Back to Journals » Patient Preference and Adherence » Volume 11

Getting patients in the door: medical appointment reminder preferences

Authors Crutchfield TM, Kistler CE

Received 16 July 2016

Accepted for publication 28 October 2016

Published 25 January 2017 Volume 2017:11 Pages 141—150

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S117396

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Johnny Chen

Trisha M Crutchfield,1–3 Christine E Kistler2–4

1University of North Carolina Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, 2University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, 3Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, 4Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Purpose: Between 23% and 34% of outpatient appointments are missed annually. Patients who frequently miss medical appointments have poorer health outcomes and are less likely to use preventive health care services. Missed appointments result in unnecessary costs and organizational inefficiencies. Appointment reminders may help reduce missed appointments; particular types may be more effective than other types. We used a survey with a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to learn why individuals miss appointments and to assess appointment reminder preferences.
Methods: We enrolled a national sample of adults from an online survey panel to complete demographic and appointment habit questions as well as a 16-task DCE designed in Sawtooth Software’s Discover tool. We assessed preferences for four reminder attributes – initial reminder type, arrival of initial reminder, reminder content, and number of reminders. We derived utilities and importance scores.
Results: We surveyed 251 adults nationally, with a mean age of 43 (range 18–83) years: 51% female, 84% White, and 8% African American. Twenty-three percent of individuals missed one or more appointments in the past 12 months. Two primary reasons given for missing an appointment include transportation problems (28%) and forgetfulness (26%). Participants indicated the initial reminder type (21%) was the most important attribute, followed by the number of reminders (10%). Overall, individuals indicated a preference for a single reminder, arriving via email, phone call, or text message, delivered less than 2 weeks prior to an appointment. Preferences for reminder content were less clear.
Conclusion: The number of missed appointments and reasons for missing appointments are consistent with prior research. Patient-centered appointment reminders may improve appointment attendance by addressing some of the reasons individuals report missing appointments and by meeting patients’ needs. Future research is necessary to determine if preferred reminders used in practice will result in improved appointment attendance in clinical settings.

Keywords: reminders, discrete choice experiment, no-show rates, text messaging, survey, preferences, appointment attendance, DNAs, conjoint analysis

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]

 

Other article by this author:

Older adults’ preferences for colorectal cancer-screening test attributes and test choice

Kistler CE, Hess TM, Howard K, Pignone MP, Crutchfield TM, Hawley ST, Brenner AT, Ward KT, Lewis CL

Patient Preference and Adherence 2015, 9:1005-1016

Published Date: 15 July 2015