. Kimball AB, Wu EQ, Guerin A, et al. Risks of developing psychiatric disorders in pediatric patients with psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67(4):
11. Dommasch ED, Lee MP, Joyce CJ, Garry EM, Gagne JJ. Drug utilization patterns and adherence in patients on systemic medications for the treatment of psoriasis: A retrospective, comparative cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79(6):1061–1068 e1061. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2018.06.053
12. Dutheil F, Pereira B, Moustafa F, Naughton G, Lesage FX, Lambert C. At-risk and intervention thresholds of occupational stress using a visual analogue scale. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0178948. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0178948
13. Lesage FX, Berjot S. Validity of occupational stress assessment using a visual analogue scale. Occup Med (Lond). 2011;61(6):434–436. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqr037
14. Liu ZW, Yu Y, Hu M, Liu HM, Zhou L, Xiao SY. PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 for Screening Depression in Chinese Rural Elderly. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0151042. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151042
15. Plummer F, Manea L, Trepel D, McMillan D. Screening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: a systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016;39:24–31. doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.11.005
16. Ross C, Marshman G, Grillo M, Stanford T. Biological therapies for psoriasis: adherence and outcome analysis from a clinical perspective. Australas J Dermatol. 2016;57(2):137–140. doi:10.1111/ajd.12294
17. Seale L, Cardwell LA, Feldman SR. Adherence to biologics in patients with psoriasis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2018;14(2):155–161. doi:10.1080/1744666X.2018.1427065
18. Thorneloe RJ, Griffiths CEM, Emsley R, et al. Intentional and Unintentional Medication Non-Adherence in Psoriasis: the Role of Patients’ Medication Beliefs and Habit Strength. J Invest Dermatol. 2018;138(4):785–794. doi:10.1016/j.jid.2017.11.015
19. Esposito M, Gisondi P, Cassano N, et al. Survival rate of antitumour necrosis factor-alpha treatments for psoriasis in routine dermatological practice: a multicentre observational study. Br J Dermatol. 2013;169(3):666–672. doi:10.1111/bjd.12422
20. Zaghloul SS, Goodfield MJ. Objective assessment of compliance with psoriasis treatment. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(4):408–414. doi:10.1001/archderm.140.4.408
21. Svendsen MT, Andersen F, Hansen J, Johannessen H, Andersen KE. Medical adherence to topical corticosteroid preparations prescribed for psoriasis: A systematic review. J Dermatolog Treat. 2017;28(1):32–39.
22. Wang W, Qiu Y, Zhao F, Zhang F. Poor medication adherence in patients with psoriasis and a successful intervention. J Dermatolog Treat. 2019;30(6):525–528. doi:10.1080/09546634.2018.1476652
23. Thorneloe RJ, Bundy C, Griffiths CE, Ashcroft DM, Cordingley L. Adherence to medication in patients with psoriasis: a systematic literature review. Br J Dermatol. 2013;168(1):20–31. doi:10.1111/bjd.12039
24. Storm A, Andersen SE, Benfeldt E, Serup J. One in 3 prescriptions are never redeemed: primary nonadherence in an outpatient clinic. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59(1):27–33. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2008.03.045
25. Thorneloe RJ, Bundy C, Griffiths CE, Ashcroft DM, Cordingley L. Nonadherence to psoriasis medication as an outcome of limited coping resources and conflicting goals: findings from a qualitative interview study with people with psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176(3):667–676. doi:10.1111/bjd.15086
26. Devaux S, Castela A, Archier E, et al. Adherence to topical treatment in psoriasis: a systematic literature review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;26(Suppl 3):61–67. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04525.x
27. Lima CKT, Carvalho PMM, Lima I, et al. The emotional impact of Coronavirus 2019-nCoV (new Coronavirus disease). Psychiatry Res. 2020;287:112915. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112915
28. Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, et al. Factors Associated With Mental Health Outcomes Among Health Care Workers Exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(3):e203976. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3976
29. Zhai Y, Du X. Mental health care for international Chinese students affected by the COVID-19 outbreak. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(4):e22. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30089-4
30. Liu S, Yang L, Zhang C, et al. Online mental health services in China during the COVID-19 outbreak. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(4):e17–e18. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30077-8
31. Kang L, Li Y, Hu S, et al. The mental health of medical workers in Wuhan, China dealing with the 2019 novel coronavirus. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(3):e14. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30047-X
32. Svendsen MT, Andersen F, Andersen KH, et al. A smartphone application supporting patients with psoriasis improves adherence to topical treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol. 2018;179(5):1062–1071. doi:10.1111/bjd.16667
33. Dooley D, Fielding J, Levi L. Health and unemployment. Annu Rev Public Health. 1996;17:449–465.
© 2020 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.