Back to Journals » Open Access Surgery » Volume 6

Maternal morbidity at first repeat cesarean: a sub-analysis of Interceed™ barrier placed at primary cesarean section

Authors Chapa H, Venegas G

Received 11 December 2012

Accepted for publication 4 January 2013

Published 9 February 2013 Volume 2013:6 Pages 7—12

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OAS.S41447

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 2


Hector O Chapa, Gonzalo Venegas

Women's Specialty Center Dallas, Chapa Medical Consulting, Dallas, TX, USA

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare maternal morbidity at repeat cesarean section (CS) between use of a Gynecare Interceed™ Absorbable Adhesion Barrier (Gynecare, Somerville, NJ, USA) and non-use at primary cesarean delivery.
Design: This was a retrospective study of patients in whom an absorbable adhesion barrier was/was not used at their primary CS.
Methods: Mean and excessive blood loss, the need for adhesiolysis, and postoperative fever were compared between those in whom a barrier was used at first CS and those in whom a barrier was not used. Visceral injury at repeat cesarean was also compared between the two groups.
Results: No statistically significant difference in mean blood loss was noted between the two groups. However, significantly more patients in whom a barrier was not used had excessive intraoperative blood loss (barrier group, 1/53 [1.9%]; no-barrier group, 6/59 [10.1%]; P = 0.04). All seven cases of excessive blood loss had adhesiolysis. Significantly more patients in the no-barrier group underwent adhesiolysis (no-barrier group, 35/59 [59.3%]; barrier group, 7/53 [13.2%]; P = 0.03). No statistical difference in postoperative metritis was noted (1/59 [1.8%] in the barrier group and 1/59 [1.7%] in the no-barrier group; P = 0.99). Only one deserosalization of the bladder dome occurred in a patient in the no-barrier group.
Conclusion: Those in whom a barrier was not used at primary CS were more likely to have adhesiolysis and excessive blood loss (>1250 mL) at repeat CS. No significant difference in postoperative metritis/fever was noted between groups. Adhesion barrier at primary CS may reduce some aspects of maternal morbidity at repeat CS.

Keywords: excessive blood loss, adhesiolysis, postoperative metritis, postoperative fever, visceral injury

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]