Back to Browse Journals » International Journal of Nanomedicine » Volume 7
Evaluation of atherosclerotic lesions using dextran- and mannan–dextran-coated USPIO: MRI analysis and pathological findings
Authors Tsuchiya K, Nitta N, Sonoda A, Nitta-Seko A, Ohta S, Takahashi M, Murata K, Mukaisho K, Shiomi M, Tabata Y, Nohara S
Received 23 December 2011
Accepted for publication 15 February 2012
Published 3 May 2012 Volume 2012:7 Pages 2271—2280
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S29417
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewer comments 3
Keiko Tsuchiya1, Norihisa Nitta1, Akinaga Sonoda1, Ayumi Nitta-Seko1, Shinichi Ohta1, Masashi Takahashi1, Kiyoshi Murata1, Kenichi Mukaisho2, Masashi Shiomi3, Yasuhiko Tabata4, Satoshi Nohara5
1Department of Radiology, 2Department of Pathology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, 3Institute for Experimental Animals, Kobe University School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, 4Department of Biomaterials, Institute for Frontier Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 5Nagoya Research Laboratory, Meito Sangyo, Kiyosu, Aichi, Japan
Abstract: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can detect atherosclerotic lesions containing accumulations of ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxides (USPIO). Positing that improved USPIO with a higher affinity for atherosclerotic plaques would yield better plaque images, we performed MRI and histologic studies to compare the uptake of dextran- and mannan–dextran-coated USPIO (D-USPIO and DM-USPIO, respectively) by the atherosclerotic walls of rabbits. We intravenously injected atherosclerotic rabbits with DM-USPIO (n = 5) or D-USPIO (n = 5). Two rabbits were the controls. The doses delivered were 0.08 (dose 1) (n = 1), 0.4 (dose 2) (n = 1), or 0.8 (dose 3) (n = 3) mmol iron/Kg. The dose 3 rabbits underwent in vivo contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) before and 5 days after USPIO administration. Afterwards, all animals were euthanized, the aortae were removed and subjected to in vitro MRI study. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the aortic wall in the same region of interest (ROI) was calculated in both in vivo and in vitro studies. Histological assessment through measurement of iron-positive regions in Prussian blue-stained specimens showed that iron-positive regions were significantly larger in rabbits injected with DM- rather than D-USPIO (P < 0.05) for all doses. In vivo MRA showed that the SNR-reducing effect of DM- was greater than that of D-USPIO (P < 0.05). With in vitro MRI scans, SNR was significantly lower in rabbits treated with dose 2 of DM-USPIO compared with D-USPIO treatment (P < 0.05), and it tended to be lower at dose 3 (P < 0.1). In conclusion, we suggest that DM-USPIO is superior to D-USPIO for the study of atherosclerotic lesions in rabbits.
Keywords: atherosclerosis, magnetic resonance imaging, contrast media, plaque, mannan–dextran-coated USPIO
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
Other article by this author:
Histological study of the biodynamics of iron oxide nanoparticles with different diameters
Tsuchiya K, Nitta N, Sonoda A, Nitta-Seko A, Ohta S, Otani H, Takahashi M, Murata K, Murase K, Nohara S, Mukaisho K
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2011, 6:1587-1594
Published Date: 2 August 2011
Readers of this article also read:
Causative factors for formation of toxic islet amyloid polypeptide oligomer in type 2 diabetes mellitus
Jeong HR, An SSA
Clinical Interventions in Aging 2015, 10:1873-1879
Published Date: 19 November 2015
Real-world evaluation of compliance and preference in Alzheimer’s disease treatment
Pai MC, Aref H, Bassil N, Kandiah N, Lee JH, Srinivasan AV, diTommaso S, Yuksel O
Clinical Interventions in Aging 2015, 10:1779-1788
Published Date: 3 November 2015
Mutations in presenilin 2 and its implications in Alzheimer’s disease and other dementia-associated disorders
Cai Y, An SSA, Kim SY
Clinical Interventions in Aging 2015, 10:1163-1172
Published Date: 14 July 2015
Biological differences between melancholic and nonmelancholic depression subtyped by the CORE measure
Spanemberg L, Caldieraro MA, Vares EA, Wollenhaupt-Aguiar B, Kauer-Sant’Anna M, Kawamoto SY, Galvão E, Parker G, Fleck MP
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2014, 10:1523-1531
Published Date: 19 August 2014
Post-traumatic epilepsy: current and emerging treatment options
Szaflarski JP, Nazzal Y, Dreer LE
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2014, 10:1469-1477
Published Date: 11 August 2014
Epithelial cell adhesion molecule aptamer functionalized PLGA-lecithin-curcumin-PEG nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery to human colorectal adenocarcinoma cells
Li L, Xiang DX, Shigdar S, Yang WR, Li Q, Lin J, Liu KX, Duan W
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2014, 9:1083-1096
Published Date: 21 February 2014
Corrigendum
Chen ZQ, Liu Y, Zhao JH, Wang L, Feng NP
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:1709-1710
Published Date: 30 March 2012
Biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of a telodendrimer micellar paclitaxel nanoformulation in a mouse xenograft model of ovarian cancer
Xiao W, Luo J, Jain T, Riggs JW, Tseng HP, Henderson PT, Cherry SR, Rowland D, and Lam KS
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:1587-1597
Published Date: 27 March 2012
Formulation and pharmacokinetic evaluation of a paclitaxel nanosuspension for intravenous delivery
Wang YL, Li XM, Wang LY, Xu YL, Cheng XD, Wei P
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2011, 6:1497-1507
Published Date: 13 July 2011
Particle size reduction to the nanometer range: a promising approach to improve buccal absorption of poorly water-soluble drugs
Rao S, Song Y, Peddie F, Evans AM
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2011, 6:1245-1251
Published Date: 20 June 2011
