Back to Journals » Clinical Interventions in Aging » Volume 12

Should physicians always rely on estimated glomerular filtration rate without knowing the equation?

Authors Fabbian F, Priori D, De Giorgi A

Received 3 July 2017

Accepted for publication 5 July 2017

Published 22 August 2017 Volume 2017:12 Pages 1309—1311


Checked for plagiarism Yes

Editor who approved publication: Dr Richard Walker

Fabio Fabbian, Dario Priori, Alfredo De Giorgi

Department of Medical Sciences, Clinica Medica Unit, University Hospital St Anna, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy

We read with interest the paper written by Deskur-Smielecka et al1 who investigated the performance of three equations for valuating renal function in 174 patients, aged 78 years, with different cancer diagnosis. They used Cockcroft–Gault (C–G), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), and Berlin Initiative Study1 (BIS1) equations and found that there is a considerable disagreement between renal function estimation formulas. We also performed two studies evaluating different formulas for the calculation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients with eating disorders2 and in those with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM).3

Authors’ reply

Ewa Deskur-Smielecka1,2 Aleksandra Kotlinska-Lemieszek1,2 Jerzy Chudek3,4 Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis1,2

The letter from Fabbian et al, in general, supports our findings concerning the disagreement between currently used equations for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). We agree that disagreement in the estimation of kidney function was previously found by a number of authors. However, in our paper1 we describe this aspect in very specific population – geriatric, palliative care patients – with high prevalence of cachexia and substantial muscle mass loss. Our group has shown some similarities (low creatinine generation) to the group of patients with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa studied by Fabbian et al.2 However, it has to be stressed that patients with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa were much younger, and therefore had much better, mostly normal kidney function. The second population analyzed by Fabbian et al3 – diabetic patients – also differ from out cohort, as they were better nourished. Regardless of these differences, the conclusions concerning the disagreement of different methods in the estimation of kidney function are quite similar. Importantly, the disagreement is more clinically significant in older population, including geriatric, palliative care patients, due to much greater prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD)4 that affects adjusting drug dosage.

View the original paper by Deskur-Smielecka and colleagues.

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]